[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49312-49317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration

[Application Number D-11270]


Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-
14 for Plan Asset Transactions Determined by Independent Qualified 
Professional Asset Managers

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, DOL.

ACTION: Notice of proposed amendment to PTE 84-14.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a notice of pendency before the 
Department of Labor (the Department) of a proposed amendment to PTE 84-
14. The exemption permits various parties that are related to employee 
benefit plans to engage in transactions involving plan assets if, among 
other

[[Page 49313]]

conditions, the assets are managed by ``qualified professional asset 
managers'' (QPAMs), which are independent of the parties in interest 
and which meet specified financial standards. Additional exemptive 
relief is provided for employers to furnish limited amounts of goods 
and services to a managed fund in the ordinary course of business. 
Limited relief is also provided for leases of office or commercial 
space between managed funds and QPAMs or contributing employers. 
Finally, relief is provided for transactions involving places of public 
accommodation owned by a managed fund.
    Currently, PTE 84-14 requires the QPAM managing the assets of a 
plan in an investment fund to be independent of, and unrelated to, the 
employer sponsoring such plan. However, as described in the notice of 
final amendment to PTE 84-14 contained in this issue of the Federal 
Register, limited retroactive and transitional relief is provided for 
financial service entities to act as QPAMS for their own plans. If this 
proposed amendment is granted, a QPAM may prospectively manage an 
investment fund containing the assets of its own plan or the plan of an 
affiliate, to the extent the conditions of the proposal are met.
    The proposed amendment would affect participants and beneficiaries 
of employee benefit plans, the sponsoring employers of such plans, and 
other persons engaging in the described transactions.

DATES: Written comments must be received by the Department on or before 
October 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: All written comments (preferably three copies) should be 
addressed to the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Exemption 
Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5649, 
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 (attention: PTE 84-
14 Amendment). Interested persons are also invited to submit comments 
to EBSA via e-mail or fax. Any such comments should be sent either by 
e-mail to [email protected] or by fax to (202) 219-0204 by the 
end of the scheduled comment period. All comments received will be 
available for public inspection at the Public Documents Room, Employee 
Benefits Security Administration, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Motta, Office of Exemption 
Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-5649, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington DC 20210, (202) 693-8540 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given of the pendency 
before the Department of a proposed amendment to PTE 84-14 (49 FR 9494, 
March 13, 1984, as corrected at 50 FR 41430, October 10, 1985, and 
amended elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register). PTE 84-14 
provides an exemption from certain of the restrictions of section 406 
of ERISA, and from certain taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of 
the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) of the Code. The Department 
is proposing this amendment to PTE 84-14 on its own motion, pursuant to 
section 408(a) of ERISA and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in 
accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart B 
(55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 102 of the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 
U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), generally transferred the authority of the 
Secretary of Treasury to issue administrative exemptions under 
section 4975(c)(2) of the Code to the Secretary of Labor.
    For purposes of this exemption, references to specific 
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer 
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Economic Analysis

Executive Order 12866 Statement

    Under Executive Order 12866, the Department must determine whether 
the regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to the 
requirements of the Executive Order and subject to review by the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB). Under section 3(f), the order defines a 
``significant regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result 
in a rule: (1) Having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million 
or more, or adversely and materially affecting a sector of the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local or tribal governments or communities (also 
referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned 
by another agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of 
entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
    Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, it has been 
determined that this action is a ``significant regulatory action.'' 
Accordingly, this action has been reviewed by OMB.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, the Department of Labor conducts a preclearance consultation 
program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an 
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing collections of 
information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA 
95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps to ensure that requested data 
can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and 
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly 
understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents 
can be properly assessed.
    Currently, the Department is soliciting comments concerning the 
information collection request (ICR) included in PTE 84-14 and this 
Notice of Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 
84-14 for Plan Asset Transactions Determined by Independent Qualified 
Professional Asset Managers. A copy of the ICR may be obtained by 
contacting Gerald B. Lindrew, Office of Policy and Research, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-5647, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone 
(202) 693-8410; Fax: (202) 219-4745. These are not toll-free numbers.
    The Department has submitted a copy of the proposed information 
collection to OMB in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) for review of 
its information collections. The Department and OMB are particularly 
interested in comments that:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriated 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology,

[[Page 49314]]

e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
    Comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; Attention: Desk Officer for the 
Employee Benefits Security Administration. Although comments may be 
submitted through October 24, 2005. OMB requests that comments be 
received within 30 days of publication of the Notice of Proposed 
Amendment to ensure their consideration.
    The provisions for compliance with PTE 84-14 (49 FR 9494, March 13, 
1984, as corrected at 50 FR 41430, October 10, 1985), a final amendment 
to PTE 84-14 published in this issue of the Federal Register, and this 
proposed amendment have been discussed in greater detail earlier in the 
preamble. Briefly, PTE 84-14 permits various parties in interest to 
employee benefit plans to engage in transactions involving plan assets 
if, among other requirements, the assets are managed by a QPAM. Such 
transactions include, for example, the leasing of office space by an 
investment fund to a QPAM or the furnishing of services and facilities 
by a place of public accommodation owned by an investment fund managed 
by a QPAM. The final amendment, among other things, provides limited 
retroactive and transitional relief from the sanctions of certain 
sections of ERISA and the Code for financial institutions such as 
banks, insurance companies, or registered investment advisers, that act 
as QPAMs for their own plans. The proposed amendment, if granted, would 
provide prospective relief for financial institutions to act as QPAMS 
for their own plans.
    The Department included in the final amendment published in this 
issue of the Federal Register and this proposed amendment certain 
requirements intended to preserve plan assets and protect plan 
participant benefits with respect to transactions between a party in 
interest to a plan and an investment fund containing plan assets 
managed by a QPAM. PTE 84-14, as restated and amended in the final 
amendment, includes a requirement for a written agreement between a 
plan and the QPAM it has retained, and written guidelines between a 
QPAM and a property manager that a QPAM has retained. Because it is 
customary business practice for agreements related to the investment of 
plan assets or transactions relating to the leasing of space to be 
described in writing, no burden was estimated for these provisions of 
the final amendment. Accordingly, this ICR includes only the burden for 
provisions in the proposed amendment.
    In order for a transaction to qualify for an exemption under the 
proposed amendment, a QPAM must, among other requirements, establish 
written policies and procedures that are designed to assure compliance 
with the conditions of the proposed amendment, including the steps 
adopted by the QPAM to measure compliance. Based on information in the 
1999 Form 5500 Annual Report, the Department estimates that 
approximately 6,500 banks, savings institutions, insurance companies, 
and investment advisers currently acting as QPAMs for employee benefit 
plans might choose to act as QPAMs for their own plans. QPAMs are 
assumed to use a service provider, such as an attorney, to develop the 
written policies and procedures required under the proposed amendment. 
To meet the Department's requirements regarding written policies and 
procedures, service providers will most likely develop standardized 
language that can then be modified to include the specific steps 
adopted by a particular QPAM to assure compliance. If all 6,500 
financial institutions choose to act as QPAMs for their own plans, the 
start-up cost, assuming one hour of a service provider's time, at $84 
per hour, would be $546,000. The actual amount of time required, and 
the resulting cost burden, may be even lower because the Department has 
described the objective requirements of the exemption that are to be 
included in the policies and procedures, and because most service 
providers will handle multiple QPAMs, thereby reducing per-plan costs.
    Going forward, the Department is not aware of a basis for 
estimating how many additional QPAMs will choose to handle investments 
for their own plans, but assumes the number to be small. Most QPAMs are 
believed to be large institutions that will take advantage of the 
proposed amendment soon after it is granted. For purposes of this ICR, 
the Department has assumed that an additional 1%, or 65 QPAMs, 
annually, at a cost of approximately $5,500, will establish policies 
and procedures in order to manage investments for their own plans.
    Finally, under the proposed amendment, an independent auditor is 
required to conduct an exemption audit, on an annual basis, the results 
of which are presented in a written report to the plan. Because it is 
customary business practice for an independent auditor engaged by an 
entity such as a plan to provide a written report, the Department has 
not estimated a cost burden for this provision of the proposed 
amendment.
    Type of Collection: New.
    Agency: Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security 
Administration.
    Title: Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14 for Plan Asset Transactions 
Determined by Independent Qualified Professional Asset Managers.
    OMB Control Number: 1210-NEW.
    Affected Public: Business or other for profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondents: 6,565.
    Responses: 6,565.
    Frequency of Response: One time.
    Estimated Burden Hours: 0.
    Estimated Capital/Startup Costs: $546,000.
    Estimated Annual Costs (Operating & Maintenance): $5,500.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $551,500.
    The public is not required to respond to a collection of 
information that does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Background

    PTE 84-14, which was proposed on the Department's own motion on 
December 21, 1982, was granted as part of a continuing effort by the 
Department to improve the administration of the prohibited transaction 
rules of ERISA. The rules set forth in section 406 of ERISA prohibit 
various transactions between a plan and a party in interest (including 
a fiduciary) with respect to such plan. Unless a statutory or 
administrative exemption applies to the transaction, section 406(a) of 
ERISA prohibits, among other things: Sales, leases, loans or the 
provision of services between a party in interest and a plan, as well 
as a use of plan assets by or for the benefit of, or a transfer of plan 
assets to, a party in interest. In addition, unless exempted, a 
fiduciary of a plan is not permitted to engage in any acts of self-
dealing or make decisions on behalf of a plan if the fiduciary is in a 
conflict of interest situation.
    The Department has frequently exercised its statutory authority 
under section 408(a) of ERISA to grant both individual and class 
exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions where it has been 
able to find that the criteria for granting such exemptions have been 
satisfied. Based on its experience considering requests for individual 
and class exemptions, and in dealing with instances of abusive 
violations of the fiduciary responsibility rules of ERISA, the 
Department determined that as a general matter, transactions entered 
into on behalf of plans with parties in interest are most

[[Page 49315]]

likely to conform to ERISA's general fiduciary standards where the 
decision to enter into the transaction is made by an independent 
fiduciary. As granted, PTE 84-14 provides broad relief for various 
party in interest transactions that involve plan assets that are 
transferred to a qualified professional asset manager (QPAM) for 
discretionary management.

Description of Existing Relief

    The relief provided by PTE 84-14 is described in four separate 
parts. The General Exemption, set forth in Part I, permits an 
investment fund managed by a QPAM to engage in a wide variety of 
transactions described in ERISA section 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) with 
virtually all parties in interest except the QPAM which manages the 
assets involved in the transaction and those parties most likely to 
have the power to influence the QPAM.
    Part II of the exemption provides limited relief under both section 
406(a) and (b) of ERISA for certain transactions involving those 
employers and certain of their affiliates which could not qualify for 
the General Exemption provided by Part I.
    Part III of the exemption provides limited relief under section 
406(a) and (b) of ERISA for the leasing of office or commercial space 
by an investment fund to the QPAM, an affiliate of the QPAM, or a 
person who could not qualify for the General Exemption provided by Part 
I because it held the power of appointment described in Part I(a).
    Part IV of the exemption provides limited relief under sections 
406(a) and 406(b)(1) and (2) of ERISA for the furnishing of services 
and facilities by a place of public accommodation owned by an 
investment fund managed by a QPAM, to all parties in interest, if the 
services and facilities are furnished on a comparable basis to the 
general public.
    Part V of the exemption contains definitions for certain terms used 
in the exemption. In this regard, section V(a) defines the term 
``QPAM'' as an ``independent fiduciary which is a bank, savings and 
loan association, insurance company, or registered investment adviser, 
that meets certain financial conditions.'' Section V(o) of PTE 84-14, 
as adopted in the final amendment to PTE 84-14 published in this issue 
of the Federal Register, defines the term ``independent fiduciary'' to 
mean a fiduciary managing the assets of a plan in an investment fund 
that is independent of and unrelated to the employer sponsoring such 
plan. The definition additionally provides that a fiduciary will not be 
deemed to be independent of and unrelated to the employer sponsoring 
the plan if such fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is 
controlled by, or is under common control with the employer sponsoring 
the plan. Lastly, section V(o) provides that, for the period from 
December 21, 1982, through the date on which the Department grants a 
final amendment which addresses relief for financial institutions that 
serve as investment managers for their own plans, a QPAM managing the 
assets of a plan in an investment fund will not fail to qualify as a 
QPAM solely because such fiduciary is the employer sponsoring the plan 
or directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under 
common control with the employer sponsoring the plan.

Description of the Proposed Amendment

    The Department is proposing this amendment on its own motion in 
connection with its determination that the existing QPAM class 
exemption does not permit financial services entities to act as QPAMs 
for their own plans.\2\ The proposed amendment, if granted, would 
provide prospective relief for a financial institution to act as QPAM 
for its own plan. This relief is set out in a newly designated Part V, 
which specifically provides relief for transactions described in Parts 
I, III and IV of PTE 84-14 that involve a QPAM-managed investment fund 
containing the assets of a plan sponsored by such QPAM. For purposes of 
this proposed amendment, the exemption's ``Definitions'' section has 
been re-designated as Part VI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ As described in the notice of final amendment to PTE 84-14 
that appears elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PTE 84-14 was developed and granted based on the essential premise 
that broad relief could be afforded for all types of transactions in 
which a plan engages only if the commitments and the investments of 
plan assets and the negotiations leading thereto are the sole 
responsibility of an independent, discretionary, manager. As noted 
above, however, the proposed amendment described herein involves the 
investment of the assets of a QPAM's own plan in an investment fund 
managed by such QPAM. In the Department's view, retention of 
discretionary authority by the plan sponsor/QPAM would be inconsistent 
with the underlying concept of the QPAM exemption as originally 
adopted. In addition, there is no independent fiduciary present in this 
situation that would be responsible for monitoring the activities of 
the QPAM with respect to its own in-house plan.
    In order to address this lack of independence, the proposed 
amendment relies on an ``exemption audit,'' in addition to the other 
safeguards currently contained in the exemption. This audit is 
substantially similar to the audit required under PTE 96-23 (61 FR 
15975 (Apr. 10, 1996)), which provides relief for various party in 
interest transactions that involve the assets of a plan managed by an 
in-house manager (INHAM). The proposed amendment requires that an 
independent auditor conduct an annual exemption audit to determine 
whether the written procedures adopted by the QPAM are designed to 
assure compliance with the conditions of the exemption. The Department 
believes that the involvement of an independent party in overseeing 
compliance with the exemption would serve as a meaningful safeguard 
without interfering with the QPAM's investment decisions. The audit is 
further intended to protect plans by ensuring that an investment 
manager, who may not otherwise have experience managing ERISA plan 
assets, complies with the provisions of ERISA and the requirements of 
this exemption.
    Accordingly, section V(c) of the proposed amendment requires that 
the independent auditor conduct an exemption audit on an annual basis 
to review the written policies and procedures adopted by the QPAM. The 
purpose of this review is to ensure that such policies and procedures 
are consistent with the exemption's objective requirements. The 
independent auditor must also test a representative sample of 
transactions involving the QPAM's plan in order to make findings 
regarding whether the QPAM's is in operational compliance with the 
written policies and procedures adopted by the QPAM and the objective 
requirements of the exemption. The exemption further requires that the 
independent auditor make a determination as to whether the QPAM has 
satisfied the definition of a QPAM under the exemption, and issue a 
written report describing the steps performed by the auditor during the 
course of its review and the auditor's findings.\3\ Although the 
proposed amendment limits the auditor's

[[Page 49316]]

responsibilities to make findings on the QPAM's compliance with the 
objective requirements of the proposal, the QPAM remains responsible 
for assuring compliance with all of the applicable conditions of the 
exemption. Accordingly, the failure of the QPAM to comply with a 
condition of the exemption not described in Section VI(q) would, with 
respect to a specific transaction, render the exemption unavailable for 
that transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Department also notes that an adverse finding in the 
auditor's report would not, in itself, render the exemption 
unavailable for any transaction engaged in by the QPAM on behalf of 
the plan. The Department cautions that the failure of the QPAM to 
take appropriate steps to address any adverse findings in an 
unsatisfactory audit would raise issues under ERISA's fiduciary 
responsibility provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, an independent auditor must review the written 
policies and procedures adopted by the QPAM for consistency with the 
exemption's objective requirements that apply to such transactions. 
These written policies and procedures must describe, for example, the 
requirements to qualify as a QPAM and the requirement that, with 
respect to transactions described in Part V, the QPAM must have 
discretionary authority or control over the plan assets that are 
involved in the transaction.
    In addition, if a QPAM manages an investment fund that contains the 
assets of a plan sponsored by such QPAM, and the QPAM seeks to engage 
in a transaction described in Part I of the exemption on behalf of the 
fund, the QPAM's written policies and procedures must describe the 
objective requirements contained in Part I of the exemption. In this 
regard, the QPAM's written policies and procedures must describe the 
exemption's requirements that: (1) The transaction may not be entered 
into with any party in interest that has the power to appoint or 
terminate the QPAM as a manager of the plan assets involved in the 
transaction or negotiate the terms of the management agreement with 
such QPAM; (2) the transaction may not be entered into with the QPAM or 
a person related to the QPAM; and (3) the transaction is not described 
in any of the class exemptions listed in section I(b). The written 
policies and procedures must also describe the exemption's objective 
requirements regarding the QPAM's responsibility for: (1) Negotiating 
the terms of the transaction; and (2) deciding to enter into the 
transaction on behalf of the investment fund.
    The class exemption contains certain other objective requirements 
that are applicable to transactions described in Part III of PTE 84-14, 
relating to the leasing of office or commercial space by an investment 
fund managed by a QPAM to the QPAM or other specified persons. 
Accordingly, the objective requirements applicable to Part III 
transactions include: (1) that the amount of space that may be covered 
by the lease does not exceed the limitation described in section 
III(a); and (2) that no commission or other fee may be paid by the 
investment fund to the QPAM or the persons specified in section III(d).

General Information

    The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
    (1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption 
under section 408(a) of ERISA and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code does 
not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified 
person with respect to a plan from certain other provisions of ERISA 
and the Code, including any prohibited transaction provisions to which 
the exemption does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility 
provisions of section 404 of ERISA which require, among other things, 
that a fiduciary discharge his or her duties respecting the plan solely 
in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan. 
Additionally, the fact that a transaction is the subject of an 
exemption does not affect the requirement of section 401(a) of the Code 
that the plan must operate for the exclusive benefit of the employees 
of the employer maintaining the plan and their beneficiaries;
    (2) Before an exemption may be granted under section 408(a) of 
ERISA and 4975(c)(2) of the Code, the Department must find that the 
exemption is administratively feasible, in the interests of the plan 
and of its participants and beneficiaries, and protective of the rights 
of participants and beneficiaries of the plan;
    (3) If granted, the proposed amendment is applicable to a 
particular transaction only if the transaction satisfies the conditions 
specified in the amendment; and
    (4) The proposed amendment, if granted, will be supplemental to, 
and not in derogation of, any other provisions of ERISA and the Code, 
including statutory or administrative exemptions and transitional 
rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an 
administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the 
transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction.

Written Comments

    The Department invites all interested persons to submit written 
comments on the proposed amendment to the address and within the time 
period set forth above. All comments received will be made a part of 
the record. Comments should state the reasons for the writer's interest 
in the proposed exemption. Comments received will be available for 
public inspection at the above address.

Proposed Amendment

    Under section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code 
and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, 
subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990), the Department 
proposes to amend PTE 84-14 as set forth below:

Part V--Specific Exemption Involving QPAM-Sponsored Plan

    Effective as of the date of publication of the final amendment to 
PTE 84-14 in the Federal Register, the relief provided by Parts I, III 
or IV of PTE 84-14 from the applicable restrictions of section 406(a), 
section 406(b)(1) and (2), and section 407(a) of ERISA and the taxes 
imposed by Code section 4975(a) and (b), by reason of Code section 
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E), shall apply to a transaction involving the 
assets of a plan sponsored by the QPAM if:
    (a) The QPAM has discretionary authority or control with respect to 
the plan assets involved in the transaction;
    (b) The QPAM adopts written policies and procedures that are 
designed to assure compliance with the conditions of the exemption;
    (c) An independent auditor, who has appropriate technical training 
or experience and proficiency with ERISA's fiduciary responsibility 
provisions and so represents in writing, conducts an exemption audit 
(as defined in section VI(p)) on an annual basis. Following completion 
of the exemption audit, the auditor shall issue a written report to the 
plan presenting its specific findings regarding the level of compliance 
with the policies and procedures adopted by QPAM in accordance with 
section V(b);
    (d) The transaction meets the applicable requirements set forth in 
Parts I, III, or IV of the exemption.

Section VI. Definitions

    (o) For purposes of section V(a), the term ``independent 
fiduciary'' means a fiduciary managing the assets of a plan in an 
investment fund that is independent of and unrelated to the employer 
sponsoring such plan. For purposes of this exemption, the independent 
fiduciary will not be deemed to be independent of and unrelated to the 
employer sponsoring the plan if such fiduciary directly or indirectly 
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the 
employer sponsoring the plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a QPAM 
acting as a manager for its own plan or the plan of an affiliate (as 
defined in

[[Page 49317]]

section VI(c)(1)) will be deemed to satisfy the requirements of this 
section VI(o) if the requirements of Part V are met.
    (p) Exemption Audit. An ``exemption audit'' of a plan must consist 
of the following:
    (1) A review of the written policies and procedures adopted by the 
QPAM pursuant to section V(b) for consistency with each of the 
objective requirements of this proposed exemption (as described in 
section VI(q)).
    (2) A test of a representative sample of the plan's transactions in 
order to make findings regarding whether the QPAM is in compliance with 
(i) the written policies and procedures adopted by the QPAM pursuant to 
section VI(q) of the exemption and (ii) the objective requirements of 
the exemption.
    (3) A determination as to whether the QPAM has satisfied the 
definition of an QPAM under the exemption; and
    (4) Issuance of a written report describing the steps performed by 
the auditor during the course of its review and the auditor's findings.
    (q) For purposes of section VI(p), the written policies and 
procedures must describe the following objective requirements of the 
exemption and the steps adopted by the QPAM to assure compliance with 
each of these requirements:
    (1) The definition of a QPAM in section V(a).
    (2) The requirement of sections V(a) and I(c) regarding the 
discretionary authority or control of the QPAM with respect to the plan 
assets involved in the transaction, in negotiating the terms of the 
transaction and with respect to the decision on behalf of the 
investment fund to enter into the transaction.
    (3) For a transaction described in Part I:
    (A) That the transaction is not entered into with any person who is 
excluded from relief under section I(a), section I(d), or section I(e),
    (B) That the transaction is not described in any of the class 
exemptions listed in section I(b),
    (4) If the transaction is described in section III,
    (i) That the amount of space covered by the lease does not exceed 
the limitations described in section III(a); and
    (ii) That no commission or other fee is paid by the investment fund 
as described in section III(d).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of August, 2005.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits 
Security Administration, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05-16681 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P