[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 240 (Thursday, December 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74332-74333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7350]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-509]


In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Server Computers, 
and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision To Remand-in-Part 
and Vacate-in-Part an Initial Determination Finding a Violation of 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930; Referral of Motion to 
Administrative Law Judge

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to reverse the presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') findings in the above-captioned investigation of 
literal infringement with respect to the asserted claims of U.S. Patent 
No. 6,138,184 (``the `184 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 5,892,976 
(``the `976 patent'') and to remand the investigation to the ALJ for a 
determination of whether claims 7, 24, and 41 of the `184 patent and 
claim 9 of the `976 patent are infringed under the doctrine of 
equivalents, and whether a domestic industry exists as to those 
patents. The Commission has also determined to vacate that portion of 
the ID which concerns infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,085,318 (``the `318 patent'') under the doctrine of equivalents. The 
Commission has determined to affirm the remainder of the ID. Finally, 
the Commission has directed the ALJ to set a new target date in the 
investigation and to rule on a motion filed on October 27, 2005, by 
respondent concerning a recently discovered license agreement related 
to the patents at issue in this investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodney Maze, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the 
Commission on June 7, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Hewlett-
Packard Development Company, L.P. of Houston, Texas and Hewlett-Packard 
Company of Palo Alto, California (collectively ``HP''). 69 FR 31844 
(June 7, 2004). The complainants alleged violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation and sale of 
certain personal computers, server computers, and components thereof, 
by reason of infringement of seven U.S. patents. The complainants named 
Gateway, Inc. of Poway, California (Gateway) as the only respondent. 
Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,737,604, claims 1, 3, 4, 6-8, 18, 20, 21, 
23-25, 35, 37, 38, and 40-42 of the `184 patent, claim 9 of the `976 
patent, and claim 1 of the `318 patent remain at issue in this 
investigation.
    On May 24, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 45) extending the 
target date of the investigation by three months or until December 8, 
2005. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has 
determined not to review this ID.
    On August 8, 2005, the ALJ issued his final ID on violation and his 
recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The final ID 
incorporates by reference Order No. 15 setting forth the ALJ's 
construction of the claim terms at issue in this investigation. The ALJ 
found a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of claims 7, 
24, and 41 of the `184 patent and claim 9 of the `976 patent. He found 
all other asserted claims of the `184 and `976 patents to be invalid. 
The ALJ did not find a violation of section 337 with respect to the 
other two patents. Petitions for review were filed by HP, Gateway, and 
the Commission investigative attorney (IA) on August 18, 2005.
    On August 23, 2005, the Commission issued a notice indicating that 
it had determined to extend the deadline for determining whether to 
review the final ID by 14 days, i.e., from September 22, 2005, until 
October 6, 2005. On August 25, 2005, all parties filed responses to

[[Page 74333]]

the petitions. On October 6, 2005, the Commission issued a notice 
indicating that it had determined to extend the deadline for 
determining whether to review the final ID by 8 days, i.e., from 
October 6, 2005, until October 14, 2005.
    On October 20, 2005, the Commission issued a notice indicating that 
it had determined to review the final ID in its entirety. 70 FR 61157 
(October 20, 2005). In connection with its review, the Commission 
requested written submissions on the issues under review and the issues 
of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. On October 27, 2005, 
Gateway filed a motion to stay the Commission's review of the ID and 
remand to the ALJ for additional findings concerning a license 
agreement related to the patents at issue in this investigation. On 
November 7, 2005, HP and the IA filed separate responses to Gateway's 
motion.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the 
final ID and the submissions of the parties, the Commission has 
determined to reverse the ALJ's finding of literal infringement with 
respect to claims 7, 24, and 41 of the `184 patent and claim 9 of the 
`976 patent and to remand the investigation to the ALJ for findings 
concerning infringement of these claims under the doctrine of 
equivalents and whether the technical prong of the domestic industry 
requirement has been met in regard to the `184 and `976 patents. The 
Commission has also determined to vacate that portion of the ID which 
concerns infringement of claim 1 of the `318 patent under the doctrine 
of equivalents. The Commission has determined to affirm the remainder 
of the ID. The Commission has also directed the ALJ to consider and 
rule on Motion Docket No. 52C, filed by Gateway on October 27, 2005, 
which concerns a license agreement related to the patents at issue in 
this investigation. Finally, the Commission has directed the ALJ to 
extend the target date of the investigation as may be necessary to 
conclude the proceedings and to issue his findings on remand two months 
before the new target date.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and section 210.45 of 
the Commission's Interim Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
210.45).

    Issued: December 8, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E5-7350 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P