[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3138-3140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB 
for Review and Approval

January 19, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commissions, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public 
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the 
following information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for 
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control 
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's 
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of 
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before February 23, 
2007. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments 
by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. To submit your comments by e-mail send 
them to [email protected]. To submit your comments by U.S. mail, mark them to 
the attention of Cathy Williams, Federal Communications Commission, 
Room 1-C823, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 and Allison E. 
Zaleski, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Room 10236 NEOB, 
Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-6466 or via the Internet at [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection(s) send an e-mail to [email protected] or contact 
Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918. If you

[[Page 3139]]

would like to obtain a copy of the information collection, you may do 
so by visiting the FCC PRA Web page at: http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.

SUPPLMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0692.
    Title: Home Wiring Provisions.
    Form Number: Not applicable.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Individuals or households; Business or other for-
profit entities.
    Number of Respondents: 22,500.
    Estimated Time per Response: 5 minutes-20 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping requirement; On occasion 
reporting requirement; Annual reporting requirement; Third party 
disclosure requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    Total Annual Burden: 46,114 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: None.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for 
confidentiality.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection accounts for the 
information collection requirement stated in 47 CFR 76.613, where MVPDs 
causing harmful signal interference may be required by the Commission's 
engineer in charge (EIC) to prepare and submit a report regarding the 
cause(s) of the interference, corrective measures planned or taken, and 
the efficacy of the remedial measures.
    47 CFR 76.620 applies the Commission's signal leakage rules to all 
non-cable MVPDs. Our rules require that each cable system perform an 
independent signal leakage test annually, therefore, non-cable MVPDs 
will now be subject to the same requirement, although the Second Order 
on Reconsideration, FCC 03-9, has exempted small non-cable MVPDs. We 
recognize, however, that immediate compliance with these requirements 
may present hardships to existing non-cable MVPDs not previously 
subject to such rules. We will allow a five-year transition period from 
the effective date of these rules to afford non-cable MVPDs time to 
comply with our signal leakage rules other than 47 CFR 76.613. The 
transition period will apply only to systems of those non-cable MVPDs 
that have been substantially built as of January 1, 1998.
    47 CFR 76.802, Disposition of Cable Home Wiring, gives individual 
video service subscribers in single unit dwellings and MDUs the 
opportunity to purchase their cable home wiring at replacement cost 
upon voluntary termination of service. In calculating hour burdens for 
notifying individual subscribers of their purchase rights, we make the 
following assumptions:
    (1) There are approximately 20,000 MVPDs serving approximately 
72,000,000 subscribers in the United States.
    (2) The average rate of churn (subscriber termination) for all 
MVPDs is estimated to be 1% per month, or 12% per year.
    (3) MVPDs own the home wiring in 50% of the occurrences of 
voluntary subscriber termination.
    (4) Subscribers or property owners already have gained ownership of 
the wiring in the other 50% of occurrences (e.g., where the MVPD has 
charged the subscriber for the wiring upon installation, has treated 
the wiring as belonging to the subscriber for tax purposes, or where 
state and/or local law treats cable home wiring as a fixture).
    (5) Where MVPDs own the wiring, we estimate that they intend to 
actually remove the wiring 5% of the time, thus initiating the 
disclosure requirement.
    We believe in most cases that MVPDs will choose to abandon the home 
wiring because the cost and effort required to remove the wiring 
generally outweigh its value. The burden to disclose the information at 
the time of termination will vary depending on the manner of 
disclosure, e.g., by telephone, customer visit or registered mail. 
Virtually all voluntary service terminations are done by telephone.
    In addition, 47 CFR 76.802 states that if a subscriber in an MDU 
declines to purchase the wiring, the MDU owner or alternative provider 
(where permitted by the MDU owner) may purchase the home wiring where 
reasonable advance notice has been provided to the incumbent.
    (1) According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the nation's population was 
approximately 281,000,000.
    (2) The American Housing Survey for the United States, 2001, Table 
2-25, and the 2000 Census stated that the total number of living units 
of all types in the United States was approximately 106,000,000, or an 
average of 2.65 people per unit.
    (3) The American Housing Survey also estimated that 24,600,000 
occupied housing units were classified as ``multi-units,'' that is, 
they are in MDUs with two or more units per building.
    (4) The American Housing Survey data also found that there were 
approximately 7,600,000 buildings classified as MDUs in the United 
States.
    (5) Approximately 66,000,000 people resided in these 24,600,000 
occupied housing units in these MDUs in 2000.
    (6) We estimate that 2,000 MDU owners will provide advance notice 
to the incumbent MVPD that the MDU owner wishes to use the home run 
wiring to receive service from an alternative video service provider.
    47 CFR 76.802 also states that, to inform subscribers of per-foot 
replacement costs, MVPDs may develop replacement cost schedules based 
on readily available information; if the MVPD chooses to develop such 
schedules, it must place them in a public file available for public 
inspection during regular business hours.
    We estimate that 50% of MVPDs will develop such cost schedules to 
place in their public files. Virtually all individual subscribers 
terminate service via telephone, and few subscribers are anticipated to 
review cost schedules on public file.
    47 CFR 76.804 Disposition of Home Run Wiring. We estimate the 
burden for notification and election requirements for building-by-
building and unit-by-unit disposition of home run wiring as described 
below. Note that these requirements apply only when an MVPD owns the 
home run wiring in an MDU and does not (or will not at the conclusion 
of the notice period) have a legally enforceable right to remain on the 
premises against the wishes of the entity that owns or controls the 
common areas of the MDU or have a legally enforceable right to maintain 
any particular home run wire dedicated to a particular unit on the 
premises against the MDU owner's wishes.
    We use the term ``MDU owner'' to include whatever entity owns or 
controls the common areas of an apartment building, condominium or 
cooperative. For building-by-building disposition of home run wiring, 
the MDU owner gives the incumbent service provider a minimum of 90 
days' written notice that its access to the entire building will be 
terminated. The incumbent then has 30 days to elect what it will do 
with the home run wiring. Where parties negotiate a price for the 
wiring and are unable to agree on a price, the incumbent service 
provider must elect among abandonment, removal of the wiring, or 
arbitration for a price determination. Also, regarding cable home 
wiring, when the MDU owner notifies the incumbent service provider that 
its access to the building will be terminated, the incumbent provider 
must, within 30 days of the initial

[[Page 3140]]

notice and in accordance with our home wiring rules:
    (1) Offer to sell to the MDU owner any home wiring within the 
individual dwelling units which the incumbent provider owns and intends 
to remove, and
    (2) Provide the MDU owner with the total per-foot replacement cost 
of such home wiring.
    The MDU owner must then notify the incumbent provider as to whether 
the MDU owner or an alternative provider intends to purchase the home 
wiring not later than 30 days before the incumbent's access to the 
building will be terminated. For unit-by-unit disposition of home run 
wiring, an MDU owner must provide at least 60 days' written notice to 
the incumbent MVPD that it intends to permit multiple MVPDs to compete 
for the right to use the individual home run wires dedicated to each 
unit. The incumbent service provider then has 30 days to provide the 
MDU owner with a written election as to whether, for all of the 
incumbent's home run wires dedicated to individual subscribers who may 
later choose the alternative provider's service, it will remove the 
wiring, abandon the wiring, or sell the wiring to the MDU owner.
    In other words, the incumbent service provider will be required to 
make a single election for how it will handle the disposition of 
individual home run wires whenever a subscriber wishes to switch 
service providers; that election will then be implemented each time an 
individual subscriber switches service providers.
    Where parties negotiate a price for the wiring and are unable to 
agree on a price, the incumbent service provider must elect among 
abandonment, removal of the wiring, or arbitration for a price 
determination. The MDU owner also must provide reasonable advance 
notice to the incumbent provider that it will purchase, or that it will 
allow an alternative provider to purchase, the cable home wiring when a 
terminating individual subscriber declines. If the alternative provider 
is permitted to purchase the wiring, it will be required to make a 
similar election during the initial 30-day notice period for each 
subscriber who switches back from the alternative provider to the 
incumbent MVPD.
    While the American Housing Survey estimates that there were some 
7,600,000 MDUs with 24,600,000 resident occupants in the United States 
in 2000, we estimate that there will be only 12,500 notices and 12,500 
elections being made on an annual basis. In many buildings, the MDU 
owner will be unable to initiate the notice and election processes 
because the incumbent MVPD service provider continues to have a legally 
enforceable right to remain on the premises. In other buildings, the 
MDU owner may simply have no interest in acquiring a new MVPD service 
provider.
    OMB Control Number: 3060-1032.
    Title: Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and 
Compatibility Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronics Equipment, 
CS Docket No. 97-80 and PP Docket No. 00-67.
    Form Number: Not applicable.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
    Number of Respondents: 611.
    Estimated Time per Response: 30 seconds-40 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping requirement; On occasion 
reporting requirement; Third party disclosure requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
    Total Annual Burden: 97,928 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: None.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Nature and Extend of Confidentiality: There is no need for 
confidentiality.
    Needs and Uses: On March 17, 2005, the FCC released a Second Report 
and Order (2005 Deferral Order), In the Matter of Implementation of 
Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial 
Availability of Navigation Devices, CS Docket No. 97-80, FCC 05-76, in 
which the Commission set forth reporting requirements for certain cable 
providers, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association 
(NCTA), and the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA). The cable 
providers are responsible for filing status reports regarding 
deployment and support of point of deployment modules, more commonly 
known as CableCARDs. The NCTA and CEA are required to file status 
reports to keep the FCC abreast of negotiations over bidirectional 
support and software-based security solutions for digital cable 
products available at retail.
    On October 9, 2003, the FCC released the Second Report and Order 
and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2nd R&O), In the 
Matter of Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act 
of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices, Compatibility 
Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronics Equipment, CS Docket No. 
97-80, PP Docket No. 00-67, FCC 03-225, the Commission adopted final 
rules that set technical and other criteria that manufacturers would 
have to meet in order to label or market unidirectional digital cable 
televisions and other unidirectional digital cable products as 
``digital cable ready.'' This regime includes testing and self-
certification standards, certification recordkeeping requirements, and 
consumer information disclosures in appropriate post-sale materials 
that describe the functionality of these devices and the need to obtain 
a security module from their cable operator. To the extent 
manufacturers have complaints regarding the certification process, they 
may file formal complaints with the Commission. In addition, should 
manufacturers have complaints regarding administration of the Dynamic 
Feedback Arrangement Scrambling Technique or DFAST license which 
governs the scrambling technology needed to build unidirectional 
digital cable products, they may also file complaints with the FCC. The 
2nd R&O also prohibits MVPDs from encoding content to activate 
selectable output controls on unidirectional digital cable products, or 
the down-resolution of unencrypted broadcast television programming. 
MVPDs are also limited in the levels of copy protection that could be 
applied to various categories of programming. As a part of these 
encoding rules is a petition process for new services within existing 
business models, a PR Newswire Notice relating to initial 
classification of new business models, and a complaints process for 
disputes regarding new business models.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-1011 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P