[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73304-73308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25080]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 071212833-7843-01]
RIN 0648-XB94


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fisheries; 2008 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2008 specifications for the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery, including state-by-state commercial quotas, a recreational 
harvest limit, and recreational possession limits for Atlantic bluefish 
off the east coast of the United States. The intent of these 
specifications is to establish the allowable 2008 harvest levels and 
possession limits to attain the target fishing mortality rate (F), 
consistent with the stock rebuilding program in Amendment 1 to the 
Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP).

DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. eastern 
standard time, on January 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-XB94, by any one 
of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov,
     Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Regional Administrator.
     Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, 
Northeast Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. 
Mark the outside of the envelope: ``Comments on 2008 Bluefish 
Specifications'',
    Instructions: All comments received are part of the public record 
and will generally be posted to http://regulations.gov without change. 
All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) 
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publically accessible. Do 
not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or 
protected information.
    NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic 
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or 
Adobe PDF file formats only.
    Copies of the specifications document, including the Environmental 
Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and 
other supporting documents for the specifications, are available from 
Daniel Furlong, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council, Room 2115, Federal Building, 300 South Street, Dover, DE 
19901-6790. The specifications document is also accessible via the 
Internet at http://www.nero.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
(978) 281-9273.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The regulations implementing the FMP are prepared by the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and appear at 50 CFR part 
648, subparts A and J. Regulations requiring annual specifications are 
found at Sec.  648.160. The management unit for bluefish (Pomatomus 
saltatrix) is U.S. waters of the western Atlantic Ocean.

[[Page 73305]]

    The FMP requires that the Council recommend, on an annual basis, 
total allowable landings (TAL) for the fishery, consisting of a 
commercial quota and recreational harvest limit (RHL). A research set 
aside (RSA) quota is deducted from the bluefish TAL (after any 
applicable transfer) in an amount proportional to the percentage of the 
overall TAL as allocated to the commercial and recreational sectors. 
The annual review process for bluefish requires that the Council's 
Bluefish Monitoring Committee (Monitoring Committee) review and make 
recommendations based on the best available data, including, but not 
limited to, commercial and recreational catch/landing statistics, 
current estimates of fishing mortality, stock abundance, discards for 
the recreational fishery, and juvenile recruitment. Based on the 
recommendations of the Monitoring Committee, the Council makes a 
recommendation to the Northeast Regional Administrator (RA). This FMP 
is a joint plan with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 
(Commission); therefore, the Commission meets during the annual 
specification process to adopt complementary measures.
    The Council's recommendations must include supporting 
documentation, concerning the environmental, economic, and social 
impacts of the recommendations. NMFS is responsible for reviewing these 
recommendations to assure they achieve the FMP objectives, and may 
modify them if they do not. NMFS then publishes proposed specifications 
in the Federal Register. After considering public comment, NMFS will 
publish final specifications in the Federal Register.
    In July 2007, the Monitoring Committee met to discuss the updated 
estimates of bluefish stock biomass and project fishery yields for 
2008. In August 2007, the Council approved the Monitoring Committee's 
recommendations and the Commission's Bluefish Board (Board) adopted 
complementary management measures.

Proposed Specifications

Updated Model Estimates

    According to Amendment 1 to the FMP (Amendment 1), overfishing for 
bluefish occurs when F exceeds the fishing mortality rate that allows 
maximum sustainable yield (FMSY), or the maximum F threshold 
to be achieved. The stock is considered overfished if the biomass (B) 
falls below the minimum biomass threshold, which is defined as \1/2\ 
BMSY. Amendment 1 also established that the long-term target 
F (F0.1) is 90 percent of FMSY, and the long-term 
target B is BMSY = 237 million lb (107,500 mt). The 
rebuilding plan established through Amendment 1 stipulates that the 
target fishing mortality rate (Ftarget) in 2008 be set at F 
= 0.31, or the status quo fishing mortality rate (Fyear), 
whichever is less.
    An age-structured assessment program (ASAP) model for bluefish was 
presented to the 41st Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC-41) in 
2005, and estimated annual biomass and F through the 2004 fishing year, 
as well as updated biological reference points. The original ASAP model 
output was revised in 2006. The ASAP model was updated for the purpose 
of estimating the current status of the bluefish stock; i.e., 2006 
biomass and F estimates were compared to the corrected ASAP model 
output, in order to enable the Monitoring Committee to recommend 2008 
specifications using landing information and survey indices through the 
2006 fishing year. Additionally, a projection of biomass through 2010 
was done using F target = F2006 = 0.15. This 
projection identified a target yield for 2008 and also indicated that 
biomass is likely to reach the target before the 2010 rebuilding 
deadline. According to the biological reference points specified in 
Amendment 1 to the FMP, and the most recent estimates of stock biomass, 
the bluefish stock was rebuilt to above BMSY in 2006. The 
Monitoring Committee, however, supported the model updates and 
corrected biological reference points from SARC-41 that derived the 
following new estimates of biomass and projected fishery yields: (1) An 
estimated stock biomass for 2006, B2006 = 307.5 million lb 
(139,496 mt); and (2) projected yields for 2008 using Ftarget 
= F2006 = 0.15. Based on the updated biological reference 
points, and the 2006 estimate of bluefish stock biomass, the bluefish 
stock is not considered overfished: B2006 = 307.5 million lb 
(139,496 mt) is greater than the minimum biomass threshold, \1/2\ 
BMSY = 162 million lb (73,526 mt). Estimates of fishing 
mortality have declined from 0.41 in 1991 to 0.15 in 2006. The new 
model results also conclude that the Atlantic stock of bluefish is not 
experiencing overfishing; i.e., the most recent F (F2006 = 
0.15) is less than the maximum F overfishing threshold specified by 
SARC-41 (FMSY = 0.19).

2008 TAL

    The FMP specifies that the bluefish stock is to be rebuilt to 
BMSY over a 9-year period (i.e., by the year 2010). The FMP 
requires the Council to recommend, on an annual basis, a level of total 
allowable catch (TAC) consistent with the rebuilding program in the 
FMP. An estimate of annual discards is deducted from the TAC to 
calculate the TAL that can be made during the year by the commercial 
and recreational fishing sectors combined. The TAL is composed of a 
commercial quota and a RHL. The FMP rebuilding program requires the TAC 
for any given year to be set based either on the target F resulting 
from the stock rebuilding schedule specified in the FMP (0.31 for 
2008), or the F estimated in the most recent fishing year (F2006 
= 0.15), whichever is lower. Therefore, the 2008 recommendation is 
based on an estimated F of 0.15. An overall TAC of 31.887 million lb 
(14,464 mt) was recommended as the coast-wide TAC by the Council at its 
August 2007 meeting to achieve the target fishing mortality rate, (F = 
0.15) in 2008, and to ensure that the bluefish stock continues toward 
the long-term biomass target, BMSY = 324 million lb (147,052 
mt), consistent with the rebuilding schedule specified in Amendment 1. 
Based on the 2006 biomass estimate (307.5 million lb (139,496 mt)), the 
bluefish stock is well above the minimum biomass threshold (\1/2\ 
BMSY = 162 million lb (73,526 mt)), but is still slightly 
below the long-term biomass target (BMSY = 324 million lb 
(147,052 mt)).
    The proposed TAL for 2008 is derived by subtracting an estimate of 
discards of 3.734 million lb (1,694 mt), the average discard level from 
2000-2006, from the TAC. After subtracting estimated discards, the 2008 
TAL would be approximately 1.4 percent greater than the 2007 TAL, or 
28.156 million lb (12,771 mt). Based strictly on the percentages 
specified in the FMP (17 percent commercial, 83 percent recreational), 
the commercial quota for 2008 would be 4.787 million lb (2,171 mt), and 
the RHL would be 23.370 million lb (10,600 mt) in 2008. In addition, up 
to 3 percent of the TAL may be allocated as RSA quota. The discussion 
below describes the recommended allocation of TAL between the 
commercial and recreational sectors, and its proportional adjustment 
downward to account for the recommended bluefish RSA quota.

Proposed Commercial Quota and Recreational Harvest Limit

    The FMP stipulates that, in any year in which 17 percent of the TAL 
is less than 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt), the commercial quota may be 
increased up to 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt) as long as the 
recreational fishery is not projected to land more than 83 percent of 
the TAL in the upcoming fishing year, and the combined projected

[[Page 73306]]

recreational landings and commercial quota would not exceed the TAL. At 
the Monitoring Committee meeting, Council staff estimated projected 
recreational landings for the 2008 fishing year by using simple linear 
regression of the recent (2000-2006) temporal trends in recreational 
landings. Recreational landings are projected to reach 18.864 million 
lb (8,557 mt) in 2008. If the maximum commercial quota of 10.500 
million lb (4,763 mt) is established within a TAL of 28.156 million lb 
(12,771 mt), this would leave 17.656 million lb (8,009 mt) for the 
recreational fishery. This amount is less than the projected 2008 
recreational landings described above, which, when added to the maximum 
allowable commercial quota of 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt), would 
exceed the overall TAL. Therefore, because the FMP and regulations 
governing the bluefish fishery do not allow for this maximum allowable 
commercial quota, the Monitoring Committee and the Council recommended, 
and NMFS proposes, to transfer 4.088 million lb (1,854 mt) from the 
initial recreational allocation of 23.370 million lb (10,600 mt), 
resulting in a proposed 2008 commercial quota of 8.875 million lb 
(4,026 mt) and a RHL of 19.281 million lb (8,746 mt), which is 2.2 
percent greater than the projected 2008 recreational landings. These 
allocations were also recommended by the Commission to be implemented 
by the states for fisheries within state waters.

RSA

    A request for proposals was published to solicit research proposals 
to utilize RSA in 2006 based on research priorities identified by the 
Council (December 27, 2006; 71 FR 77726). Oneresearch project that 
would utilize bluefish RSA has been preliminarily approved by the RA 
and forwarded to the NOAA Grants Office. Therefore, a 50,000-lb 
(22,680-kg) RSA quota is proposed for use by this, or other potential 
research projects during 2008. This proposed rule does not represent 
NOAA's approval of any RSA-related grant award, which will be included 
in a subsequent action. Consistent with the allocation of the bluefish 
RSA, the proposed commercial quota for 2008 would be reduced to 8.859 
million lb (4,018 mt) and the proposed RHL reduced to 19.246 million lb 
(8,730 mt).

Proposed Recreational Possession Limit

    The Council recommends, and NMFS proposes, to maintain the current 
recreational possession limit of up to 15 fish per person to achieve 
the RHL.

Proposed State Commercial Allocations

    The proposed state commercial allocations for the recommended 2008 
commercial quota are shown in Table 1, based on the percentages 
specified in the FMP. The table shows the allocations both before and 
after the deduction made to reflect the proposed RSA allocation.

                                        Table 1. Proposed Bluefish Commercial State-by-State Allocation for 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             States                        Quota                      2007 Commercial Quota              2008 Commercial Quota    2008 Commercial Quota
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           (lb)                     (kg)
                                                                                                       -------------------------------------------------
                                       Percent Share               (Ib)                   (kg)                RSA Deducted             RSA Deducted
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ME                                0.6685                  59,329                 26,911                 59,224                   26,864
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NH                                0.4145                  36,787                 16,686                 36,722                   16,657
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA                                6.7167                  596,107                270,392                595,049                  269,912
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RI                                6.8081                  604,219                274,072                603,146                  273,585
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CT                                1.2663                  112,384                50,977                 112,185                  50,887
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NY                                10.3851                 921,678                418,070                920,041                  417,328
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NJ                                14.8162                 1,314,938              596,452                1,312,603                595,393
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DE                                I .8782                 166,690                75,610                 166,394                  75,476
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MD                                3.0018                  266,410                120,843                265,937                  120,628
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VA                                11.8795                 1,054,306              478,230                1,052,433                477,380
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NC                                32.0608                 2,845,396              1,290,663              2,840,343                1,288,371
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SC                                0.0352                  3,124                  1,417                  3,118                    1,414
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GA                                0.0095                  843                    382                    842                      382
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FL                                10.0597                 892,798                404,971                891,213                  404,252
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                             100.0001                8,875,000              4,025,674              8,859,240                4,018,529
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the 
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further 
consideration after public comment.
    This action is exempt from review under E.O. 12866.
    An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as 
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The 
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, 
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is 
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at 
the beginning of this

[[Page 73307]]

preamble and in the SUMMARY. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy 
of this analysis is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
    No large entities participate in this fishery, as defined in 
section 601 of the RFA. Therefore, there are no disproportionate 
effects on small versus large entities. Information on costs in the 
fishery are not readily available and individual vessel profitability 
cannot be determined directly. Therefore, changes in gross revenues 
were used as a proxy for profitability. In the absence of quantitative 
data, qualitative analyses were conducted.
    The participants in the commercial sector were defined using two 
sets of data. First, the Northeast dealer reports were used to identify 
any vessel that reported having landed 1 lb (0.45 kg) or more of 
bluefish during calendar year 2006 (the last year for which there is 
complete data). These dealer reports identified 725 vessels that landed 
bluefish in states from Maine to North Carolina. However, this database 
does not provide information about fishery participation in South 
Carolina, Georgia, or Florida. South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports were 
used to identify 820 vessels\1\ that landed bluefish in North Carolina 
and 567 vessels that landed bluefish on Florida's east coast. There 
were no landings of bluefish in South Carolina in 2006, and bluefish 
landings in Georgia were near zero, representing a negligible 
proportion of the total bluefish landings along the Atlantic Coast in 
2006. In recent years, approximately 2,063 party/charter vessels may 
have been active in the bluefish fishery and/or have caught bluefish.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Some of these vessels were identified in the Northeast 
dealer data, therefore double counting is possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The IRFA analyzed three alternatives (including the no action/
status quo alternative) for allocating the TAL between the commercial 
and recreational sectors of the fishery. Consistent with the FMP's 
rebuilding schedule and the status of the resource as assessed by the 
revised SARC-41 report and the updated model projections, alternatives 
one and two were based on an overall TAL of 28.156 million lb (12,771 
mt) and included an RSA quota of 50,000 lb (22,680 kg). The no action 
alternative includes an overall TAL of 27.762 million lb (12,593 mt) 
and an RSA quota of 50,000 lb (22,680 kg). Outside of the difference in 
the overall TAL specification, the alternatives differed only in the 
manner in which the TAL was allocated between the commercial and 
recreational sectors.
    The recommended alternative, before RSA deduction, would allocate 
8.875 million lb (4,026 mt) to the commercial sector and 19.281 million 
lb (8,746 mt) to the recreational sector. Alternative 2, the most 
restrictive alternative, would have allocated 4.787 million lb (2,171 
mt) to the commercial sector and 23.370 million lb (10,600 mt) to the 
recreational sector, reflecting the percentage allocations specified in 
the FMP (i.e., the 17-percent commercial/83-percent recreational sector 
split). Alternative 3 would have allocated 8.689 million lb (3,941 mt) 
to the commercial sector and 19.073 million lb (8,651 mt) to the 
recreational sector, reflecting the commercial level that was place in 
2007 (i.e., status quo/no action alternative).
    For the commercial sector, the recommended coast-wide quota is 
approximately 27 percent higher than 2006 commercial landings. 
Approximately 19 percent of the TAL was not harvested during the 2006 
fishing year and, based on available data, the 2007 TAL is also not 
expected to be fully harvested. Only three states, Rhode Island, New 
York, and North Carolina, fully harvested their initial bluefish quotas 
and received allocation transfers from other states in 2006. Four 
additional states, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and 
Virginia, harvested more than 50 percent of their bluefish quotas, 
while the remaining states only harvested between 0 and 40 percent of 
their allocations. Given these recent trends in landings, it is 
unlikely that the proposed TAL will be fully harvested in 2008, 
therefore resulting in no overall coastwide economic impacts on the 
bluefish fishery. For states that did not harvest their quotas in 2006, 
the proposed 2008 quotas are also not expected to result in any 
detrimental impacts. For states that exceeded their initial quota 
allocations in 2006, but received quota transfers from other states, 
the apparent economic losses would likely be mitigated by quota 
transfers during 2008, therefore resulting in no overall impacts. For 
states that exceeded their post-transfer quota allocations in 2006 
(i.e., New York), any economic impacts would be solely due to the 
overage in landings.
    Impacts on individual commercial vessels were assessed by 
conducting a threshold analysis using the dealer reports for the 725 
vessels that landed bluefish from Maine through North Carolina. The 
analysis projected that there would be no revenue change for 481 out of 
725 vessels, while 238 vessels could incur slight revenue losses of 
less than 5 percent. Another six vessels, all identified with home 
ports in New York, could incur revenue losses of between 5 percent and 
29 percent. According to a threshold impact analysis that compared 2006 
landings from the Northeast dealer reports to the recommended 2008 
adjusted commercial quota allocation, New York could experience 
decreases in landings of up to 14 percent, while overall coastwide 
landings would increase by approximately 27 percent. This is due to the 
fact that New York's proposed 2008 quota is smaller than its actual 
2006 landings.
    The impacts of the proposed alternative on commercial vessels in 
the South Atlantic were assessed using trip ticket data. The analysis 
concluded that, as a consequence of the 2008 recommended allocation 
compared to 2006 landings, there would be no revenue reductions in 
North Carolina or Florida. The FMP provision that allows commercial 
quota to be transferred from one state to another may result in 
transfers of quota to New York and North Carolina, from other states, 
thus mitigating any potential negative revenue impacts. While not 
assured, such transfers have been made annually in recent years, 
including 2006 and 2007.
    The analysis of Alternative 2 concluded that, for the commercial 
sector, there would be a 32-percent decrease in total potential 
commercial landings in 2008 compared to 2006 landings. The analysis of 
impacts on individual commercial vessels projected that there would be 
no revenue change for 62 of the 725 vessels that landed bluefish in 
2006, while 610 vessels could incur slight revenue losses (less than 5 
percent). Another 31 vessels could incur revenue losses of between 5 
percent and 29 percent, while 22 vessels could incur revenue losses of 
greater than 29 percent. Most of the vessels projected to incur revenue 
losses of greater than 5 percent had home ports in Massachusetts, New 
York, New Jersey, or North Carolina. Again, the commercial quota 
transfer provision could be expected to mitigate some or all of these 
impacts, although to a lesser extent than in the other alternatives, as 
all states would have less quota to transfer.
    The impacts of Alternative 2 on commercial vessels in the South 
Atlantic area were assessed using trip ticket data. The analysis 
concluded that, compared to 2006, landings of bluefish in 2008 could be 
reduced by approximately 47 percent in North Carolina. However, on 
average, reductions in revenues due to the

[[Page 73308]]

potential decrease in landings would be approximately 4 percent for 
vessels that land in North Carolina. No projected revenue losses are 
expected for vessels that land in Florida.
    The analysis of Alternative 3 concluded that, for the commercial 
sector, there would be a 24-percent increase in total potential 
commercial landings in 2008 compared to actual landings in 2006. The 
analysis of impacts on individual commercial vessels projected that 
there would be no change in revenue for 298 of the 725 vessels that 
landed bluefish in 2006, while 407 could incur slight revenue losses 
(less than 5 percent). Another 20 vessels could incur revenue losses of 
between 5 percent and 29 percent, and zero vessels would incur revenue 
losses of greater than 29 percent. The vessels projected to incur 
revenue losses of greater than 5 percent had home ports in New York and 
New Jersey.
    The impacts of Alternative 3 on commercial vessels in the South 
Atlantic area were assessed using trip ticket data. The analysis 
concluded that these impacts would result in revenue reductions, 
associated with an estimated 9 percent landings decrease, of 
approximately 1 percent for 820 vessels identified as landing in North 
Carolina, and no revenue reductions for vessels landing in Florida.
    For the recreational sector of the fishery, there were no negative 
revenue impacts projected to occur with regard to the recommended RHL, 
because this level would be greater than the recreational landings in 
2006 (16.894 million lb (7,663 mt)), and above the recreational 
landings projected for 2008 (18.864 million lb (8,557 mt)). The 
recommended RHL is higher than the other two other alternatives, to 
account for this increase in expected landings. The recreational 
fishery impacts are not expected to be substantial under any of the 
alternatives, because the RHL under each alternative is greater than 
the projected landings for 2008. Although there is very little 
empirical evidence regarding the sensitivity of charter/party anglers 
to regulation, it is anticipated that the proposed harvest levels will 
not affect the demand for charter/party boat trips.
    The IRFA also analyzed the impacts on revenues of the proposed RSA 
amount and found that the social and economic impacts are minimal. 
Assuming that the full RSA of 50,000 lb (22,680 kg) is landed and sold 
to support the proposed research project (a supplemental finfish survey 
in the Mid-Atlantic), then all of the participants in the fishery would 
benefit from the anticipated improvements in the data underlying the 
stock assessments. Because the recommended overall commercial quota is 
higher than 2006 landings, no overall negative impacts are expected in 
the commercial sector. Based on recent trends in the recreational 
fishery, recreational landings will more than likely remain below the 
recommended harvest level in 2008.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 19, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-25080 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S