[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 21, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7826-7829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2801]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[Docket No. EPA-R02-OAR-2006-0685, FRL-8275-5]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York; 
Motor Vehicle Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is approving a revision to the State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) for New York's motor vehicle enhanced inspection and 
maintenance (I/M) program which includes the adoption of a statewide 
On-Board Diagnostic (OBD) program. New York has made revisions to Title 
6 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR), Part 217, 
``Motor Vehicle Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program 
Requirements,'' and Title 15 NYCRR Part 79, ``Motor Vehicle Inspection 
Regulations,'' to comply with EPA regulations and to improve 
performance of its I/M program. The intended effect of this action is 
to maintain consistency between the State-adopted rules and the 
federally approved SIP and to approve a control strategy that will 
result in emission reductions that will help achieve attainment of the 
national ambient air quality standard for ozone.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be effective March 23, 2007.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under the 
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) which replaces the Regional 
Materials in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The new FDMS is located at 
www.regulations.gov and the docket ID for this action is EPA-R02-OAR-
2006-0685. All documents in the docket are listed in the FDMS index. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in FDMS or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New 
York 10007-1866. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
also available for public inspection during normal business hours, by 
appointment at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC; and the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation, Division of Air Resources, 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 
12233.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3381.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background
    A. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M Programs?
    B. What Did New York Include in This Latest Submittal?
    C. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
II. What Comments Did EPA Receive in Response to Its Proposal?
III. Summary of Conclusions
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

A. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for I/M Programs?

    The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires certain states to implement an 
enhanced inspection and maintenance (I/M) program to detect gasoline-
fueled motor vehicles which exhibit excessive emissions of certain air 
pollutants. The enhanced I/M program is intended to help states meet 
federal health-based national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for 
ozone and carbon monoxide by requiring vehicles with excess emissions 
to have their emissions control systems repaired. Section 182 of the 
CAA requires I/M programs in those areas of the nation that are most 
impacted by carbon monoxide and ozone pollution. Section 184 of the CAA 
also created an ``Ozone Transport Region'' (OTR) which geographically 
includes the 11 states from Maryland to Maine (including all of New 
York State) and the District of Columbia Consolidated Metropolitan 
Statistical Area. Depending on the severity of the nonattainment 
designation(s) and/or geographic location within the OTR, EPA's 
regulation under 40 CFR 51.350 outlines the appropriate motor vehicle 
I/M requirements.
    As a result of the 1-hr ozone nonattainment designations, New York 
State's 62 counties were divided into two separate I/M areas. The 
``downstate'' 9-county New York Metropolitan Area (NYMA), which 
includes New York City (Bronx, Kings, New York, Richmond, and Queens 
Counties), Long Island (Nassau and Suffolk Counties), and Westchester 
and Rockland Counties, has been classified as a high enhanced I/M area. 
On January 1, 1998, New York began implementing a high enhanced I/M 
program (New York refers to this program as its NYTEST program) in the 
NYMA. By May 1999, this enhanced I/M program was fully functional for 
the entire NYMA.
    The remaining 53 ``Upstate'' counties of New York State were 
classified as a low enhanced I/M area. Since 1998, the Upstate I/M area 
featured annual anti-tampering visual inspections including a gas cap 
presence check.
    Since all of New York State is included within the OTR, additional 
I/M requirements are mandated in the more populated counties of Upstate 
New York pursuant to 40 CFR 51.350(a). Section 51.350(a)(1) provides 
that,

[[Page 7827]]

``States or areas within an ozone transport region shall implement 
enhanced I/M programs in any metropolitan statistical area (MSA), or 
portion of an MSA, within the state or area with a 1990 population of 
100,000 or more as defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
regardless of the area's attainment classification.'' Further, section 
51.350(b)(1) provides that, ``[i]n an ozone transport region, the 
program shall entirely cover all counties within subject MSAs or 
subject portions of MSAs, as defined by OMB in 1990, except largely 
rural counties having a population density of less than 200 persons per 
square mile based on the 1990 Census can be excluded except that at 
least 50 percent of the MSA population must be included in the program* 
* *.'' In effect, 16 of the 53 counties located in Upstate New York are 
required to have low enhanced I/M. The 16 counties are Albany, Broome, 
Chautauqua, Dutchess, Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, 
Putnam, Rensselaer, Schenectady, Saratoga, Warren and Washington.
    On April 5, 2001, EPA published in the Federal Register 
``Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements 
Incorporating the On-Board Diagnostics Check'' (66 FR 18156). The 
revised I/M rule requires that electronic checks of the On-Board 
Diagnostics (OBD) system on model year 1996 and newer OBD-equipped 
motor vehicles be conducted as part of states' motor vehicle I/M 
programs. OBD is part of the sophisticated vehicle powertrain 
management system and is designed to detect engine and transmission 
problems that might cause vehicle emissions to exceed allowable limits. 
OBD is the subject of this proposed rulemaking action.
    The OBD system monitors the status of up to 11 emission control 
related subsystems by performing either continuous or periodic 
functional tests of specific components and vehicle conditions. The 
first three testing categories--misfire, fuel trim, and comprehensive 
components--are continuous, while the remaining eight only run after a 
certain set of conditions has been met. The algorithms for running 
these eight periodic monitors are unique to each manufacturer and 
involve such things as ambient temperature as well as driving 
conditions. Most vehicles will have at least five of the eight 
remaining monitors (catalyst, evaporative system, oxygen sensor, heated 
oxygen sensor, and exhaust gas recirculation or EGR system) while the 
remaining three (air conditioning, secondary air, and heated catalyst) 
are not necessarily applicable to all vehicles. When a vehicle is 
scanned at an OBD-I/M test site, these monitors can appear as either 
``ready'' (meaning the monitor in question has been evaluated), ``not 
ready'' (meaning the monitor has not yet been evaluated), or ``not 
applicable'' (meaning the vehicle is not equipped with the component 
monitor in question).
    The OBD system is also designed to fully evaluate the vehicle 
emissions control system. If the OBD system detects a problem that may 
cause vehicle emissions to exceed 1.5 times the Federal Test Procedure 
(FTP) standards, then the Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) is 
illuminated. By turning on the MIL, the OBD system notifies the vehicle 
operator that an emission-related fault has been detected, and the 
vehicle should be repaired as soon as possible thus reducing the 
harmful emissions contributed by that vehicle.
    EPA's revised OBD I/M rule applies to only those areas that are 
required to implement I/M programs under the CAA, which include the 
NYMA and certain counties in Upstate New York. This rule established a 
deadline of January 1, 2002 for states to begin performing OBD checks 
on 1996 and newer model OBD-equipped vehicles and to require repairs to 
be performed on those vehicles with malfunctions identified by the OBD 
check.
    EPA's revised I/M rule also provided several options to states to 
delay implementation of OBD testing, under certain circumstances. An 
extension of the deadline for states to begin conducting mandatory OBD 
checks is permissible provided the state making the request can show 
just cause to EPA for a delay and that the revised implementation date 
represents ``the best the state can reasonably do'' (66 FR 18159). 
EPA's final rule identifies factors that may serve as a possible 
justification for states considering making a request to the EPA to 
delay implementation of OBD I/M program checks beyond the January 2002 
deadline. Potential factors justifying such a delay include contractual 
impediments, hardware or software deficiencies, data management 
software deficiencies, the need for additional training for the testing 
and repair industries, and the need for public education or outreach.
    On May 7, 2001 (66 FR 22922), EPA fully approved New York's 
enhanced I/M program as it applies to NYMA and included the state's 
performance standard modeling as meeting the applicable requirements of 
the CAA. However, the OBD component of that program was not being 
implemented at that time and therefore was not approved by EPA as 
satisfying a fully operational OBD program. Additional information on 
EPA's final approval of New York's enhanced I/M program can be found in 
EPA's May 7, 2001 final approval notice.

B. What Did New York Include in This Latest Submittal?

    On April 4, 2002, the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation (NYSDEC) requested a formal extension of the OBD I/M test 
deadline, per EPA's I/M requirement rule. New York's request lists 
contractual impediments, hardware and software deficiencies and data 
management deficiencies as the factors for its request for an extension 
of the OBD testing deadline. Based upon the reasons listed by New York, 
EPA believed that the State's delayed implementation was justified.
    On February 27, 2006, NYSDEC submitted to EPA a revision to its SIP 
which incorporates OBD system requirements in the NYMA and the 53 
counties located in Upstate New York. New York's SIP revision includes 
revisions to the NYSDEC regulation found at Title 6 of the New York 
Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR), Part 217, ``Motor Vehicle 
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements,'' and the New 
York State Department of Motor Vehicles (NYSDMV) regulation found at 
Title 15 NYCRR Part 79, ``Motor Vehicle Inspection Regulations,'' and a 
performance standard modeling demonstration. On October 12, 2006 (71 FR 
60098), EPA proposed to approve New York's revised enhanced I/M program 
which includes the adoption of a statewide OBD program. For a detailed 
discussion on the content and requirements of the revisions to New 
York's regulations, the reader is referred to EPA's proposed rulemaking 
action.

C. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

    The EPA is approving a revision to the New York SIP pertaining to 
New York's enhanced I/M program which incorporates OBD testing 
requirements and procedures in the NYMA and the 53 counties located in 
Upstate New York (New York refers to this program as the New York 
Vehicle Inspection Program (NYVIP)). EPA is also repealing Title 6 of 
the NYCRR, Subpart 217-2, ``Motor Vehicle NY 91 Inspection and 
Maintenance Program Requirements'' and Title 15 NYCRR Part 79, Section 
26, which previously included exhaust emission standards and 
inspection/repair procedures that are no longer

[[Page 7828]]

being relied upon by or necessary for New York State to implement as 
part of its enhanced I/M program.

II. What Comments Did EPA Receive in Response to Its Proposal?

    In response to EPA's October 12, 2006 proposed rulemaking action, 
EPA received no comments.

III. Summary of Conclusions

    EPA's review of the materials submitted indicates that New York has 
revised its I/M program in accordance with the requirements of the CAA, 
40 CFR part 51 and all of EPA's technical requirements for an 
approvable OBD program. EPA is approving the revisions to the NYSDEC 
regulation Title 6 of the NYCRR, Part 217, ``Motor Vehicle Enhanced 
Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements,'' specifically, 
Subpart 217-1, ``Motor Vehicle Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance 
Program Requirements'' and Subpart 217-4, ``Inspection and Maintenance 
Program Audits,'' effective on October 30, 2002, and the New York State 
Department of Motor Vehicles regulation Title 15 NYCRR Part 79 ``Motor 
Vehicle Inspection Regulations,'' specifically, Sections 79.1-79.15, 
79.17, 79.20, 79.21, 79.24, and 79.25, effective on May 4, 2005. The 
CAA gives states the discretion in program planning to implement 
programs of the state's choosing as long as necessary emission 
reductions are met. EPA is also approving New York's performance 
standard modeling demonstration, which reflects the State's I/M program 
as it is currently implemented in the 53 counties located in Upstate 
New York (NYVIP), as meeting the required EPA alternate low enhanced I/
M performance standards.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Act. 
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of 
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. In this 
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State 
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to 
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Act. Thus, the requirements of section 
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an 
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by April 23, 2007. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: January 23, 2007.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart HH--New York

0
2. Section 52.1670 is amended by adding new paragraph (c)(111) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  52.1670  Identification of plans.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
* * * * *
    (111) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted on 
February 27, 2006, by the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation, which consist of administrative changes to its motor 
vehicle enhanced inspection and maintenance (I/M) program which 
includes the adoption of a statewide On-Board Diagnostic (OBD) program.

[[Page 7829]]

    (i) Incorporation by reference:
    (A) Regulation Title 6 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations 
(NYCRR), Part 217, ``Motor Vehicle Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance 
Program Requirements,'' specifically, Subpart 217-1, ``Motor Vehicle 
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements'' and Subpart 
217-4, ``Inspection and Maintenance Program Audits,'' effective on 
October 30, 2002, and the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles 
regulation Title 15 NYCRR Part 79 ``Motor Vehicle Inspection 
Regulations,'' specifically, Sections 79.1-79.15, 79.17, 79.20, 79.21, 
79.24, and 79.25, effective on May 4, 2005.

0
3. In 52.1679, the table is amended by revising the entries under Title 
6 for Part 217 and Title 15 for Part 79 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1679  EPA-approved New York State regulations.

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              State
        New York State regulation           effective    Latest EPA  approval date             Comments
                                               date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 6:
 
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Part 217, Motor Vehicle Emissions:
    Subpart 217-1, Motor Vehicle Enhanced     10/30/02  2/21/07....................
     Inspection and Maintenance Program                 [Insert FR page citation]..
     Requirements.
    Subpart 217-4, Inspection and             10/30/02  2/21/07....................
     Maintenance Program Audits.                        [Insert FR page citation]..
 
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Title 15:
    Part 79, ``Motor Vehicle Inspection         5/4/05  2/21/07....................
     Regulations'' Sections 79.1-79.15,                 [Insert FR page citation]..
     79.17, 79.20, 79.21, 79.24, 79.25.
 
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E7-2801 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P