[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 2 (Thursday, January 3, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 406-411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 600 and 622

[Docket No. 070518142-7238-02]
RIN 0648-AV45


Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; 
Gulf of Mexico Vermilion Snapper Fishery Management Measures

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement a regulatory 
amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of 
the Gulf of Mexico (FMP) prepared by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery 
Management Council (Council). This final rule reduces the minimum size 
limit for vermilion snapper to 10 inches (25.4 cm) total length (TL), 
eliminates the 10-fish recreational bag limit for vermilion snapper 
within the existing 20-fish aggregate reef fish bag limit, and 
eliminates the 40-day commercial closed season for vermilion snapper 
(from April 22 through May 31 each year). NMFS is also implementing 
through this rule clarifications for the Gulf of Mexico red snapper 
individual fishing quota (IFQ) program, as well as non-substantive 
changes to codified text, including removing obsolete language 
regarding the use of fish traps in the Gulf of Mexico, removing 
outdated and redundant language, revising phone numbers and an outdated 
definition, and revising incorrect references. The intended effects of 
this final rule are to help achieve optimum yield (OY) by reducing 
vermilion snapper harvest limitations consistent with the findings of 
the recent stock assessment and to clarify and update existing 
regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective February 4, 2008, except for the 
amendments toSec.  622.16(c)(3)(i) and (ii) which are effective January 
3, 2008 and the amendment to Sec.  622.39(b)(1)(x) which is effective 
February 4, 2008 through March 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) 
may be obtained from Sarah DeVido, NMFS, Southeast Regional Office, 263 
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701; telephone 727-824-5305; 
fax 727-824-5308; email [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah DeVido, telephone 727-824-5305; 
fax 727-824-5308; e-mail [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico 
is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council and is 
implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority 
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
    In accordance with the FMP's framework procedure, the Council 
recommended, and NMFS published, a proposed rule to implement the 
regulatory amendment and requested public comment through May 14, 2007 
(72 FR 20980, April 27, 2007). The rationale for the measures contained 
in the regulatory amendment, is provided in the preamble to the 
proposed rule and the responses to comment below and is not repeated 
here. A summary of the public comments received by NMFS on the proposed 
rule and NMFS' responses are provided below.

Comments and Responses

    A total of 83 individuals submitted comments during the comment 
period on the proposed rule to reduce the size limit, relax the 
recreational bag limit, and remove a commercial closure. Of these, 68 
of the commenters expressed support for one, two or all three of the 
proposed actions, and did not express any specific objections. The 
remaining 15 commenters opposed one or more of the proposed actions.
    Comment 1: The regulations for vermilion snapper should remain as 
they are. Of special concern is the proposal to remove the 10-fish bag 
limit restriction. Such an action is not in line with a conservation-
oriented approach to recreational fishing. The upcoming reductions in 
bag limits for red snapper and gray triggerfish may cause an effort 
shift to vermilion snapper, which could lead to increased harvests of 
this species. Optimistic assumptions regarding current low fishing 
mortality should not be relied upon. Effort shifts could substantially 
increase fishing mortality, and the regulations would have to be 
revised to ensure the vermilion snapper stock does not become 
overfished or undergo overfishing.
    Response: Fishery stocks should be managed conservatively, with a 
goal of achieving optimum yield (OY) from the fishery. The 2006 stock 
assessment for vermilion snapper incorporated new

[[Page 407]]

information unavailable for the 2001 assessment. The results of the 
2006 stock assessment concluded vermilion snapper was neither 
overfished nor undergoing overfishing. Currently, the vermilion snapper 
fishery is being fished at a rate below OY. The assessment suggests 
fishing mortality (F) may exceed FOY by 2012, but should not exceed the 
maximum fishing mortality threshold, i.e., the overfishing threshold, 
through 2017. The regulations implemented through Amendment 23 were 
overly restrictive and can be removed to allow the fishery to better 
achieve OY.
    Comment 2: There was general support for the proposed reduction in 
the size limit, but mixed opinions regarding the changes to the bag 
limit and the commercial closure. Most comments did not provide a 
rationale for their support or opposition. Several commenters opposed 
the removal of the commercial closed season, but supported the removal 
of the 10-fish bag limit restriction within the 20-fish aggregate bag 
limit. Some supported the change in the size limit, but opposed the 
other two proposed actions. Some commenters apparently misinterpreted 
the ``removal'' of the 10-fish bag limit as meaning the bag limit would 
be set to zero. A few commenters focused on a possible reallocation of 
catches between commercial and recreational sectors if the commercial 
closure were rescinded but the 10-fish bag limit were retained.
    Response: Given the vermilion snapper fishery is not achieving 
optimum yield, the relaxation of harvesting restrictions is intended to 
allow the fishery to better optimize this resource. The size limit 
reduction is expected to increase recreational catch by as much as 20 
percent, and commercial harvest by 12 percent, while reducing discard 
mortalities. Elimination of the recreational bag limit is not expected 
to greatly increase harvest; before this restriction was implemented, 
less than 2 percent of anglers harvested more than 10 fish. However, 
removal of the bag limit restriction would allow anglers to take more 
fish if they choose. Eliminating the commercial closure is expected to 
increase commercial harvest by as much as 16 percent. In total, these 
actions should allow increases of over 25 percent for both the 
recreational and commercial sectors, which will maintain current 
allocation ratios while allowing fishery participants to derive greater 
benefit from the vermilion snapper resource.

Clarification of Language

    In Sec.  622.16(c)(3)(i) and (ii), NMFS clarifies language 
regarding the Gulf of Mexico red snapper IFQ program relating to a 
requirement for advanced notification of landing and a restriction on 
time of offloading IFQ red snapper. NMFS believes that the current 
regulatory text does not sufficiently distinguish between the terms 
``landing'' and ``offloading'' and, therefore, is not consistent with 
the intended regulatory effect. The current wording ofSec.  
622.16(c)(3)(i) refers to landing which, by definition, includes not 
only landing but also offloading. The intent was to constrain the 
landing of a vessel with IFQ red snapper on board to an allowable time 
period no less than 3 hours and no more than 12 hours after the time of 
advanced notification of landing. However, the current wording also 
constrains offloading of IFQ red snapper to this same time period. To 
correct this unintentional effect, this rule defines ``landing'', for 
purposes of Sec.  622.16(c)(3)(i) only, in a way that removes any 
reference to ``offloading.''
    In Sec.  622.16(c)(3)(ii), the current regulatory text refers to 
both ``landing'' (or ``land'') and ``offloading'' (or ``offload'') and 
restricts both to an allowable time period of 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. The 
intent was to restrict offloading of IFQ red snapper to the 6 a.m. to 6 
p.m. time period, not to restrict landing the vessel to that time 
frame. To correct this unintentional effect, this rule deletes 
reference to ``landing'' and ``land'' in Sec.  622.16(c)(3)(ii).

Other Non-Substantive Changes Implemented by NMFS

Revision to Definition

    In Sec.  622.2, NMFS revises the definition of ``Regional 
Administrator'' to incorporate a change of address.

Revision to References

    In Sec.  622.7 and Sec.  622.16, NMFS revises incorrect references 
to other sections in part 622.

Revision to Phone Numbers

    In Sec.  622.15, Sec.  622.17, andSec.  622.41, the phone numbers 
for NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, Southeast Region, are updated.

Removal of Outdated Language

    In Sec.  622.17, references to fishing for South Atlantic golden 
crab in the northern zone through May 3, 2005 are outdated and 
therefore removed.
    In Sec.  622.42, the reference to the South Atlantic snowy grouper 
quota that commences January 1, 2006 is outdated and therefore removed, 
and the remaining paragraphs are redesignated.
    In Sec.  622.44, the reference to the South Atlantic snowy grouper 
commercial trip limit for 2006 is outdated and therefore removed, and 
the remaining paragraphs are redesignated.

Removal of Redundant Language

    In Sec.  622.37, the minimum size limit for South Atlantic 
vermilion snapper is 12 inches (30.5 cm) for those that are subject to 
the bag limit and those that are not subject to the bag limit. This 
language has been simplified to state that the minimum size limit for 
South Atlantic vermilion snapper is 12 inches (30.5 cm).

Consistency of Language

    In Sec.  622.39, the language specifying the Gulf grouper zero bag 
limit for captain and crew has been revised to be consistent with the 
language specifying the Gulf red snapper zero bag limit for captain and 
crew.

Removal of Obsolete Language

    NMFS published a final rule in the Federal Register on March 25, 
1997 (62 FR 13983) prohibiting the use of fish traps in the exclusive 
economic zone (EEZ) of the Gulf of Mexico beginning February 8, 2007. 
Therefore, this final rule removes obsolete language regarding the use 
and/or possession of fish traps in the Gulf of Mexico and revises 
several paragraphs to account for the removal of this language.

General Prohibitions (Sec.  600.725)

    In the table under paragraph (v), under the heading ``IV. Gulf of 
Mexico Fishery Management Council,'' entry 3.B. is removed because the 
use of fish traps in the Gulf is no longer allowed. Also, under the 
heading ``III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council,'' entry 6.B. 
is revised to reflect only the use of sea bass pots in the South 
Atlantic EEZ. The use of fish traps in the South Atlantic has been 
prohibited since January 1, 1992 (56 FR 56016, October 31, 1991), 
however, this language was inadvertently not removed at that time.

Permits and Fees (Sec.  622.4)

    Paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (n) are removed because fish traps are no 
longer allowed to be used and/or possessed in the Gulf of Mexico. 
Paragraph (a)(4)(i) is revised to clarify language regarding dealer 
permit requirements for the specified species in the Gulf, South 
Atlantic, and Atlantic EEZs. Paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(G), (d), and (g)(1) 
are revised to eliminate language allowing fish traps in the Gulf but 
retain

[[Page 408]]

language allowing the use and possession of sea bass pots in the South 
Atlantic EEZ.

Recordkeeping and Reporting (Sec.  622.5)

    Paragraphs (a)(1)(ii)(A) and (B) are removed because the use and/or 
possession of fish traps is no longer allowed in the Gulf of Mexico.

Vessel and Gear Identification (Sec.  622.6)

    Paragraphs (a)(1)(ii), (b)(1)(i)(B), and (b)(1)(ii)(B) are revised 
to eliminate fish trap language but retain sea bass pot language for 
use and/or possession in the South Atlantic EEZ.

Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMSs) (Sec.  622.9)

    The last sentence of paragraph (a)(2) is removed because it is no 
longer effective.

Prohibited Gear and Methods (Sec.  622.31)

    Paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) are removed, however, paragraph 
(c) is retained and revised to include language which prohibits the use 
and/or possession of fish traps in both the South Atlantic and Gulf 
EEZs.

Gulf EEZ Seasonal and/or Area Closures (Sec.  622.34)

    Paragraph (g)(3) is removed because fish traps are no longer 
allowed to be used or possessed in the Gulf EEZ.

Bag and Possession Limits (Sec.  622.39)

    Paragraph (a)(2)(iv) is revised to eliminate language pertaining to 
fish traps.

Limitations on Traps and Pots (Sec.  622.40)

    Paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (c)(2), and (d)(1) are removed to 
eliminate the use and/or possession of fish traps in the Gulf. The 
subsequent paragraphs are redesignated for clarity and flow. Paragraph 
(d)(2) is added and reserved to avoid confusion.

Species Specific Limitations (Sec.  622.41)

    Paragraph (i) is revised to eliminate outdated language implying 
use and/or possession of fish traps in the Gulf of Mexico is allowed.

Classification

    The Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS determined the regulatory 
amendment is necessary for the management of the Gulf of Mexico 
vermilion snapper fishery and is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Act and other applicable laws.
    This final rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared. The 
FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), a 
summary of significant economic issues raised by public comments, NMFS 
responses to those comments, and a summary of the analyses completed to 
support the action. A copy of the full analysis is available from the 
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis follows.
    This rule will reduce the minimum size limit for vermilion snapper 
to 10 inches (25.4 cm) TL, eliminate the 10-fish vermilion snapper 
recreational bag limit but include vermilion snapper in the 20-fish 
aggregate bag limit, and eliminate the April 22 through May 31 
commercial closed season. The purpose of this action is to eliminate 
management measures that are causing the vermilion snapper fishery to 
be fished at a rate below OY, which is resulting in the unnecessary 
loss of social and economic benefits. These regulations have been 
determined to no longer be required because the vermilion snapper stock 
has been determined to be healthy, not overfished, nor undergoing 
overfishing.
    No significant economic issues were raised by public comments. 
Therefore, no changes were made in the final rule as a result of such 
comments.
    The measures in this rule are expected to affect commercial reef 
fish operations, for-hire vessels operating in the reef fish fishery, 
and dealers and processors that receive vermilion snapper. As of 
October 2003, there were 1,158 active commercial reef fish permits. Of 
these entities, 441 vessels reported logbook landings of vermilion 
snapper, with most using vertical line gear. During the period 2000-
2004, the average vessel operating in the commercial vermilion snapper 
fishery generated revenues of $65,200 of which $7,400 was from 
vermilion snapper harvests. These estimates included all vessels that 
landed at least 1 lb (0.5 kg) of vermilion snapper and all the trips 
taken by these vessels regardless of whether vermilion snapper was 
caught on that trip. These estimates are assumed to be lower bound 
estimates, however, since landings of all commercial species, whether 
from Federal or state fisheries, are not required to be recorded or 
captured by the logbook program, which captures only reef fish and 
coastal pelagic harvests.
    An estimated 1,625 for-hire vessels are currently permitted to 
harvest reef fish in the Gulf of Mexico. This sector is comprised of 
charter boats that are generally smaller and charge a fee on a per-
vessel basis, and headboats that are larger and charge a fee per 
angler. On average, charter boats are estimated to generate gross 
revenues ranging from $58,000 in the eastern Gulf to $81,000 in the 
western Gulf, or an overall average of $64,000. The comparable values 
for headboats are $281,000 and $550,000, or an overall average of 
$400,000.
    The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small business 
operating in the finfish industry as one that is independently owned 
and operated, is not dominant in its field of operation, and has 
average annual receipts not in excess of $4.0 million (NAICS code 
114111, finfish fishing). The appropriate revenue benchmark for a 
vessel operating in the for-hire sector is $6.5 million (NAICS code 
713990, amusement and recreation industries). Based on the gross 
revenue estimates presented above, all commercial and for-hire fishing 
vessels potentially affected by this rule are determined, for the 
purpose of this analysis, to be small business entities.
    Instead of a receipts threshold, the SBA uses an employment 
threshold for seafood dealers and processors, with the appropriate 
values of fewer than 100 employees per dealer and fewer than 500 
employees per processor. A Federal permit is required for a fish dealer 
to purchase reef fish from commercial vessels. Based on permits files, 
there are currently 227 dealers holding permits to buy and sell reef 
fish species. All reef fish processors would be included in this total 
since a processor must be a dealer. Dealers often hold multiple types 
of permits and operate in both Federal and state fisheries. It is 
unknown what percentage of any of the average dealer's business comes 
from the vermilion snapper fishery.
    Average employment information per reef fish dealer is unknown. 
Although dealers and processors are not synonymous entities, total 
employment for reef fish processors in the Southeast is estimated at 
approximately 700 individuals, both part and full time. While all 
processors must be dealers, a dealer need not be a processor. Further, 
processing is a much more labor-intensive exercise than dealing. 
Therefore, given the employment estimate for the processing sector (700 
persons) and the total number of dealers operating in the reef fish 
fishery (227), NMFS determines that the average number of employees per 
dealer and processor does not surpass the SBA employment benchmark and, 
for the purpose of this analysis, NMFS determines that all dealers 
potentially affected by this rule are small entities.

[[Page 409]]

    None of the measures in this rule will alter existing reporting and 
record-keeping requirements.
    The rule is expected to increase net revenues in the commercial 
vermilion snapper fishery by approximately $1.443 million, or 
approximately 3.5 percent of total average net revenues relative to the 
2000-2002 fishery. If spread over the average 441 vessels that operated 
in the fishery from 2000-2004, the increased net revenues expected to 
be generated as a result of the rule equate to approximately $3,300 per 
vessel or approximately 5 percent of average gross revenues.
    Within the for-hire sector, the rule is expected to result in an 
increase of approximately $3.158 million in net revenues. It is not 
possible to determine how many of the 1,625 entities permitted to 
operate in this fishery will be affected. If evenly distributed across 
all said entities, the expected increase in net revenues equates to 
approximately $1,900 per entity, or approximately 12 percent per 
entity. Since not all of the vessels permitted to operate in the for-
hire reef fish fishery are expected to participate in the vermilion 
snapper fishery, actual increases in net revenue per vessel for those 
vessels fishing for vermilion snapper are expected to exceed these 
estimates.
    The impact of the rule on reef fish dealers cannot be determined 
with available data. However, although the current measures were 
originally projected to result in an approximate 26-percent reduction 
in vermilion snapper harvests, which are expected to be recovered under 
the rule, the vermilion snapper fishery comprises less than 10 percent 
of the total commercial reef fish fishery. Hence, the additional 
commercial harvests, and resultant effect on revenues or profits, 
expected to occur as a result of the rule, are not expected to be 
substantial relative to overall commercial reef fish sales.
    Two alternatives to the measures in this final rule, including the 
status quo, were considered. The status quo would maintain current 
regulations in the fishery that are not biologically supported and 
would result in the loss of economic benefits. The second alternative 
allowed the continuation or suspension of the individual components of 
current vermilion snapper regulations. The continuation of any of these 
individual components would be expected to, similar to the status quo, 
result in the continued loss of economic benefits to the fishery. The 
rule will rescind current regulations that have been determined to be 
unnecessary from a biological perspective and is expected to result in 
increased economic and social benefits to the fishery.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 533(b)(B), NMFS finds good cause to waive 
notice and comment on the non-substantive measures contained in this 
rule. These measures, which remove obsolete text regarding the use of 
fish traps in the Gulf of Mexico, remove outdated and redundant 
language, revise phone numbers and an outdated definition, and revise 
incorrect references, simply clarify and update existing regulations to 
eliminate confusion among the regulated communities. No additional 
regulatory requirements are imposed by these measures. Therefore, 
providing notice and comment would be unnecessary and contrary to the 
public interest.
    NMFS also finds good cause to waive notice and comment, and the 30-
day delay in effective date, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 533(d)(3), on 
language clarifying Gulf of Mexico red snapper IFQ program components. 
The current definition of ``landing'' includes both arrival of a vessel 
at a dock, berth, beach, seawall, or ramp, and offloading of the catch, 
which therefore constrains fishers to complete both of these activities 
during the 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. time frame. However, NMFS' intent was to 
restrict only offloading to this time period. The current regulatory 
text creates unnecessary safety issues for IFQ fishers that must stay 
out longer waiting for the offloading window. It is frequently 
difficult to predict arrival time due to variable weather conditions, 
vessel operational problems, or at-sea boardings that occur after 
advanced notification of landing is given. Vessels waiting offshore to 
land their vessels and offload their catch will add to navigational 
congestion and increased vessel traffic, raising concerns about vessel 
traffic safety. Being required to wait offshore also increases the risk 
of fuel shortages, and in turn bilge failure, adding to the potential 
for vessel damage or loss. Providing an opportunity for public notice 
and comment would delay implementation of these measures beyond the 
imminent opening date of the commercial fishery on January 1, 2008, 
which would extend these risks and is therefore unnecessary and 
contrary to the public interest. For all of these reasons, NMFS finds 
good cause to waive notice and comment and the 30-day delay in 
effective date on these measures.

List of Subjects

50 CFR Part 600
    Administrative practice and procedures, Confidential business 
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign relations, 
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 622
    Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Virgin Islands.

    Dated: December 28, 2007
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 600 and 622 are 
amended as follows:

PART 600--MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  600.725, in paragraph (v), in the table under heading ``IV. 
Gulf of Mexico Fishery management Council,'' entry 3.B. is removed 
entries 3.C. and 3.D. are redesignated as 3.B. and 3.C., respectively 
and under heading ``III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council,'' 
entry 6.B. is revised to read as follows.


Sec.  600.725  General prohibitions.

* * * * *
    (v) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Fishery                       Authorized gear types
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
 
 III. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
                                * * * * *
6. * * *                                     ...........................
B. Black sea bass pot fishery                B. Pot.
                                * * * * *
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC

0
3. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

0
4. In Sec.  622.2, the definition for ``Regional Administrator'' is 
revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.2  Definitions and acronyms.

* * * * *
    Regional Administrator (RA), for the purposes of this part, means 
the

[[Page 410]]

Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33701, or a designee.
* * * * *

0
5. In Sec.  622.4, paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (n) are removed and 
reserved; and paragraph (a)(4)(i), (b)(3)(ii)(G), the first and last 
sentence of paragraph (d), and the first sentence of paragraph (g)(1) 
are revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.4  Permits and fees.

    (a) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) Permits. For a dealer to receive Gulf reef fish harvested from 
the Gulf EEZ; golden crab, South Atlantic snapper-grouper, rock shrimp, 
or wreckfish harvested from the South Atlantic EEZ; or dolphin or wahoo 
harvested from the Atlantic EEZ; a dealer permit for Gulf reef fish, 
golden crab, South Atlantic snapper-grouper, rock shrimp, wreckfish, or 
Atlantic dolphin and wahoo, respectively, must be issued to the dealer.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (G) If a sea bass pot will be used, the number, dimensions, and 
estimated cubic volume of the pots that will be used and the 
applicant's desired color code for use in identifying his or her vessel 
and buoys (white is not an acceptable color code).
* * * * *
    (d) Fees. Unless specified otherwise, a fee is charged for each 
application for a permit, license, or endorsement submitted under this 
section, for each request for transfer or replacement of such permit, 
license, or endorsement, and for each sea bass pot identification tag 
required under Sec.  622.6(b)(1)(i)(B). * * * The appropriate fee must 
accompany each application, request for transfer or replacement, or 
request for sea bass pot identification tags.
* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (1) Vessel permits, licenses, and endorsements and dealer permits. 
A vessel permit, license, or endorsement or a dealer permit or 
endorsement issued under this section is not transferable or 
assignable, except as provided in paragraph (m) of this section for a 
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, in paragraph (o) of this 
section for a king mackerel gillnet permit, in paragraph (q) of this 
section for a commercial vessel permit for king mackerel, in paragraph 
(r) of this section for a charter vessel/headboat permit for Gulf 
coastal migratory pelagic fish or Gulf reef fish, in paragraph (s) of 
this section for a commercial vessel moratorium permit for Gulf shrimp, 
in Sec.  622.17(c) for a commercial vessel permit for golden crab, in 
Sec.  622.18(b) for a commercial vessel permit for South Atlantic 
snapper-grouper, or in Sec.  622.19(b) for a commercial vessel permit 
for South Atlantic rock shrimp. * * *
* * * * *
Sec.  622.5 [Amended]

0
6. In Sec.  622.5, paragraphs (a)(1)(ii)(A) and (B) are removed.

0
7. In Sec.  622.6, the first sentence in paragraph (a)(1)(ii), the 
first sentence in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(B), and paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) 
are revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.6  Vessel and gear identification.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Official number and color code. The following vessels must 
display their official number as specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of 
this section and, in addition, must display their assigned color code: 
A vessel for which a permit has been issued to fish with a sea bass 
pot, as required under Sec.  622.4(a)(2)(vi); a vessel in the 
commercial Caribbean reef fish fishery fishing with traps; and a vessel 
in the Caribbean spiny lobster fishery.* * *
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) South Atlantic EEZ. A sea bass pot used or possessed in the 
South Atlantic EEZ between 35[deg]15.19' N. lat. (due east of Cape 
Hatteras Light, NC) and 28[deg]35.1' N. lat. (due east of the NASA 
Vehicle Assembly Building, Cape Canaveral, FL), or a sea bass pot on 
board a vessel with a commercial permit for South Atlantic snapper-
grouper, must have a valid identification tag issued by the RA 
attached. * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (B) South Atlantic EEZ. In the South Atlantic EEZ, buoys are not 
required to be used, but, if used, each buoy must display the official 
number and color code assigned by the RA. However, no color code is 
required on a buoy attached to a golden crab trap.
* * * * *

0
8. In Sec.  622.7, paragraph (w) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.7  Prohibitions.

* * * * *
    (w) Fail to comply with the requirements for observer coverage as 
specified in Sec.  622.8.
* * * * *
Sec.  622.9 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec.  622.9, the last sentence of paragraph (a)(2) is removed.

0
10. In Sec.  622.15, paragraph (d)(4) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.15  Wreckfish individual transferable quota (ITQ) system.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (4) If a wreckfish is to be offloaded at a location other than a 
fixed facility of a dealer who holds a dealer permit for wreckfish, as 
required under Sec.  622.4 (a)(4), the wreckfish shareholder or the 
vessel operator must advise NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, Southeast 
Region, St. Petersburg, FL, by telephone (727-824-5344), of the 
location not less than 24 hours prior to offloading.

0
11. In Sec.  622.16, a sentence is added to the beginning of paragraph 
(c)(3)(i), and the last sentence of paragraph (c)(3)(i) and paragraph 
(c)(3)(ii) are revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.16  Gulf red snapper individual fishing quota (IFQ) program.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) Advance notice of landing. For the purpose of this paragraph, 
landing means to arrive at a dock, berth, beach, seawall, or ramp. * * 
* Failure to comply with this advance notice of landing requirement is 
unlawful and will preclude authorization to complete the landing 
transaction report required in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section 
and, thus, will preclude issuance of the required transaction approval 
code.
    (ii) Time restriction on offloading. IFQ red snapper may be 
offloaded only between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., local time.
* * * * *

0
12. In Sec.  622.17, paragraph (b)(4)(ii) is removed and reserved, and 
the third and fourth sentences in paragraph (b)(2) are revised to read 
as follows:


Sec.  622.17  South Atlantic golden crab controlled access.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * * A vessel with a documented length overall greater than 65 
ft (19.8 m) with a permit to fish for golden crab in the southern zone 
may fish in that zone, consistent with the provisions of paragraph 
(b)(3) of this section. A vessel may possess golden crab only in a zone 
in which it is authorized to fish, except that other zones may be 
transited if the vessel notifies NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, 
Southeast Region, St. Petersburg, FL, by telephone (727-824-5344) in 
advance and does not fish in a zone in which it is not authorized to 
fish.
* * * * *

[[Page 411]]


0
13. In Sec.  622.31, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.31  Prohibited gear and methods.

* * * * *
    (c) Fish traps. A fish trap may not be used or possessed in the 
Gulf or South Atlantic EEZ. A fish trap deployed in the Gulf or South 
Atlantic EEZ may be disposed of in any appropriate manner by the 
Assistant Administrator or an authorized officer.
* * * * *
Sec.  622.34 [Amended]
0
14. In Sec.  622.34, paragraph (g)(3) is removed, and paragraph (n) is 
removed and reserved.

0
15. In Sec.  622.37, paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and (e)(1)(ii) are revised 
to read as follows:


Sec.  622.37  Size limits.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Vermilion snapper--10 inches (25.4 cm), TL.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Vermilion snapper--12 inches (30.5 cm), TL.
* * * * *

0
16. In Sec.  622.39, paragraphs (a)(2)(iv), and (b)(1)(ii) are revised; 
paragraph (b)(1)(ix) is removed and reserved; and paragraph (b)(1)(x) 
is added to read as follows:


Sec.  622.39  Bag and possession limits.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iv) When the vessel has on board or is tending any trap other than 
a stone crab trap or a spiny lobster trap.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Groupers, combined, excluding goliath grouper and Nassau 
grouper--5 per person per day, but not to exceed 1 speckled hind or 1 
warsaw grouper per vessel per day or 1 red grouper per person per day. 
However, no grouper may be retained by the captain or crew of a vessel 
operating as a charter vessel or headboat. The bag limit for such 
captain and crew is zero.
* * * * *
    (x) Gulf reef fish, combined, excluding those specified in 
paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (ii) , (iv), (vi), (vii), and (viii) of this 
section and excluding dwarf sand perch and sand perch--20.
* * * * *
Sec.  622.40 [Amended]
0
17. In Sec.  622.40, paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (c)(2), and (d)(1) are 
removed; paragraphs (a)(3), (b)(3), (c)(3), and (d)(2) are redesignated 
as paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (c)(2), and (d)(1), respectively, and 
paragraph (d)(2) is added and reserved.

0
18. In Sec.  622.41, paragraphs (a)(4) and (i) are revised to read as 
follows:


Sec.  622.41  Species specific limitations.

    (a) * * *
    (4) Not less than 24 hours prior to harvest of aquacultured live 
rock, the owner or operator of the harvesting vessel must provide the 
following information to the NMFS Office for Law Enforcement, Southeast 
Region, St. Petersburg, FL, by telephone (727-824-5344):
* * * * *
    (i) Gulf reef fish exhibiting trap rash. Possession of Gulf reef 
fish in or from the Gulf EEZ that exhibit trap rash is prima facie 
evidence of illegal trap use and is prohibited. For the purpose of this 
paragraph, trap rash is defined as physical damage to fish that 
characteristically results from contact with wire fish traps. Such 
damage includes, but is not limited to, broken fin spines, fin rays, or 
teeth; visually obvious loss of scales; and cuts or abrasions on the 
body of the fish, particularly on the head, snout, or mouth.
* * * * *
Sec.  622.42 [Amended]
0
19. In Sec.  622.42, paragraph (e)(1)(i) is removed and paragraphs 
(e)(1)(ii) and (iii) are redesignated as (e)(1)(i) and (ii), 
respectively.
Sec.  622.44 [Amended]
0
20. In Sec.  622.44, paragraph (c)(3)(i) is removed and paragraphs 
(c)(3)(ii) through (iv) are redesignated as paragraphs (c)(3)(i) 
through (iii), respectively.
Sec.  622.45 [Amended]
0
21. In Sec.  622.45, paragraph (c)(5) is removed.
0
22. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in 50 CFR part 622, 
revise all references to ``NMFS, Office of Enforcement''; ``NMFS Office 
of Enforcement''; ``NMFS Office of Law Enforcement''; and ``NMFS Law 
Enforcement Office'' to read ``NMFS Office for Law Enforcement'' 
wherever they occur.
[FR Doc. E7-25584 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S