[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78222-78223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-
327, 348 and 350 (Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-
587, 612, and 614-618 (Second Review)]


Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, 
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, 
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, 
Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the 
United Kingdom, and the antidumping finding on cut-to-length carbon 
steel plate from Taiwan, as well as revocation of countervailing duty 
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, 
Mexico, Spain, and Sweden, would not be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec.  207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission further determines that revocation of the 
antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from Germany and 
Korea and the countervailing duty order on corrosion-resistant steel 
from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. Finally, the Commission determines that revocation of 
the antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from 
Australia, Canada, France, and Japan, as well as the countervailing 
duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from France, would not be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Stephen Koplan 
dissenting with respect to corrosion-resistant steel from Australia, 
Canada, France, and Japan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 78223]]

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2005 (70 FR 
62324, October 31, 2005), and determined on February 6, 2006, that it 
would conduct full reviews (70 FR 8874, February 21, 2006). Notice of 
the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of public hearings to be 
held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice 
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
March 30, 2006 (71 F.R. 16178). The hearings were held in Washington, 
DC, on October 17 and 19, 2006, and all persons who requested the 
opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission is scheduled to transmit its determinations in these 
reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on January 17, 2007. The views of 
the Commission will be contained in USITC Publication 3899 (January 
2007), entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, 
Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, 
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom: Investigation 
Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-327, 348, and 350 
(Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-587, 612, and 614-
618 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: December 20, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-22183 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P