[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29908-29910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on 
a Petition To Delist the California Brown Pelican and Initiation of a 
5-Year Review for the Brown Pelican

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition finding and initiation of status 
reviews for the 12-month finding and 5-year review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 
90-day finding on a petition to remove the California brown pelican 
(Pelecanus occidentalis californicus) from the Federal List of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants pursuant to section 
4(b)(3) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We 
find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial 
information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. We, 
therefore, are initiating a status review of the California brown 
pelican to determine if delisting under the Act is warranted. We note 
that the taxon on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Species 
is the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis). The petition requests 
specifically the delisting of the California brown pelican, (Pelecanus 
occidentalis californicus), rather than the delisting of the entire 
listed entity. Brown pelicans in coastal States along the Atlantic 
Coast and in Florida and Alabama were removed from the List of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife on February 4, 1985 (50 FR 4938). 
The brown pelican remains listed as endangered throughout the remainder 
of its range in North, Central, and South America and the Caribbean. 
Because a status review is also required for the 5-year review of 
listed species under section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act, we are electing to 
initiate a 5-year review of the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) 
throughout its range and prepare these reviews simultaneously. The 
purpose of reviews conducted under this section of the Act is to ensure 
that the classification of species as threatened or endangered on the 
List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants is accurate. To 
ensure that the reviews are comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific 
and commercial information regarding this species.

DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on May 24, 2006. 
To allow us adequate time to conduct these reviews, we must receive 
your comments and information on or before July 24, 2006. However, we 
will continue to accept new information about any listed species at any 
time.

ADDRESSES: To submit comments and information on the 90-day finding for 
the California brown pelican delisting petition or the rangewide 5-year 
status review, see ``Public Comments'' under Supplementary Information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the California brown pelican 
(Pelecanus occidentalis californicus), contact Michael McCrary (see 
Public Comments), telephone, 805-644-1766; facsimile, 805-644-3958. For 
the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), contact Steve Chambers (see 
Public Comments), telephone, 505-248-6658; facsimile, 505-248-6788.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Petition Information

    We received a petition from Craig Harrison, of the law firm Hunton 
and Williams, representing the Endangered Species Recovery Council, 
dated December 14, 2005, to remove the California brown pelican from 
the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. We 
note that the taxon on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened 
Species is Pelecanus occidentalis. The petition requests specifically 
the delisting of the subspecies California brown pelican, (Pelecanus 
occidentalis californicus), rather than the delisting of the entire 
listed entity. The petition contained information on population size, 
population trends, reproduction, and distribution of the California 
brown pelican, including information on the status and management of 
the California brown pelican in Mexico. It also contained information 
on what the petitioners reported as the elimination (e.g., banning of 
DDT and other contaminants) or management of threats that had 
originally resulted in the California brown pelican being listed as 
endangered.
    On the basis of information provided in the petition, we have 
determined that the petition presents substantial scientific or 
commercial information, and that removing the California brown pelican 
from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants 
may be warranted. Therefore, we are initiating a status review to 
determine if removing the subspecies is warranted. To ensure that the 
status review is comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific and 
commercial information regarding this species. Under section 4(b)(3)(B) 
of the Act, we are required to make a finding as to whether delisting 
the California brown pelican is warranted by December 14, 2006.

Five-Year Review--Why Is a 5-Year Review Conducted?

    Under the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) we 
maintain a List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants at 50 
CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of 
the Act requires that we conduct a review of listed species at least 
once every 5 years. Then, on the basis of such reviews, under section 
4(c)(2)(B) we determine whether or not any species should be removed 
from the List (delisted), or reclassified from endangered to threatened 
or from threatened to endangered. Delisting a species must be supported 
by the best scientific and commercial data available and only 
considered if such data substantiates that the species is neither 
endangered nor threatened for one or more of the following reasons: (1) 
The species is considered extinct; (2) the species is considered to be 
recovered; and/or (3) the original data available when the species was 
listed, or the interpretation of such data, were in error. Any change 
in Federal classification would require a separate rulemaking process.
    Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice 
in the Federal Register announcing those species currently under active 
review. This notice announces our active review of the brown pelican.

[[Page 29909]]

What Information Is Considered in the Review?

    A 5-year review considers all new information available at the time 
of the review. These reviews will consider the best scientific and 
commercial data that has become available since the current listing 
determination or most recent status review, such as:
    A. Species biology including, but not limited to, population 
trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
    B. Habitat conditions including, but not limited to, amount, 
distribution, and suitability;
    C. Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit 
the species;
    D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How 
Do We Determine Whether a Species Is Endangered or Threatened?''); and
    E. Other new information, data, or corrections including, but not 
limited to, taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of 
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical 
methods.

How Do We Determine Whether a Species Is Endangered or Threatened?

    Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a 
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five 
following factors:
    A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or 
curtailment of its habitat or range;
    B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or 
educational purposes;
    C. Disease or predation;
    D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
    E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued 
existence.
    Our assessment of these factors is required, under section 4(b)(1) 
of the Act, to be based solely on the best scientific and commercial 
data available.

What Could Happen as a Result of This Review?

    If we find that there is information concerning the brown pelican 
indicating a change in classification may be warranted, we may propose 
a new rule that could do one of the following: (a) Reclassify the 
species from endangered to threatened; (b) remove the species from the 
List; or (c) find that various subunits of the species, such as 
subspecies or potential distinct population segments, differ in status 
such that one or more of these subunits should be reclassified or 
removed from the List. We may find that a change in classification of 
the currently listed species is not warranted, and the species should 
remain on the List under its current status.
    We will base our 12-month finding and 5-year review on a review of 
the best scientific and commercial information available, including all 
information received during the information request period. Please note 
that comments merely stating support or opposition to the actions under 
consideration without providing supporting information, although noted, 
will not be considered in making a determination, as section 4(b)(1)(A) 
directs that determinations as to whether any species is a threatened 
or endangered species shall be made ``solely on the basis of the best 
scientific and commercial data available.'' At the conclusion of these 
simultaneous reviews, we will issue the 12-month finding on the 
petition, as provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, and make the 
requisite finding under section 4(c)(2)(B) of the Act based on the 
results of the 5-year review.

Public Comments

    To ensure that the status review for the California brown pelican 
and 5-year review for the brown pelican are complete and based on the 
best available scientific and commercial information, we are soliciting 
any additional information, or suggestions from the public, other 
concerned governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, 
industry, environmental entities, or any other interested parties. 
Information sought includes any data regarding historical and current 
distribution, biology and ecology, ongoing conservation measures for 
the species, and threats to the species. We also request information 
regarding the adequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms.
    Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular 
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold 
their home addresses from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to 
the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which 
we would withhold from the rulemaking record a respondent's identity, 
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or 
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comment, but you should be aware that the Service may be required to 
disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information 
Act. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all 
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations 
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
    1. You may submit written comments and information to the Field 
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife 
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003.
    2. You may hand-deliver written comments and information to our 
office at the address given above.
    3. You may send your comments and information by electronic mail 
(e-mail) directly to the Service at [email protected]. Please 
avoid the use of special characters or any form of encryption in your 
e-mail. Electronic attachments in standard formats (such as .pdf or 
.doc) are acceptable, but please name the software necessary to open 
any attachments in formats other than those given above. Please also 
include ``Attn: Brown Pelican'' in your e-mail subject header and your 
name and return address in the body of your message. If you do not 
receive a confirmation from the system that we have received your e-
mail, contact us directly by calling our Ventura Fish and Wildlife 
Office at phone number 805-644-1766 or please submit your comments or 
information in writing using one of the alternate methods described 
above. In the event that our internet connection is not functional, 
please submit your comments or information by one of the alternate 
methods mentioned above. Please note that the e-mail address will be 
closed out at the termination of the information request period.
    All comments and materials received for both the status review of 
the California brown pelican and the 5-year review of the brown pelican 
throughout its range will be available for public inspection, by 
appointment, during normal business hours at our Ventura Fish and 
Wildlife Office (see addresses above).

For the California Brown Pelican (Pelecanus Occidentalis Californicus) 
Petition To Delist

    We are requesting information on the status of the California brown 
pelican throughout its range in both the United States and Mexico. 
Information/comments of particular interest include:
    (1) Information on distribution, habitat selection, food habits, 
population density and trends, and habitat trends;

[[Page 29910]]

    (2) Information on the distribution and abundance of prey species 
of California brown pelicans and any changes in the distribution and 
abundance of prey over time;
    (3) Information on the effects of potential threats to California 
brown pelicans, including oil and gas development, contaminants, 
commercial and recreational fishing, disturbance, disease, and 
predation, in the United States and Mexico;
    (4) Information on management programs for California brown pelican 
conservation in the United States and Mexico.
    (5) Information or comments on the biological and administrative 
appropriateness of delisting California brown pelican (Pelecanus 
occidentalis californicus), although it is only a portion of the listed 
entity.

For the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus Occidentalis) Rangewide 5-Year Review

    In addition to the information requested above, we are also 
requesting information for the 5-year review of the brown pelican 
throughout its entire range in North, Central, and South America and 
the Caribbean. We are requesting information on:
    (1) Species biology, including but not limited to, population 
trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
    (2) Habitat conditions, including but not limited to, amount, 
distribution, and suitability;
    (3) Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit 
the species;
    (4) Threat status and trends; and
    (5) Other new information, data, or corrections including, but not 
limited to, taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of 
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical 
methods.

Author

    The primary author of this document is Christine Hamilton, 
biologist, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office.

Authority

    The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: May 15, 2006.
 Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6-7715 Filed 5-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P