[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47774-47776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 300

[Docket No. 060719189-5189-01; I.D. 071405C]
RIN 0648-AT33


International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Restrictions for 
2005 and 2006 Purse Seine and Longline Fisheries in the Eastern 
Tropical Pacific Ocean

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.

Action: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes this rule to implement the 2005 and 2006 
management measures to prevent overfishing of the eastern tropical 
Pacific Ocean (ETP) tuna stocks, consistent with recommendations by the 
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) that have been approved 
by the Department of State (DOS) under the Tuna Conventions Act. The 
purse seine fishery for tuna in the Convention Area would be closed for 
a 6-week period beginning November 20, 2005, through December 31, 2005, 
and beginning November 20, 2006, through December 31, 2006. A closure 
later in the fishing year minimizes the disruption of planned fishery 
operations, which are not traditionally active during the winter, while 
meeting the conservation goals for tunas in the ETP. This proposed rule 
would also close the U.S. longline fishery in the IATTC Convention Area 
in 2005 and 2006 if the catch reaches the estimated level of 2001. For 
2001, the estimated catch of longline caught bigeye tuna was 150 metric 
tons (mt). This action is taken to limit fishing mortality caused by 
purse seine fishing and longline fishing in the Convention Area and

[[Page 47775]]

contribute to long-term conservation of the tuna stocks at levels that 
support healthy fisheries.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed rule or the initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis (IRFA) should be sent to Rodney R. McInnis, 
Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean 
Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 or by email to the 
Southwest Region at [email protected]. Comments may also be submitted 
by email through the Federal e-Rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Include in the subject line of the e-mail comment 
the following document identifier: 0648-AT33. Comments also may be 
submitted by fax to (562) 980-4047. Copies of the initial regulatory 
impact review/IRFA may be obtained from the Southwest Regional 
Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, 
CA 90902-4213.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Allison Routt, Sustainable 
Fisheries Division, Southwest Region, NMFS, (562) 980-4030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

    This proposed rule is also accessible via the Internet at the 
Office of the Federal Register's website at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
    The United States is a member of the IATTC, which was established 
under the Convention for the Establishment of an Inter-American 
Tropical Tuna Commission signed in 1949 (Convention). The IATTC was 
established to provide an international arrangement to ensure the 
effective international conservation and management of highly migratory 
species of fish in the Convention Area. For the purposes of this 
closure, the Convention Area is defined to include the waters of the 
eastern tropical Pacific Ocean bounded by the coast of the Americas, 
the 40[deg] N. and 40[deg] S. parallels, and the 150[deg] W. meridian. 
The IATTC has maintained a scientific research and fishery monitoring 
program for many years and annually assesses the status of stocks of 
tuna and the fisheries to determine appropriate harvest limits or other 
measures to prevent overexploitation of the stocks and promote viable 
fisheries.
    Under the Tuna Conventions Act, 16 U.S.C. 951-961 and 971 et seq., 
NMFS must publish proposed rules to carry out IATTC recommendations 
that have been approved by DOS. The Southwest Regional Administrator, 
also is required by rules at 50 CFR 300.29(b)(3) to issue a direct 
notice to the owners or agents of all U.S. purse seine vessels that 
operate in the ETP of actions recommended by the IATTC and approved by 
the DOS.
    At an extraordinary meeting in October 2003, the IATTC adopted a 
resolution addressing yellowfin, bigeye, and skipjack tuna conservation 
for 2003 and 2004. The 2003 resolution called upon the Parties to the 
Convention and cooperating non-Parties to prohibit tuna purse seine 
fishing in a portion of the IATTC Convention Area for the month of 
December 2003 and for a 6-week period beginning August 1, 2004. NMFS 
implemented the 2003 closure by separate action in 2003.
    At the June 2004 IATTC meeting, the October 2003 resolution was 
revised and a new resolution was adopted by the Commission. The June 
2004 resolution is a multi-annual program on the conservation of tuna 
in the eastern Pacific Ocean for 2004, 2005, and 2006. This resolution 
offers a choice for closing the purse seine fishery, either a 6-week 
closure beginning August 1, of each year, or a 6-week closure beginning 
November 20, of each year. The resolution of June 2004 incorporated 
flexibility for nations to administer the purse seine closure in 
accordance with national legislation and national sovereignty. The 
selected measures should provide protection against overfishing of the 
stocks in a manner that is fair, equitable, and readily enforceable.
    Comments were received during the 2004 proposed rule comment period 
with respect to the timing of the closure. Most comments received noted 
that a closure later in the fishing year gave better public notice, 
minimized the disruption of planned fishery operations, and was in 
keeping with the timing of closures for this purse seine fishery and 
the ability for the industry to prepare for and plan the closure while 
meeting the conservation goals for tunas in the ETP. In response to 
these comments, the U.S. chose the period beginning on November 20, 
2004 for the 2004 closure of the purse seine fishery.
    The June 2004 resolution also calls upon each Party and cooperating 
non-Party to take measures necessary to ensure that each nation's 
longline catch of bigeye tuna in the ETP during 2005 and 2006 will not 
exceed the catch level of 2001. The U.S. catch level of longline caught 
bigeye tuna for 2001 is estimated to be 150 metric tons in the 
Convention Area. This limitation is intended to prevent overfishing of 
the stock, which has declined in recent years while longline fishing 
effort has greatly expanded. In 2004, the U.S. catch level of longline-
caught bigeye in the Convention Area of 150 mt was reached. On December 
10, 2004, NMFS closed the U.S. longline fishery for bigeye tuna in the 
Convention Area for the remainder of 2004.
    The IATTC action at the extraordinary meeting in October 2003 and 
the June 2004 resolution came after considering a variety of measures, 
including the use of quotas and partial fishery closures as in 1999 
through 2002 and the full month purse seine closure used in 2003.
    The proposed 2005 and 2006 time/area closure is based on 2004 
assessments of the condition of the tuna stocks in the ETP and historic 
catch and effort data for different portions of the ETP, as well as 
records relating to implementation of quotas and closures in prior 
years. The closure is targeted to areas with high catches of bigeye 
tuna in the purse seine fishery and is believed by the IATTC scientific 
staff to be sufficient to reduce the risk of overfishing of that stock, 
especially when considered in combination with the measures implemented 
in December 2004. The IATTC met in June 2005 and reviewed tuna stock 
assessments and fishery information and considered that new information 
in evaluating the need for management measures for 2005 and future 
years. The IATTC's June 2004 resolution remains in force, and the DOS 
has approved the resolution, including the management measures 
described above.
    The Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, sent a notice May 31, 
2005, to owners and agents of U.S. fishing vessels of the actions 
adopted by the IATTC and approved by the DOS.

Classification

    This action is proposed under the regulations for the Pacific Tuna 
Fisheries found at 50 CFR 300.25.
    On December 8, 1999, NMFS prepared a biological opinion (BO) 
assessing the impacts of the fisheries as they would operate under the 
regulations (65 FR 47, January 3, 2000) implementing the International 
Dolphin Conservation Program Act (IDCPA). For the final rule (69 FR 
176, September 13, 2004) to implement the IDCPA, NMFS amended the 
incidental take statement included in the December 8, 1999 BO. NMFS 
concluded that the fishing activities conducted under those regulations 
are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered 
or threatened species under the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the 
destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. This proposed 
rule will not result in any changes in the fisheries

[[Page 47776]]

such that there would be impacts beyond those considered in that BO. 
The IATTC has also taken action to reduce sea turtle injury and 
mortality from interactions in the purse seine fishery so impacts of 
the fisheries should be lower than in the past. Because this closure 
does not alter the scope of the fishery management regime analyzed in 
the IDCPA rule, or the scope of the impacts considered in that 
consultation, NMFS is relying on that analysis to conclude that this 
rule will not likely adversely effect any endangered or threatened 
species under the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the destruction or 
adverse modification of critical habitat. Therefore, NMFS has 
determined that additional consultation is not required for this 
action.
    The U.S. ETP tuna purse seine fisheries occasionally interact with 
a variety of species of dolphin, and dolphin takes are authorized and 
managed under the IDCPA. These conservation management measures in this 
proposed rule do not affect the administration of that program, which 
is consistent with section 303(a)(2) of the Marine Mammal Protection 
Act.
    NMFS prepared an EA for the final rule (70 FR 69, April 12, 2005), 
to implement resolutions adopted by the IATTC and by the Parties to the 
Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program. The 
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries concluded that there would be no 
significant impact on the human environment as a result of that final 
rule. The impacts of the fisheries as they will operate under the 6-
week closures in 2005 and 2006 are within the range of impacts of the 
alternatives considered in that EA, and are not expected to pose 
different impacts to the human environment. Therefore, this action does 
not require further analysis under NEPA.
    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    An IRFA was prepared that describes the economic impact that this 
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A copy of the 
IRFA for this proposed rule is available for public comment (see 
ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis follows.
    This action would prohibit the use of purse seine gear to harvest 
tuna in the Convention Area for a 6- week period beginning November 20, 
2005, through December 31, 2005, and beginning November 20, 2006, 
through December 31, 2006, and limit the annual 2005 and 2006 U.S. 
catch of bigeye tuna caught by longline in the ETP to the level reached 
in 2001 (150 metric tons).
    The proposed purse seine closure would apply to the U.S. tuna purse 
seine fleet, which consists of 10- 20 small vessels (carrying capacity 
below 400 short tons (363 metric tons)) and 4-6 large vessels (carrying 
capacity 400 short tons (363 metric tons) or greater). The large 
vessels usually fish outside U.S. waters and deliver their catch to 
foreign ports or transship to processors outside the mainland United 
States. The large vessels are categorized as large business entities 
(revenues in excess of $3.5 million per year). A large purse seine 
vessel typically generates 4,000 to 5,000 metric tons of tuna valued at 
between $4 and $5 million per year. The closure should not 
significantly affect their operations as they are capable of fishing in 
other areas that would remain open. The small vessels are categorized 
as small business entities (revenues below $3.5 million per year). They 
fish out of California in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) most 
of the year for small pelagic fish (Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel) 
and for market squid in summer. Some small vessels harvest tuna 
seasonally when they are available. The proposed time/area closure will 
have no effect on small vessels because they do not have the endurance 
and markets to fish that far south.
    For 2004, the U.S. chose to close the purse seine fishery beginning 
November 20, 2004, for the remainder of 2004. In 2004 the U.S. catch 
level of longline caught bigeye tuna in the Convention Area of 150 
metric tons was reached. On December 10, 2004, NMFS closed the U.S. 
longline fishery for bigeye tuna in the Convention Area for the 
remainder of 2004.
    The portion of the U.S. longline fleet (approximately 18 vessels) 
operating out of California has historically caught bigeye tuna in the 
swordfish fishery (now closed), so they should not be affected by the 
longline fishery limit. Further, the prohibition of swordfish targeted 
by this fleet has encouraged many of the vessel owners to relocate 
their activity to Hawaii; therefore, the likelihood that they will fish 
in the ETP for bigeye tuna is reduced. The portion of the fleet 
operating out of Hawaii has generally operated outside the boundaries 
of the IATTC Convention Area, and has not made significant catches in 
those waters. In 2004, the Hawaii based longline fishery harvested the 
150 metric ton limit of bigeye tuna in the Convention Area. With the 
reopening of the swordfish fishery for that fleet, effort directed at 
bigeye tuna (which has mainly occurred west of the Convention Area) 
should decrease. A closure should not significantly affect their 
operations as they are capable of fishing in other areas that would 
remain open, outside the boundaries of the IATTC Convention Area.
    NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. This rule does not impose 
reporting or recordkeeping requirements, and the compliance 
requirements for the closure areas are as described at the outset of 
this summary.
    NMFS considered three alternatives for this proposed rule:
    The 2004 IATTC Tuna Conservation Resolution allows nations to opt 
for a six-week summer closure of the purse seine fishery from August 1 
through September 20 of each of the years 2004, 2005, and 2006, rather 
than the closure from November 21 through December 31. Based on public 
comments on the proposed rule in 2004, NMFS chose to pursue six-week 
closures that begin in November 2005 and November 2006. The August 1 
September 20 closure alternative would have had a greater economic 
impact on small entities than the November 20 December 31 closure. In 
particular, the U.S. purse seine fleet prefers a closure later in the 
fishing year because the winter weather is not conducive to fishing. 
Also, throughout the history of this fishery shipyards have been 
prepared to accept vessels for scheduled repairs during the winter 
months. The fishery closure later in the year allows the industry to 
plan for and mitigate economic impacts of a closure while still 
providing the conservation benefits to the tuna resources in the ETP.
    NMFS also considered the alternative of not implementing the 2004 
IATTC Tuna Conservation Resolution. This alternative would have imposed 
no economic costs on small entities. However, failure to implement 
measures that have been agreed on pursuant to this Convention would 
violate the United States' obligations under the Convention, and would 
violate the Tuna Conventions Act.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951-961 and 971 et seq.

    Dated: August 9, 2005.
James W. Balsinger,
Acting Deputy Assistant, Administrator for Regulatory Programs, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-16115 Filed 8-10-05; 1:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S