[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 217 (Friday, November 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63548-63551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts Travel
Management Plan, Ashley National Forest; Duchesne, Daggett, and Summit
Counties, UT, and Sweetwater County, WY
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the effects of designating National Forest
System (NFS) roads and trails available for public motorized use on the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts within the Ashley
National Forest. The decision will be to determine whether to include
routes that are not currently NFS roads or trails open for public
motorized use, establish a season of use and/or type of vehicle use for
roads and trails, the prohibition of wheeled motorized vehicle travel
off designated NFS roads and trails by the public (except as allowed by
permit or other authorization), and change dispersed vehicle camping
designations from allowing travel up to 300 feet off road to 150 feet
off road. A National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision is not
required to designate roads and trails for public motorized uses that
are currently part of the National Forest System of roads and trails.
Once a decision is made, a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) will be
prepared, in compliance with the 2005 Forest Service Travel Management
Rule (36 CFR Part 212). The MVUM will show all the routes that are
designated for public motorized use on the Roosevelt/Duchesne and
Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts. The MVUM will be the primary tool used
to determine compliance and enforcement with motorized vehicle use
designations on the forest. Those existing routes and other non-system
routes not designated open on the MVUM will be legally closed to
motorized travel. The decisions on motorized travel will not include
motorized over-the-snow travel.
DATES: The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected July
2008 and the final environmental impact statement is expected November
2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Kris Rutledge, Travel Management
Team Coordinator, Ashley National Forest 355 N Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT
84078 or call (435) 781-5196.
Electronic comments may be e-mailed to [email protected], contain ``Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
District Travel Management Plan'' in the subject line, and must be
submitted in MS Word (*.doc) or rich text format (*.rtf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Rutledge, Project Coordinator, at
the Ashley National Forest 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT., by phone
(435) 781-5196, or e-mail [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There will be a concurrent NOI and scoping
for the Vernal Ranger District Travel Management Plan. The Vernal
Ranger District is also located within the Ashley National Forest.
However, because of differences in travel management within this
District that currently allow motorized use on existing, non-designated
routes in certain areas, and the large number of user-created routes on
this District, it is anticipated that the assessment for the EIS will
take longer than for the Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
Districts. Therefore, the analysis will be completed separately and at
a later date. Cumulative effects will be analyzed for both EISs.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Ashley National Forest has determined that there is a need to
improve management and enforcement of off-highway vehicle travel policy
on the Forest. This need includes three fundamental management
considerations.
1. The need to better accommodate current motorized use and to
address future growth. There has been rapid growth in OHV use that was
not anticipated when the 1982 Ashley National Forest Plan was written.
Over the past few decades, the availability and capability of motorized
vehicles, particularly off-highway vehicles (OHVs) and sport utility
vehicles (SUVs) has increased tremendously. Utah is experiencing a high
level of OHV use (196 % increase in eight years), with an even greater
increase in use in the Uintah Basin (360% increase in eight years).
2. The need to have a travel plans that is simple to understand and
implement, and consistent with other Forests and land management
agencies. The model used for the existing travel plan relies on ``open
unless signed or mapped closed'' designations that are complicated to
interpret and, as a result, are difficult to enforce. The lack of
simple and consistent travel policies among other Forests and land
management agencies is confusing for the public; inhibits cooperative
law enforcement; and has resulted in unplanned roads and trails,
erosion, watershed and habitat degradation, and detrimental impacts to
cultural resource sites. Compaction and erosion are the primary effects
of OHV use on soils. Riparian areas and aquatic dependent species are
particularly vulnerable to OHV use. The Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR
Part 212, provides policy for ending this trend of unauthorized route
proliferation and managing the Forest transportation system in a
sustainable manner through designation of motorized NFS roads, trails,
and areas, and the prohibition of cross-country travel.
3. The need for changes to the existing transportation system. This
will help provide wheeled, motorized access to dispersed recreation
opportunities (camping, hunting, fishing, hiking, horseback riding,
etc.); provide a diversity of wheeled motorized recreation
opportunities (4X4 vehicles, motorcycles, ATVs, passenger vehicles,
etc.); and reduce the potential for OHV conflicts and impacts to other
resource uses and values.
It is Forest Service policy to provide a diversity of road and
trail opportunities for experiencing a variety of environments and
modes of travel consistent with the National Forest recreation role and
land capability (FSM 2353.03(2)). In meeting these needs, the proposed
action must also achieve the following purposes:
A. Avoid impacts to cultural resources.
B. Provide for public safety.
C. Provide for a diversity of recreational opportunities.
D. Assure adequate access to public and private lands.
E. Provide for adequate maintenance and administration of
designations based on availability of resources and funding to do so.
F. Minimize damage to soil, vegetation and other forest resources.
G. Avoid harassment of wildlife and significant disruption of
wildlife habitat.
H. Minimize conflicts between wheeled motor vehicles and existing
or
[[Page 63549]]
proposed recreational uses of NFS lands.
I. Minimize conflicts among different classes of wheeled motor
vehicle uses of NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
J. Assure compatibility of wheeled motor vehicle use with existing
conditions in populated areas, taking into account sound, emissions,
etc.
K. Assure compatibility of motorized vehicle use within Inventoried
Roadless Areas according to 3CFR294.12a.
L. Have valid existing rights of use and access (rights-of-way).
M. Provide consistency of use on roads that cross jurisdictional
boundaries.
N. Include consideration for compatibility with existing Potential
for Wilderness Evaluation studies.
Proposed Action
The proposed action has been developed by tentatively designating a
motorized travel plan that moves towards desired conditions identified
in the pre-project assessment. The proposed travel plan was compared to
the existing travel plan to identify changes from current conditions.
The proposed action includes addition of non-system routes, closure of
system routes, and identification of current system routes where a
change in use or route classification is needed to create the desired
travel plan.
The designations will set specific seasons of use, where
appropriate, and specify the type of use (e.g., street legal vehicle,
OHVs, 4-wheel drive) for roads and trails. The Forest Service will
produce a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) depicting those routes that are
open to the general public for wheeled motorized use. The final
implementation of the MVUM will include consideration of any conflicts
with special use permits, easements, or rights of use that may have
been unknown or not identified at the time of the proposed action.
A consequence of designating routes open for public motorized
travel is that existing routes not designated as open would not be
available for public motorized travel.
1. Changes in Mileage to the National Forest Transportation System
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District currently manages and
maintains approximately 539 miles of NFS roads and 41 miles of NFS
motorized trails. Based on the stated purpose and need for action, the
Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District proposes to add approximately 5.80
miles of existing unauthorized routes to its NFS roads; add 12.39 miles
to its motorized trail system; restrict motorized travel on 4.48 miles
of NFS roads, including the seasonal closure of 1.22 miles of NFS road;
and to restrict through seasonal closure 0.67 miles of motorized
trails. These changes would bring the total NFS roads on the Roosevelt/
Duchesne Ranger District to approximately 540.32 miles and the miles of
the motorized trails to 52.72.
The Flaming Gorge Ranger District currently manages and maintains
approximately 434 miles of NFS roads and 21 miles of motorized trail
system. Based on the stated purpose and need for action, the Flaming
Gorge Ranger District proposes to add approximately 63.84 miles of
existing unauthorized routes to its NFS roads; add 8.82 miles to its
motorized trail system; and to restrict motorized travel on 0.29 miles
of NFS roads and 3.68 miles of NFS motorized trails. These changes
would bring the total NFS roads on the Flaming Gorge Ranger District to
approximately 497.55 miles and the NFS motorized trails to 26.14 miles.
2. Allowing Non-Street Legal Vehicles (OHVS) Access to NFS Roads
Currently Open to Street Legal Vehicles Only
The Ashley National Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 roads are
subject to State traffic laws (36 CFR 212.5 (a)(1). Level 5 roads are
open to highway legal vehicles only and are shown on the current travel
maps as Highway and Improved Paved Roads. Maintenance level 3 and 4
roads are suitable for passenger cars and are shown on the current
travel maps as Improved Roads that are gravel or native dirt.
Maintenance level 2 roads include 4-wheel drive vehicles and are not
suitable for passenger cars. These roads are shown on the current
travel maps as Unimproved Roads. Both improved gravel or dirt and
unimproved roads may be managed for street legal vehicles only, or a
mix of street legal and non-street legal vehicles (OHVs). This is
referred to as ``mixed traffic''.
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District proposes to add mixed
traffic use to 2.87 miles of road that are currently designated for
street legal vehicles only. The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District
proposes to change .15 miles of road currently designated as mixed
traffic use to allow only street legal vehicle use and allow mixed
traffic on 1.92 miles of motorized trail. The Flaming Gorge Ranger
District proposes to add mixed traffic use to 17.67 miles of road that
are currently designated for street legal vehicles only.
The change of motorized use on an open NFS road does not require
NEPA.
3. Allowing Motorized Access to NFS Roads That Are Currently Closed
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District is not proposing to open NFS
roads that are currently closed to public motorized access. The Flaming
Gorge Ranger District is proposing to open 8.04 miles of NFS roads and
.71 miles of motorized trail that are currently closed to public
motorized access. This includes the removal of a seasonal closure on
5.99 miles of NFS roads.
4. Change the Allowable Distance for Motorized Dispersed Camping Off a
Designated Road or Motorized Trail From 300 to 150 Feet
The current travel plan allows motorized dispersed camping up to
300 feet from a designated motorized route. In order to establish
consistency with other National Forests in Utah, the allowable area for
motorized dispersed camping will be reduced to 150 feet from a
designated motorized route.
The Ashley National Forest recognizes its unique niche for
dispersed camping and plans to continue to offer a multitude of
dispersed camping opportunities where appropriate. With this in mind,
the Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts have closely
examined routes that provide this opportunity. Many sites (especially
on the Flaming Gorge) access a multitude of recreational opportunities,
such as fishing or hunting, as well as dispersed camping and have been
included in the proposals outlined in Item 1 above.
In addition, the Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District has been
inventorying existing numerous short routes that are appropriately used
for dispersed camping, but are further than 150 feet from a designated
motorized route. Those routes meeting an initial review are shown as
``Potential Dispersed Camping Routes under Consideration'' on the
proposed action map. A determination of type of vehicle class for these
routes will also be required. It is anticipated that most routes will
be designated as mixed traffic use roads or motorized trails greater
than 50 inches.
There are 15.28 miles of Potential Dispersed Camping Routes under
Consideration being proposed by the Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District.
Note: Maps describing the existing transportation system and
maps and tables describing the proposed action can found at http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/travel_management. In addition,
the maps and tables will be available for viewing at: Supervisor's
Office, 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT 84078. Roosevelt Ranger
District, 650 W. Highway 40 Roosevelt, UT 84066. Duchesne Ranger
District, 85 W. Main
[[Page 63550]]
Duchesne, UT 84021. Flaming Gorge Ranger District, Intersection of
Highways 43 and 44, Manila, UT 84046.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative would be to designate all of the
motorized system roads and trails as identified in the existing travel
management plans for Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
Districts, and would not address existing routes that are identified as
unauthorized (i.e. non-system) routes by the Forest Service. Those
existing routes not designated as open would not be available for
public motorized travel. The opportunity to motorize disperse camp up
to 300 feet from a designated motorized route would continue to be
available.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest is expecting that the public input will generate either
thematic concerns or route-specific issues that may be addressed by
modifying the proposed action to create a new alternative or
alternatives.
Decommissioning or obliterating of routes, which may involve
ground-disturbing activities, would be a part of the Proposed Action or
alternatives. The environmental consequences of having routes closed to
motorized travel will be evaluated in this environmental analysis.
Identification of new routes that would meet the goals and objectives
for a motorized transportation system on NFS lands will be, as
appropriate, a part of this travel management planning.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is Kevin Elliott, Forest Supervisor,
Ashley National Forest, 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT 84078.
Nature of Decision to be Made
Based on the purpose and need for the proposed action, the Forest
Supervisor will evaluate the Proposed Action and other alternatives in
order to make the following decisions for the specific National Forest
System lands:
1. Designating or eliminating unclassified travel ways;
2. Determine the allowed season and/or type of use for those routes
open to motorized travel; and
3. Determine if any changes in the extent and nature of motorized
dispersed camping are warranted.
Travel management direction for routes that will not have a change
in travel management direction will be shown on the MVUM (pursuant to
36 CFR part 212). Routes, for which travel management direction is
being changed, will be analyzed in the EIS for the Roosevelt/Duchesne
and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts Travel Management Plan.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from the federal, state, tribal, local
agencies, and other individuals or organizations that may be interested
in or affected by the proposed action. A series of public opportunities
are scheduled to explain the proposed travel plan and route designation
process and to provide an opportunity for public input. Dates for these
scoping meetings will be posted on the Ashley National Forest web page
at http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/travelmanagement and in
local newspapers prior to the meetings.
The Forest Service will consider all public scoping comments and
concerns that have been submitted, as well as resource related input
from the interdisciplinary team and other agency resource specialists.
This input will be used to identify issues to consider in the
environmental analysis. A comprehensive list of issues will be
determined before the full range of alternatives is developed and the
environmental analysis is begun.
The Notice of Intent is expected to be published in the Federal
Register. The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal
Register.
The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review by July 2008. EPA will publish a notice of availability
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the
draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date the EPA notice appears in
the Federal Register. At that time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected agencies, organizations, and
members of the public for their review and comment. It is very
important that those interested in the management of the Ashley
National Forest participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed November 2008. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments
received during the comment period that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable laws,
regulations, and policies considered in making the decision.
Preliminary Issues
Important goals for the project are to create a motorized travel
plan that is simple to understand, consistent with other public land
management agencies in Utah, and is enforceable. Protections for
threatened and endangered animal and plant habitats, cultural
resources, roadless considerations, and the need to maintain motorized
and non-motorized recreational opportunities have also directed the
development and design of the proposed action.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process that guides the
development of the environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). In addition, environmental objections that could be raised
at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final environmental impact
statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages,
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close of the comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental
[[Page 63551]]
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal,
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E7-22029 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P