[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 156 (Monday, August 14, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13222]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Chapter II


Fiscal Year 2006 Program for Systematic Review of Commission 
Regulations; Request for Comments and Information; Correction

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice of systematic review of current regulations; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission is issuing this 
revision to correct an erroneous citation designation in the Notice of 
systematic review of current regulations published in the Federal 
Register on June 7, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Edwards, Office of Hazard 
Identification and Reduction, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone (301) 504-
7535; e-mail [email protected].

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of June 7, 2006, in FR Doc. E6-8763, make 
the following corrections on page 32882:
    In the first column, in the ``Summary'' section, correct the second 
sentence of the first paragraph to read:

    In fiscal year 2006, the following three regulations will be 
evaluated: Safety standard for matchbooks, 16 CFR part 1202; toy 
rattles, 16 CFR parts 1510 and 1500.18(a)(15); and baby bouncers, 
walker-jumpers, and baby walkers, 16 CFR part 1500.18(a)(6).

    In the third column, correct the first sentence under ``Toy 
Rattles'' to read:

    The standard for toy rattles appears at 16 CFR parts 1510 and 
1500.18(a)(15).

    Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') 
authorizes an agency to dispense with notice and comment procedures 
when the agency, for good cause, finds that those procedures are 
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 
This amendment corrects typographical errors and does not make any 
substantive change. Accordingly, the Commission finds that notice and 
comment on this technical correction is unnecessary.

    Dated: August 7, 2006.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-13222 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P