[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 134 (Friday, July 13, 2007)] [Notices] [Pages 38629-38630] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: E7-13685] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 030-09415] Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a License Amendment to Byproduct Material License No. 24-15595-01, for Unrestricted Release of a Former Facility for Aptuit, Inc., Kansas City, MO AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Issuance of environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact for license amendment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter J. Lee, Ph.D., CHP, Health Physicist, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone: (630) 829-9870; fax number: (630) 515-1259; or by e-mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issuance of an amendment to NRC Byproduct Materials License No. 24-15595-01, which is held by Aptuit, Inc. (licensee). The amendment would authorize the unrestricted release of the licensee's Building L, which is located at 10245 Hickman Mills Drive, Kansas City, Missouri (the facility). The licensee ceased all use of licensed radioactive materials in the facility. The licensee will continue using licensed materials in other facilities under its license. The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment in support of this action in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the Environmental Assessment, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. The amendment to Aptuit, Inc.'s license will be issued following the publication of this Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. I. Environmental Assessment Identification of Proposed Action The proposed action would approve Aptuit, Inc.'s request to amend its license and release the facility for unrestricted use in accordance with 10 CFR part 20, Subpart E. The proposed action is in accordance with Aptuit, Inc.'s request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to amend its NRC Byproduct Material License by letters dated January 5, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML070080417), and May 2, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML071230265). Aptuit, Inc. was first licensed to use byproduct materials on May 23, 1973. The licensee is authorized to use byproduct materials for research and development as defined in 10 CFR 30.4. The primary isotopes used in the facility were hydrogen-3 and carbon-14. On October 1, 2006, Aptuit, Inc. completed removal of licensed radioactive material from the facility. The licensee conducted surveys of the facility and provided this information to the NRC to demonstrate that the radiological condition of the facility is consistent with radiological criteria for unrestricted use in 10 CFR part 20, subpart E. No radiological remediation activities are required to complete the proposed action. Need for the Proposed Action The licensee is requesting this license amendment because it has discontinued licensed activities in the facility. The NRC is fulfilling its responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act to make a decision on the proposed action for decommissioning that ensures that residual radioactivity is reduced to a level that is protective of the public health and safety and the environment, [[Page 38630]] and allows the facility to be released for unrestricted use. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff reviewed the information provided and surveys performed by the licensee to demonstrate that the release of the facility is consistent with the radiological criteria for unrestricted use specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its review, the staff determined that there were no radiological impacts associated with the proposed action because no radiological remediation activities were required to complete the proposed action, and that the radiological criteria for unrestricted use in Sec. 20.1402 have been met. Based on its review, the staff determined that the radiological environmental impacts from the proposed action for the Building L facility are bounded by the ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities'' (NUREG-1496). Additionally, no non-radiological or cumulative impacts were identified. Therefore, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Alternatives to the Proposed Action The only alternative to the proposed action is to take no action. Under the no-action alternative, the licensee's facility would remain under an NRC license and would not be released for unrestricted use. Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change to current conditions at the Building L facility. The no-action alternative is not acceptable because it is inconsistent with 10 CFR 30.36, which requires licensees who have ceased licensed activities in a particular building to begin decommissioning activities or submit a decommissioning plan, which upon approval, will be used to conduct decommissioning activities. This alternative would impose an unnecessary regulatory burden in controlling access to the former Building L facility, and limit potential benefits from the future use of the facility. Conclusion The NRC staff concluded that the proposed action is consistent with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative. Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not affect listed species or critical habitats. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise, the NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is not a type of activity that has potential to cause effect on historic properties. Therefore, consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act is not required. The NRC consulted with Mr. Keith Henke, Planner, Division of Community and Public Health, Office of Emergency Coordination, Department of Health and Senior Services. Mr. Henke was provided the draft EA for comment on June 27, 2007. Mr. Henke responded to the NRC by e-mail on July 2, 2007, indicating that the State had no additional comments for the Aptiut, Inc. NRC Environmental Assessment for the release of the licensee's Building L. II. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the EA in support of the proposed license amendment to release the facility for unrestricted use, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Thus, the NRC has not prepared an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. III. Further Information Documents related to this action, including the application for amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1- 800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to: [email protected]. The documents and ADAMS accession numbers related to this notice are: 1. Pam Barton, Aptuit, Inc., letter to Kevin Null, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 5, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML070080417). 2. Pam Barton, Aptuit, Inc., letter to Mike McCann, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 2, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML071230265). 3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs,'' NUREG-1748, August 2003. 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,'' NUREG-1496, August 1994. 5. NRC, NUREG-1757, ``Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,'' Volumes 1-3, September 2003. Documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 3rd day of July 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Patrick L. Louden, Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III. [FR Doc. E7-13685 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P