[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 62 (Monday, March 31, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16822-16826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 25 and 74

[WT Docket No. 02-55; ET Docket Nos. 00-258 and 95-18; FCC 08-73]


Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission proposes to eliminate, as of January 1, 2009, 
the requirement that Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS) licensees in the 
thirty largest markets and fixed BAS links in all markets be 
transitioned before the Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) operators can 
begin offering service. The Commission also seeks comment on how to 
mitigate interference between new MSS entrants and incumbent BAS 
licensees who have not completed relocation before the MSS entrants 
begin offering service. In addition, the Commission seeks comment on 
allowing MSS operators to begin providing service in those markets 
where BAS incumbents have been transitioned.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 30, 2008, and reply 
comments must be filed on or before May 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [WT Docket No. 02-55, 
ET Docket No. 00-258 and ET Docket No. 95-18], by any of the following 
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: [Optional: Include the E-mail address only if you 
plan to accept comments from the general public]. Include the docket 
number(s) in the subject line of the message.
     Mail: [Optional: Include the mailing address for paper, 
disk or CD-ROM submissions needed/requested by your Bureau or Office. 
Do not include the Office of the Secretary's mailing address here.]
     People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request 
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language 
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
    For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional 
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Oros, Office of Engineering 
and Technology, (202) 418-0636, e-mail: [email protected], TTY 
(202) 418-2989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 02-55, ET Docket 
No. 00-258, ET Docket No. 95-18, FCC 08-73, adopted March 5, 2008, and 
released March 5, 2008. The full text of this document is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20554. The complete text of this document also may be purchased from 
the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 
12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. The full text may 
also be downloaded at: http://www.fcc.gov.
    Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 
CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply 
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this 
document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking 
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of 
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
     Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically 
using the Internet by

[[Page 16823]]

accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow 
the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting comments.
     For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers 
appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one 
electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number 
referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers 
should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, 
and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit 
an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions, 
filers should send an e-mail to [email protected], and include the following 
words in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and 
directions will be sent in response.
     Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must 
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one 
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, 
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or 
rulemaking number.
    Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial 
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service 
mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. 
Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's 
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
     The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or 
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236 
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing 
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be 
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be 
disposed of before entering the building.
     Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service 
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton 
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
     U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority 
mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
    People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible 
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic 
files, audio format), send an e-mail to [email protected] or call the 
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).

Summary of Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    1. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, tentatively concludes 
to eliminate, starting on January 1, 2009, the rule that 2 GHz Mobile 
Satellite Service (MSS) systems may not begin operation until the 
relocation of the Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS) in the thirty 
largest markets and fixed BAS links in all markets is complete (top 30 
market rule). In addition, the Commission seeks comment on the 
potential for interference that may occur if the 2 GHz MSS entrants 
begin operations prior to relocation of the BAS incumbents as well as 
means that interference may be avoided or corrected. The Commission 
also seeks comment on allowing MSS operators to begin providing service 
in those markets where BAS incumbents have been relocated, even if the 
top 30 market rule is not eliminated.
    2. The 2 GHz BAS licensees are being relocated from 1990-2110 MHz 
to 2025-2110 MHz so as to provide spectrum for new services such as 
MSS. MSS operations in the 2 GHz MSS band will consist of both 
satellite uplink and ancillary terrestrial component (ATC) operations. 
Because these MSS facilities are licensed in the same spectrum as 
existing BAS operations, the Commission has had to adopt policies, such 
as the top 30 market rule, that take into account the likelihood of MSS 
and BAS interference. If MSS begins operation before BAS operations are 
relocated, MSS ``would have to accept interference from the remaining 
BAS users until they are relocated.'' Such interference could be caused 
by BAS transmitters to both ATC base stations and satellite receivers. 
MSS operations also would have to avoid causing interference from MSS 
handset transmitters (satellite and ATC) to BAS receivers that are not 
yet relocated. Under the current rules, BAS licensees maintain primary 
status in the 1990-2025 MHz band until they are relocated by a new 
entrant; they decline relocation by a new entrant; or the BAS 
relocation rules sunset on December 13, 2013.
    3. The Commission has tentatively concluded to eliminate the top 30 
market rule as of January 1, 2009. This change would allow the 2 GHz 
MSS operators to begin offering nationwide service, both satellite and 
ATC, once the Commission has determined that they have met their 
operational milestones and even if the BAS relocation is not completed. 
Even in the absence of the top 30 market rule, MSS would be primary in 
those TV markets where BAS relocation is completed but secondary in 
those TV markets where BAS is not yet relocated. However, if the 
Commission were to retain the top 30 market rule and BAS relocation 
were to follow the plan submitted by Sprint Nextel et al., on December 
6, 2007, the 2 GHz MSS operators would not be able to offer service 
until September 2009, well beyond the dates by which MSS operators ICO 
and TerreStar are required as a condition of their licenses to have 
operational satellite systems. The Commission seeks comment on this 
tentative conclusion to eliminate the top 30 market rule. It also seeks 
comment on whether it should modify other requirements to facilitate 
MSS entry into the 2 GHz MSS band.
    4. In addition to the top 30 market rule, MSS operations cannot 
begin until all fixed BAS links in all markets are relocated. Fixed BAS 
links, unlike mobile BAS operations that can often be switched to other 
available BAS channels, can't easily change frequencies which may make 
it more challenging to avoid interference. Because MSS operations, 
including ATC, could begin nationwide before the BAS relocation has 
been completed in many markets, interference between the services could 
occur. Because only those fixed links in the MSS band (2000-2020 MHz) 
could potentially receive co-channel interference, the Commission seeks 
comment on requiring only fixed BAS links in the MSS band in all 
markets to be relocated before MSS can begin operations. If the 
Commission decides not to adopt this modified requirement for 
relocating fixed BAS links prior to MSS beginning operations in the MSS 
band, it seeks comment on maintaining the current interference 
requirement in order to minimize service disruptions, i.e., require 
that MSS not cause interference to BAS in markets where BAS has not yet 
relocated, and MSS would have to accept interference caused by BAS in 
markets where BAS has not yet relocated.
    5. Even if the Commission were to eliminate the top 30 market rule 
by Jan. 1, 2009, it does not propose to alter the current rule that BAS 
licensees maintain primary status in the 1990-2025 MHz band until they 
are relocated by a new entrant; they decline relocation by a new 
entrant; or the BAS relocation rules sunset on December 13, 2013. The 
Commission seeks comment on whether it should maintain this requirement 
or alter it in some way.
    6. The MSS operators may be able to share spectrum with BAS 
licensees that

[[Page 16824]]

are not relocated if the 2 GHz MSS operators were to begin offering 
nationwide service by January 1, 2009. Sharing may be possible through 
coordination between the MSS operators and BAS licensees or BAS may be 
able to operate with reduced bandwidth using digital equipment where 
possible. The Commission seeks comment on the likelihood and extent of 
interference between MSS and BAS. It also seeks comment on how, if MSS 
was secondary to BAS in a market, MSS could avoid or correct 
interference that might occur.
    7. In order to develop a complete record on approaches other than 
the top 30 market rule that would allow 2 GHz MSS operators to begin 
operations in the MSS band by January 1, 2009, the Commission also 
seeks comment on a market-by-market approach for MSS entry. Under a 
market-by-market approach, MSS could begin providing service, both 
satellite and ATC, in a market once all BAS operations, including fixed 
BAS links there have been relocated, rather than wait until BAS in the 
top 30 markets and all fixed BAS links in all markets are relocated. 
MSS deployment would be incremental and tied to BAS relocation, rather 
than a nationwide cut-over at a specific date. This approach may be 
feasible because ICO's and TerreStar's satellites are designed with 
multiple spot beams that can operate independently of each other. Each 
spot beam can concentrate the signals from the satellite to an area on 
the ground with a radius of several hundred miles. Although the 
footprint of a spot beam may not exactly match a TV market, many of the 
BAS operations are being relocated in market clusters according to the 
Sprint Nextel et al., plan. The result is that BAS relocation will be 
occurring in large regional areas of the country, which should allow 
the satellites' spot beams to provide service in many places while 
effectively avoiding BAS operations that are not yet relocated. The 
market-by-market approach also would facilitate the MSS operators' 
ability to conduct market trials of their satellite and ATC networks in 
different areas of the country as BAS operations are relocated but 
before the top 30 markets are relocated. Although a market-by-market 
approach would reduce the likelihood of interference between MSS and 
BAS, interference between the two services would not be completely 
avoided. Because ATC stations could not be operational in a market 
until BAS there was relocated, co-channel interference from BAS 
transmitters to ATC base station receivers and from MSS handsets 
(operating with ATC base stations) to BAS receivers will be avoided. 
However, because the spot beam footprint may not match exactly the BAS 
market areas, co-channel interference from BAS transmitters to 
satellite receivers and from MSS handsets (transmitting to MSS 
satellites) to BAS receivers still may occur, although it is unlikely. 
The Commission seeks comment on the likelihood and extent of 
interference between MSS and BAS if it were to adopt a market-by-market 
approach.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    9. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as 
amended (RFA),\1\ the Commission has prepared this present Initial 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the 
policies and rules proposed in this Further Notice of Proposed Rule 
Making (FNPRM). Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. 
Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed 
by the deadlines for comments in the FNPRM. The Commission will send a 
copy of this FNPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for 
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).\2\ In addition, 
the NPRM and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the 
Federal Register.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601-612, has been 
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1996 (SBREFA), Public Law No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 
(1996).
    \2\ See 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules

    10. In the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission 
seeks comment on a tentative conclusion to modify the requirement that 
BAS licensees in the thirty largest markets be transitioned before the 
two 2 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service (MSS) operators (ICO and TerreStar) 
can begin offering service. Because the transition of the 2 GHz BAS 
licensees may be completed beyond the dates by which the 2 GHz MSS 
systems are expected to be operational, the Commission explores 
alternative ways of balancing the needs of incumbent Broadcast 
Auxiliary Services (BAS) licensees to provide service without suffering 
harmful interference and the introduction of new MSS operations in a 
timely manner.
    11. In the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission 
request comments on a tentative conclusion to eliminate, as of January 
1, 2009, the rule requiring that BAS in the top 30 markets by 
population and all fixed BAS links be transitioned before 2 GHz MSS 
operators may begin offering service. In addition, the Commission seeks 
comment on whether and how to modify the requirement that fixed BAS 
links in all markets be relocated before MSS operations can commence. 
It also seeks comment on whether it should maintain the requirement 
that BAS licensees maintain primary status in the 1990-2025 MHz band 
until they are relocated; they decline relocation by a new entrant; or 
the BAS relocation rules sunset on December 13, 2013. Furthermore, the 
Commission seeks comment on what would be the extent and likelihood of 
interference between MSS and BAS, if MSS operators enter the band 
before the completion of the BAS transition. The Commission seeks 
comment on how, if MSS was secondary to BAS in a market, MSS could 
avoid or correct any interference that might occur. Finally, the 
Commission seeks comment on using a market-by-market approach for MSS 
entry to the band as an alternative to modifying the top 30 market 
rule. Under a market-by-market approach, MSS could begin providing 
service, both satellite and ATC, in a market once all BAS operations 
have been relocated, rather than wait until the top 30 market rule is 
satisfied.

B. Legal Basis

    12. The proposed action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) 
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 CFR 154(i) and (j), 
and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules.

C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which 
the Proposed Rules Will Apply

    13. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where 
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be 
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted.\4\ The RFA generally 
defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the 
terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small 
governmental jurisdiction.'' \5\ In addition, the term ``small 
business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' 
under the Small Business Act.\6\ A small

[[Page 16825]]

business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; 
(2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any 
additional criteria established by the SBA.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
    \5\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
    \6\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition 
of ``small business concern'' in 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to the 
RFA, the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless 
an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the 
Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public 
comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are 
appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such 
definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
    \7\ Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. The proposed rule modifications may affect the interest of BAS, 
LTTS, and CARS licensees (which we have been referring to throughout 
this document generically as ``BAS''). BAS services involve a variety 
of transmitters, generally used to relay broadcast programming to the 
public (through translator and booster stations) or within the program 
distribution chain (from a remote news gathering unit to the studio). 
The CARS service includes transmitters generally used to relay cable 
programming within cable television system distribution systems. The 
Commission has not developed a definition of small entities applicable 
to Broadcast Auxiliary Service, Local Television Transmission Service 
or Cable Television Relay Service. Therefore, the applicable definition 
of small entity is the definition under the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) rules applicable to radiotelephone companies.
    15. BAS. This service uses a variety of transmitters to relay 
broadcast programming to the public (through translator and booster 
stations) or within the program distribution chain (from a remote news 
gathering unit back to the stations). There are approximately 712 TV 
BAS licensees in the 1990-2110 MHz band, and these licensees will 
ultimately be required to use only the 2020-2110 MHz portion of that 
band. It is unclear how many of these will be affected by our new 
rules.
    16. The Commission has not developed a definition of small entities 
specific to BAS licensees. The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) 
has developed small business size standards, as follows: For TV BAS, we 
use the size standard for Television Broadcasting, which consists of 
all such companies having annual receipts of no more than $12.0 
million.\8\ According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 906 
Television Broadcasting firms, total that operated for the entire 
year.\9\ Of this total, 734 firms had annual receipts of $9,999,999.00 
or less and an additional 71 had receipts of $10 million to 
$24,999,999.00.\10\ Thus, under this standard, the majority of firms 
can be considered small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120.
    \9\ U.S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series: 
Information, ``Receipts Size of Firms Subject to Federal Income Tax: 
1997,'' Table 4, NAICS code 515120 (issued Oct. 2000).
    \10\ Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. CARS. There are nine CARS mobile licensees in the 1990-2110 MHz 
band, and these licensees will ultimately be required to use only the 
2020-2110 MHz portion of that band. It is unclear how many of these 
will be affected by our new rules. The SBA has developed a small 
business size standard for Cable and other Program Distribution, which 
consists of all such companies having annual receipts of no more than 
$12.5 million.\11\ According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 
1,311 firms within the industry category Cable and Other Program 
Distribution, total, that operated for the entire year.\12\ Of this 
total, 1,180 firms had annual receipts of $9,999,999.00 or less, and an 
additional 52 firms had receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.00.\13\ 
Thus, under this standard, the majority of firms can be considered 
small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id. at NAICS code 515120.
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. LTTS. There are 34 LTTS licensees in the 1990-2110 MHz band, 
and these licensees will ultimately be required to use only the 2020-
2110 MHz portion of that band. It is unclear how many of these will be 
affected by our new rules. The Commission has not yet defined a small 
business with respect to local television transmission services. For 
purposes of this IRFA, we will use the SBA's definition applicable to 
Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications--i.e., an entity with no 
more than 1,500 persons.\14\ According to Census Bureau data for 1997, 
there were 977 firms in this category, total, that operated for the 
entire year.\15\ Of this total, 965 firms had employment of 999 or 
fewer employees, and an additional 12 firms had employment of 1,000 
employees or more.\16\ Thus, under this size standard, the majority of 
firms can be considered small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517212.
    \15\ U.S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series: 
Information, ``Employment Size of Firms Subject to Federal Income 
Tax: 1997,'' Table 5, NAICS code 517212 (issued Oct. 2000).
    \16\ Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate 
of the number of firms that have employment of 1,500 or fewer 
employees; the largest category provided is ``Firms with 1,000 
employees or more.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19. MSS. The appropriate SBA size standard for mobile satellite 
service is for the category of ``Other Telecommunications.'' This 
category ``comprises establishments primarily engaged in (1) providing 
specialized telecommunications applications, such as satellite 
tracking, communications telemetry, and radar station operations; or 
(2) providing satellite terminal stations and associated facilities 
operationally connected with one or more terrestrial communications 
systems and capable of transmitting telecommunications to or receiving 
telecommunications from satellite systems.'' \17\ Under this category, 
such a business is small if it has $13.5 million or less in average 
annual receipts.\18\ For this category, Census Bureau data for 2002 
show that there were a total of 332 firms that operated for the entire 
year.\19\ Of this total, 303 firms had annual receipts of under $10 
million and 15 firms had annual receipts of $10 million to 
$24,999,999.\20\ Consequently, we estimate that the majority of Other 
Telecommunications firms are small entities that might be affected by 
our action. The proposed rule changes would affect two 2 GHz MSS 
operators. While the Commission does not believe these two MSS 
operators to be small due to the high costs associated with launching 
their service, it has nonetheless included them in this analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ``517910 Other 
Telecommunications''; http://www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.
    \18\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517410.
    \19\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: 
Information, ``Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of 
Organization),'' Table 4, NAICS code 517910 (issued Nov. 2005).
    \20\ Id. An additional 14 firms had annual receipts of $25 
million or more.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other 
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities

    20. The interest of BAS licensees would be affected by the proposed 
rule changes by either subjecting them to the threat of increased 
interference from MSS or by making their licenses secondary to MSS in a 
portion of the spectrum. The potential harm to BAS will depend on the 
particular changes made to the rule. If MSS is allowed to enter the 
band on a market-by-market basis only where BAS has been transitioned, 
BAS would likely suffer little or no interference. If MSS is allowed to 
enter the band before BAS has been transitioned, but is required to 
cause no interference to BAS, then BAS would also likely suffer little 
or no interference. However, if BAS licensees are made secondary when 
MSS enters the band, those BAS licensees who have not been relocated 
could suffer interference. If such interference does occur, the BAS 
licensee may be able to

[[Page 16826]]

avoid the interference by operating on another BAS channel. Moreover, 
this interference would be temporary because all the BAS licensees are 
scheduled to relocate by September 7, 2009 to spectrum that does not 
conflict with MSS.
    21. The proposed rule changes would also affect the interest of the 
two 2 GHz MSS operators, TerreStar and ICO. Under the current rules 
TerreStar and ICO cannot begin operations in this band until after the 
top 30 markets have been relocated. Consequently, modifying the top 30 
market rule to allow them to enter the band sooner will provide the 2 
GHz MSS operators with a benefit and not a burden.

E. Steps Taken To Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on Small 
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered

    22. Our primary concern in this proceeding continues to be 
balancing the needs of incumbent BAS licensees to provide service 
without suffering harmful interference and the introduction of new MSS 
in a timely manner. If the Sprint Nextel et al., plan for BAS 
relocation is successfully implemented, ICO's and TerreStar's ability 
to begin operation in the 2 GHz MSS band could be delayed until 
September 2009 under the current rules. On the other hand, if BAS 
relocation of the top 30 markets and fixed BAS links in all markets is 
completed earlier than is now anticipated but before all BAS markets 
are relocated, interference between MSS, including ATC, and BAS is 
likely to occur in those markets not yet relocated. In the latter case, 
MSS would have to accept interference from the remaining BAS users 
until they are relocated. It seeks comment on whether to maintain this 
non-interference requirement. The Commission also seeks comment on 
whether it should modify other requirements for MSS entry into the 2 
GHz MSS band.

F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the 
Proposed Rules

    23. None.

Ordering Clauses

    24. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is adopted. This 
authority is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 CFR 154(i) and (j), and 
Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules.
    25. The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, 
Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of the Further Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-6494 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P