[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9723-9727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 261

[FRL-8037-1]


Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of 
Hazardous Waste; Final Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, also the Agency or 
we in this preamble) today is granting a petition to modify an 
exclusion (or delisting) from the lists of hazardous waste previously 
granted to Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) in Smyrna, Tennessee. 
This action responds to a petition for amendment submitted by Nissan to 
increase the maximum annual volume of waste and to eliminate the total 
concentration limits in its wastewater treatment sludge covered by its 
current exclusion. After careful analysis, we have concluded the 
petitioned waste does not present an unacceptable risk when disposed of 
in a Subtitle D (nonhazardous waste) landfill. This exclusion applies 
to F019 wastewater treatment sludge generated by Nissan at its facility 
in Smyrna, Tennessee. Accordingly, this final amendment conditionally 
excludes a specific yearly volume of the petitioned waste from the 
requirements of the hazardous waste regulations under the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) when the petitioned waste is 
disposed of in a Subtitle D landfill which is permitted, licensed, or 
registered by a State to manage municipal or industrial solid waste.

DATES: Effective Date: February 27, 2006.

ADDRESSES: The RCRA regulatory docket for this final amendment is 
located at the EPA Library, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 
4, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303, and is available for you to view from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. The public may copy 
material from the regulatory docket at $0.15 per page.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general and technical information 
concerning this final rule, please contact Kris Lippert, RCRA 
Enforcement and Compliance Branch (Mail Code 4WD-RCRA), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal 
Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,

[[Page 9724]]

Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8605, or call, toll free (800) 241-
1754. Questions may also be e-mailed to Ms. Lippert at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview Information
    A. What Action Is EPA Finalizing?
B. Why Is EPA Approving this Petition for Amendment?
    C. What Are the Terms of this Exclusion?
    D. When Is the Final Amendment Effective?
    E. How Does this Action Affect States?
II. Background
    A. What is a Delisting Petition?
    B. What Regulations Allow Hazardous Waste Generators to Delist 
Waste?
    C. What Information Must the Generator Supply?
III. EPA's Evaluation of the Waste Data
    A. What Waste Is the Subject of this Amendment?
    B. How did EPA Evaluate this Petition?
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Amendment
    A. Who Submitted Comments on the Proposed Rule?
V. Administrative Assessments

I. Overview Information

A. What Action Is EPA Finalizing?

    After evaluating Nissan's petition, we are amending the current 
Nissan's delisting published in the Federal Register on June 21, 2002 
(67 FR 42187) to increase the maximum annual waste volume that is 
covered by its exclusion from 2,400 cubic yards to 3,500 cubic yards 
and to eliminate the total concentration limits for barium, cadmium, 
chromium, cyanide, lead, and nickel for its F019 wastewater treatment 
sludge from the requirements of the hazardous waste regulations under 
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The waste will still 
be subject to local, State, and Federal regulations for nonhazardous 
solid wastes.

B. Why Is EPA Approving This Petition for Amendment?

    Nissan petitioned EPA to exclude the increased volume of its F019 
wastewater treatment sludge because it does not believe, even at the 
increased volume, that the petitioned waste meets the criteria for 
which it was listed. EPA is also eliminating the total concentration 
limits for barium, cadmium, chromium, cyanide, lead, and nickel from 
its F019 wastewater treatment sludge.
    Nissan believes that the waste does not contain any other 
constituents that would render it hazardous. Review of this petition 
included consideration of the original listing criteria, as well as 
factors (including additional constituents) other than those for which 
the waste was listed, as required by the Hazardous and Solid Waste 
Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. See, section 222 of HSWA, 42 U.S.C. 6921(f), 
and 40 CFR 260.22(a)(1) and (2).
    For reasons stated in both the proposed amendment and this 
document, we believe that Nissan's F019 wastewater treatment sludge 
should continue to be excluded from hazardous waste control at the 
increased volume. EPA also believes that eliminating all total 
concentration limits will not harm human health and the environment 
when disposed in a nonhazardous waste landfill, if the required 
delisting levels are met. Therefore, we are granting the final 
amendment to Nissan, located in Smyrna, Tennessee, for its F019 
wastewater treatment sludge, generated at a maximum annual volume of 
3,500 cubic yards.

C. What Are the Terms of This Exclusion?

    This amended exclusion applies to the waste described in the 
petition only if the requirements described above as well as in Table 1 
of Appendix IX to part 261 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations are satisfied. The maximum annual volume of the wastewater 
treatment sludge is 3,500 cubic yards.

D. When Is the Final Amendment Effective?

    This rule is effective February 27, 2006. HSWA amended section 3010 
of RCRA to allow rules to become effective in less than six months when 
the regulated community does not need the six-month period to come into 
compliance. That is the case here because this rule reduces, rather 
than increases, the existing requirements for persons generating 
hazardous wastes. For these same reasons, this rule can become 
effective immediately (that is, upon publication in the Federal 
Register) under the Administrative Procedure Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
553(d).

E. How Does This Action Affect States?

    Because EPA is issuing today's exclusion under the Federal RCRA 
delisting program, only States subject to Federal RCRA delisting 
provisions would be directly affected. This would exclude two 
categories of States: States having a dual system that includes Federal 
RCRA requirements and their own requirements, and States who have 
received EPA's authorization to make their own delisting decisions. We 
describe these two situations below.
    We allow states to impose their own non-RCRA regulatory 
requirements that are more stringent than EPA's, under section 3009 of 
RCRA. These more stringent requirements may include a provision that 
prohibits a Federally issued exclusion from taking effect in the State, 
or that prohibits a Federally issued exclusion from taking effect in 
the State until the State approves the exclusion through a separate 
State administrative action. Because a dual system (that is, both 
Federal and State programs) may regulate a petitioner's waste, we urge 
petitioners to contact the applicable State regulatory authorities or 
agencies to establish the status of their waste under that State's 
program.
    We have also authorized some States to administer a delisting 
program in place of the Federal program; that is, to make State 
delisting decisions. Therefore, this exclusion does not necessarily 
apply within those authorized States. If Nissan transports the 
petitioned waste to, or manages the waste in, any State with delisting 
authorization, Nissan must obtain delisting approval from that State 
before it can manage the waste as nonhazardous in that State.
    In order for this amendment to be effective in an authorized State, 
that State must adopt this amendment through its State administrative 
process.

II. Background

A. What Is a Delisting Petition?

    A delisting petition is a formal request from a generator to EPA or 
another agency with jurisdiction to exclude from the lists of hazardous 
waste regulated by RCRA, a waste that the generator believes should not 
be considered hazardous.

B. What Regulations Allow Hazardous Waste Generators to Delist Waste?

    Under 40 CFR 260.20 and 260.22, a generator may petition EPA to 
remove its waste from hazardous waste control by excluding it from the 
lists of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR 261.31, 261.32 and 
261.33. Specifically, 40 CFR 260.20 allows any person to petition the 
Administrator to modify or revoke any provision of parts 260 through 
266, 268 and 273 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 
260.22 provides generators the opportunity to petition the 
Administrator to exclude a waste on a ``generator-specific'' basis from 
the hazardous waste lists. A generator can petition EPA for an 
amendment to an existing exclusion under these same provisions of the 
Code of Federal Regulations.

[[Page 9725]]

C. What Information Must the Generator Supply?

    A petitioner must provide sufficient information to allow EPA to 
determine that the waste to be excluded does not meet any of the 
criteria under which the waste was listed as a hazardous waste. In 
addition, the Administrator must determine that the waste is not 
hazardous for any other reason.

III. EPA's Evaluation of the Waste Data

A. What Waste Is the Subject of This Amendment?

    Nissan operates a light-duty vehicle manufacturing facility in 
Smyrna, Tennessee. As a result of Nissan's use of aluminum as a 
component in its automobile bodies, Nissan generates a sludge meeting 
the listing definition of F019 at 40 CFR 261.31. Nissan was granted its 
current Federal delisting exclusion for this F019 wastewater treatment 
sludge at a maximum annual volume of 2,400 cubic yards on June 21, 2002 
(67 FR 42187).
    A full description of this waste and the Agency's evaluation of the 
original Nissan's petition are contained in the ``Proposed Rule and 
Request for Comments'' published in the Federal Register on November 
19, 2001 (66 FR 57918). After evaluating public comment on the proposed 
rule, we published a final decision in the Federal Register on June 21, 
2002 (67 FR 42187), to exclude Nissan's wastewater treatment sludge 
derived from the treatment of EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019 from the 
list of hazardous wastes found in 40 CFR 261.31. The hazardous 
constituents of concern for which F019 was listed are hexavalent 
chromium and cyanide (complexed). Nissan petitioned the EPA to exclude 
its F019 waste because Nissan does not use either of these constituents 
in the manufacturing process. Therefore, Nissan did not believe that 
the waste meets the criteria of the listing. EPA's final decision to 
grant the delisting exclusion on June 21, 2002, was conditioned on the 
following delisting levels: (1) Delisting Levels: All leachable 
concentrations for these metals, cyanide, and organic constituents must 
not exceed the following levels (ppm): Barium-100.0; Cadmium-0.422; 
Chromium-5.0; Cyanide-7.73, Lead-5.0; and Nickel-60.7; Bis-(2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate-0.601; Di-n-octyl phthalate-0.0752; and 4-
Methylphenol-7.66; (2) the total concentration of cyanide (total, not 
amenable) in the waste, not the waste leachate, must not exceed 200 mg/
kg; and (3) the total concentrations, in mg/kg, of the metals in the 
waste, not the waste leachate, must not exceed the following levels: 
Barium-20,000; Cadmium-500; Chromium-1,000; Lead-2,000; and Nickel-
20,000. If the waste exceeded any of the delisting limits, then the 
waste has to be managed as hazardous waste.

B. How Did EPA Evaluate This Petition?

    In support of its original petition, Nissan submitted: (1) 
Descriptions of its manufacturing and wastewater treatment processes, 
the generation point of the petitioned waste, and the manufacturing 
steps that will contribute to its generation; (2) Material Safety Data 
Sheets (MSDSs) for materials used to manufacture vehicles; (3) the 
minimum and maximum annual amounts of wastewater treatment sludge 
typically generated, and an estimate of the maximum annual amount 
expected to be generated in the future; (4) results of analysis of the 
currently generated waste at the Nissan plant in Smyrna, Tennessee for 
chemicals in Appendix IX of 40 CFR part 264: 17 metals; cyanide; 58 
volatile organic compounds and 124 semi-volatile organic compounds; 
and, in addition to the Appendix IX list, hexavalent chromium; (5) 
results of the analysis for those chemicals (i.e., Appendix IX list, 
hexavalent chromium) and fluoride in the leachate obtained from this 
waste by means of the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure 
((TCLP), SW-846 Method 1311); (6) results of the determinations for the 
hazardous characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, and reactivity, 
in these wastes; (7) results of determinations percent solids; and (8) 
results of a dye tracer study and source inventory of Nissan's 
industrial wastewater system.
    EPA reviewed the allowable total concentrations in the waste, as 
calculated by DRAS for the waste, to determine if increasing the 
maximum annual waste volume from 2,400 cubic yards to 3,500 cubic yards 
would be still protective to human health and the environment. The 
allowable total concentrations, according to the DRAS, were all at 
least 1,000 times greater than the actual maximum total concentrations 
found in the waste. Based on the DRAS results, EPA grants Nissan's 
petition for amendment to increase the maximum annual waste volume to 
3,500 cubic yards and to eliminate all total concentration limits.

IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Amendment

A. Who Submitted Comments on the Proposed Rule?

    We received no public comments on Nissan's Proposed Amendment and 
Request for Comments published in the Federal Register on June 24, 2005 
(70 FR 36547).

V. Administrative Assessments

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a rule of general applicability and therefore is not a 
``regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and 
Budget. Because this action is a rule of particular applicability 
relating to a particular facility, it is not subject to the regulatory 
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.), or to sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Because the rule will affect 
only one facility, it will not significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, as specified in section 203 of UMRA, or communities of 
Indian tribal governments, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 
67249, November 6, 2000). For the same reason, this rule will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This 
rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    This rule does not involve technical standards; thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply. This rule does 
not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The 
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. as added by the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types 
of rules (1) Rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to 
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of agency organization, 
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or 
obligations of non-agency parties (5 U.S.C. 804(3)). EPA is not 
required to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 
801 because this is a rule of particular applicability.

[[Page 9726]]

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261

    Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, Recycling, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 1, 2005.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Director, Waste Management Division.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 261 is amended as 
follows:

PART 261--IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

0
1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, 6924(y) and 
6938.


0
2. In Table 1 of Appendix IX, part 261 revise the entry for Nissan 
North America, Inc., to read as follows:

Appendix IX to Part 261--Wastes Excluded Under Secs. 260.20 and 260.22

                               Table 1.--Wastes Excluded From Non-Specific Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Facility                             Address                           Waste description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Nissan North America, Inc.........  Smyrna, Tennessee.................  Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA
                                                                         Hazardous Waste No. F019) that Nissan
                                                                         North American, Inc. (Nissan) generates
                                                                         by treating wastewater from automobile
                                                                         assembly plant located on 983 Nissan
                                                                         Drive in Smyrna, Tennessee. This is a
                                                                         conditional exclusion for up to 3,500
                                                                         cubic yards of waste (hereinafter
                                                                         referred to as ``Nissan Sludge'') that
                                                                         will be generated each year and
                                                                         disposed in a Subtitle D landfill after
                                                                         February 27, 2006. Nissan must continue
                                                                         to demonstrate that the following
                                                                         conditions are met for the exclusion to
                                                                         be valid.
                                                                        (1) Delisting Levels: All leachable
                                                                         concentrations for these metals,
                                                                         cyanide, and organic constituents must
                                                                         not exceed the following levels (ppm):
                                                                         Barium-100.0; Cadmium-0.422; Chromium-
                                                                         5.0; Cyanide-7.73, Lead-5.0; and Nickel-
                                                                         60.7; Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-
                                                                         0.601; Di-n-octyl phthalate-0.0752; and
                                                                         4-Methylphenol-7.66. These
                                                                         concentrations must be measured in the
                                                                         waste leachate obtained by the method
                                                                         specified in 40 CFR 261.24, except that
                                                                         for cyanide, deionized water must be
                                                                         the leaching medium. Cyanide
                                                                         concentrations in waste or leachate
                                                                         must be measured by the method
                                                                         specified in 40 CFR 268.40, Note 7.
                                                                        (2) Verification Testing Requirements:
                                                                         Sample collection and analyses,
                                                                         including quality control procedures,
                                                                         must be performed using appropriate
                                                                         methods. As applicable to the method-
                                                                         defined parameters of concern, analyses
                                                                         requiring the use of SW-846 methods
                                                                         incorporated by reference in 40 CFR
                                                                         260.11 must be used without
                                                                         substitution. As applicable, the SW-846
                                                                         methods might include Methods 0010,
                                                                         0011, 0020, 0023A, 0030, 0031, 0040,
                                                                         0050, 0051, 0060, 0061, 1010A, 1020B,
                                                                         1110A, 1310B, 1311, 1312, 1320, 1330A,
                                                                         9010C, 9012B, 9040C, 9045D, 9060A,
                                                                         9070A, (uses EPA Method 1664, Rev. A),
                                                                         9071B, and 9095B. Methods must meet
                                                                         Performance Based Measurement System
                                                                         Criteria in which the Data Quality
                                                                         Objectives are to demonstrate that
                                                                         representative samples of the Nissan
                                                                         Sludge meet the delisting levels in
                                                                         Condition (1). Nissan must perform an
                                                                         annual testing program to demonstrate
                                                                         that constituent concentrations
                                                                         measured in the TCLP extract do not
                                                                         exceed the delisting levels established
                                                                         in Condition (1).
                                                                        (3) Waste Holding and Handling: Nissan
                                                                         must hold sludge containers utilized
                                                                         for verification sampling until
                                                                         composite sample results are obtained.
                                                                         If the levels of constituents measured
                                                                         in Nissan's annual testing program do
                                                                         not exceed the levels set forth in
                                                                         Condition (1), then the Nissan Sludge
                                                                         is non-hazardous and must be managed in
                                                                         accordance with all applicable solid
                                                                         waste regulations. If constituent
                                                                         levels in a composite sample exceed any
                                                                         of the delisting levels set forth in
                                                                         Condition (1), the batch of Nissan
                                                                         Sludge generated during the time period
                                                                         corresponding to this sample must be
                                                                         managed and disposed of in accordance
                                                                         with Subtitle C of RCRA.
                                                                        (4) Changes in Operating Conditions:
                                                                         Nissan must notify EPA in writing when
                                                                         significant changes in the
                                                                         manufacturing or wastewater treatment
                                                                         processes are implemented. EPA will
                                                                         determine whether these changes will
                                                                         result in additional constituents of
                                                                         concern. If so, EPA will notify Nissan
                                                                         in writing that the Nissan Sludge must
                                                                         be managed as hazardous waste F019
                                                                         until Nissan has demonstrated that the
                                                                         wastes meet the delisting levels set
                                                                         forth in Condition (1) and any levels
                                                                         established by EPA for the additional
                                                                         constituents of concern, and Nissan has
                                                                         received written approval from EPA. If
                                                                         EPA determines that the changes do not
                                                                         result in additional constituents of
                                                                         concern, EPA will notify Nissan, in
                                                                         writing, that Nissan must verify that
                                                                         the Nissan Sludge continues to meet
                                                                         Condition (1) delisting levels.

[[Page 9727]]

 
                                                                        (5) Data Submittals: Data obtained in
                                                                         accordance with Condition (2) must be
                                                                         submitted to Narindar M. Kumar, Chief,
                                                                         RCRA Enforcement and Compliance Branch,
                                                                         Mail Code: 4WD-RCRA, U.S. EPA, Region
                                                                         4, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
                                                                         Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
                                                                         30303. The submission is due no later
                                                                         than 60 days after taking each annual
                                                                         verification samples in accordance with
                                                                         delisting Conditions (1) through (7).
                                                                         Records of analytical data from
                                                                         Condition (2) must be compiled,
                                                                         summarized, and maintained by Nissan
                                                                         for a minimum of three years, and must
                                                                         be furnished upon request by EPA or the
                                                                         State of Tennessee, and made available
                                                                         for inspection. Failure to submit the
                                                                         required data within the specified time
                                                                         period or maintain the required records
                                                                         for the specified time will be
                                                                         considered by EPA, at its discretion,
                                                                         sufficient basis to revoke the
                                                                         exclusion to the extent directed by
                                                                         EPA. All data must be accompanied by a
                                                                         signed copy of the certification
                                                                         statement in 40 CFR 260.22(i)(12).
                                                                        (6) Reopener Language: (A) If, at any
                                                                         time after disposal of the delisted
                                                                         waste, Nissan possesses or is otherwise
                                                                         made aware of any environmental data
                                                                         (including but not limited to leachate
                                                                         data or groundwater monitoring data) or
                                                                         any other data relevant to the delisted
                                                                         waste indicating that any constituent
                                                                         identified in the delisting
                                                                         verification testing is at a level
                                                                         higher than the delisting level allowed
                                                                         by EPA in granting the petition, Nissan
                                                                         must report the data, in writing, to
                                                                         EPA and Tennessee within 10 days of
                                                                         first possessing or being made aware of
                                                                         that data. (B) If the testing of the
                                                                         waste, as required by Condition (2),
                                                                         does not meet the delisting
                                                                         requirements of Condition (1), Nissan
                                                                         must report the data, in writing, to
                                                                         EPA and Tennessee within 10 days of
                                                                         first possessing or being made aware of
                                                                         that data. (C) Based on the information
                                                                         described in paragraphs (6)(A) or
                                                                         (6)(B) and any other information
                                                                         received from any source, EPA will make
                                                                         a preliminary determination as to
                                                                         whether the reported information
                                                                         requires that EPA take action to
                                                                         protect human health or the
                                                                         environment. Further action may include
                                                                         suspending or revoking the exclusion,
                                                                         or other appropriate response necessary
                                                                         to protect human health and the
                                                                         environment. (D) If EPA determines that
                                                                         the reported information does require
                                                                         Agency action, EPA will notify the
                                                                         facility in writing of the action
                                                                         believed necessary to protect human
                                                                         health and the environment. The notice
                                                                         shall include a statement of the
                                                                         proposed action and a statement
                                                                         providing Nissan with an opportunity to
                                                                         present information as to why the
                                                                         proposed action is not necessary.
                                                                         Nissan shall have 10 days from the date
                                                                         of EPA's notice to present such
                                                                         information. (E) Following the receipt
                                                                         of information from Nissan, as
                                                                         described in paragraph (6)(D), or if no
                                                                         such information is received within 10
                                                                         days, EPA will issue a final written
                                                                         determination describing the Agency
                                                                         actions that are necessary to protect
                                                                         human health or the environment, given
                                                                         the information received in accordance
                                                                         with paragraphs (6)(A) or (6)(B). Any
                                                                         required action described in EPA's
                                                                         determination shall become effective
                                                                         immediately, unless EPA provides
                                                                         otherwise.
                                                                        (7) Notification Requirements: Nissan
                                                                         must provide a one-time written
                                                                         notification to any State Regulatory
                                                                         Agency in a State to which or through
                                                                         which the delisted waste described
                                                                         above will be transported, at least 60
                                                                         days prior to the commencement of such
                                                                         activities. Failure to provide such a
                                                                         notification will result in a violation
                                                                         of the delisting conditions and a
                                                                         possible revocation of the decision to
                                                                         delist.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 06-1790 Filed 2-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P