[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 16 (Thursday, January 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3429-3431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1088]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NRC Enforcement Policy; Proposed Plan for Major Revision
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed revision; solicitation of written comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is examining its
Enforcement Policy (Enforcement Policy or Policy) and plans a major
revision to clarify use of enforcement terminology and address
enforcement issues in areas currently not covered in the Policy,
including, for example, the agency's use of Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) in enforcement cases. The NRC requests comments on (1)
what specific topics, if any, should be added or removed from the
Policy; and (2) what topics currently addressed in the Policy, if any,
require additional guidance. The NRC is soliciting written comments
from
[[Page 3430]]
interested parties including public interest groups, states, members of
the public and the regulated industry, i.e., both reactor and materials
licensees, vendors, and contractors. This request is intended to assist
the NRC in its review of the Enforcement Policy; NRC does not intend to
modify its emphasis on compliance with NRC requirements.
DATES: The comment period expires March 26, 2007. This time period
allows for the public to respond to the specific questions posed above
in this notice as well as the opportunity to provide general comments
on the revision of the Policy. Comments received after this date will
be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able
to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this
date.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed revision submitted in writing or
in electronic form will be made available for public inspection.
Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or
contact information, the NRC cautions you against including information
such as social security numbers or other sensitive personal information
in your submission. You may submit comments by any one of the following
methods:
Mail comments to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking, Directives,
and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
E-mail comments to: [email protected].
Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD
20852, between the hours of 7:45 am and 4:15 pm, Federal workdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria E. Schwartz, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
[email protected], (301) 415-1888.
SUPPLEMENTARY BACKGROUND:
I. Background
The NRC Enforcement Policy contains the enforcement policy and
procedures that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) uses to
initiate and review enforcement actions in response to violations of
NRC requirements. The primary purpose of the Enforcement Policy is to
support the NRC's overall safety mission, i.e., to protect the public
health and safety and the environment, and to assure the common defense
and security. Because it is a policy statement and not a regulation,
the Commission may deviate from this statement of policy as appropriate
under the circumstances of a particular case.
The Enforcement Policy was first published in the Federal Register
on October 7, 1980 (46 FR 66754), as an interim policy. The Commission
published a final version of the Policy on March 9, 1982 (47 FR 9987).
The Enforcement Policy has been modified on a number of occasions to
address changing requirements and additional experience and on June 30,
1995 (60 FR 34381), a major revision of the Policy was published. The
NRC maintains the Enforcement Policy on its Web site at http://www.nrc.gov; select What We Do, Enforcement, then Enforcement Policy.
The goal of the Policy is to support the NRC's safety mission by
emphasizing the importance of compliance with regulatory requirements,
and encouraging prompt identification, and prompt, comprehensive
correction of violations. Revisions to the Policy have consistently
reflected this commitment: For example, in 1998, the NRC changed its
inspection procedures to address the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)
initiative. This has been reflected in the Policy's use of risk
insights to assess the significance of violations whenever possible.
While this may result in fewer Notices of Violation being issued
(because of a greater emphasis on the use of non-cited violations), it
has not reduced the agency's emphasis on the importance of compliance
with NRC requirements. Another example involves the NRC's development
of a pilot program in 2005 which focuses on the use of Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) for certain kinds of enforcement cases. The
NRC enforcement staff has used ADR to resolve reactor, fuel facility,
and materials enforcement cases. While the use of ADR in enforcement
raises unique issues, it emphasizes creative, cooperative approaches to
handling conflicts in lieu of adversarial procedures.
The NRC is again considering a major revision of its Enforcement
Policy. As discussed above, since it was first published in 1980,
sections of the Policy have been updated and additional sections have
been included. Terms used under conventional enforcement are now
associated with the significance determination process (SDP) performed
under the ROP as well; therefore, the use of these terms must be
clarified. In addition, there are areas that are not directly addressed
in the Supplements of the Enforcement Policy, such as the enforcement
issues associated with combined licenses for the proposed new reactors
and the construction phase of proposed fuel facilities as well as
recently promulgated requirements in the safeguards and security area.
These areas must be addressed either by adding them to the text of the
existing Policy and Supplements or by revising the Policy and
developing new Supplements. Finally, the format of the Enforcement
Policy may need to be reorganized to reflect the changes that have been
made to it.
II. Proposed Plan
The NRC envisions revising the Enforcement Policy so that the
policy statement and Supplements addressing conventional enforcement
would be followed by sections addressing the enforcement processes that
differ in some way from conventional enforcement. For example,
currently the discussion in the Policy addressing Predecisional
Enforcement Conferences (PECs) contains information regarding
attendance by a whistle blower. In fact, third party (whistle blower)
invitations are unique to discrimination cases and could reasonably be
addressed, along with all of the other unique discrimination issues, in
a self-contained section addressing discrimination enforcement cases.
Providing self-contained sections would make it easier to add (and
potentially delete) them in the future, if necessary. Under this
approach, the ROP would be the first ``variation'' on conventional
enforcement. If the agency takes this approach, Sections IV through VII
or VIII of the current Enforcement Policy could be combined in the
conventional enforcement process which would be followed by the NRC's
policy regarding the use of the ROP in enforcement, etc.
The following draft Table of Contents would be consistent with the
approach outlined above:
Preface
Background and Definitions
I. Introduction and Purpose.
II. Statutory Authority and Procedural Framework.
III. Responsibilities.
IV. The Enforcement Process.
A. Assigning Severity Level (Remove section IV.5 which discusses
ROP).
B. Severity Level vis-a-vis Activity Areas.
C. Predecisional Enforcement Conferences (Remove discussion
involving discrimination cases).
D. Disposition of Violations (Remove section VI.A.1 and combine
reactor non-cited violations (NCVs) with all other NCVs such that
there is one discussion of NCVs. Put the reactor cases associated
with ROP in the ROP section.)
1. Wrongdoing.
2. Inaccurate and Incomplete Information.
E. Formal Enforcement Sanctions.
1. Notices of Violation.
2. Civil Penalties.
3. Orders.
[[Page 3431]]
F. Administrative Enforcement Sanctions.
1. Demands for Information.
2. Confirmatory Action Letters.
3. Letters of Reprimand.
G. Exercise of Enforcement Discretion.
1. Escalation of Enforcement Sanctions.
2. Mitigation of Enforcement Sanctions.
3. Notices of Enforcement Discretion (NOEDs) for Power Reactors
and Gaseous Diffusion Plants.
4. The Use of Discretion During the Adoption of New
Requirements.
H. Public Disclosure of Enforcement Actions (existing Sections
XII).
I. Reopening Closed Enforcement Actions, (existing Section
XIII).
V. Enforcement and the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP): Operating
Reactors.
VI. Enforcement Actions Involving Individuals (Incorporate existing
Section XI, ``Referrals to the Department of Justice'' into this
Section.)
VII. Discrimination.
VIII. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
IX. Follow up with any additional subject areas that may warrant a
few paragraphs segregated from the main policy discussion, e.g.,
security/safeguards, the lost source policy, interim enforcement
regarding certain fire protection issues.
X. Supplements.
A. Health Physics.
B. Reactors.
1. Operating reactors.
2. Part 50 Facility Construction.
3. Part 52 Combined Licenses.
4. Fitness for Duty.
C. Facility Security and Safeguards--
1. Physical Protection of Plants and Materials.
2. Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National
Security Information and Restricted Data.
D. Fuel Cycle and Materials Operations.
1. Gaseous Diffusion Plants.
2. Gas Centrifuge Uranium Recovery Facilities.
3. Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility.
E. Materials Safeguards.
F. Emergency Preparedness.
G. Transportation.
H. Waste Disposal.
I. Miscellaneous Matters.
The Commission is aware that enforcement actions deliver regulatory
messages. Based on this tenet, the goals of this revision are to ensure
that the Enforcement Policy (1) continues to reflect the Commission's
focus on safety, i.e., the need for licensees to identify and correct
violations, to address root causes, and to be responsive to initial
opportunities to identify and prevent violations; (2) appropriately
addresses the various subject areas that the NRC regulates; and (3)
provides a framework that supports consistent implementation,
recognizing that each enforcement action is dependent on the specific
circumstances of the case.
Dated at Rockville, MD this 17th day of January, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-1088 Filed 1-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P