[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20011-20013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP St. Petersburg 06-063]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Tampa, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
waters of Tampa Bay, Florida in the vicinity of the Gandy Bridge, while 
bridge repairs are made. This rule is necessary to ensure the safety of 
the construction workers and mariners on the navigable waters of the 
United States.

[[Page 20012]]


DATES: This rule is effective from 2:30 p.m. on March 30, 2006 through 
12 a.m. on May 1, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket [COTP 06-063] and are available for 
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg, Prevention 
Department, 155 Columbia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33606-3598 between 7:30 
a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Waterways Management Division at Coast 
Guard Sector St. Petersburg (813) 228-2191 Ext 8307.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The information regarding the 
damage to the bridge was not received with sufficient time to publish 
an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and delaying its effective date would be 
contrary to the public interest since immediate action is needed to 
minimize potential danger to the construction workers and mariners 
transiting the area. The Coast Guard will issue a broadcast notice to 
mariners to advise mariners of the restriction.
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard will 
issue a broadcast notice to mariners to advise mariners of the 
restriction.

Background and Purpose

    On March 30, 2006 at approximately 12:20 p.m. local time, the tug 
CROSBY SKIPPER and an LPG barge collided with the Gandy Bridge. Damage 
to the bridge included pieces of concrete debris falling into the 
water. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will need to make 
emergency repairs to the bridge that will include having divers in the 
water. The repairs to the bridge will require vessels to be located in 
the area to effect repairs. The nature of the damage also presents a 
hazard to mariners transiting under the bridge due to falling debris. 
This work presents a hazard to the construction workers and mariners 
transiting the area. This safety zone is being established to ensure 
the safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States.

Discussion of Rule

    The safety zone encompasses the following waters of Tampa Bay, 
Florida: all waters from surface to bottom, within a 50 yard radius of 
the following coordinates: 27[deg]53'24'' N, 082[deg]32'36'' W. Vessels 
are prohibited from anchoring, mooring, or transiting within this zone, 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or his 
designated representative. The zone is effective from 2:30 p.m. on 
March 30, 2006 through 12 a.m. on May 1, 2006.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a 
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of DHS is unnecessary. The location of this regulated area is expected 
to have minimal vessel traffic. Moreover, vessels may still enter the 
safety zone with the express permission of the Captain of the Port St. 
Petersburg or his designated representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit near the Gandy Bridge from 2:30 p.m. on March 30, 2006 through 
12 a.m. on May 1, 2006. This safety zone will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the 
following reasons. This rule will be enforced in an area where marine 
traffic is expected to be minimal. Additionally, traffic will be 
allowed to enter the zone with the permission of the Captain of the 
Port St Petersburg or designated representative.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small 
entities may contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT for assistance in understanding and participating in this 
rulemaking. We also have a point of contact for commenting on actions 
by employees of the Coast Guard. Small businesses may send comments on 
the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine 
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and 
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small 
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these 
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small 
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast 
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

[[Page 20013]]

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further 
environmental documentation. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check 
List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are 
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
No. 0170.1.

0
2. A new temporary Sec.  165.T07-063 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-063  Safety Zone; Tampa, Florida.

    (a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 
safety zone on the waters of Tampa Bay, Florida, in the vicinity of the 
Gandy bridge, that includes all the waters from surface to bottom, 
within a 50 yard radius of the following coordinates: 
27[deg]53[min]24[sec] N, 082[deg]32[min]36[sec] W. All coordinates 
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    Designated representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders 
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers 
operating Coast Guard vessels, and federal, state, and local officers 
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) St. 
Petersburg, Florida, in the enforcement of regulated navigation areas 
and safety and security zones.
    (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may anchor, moor or 
transit the Regulated Area without the prior permission of the Captain 
of the Port St Petersburg, Florida, or his designated representative.
    (d) Date. This rule is effective from 2:30 p.m. on March 30, 2006 
through 12 a.m. on May 1, 2006.

    Dated: March 30, 2006.
J.A. Servidio,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, St. Petersburg, 
Florida.
[FR Doc. 06-3716 Filed 4-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P