[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43719-43721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4012]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-346]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
The FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the licensee)
is the holder of Facility Operating License No. NPF-3, which authorizes
operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS). The
license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to
all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a pressurized-water reactor located in
Ottawa County, Ohio.
2.0 Request
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50,
appendix R, ``Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities
Operating Prior to January 1, 1979,'' establishes fire protection
requirements to satisfy 10 CFR part 50, appendix A, General Design
Criterion No. 3, ``Fire Protection.'' By letter dated January 20, 2004
(ADAMS ML040220470), as supplemented by letters dated September 3, 2004
(ADAMS ML042520326), and February 25, 2005 (ADAMS ML050610249), FENOC
requested an exemption from Appendix R, Section III.G.3, ``Fire
Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability.''
The licensee is requesting an exemption from the requirements of
Section III.G.3 to provide area-wide fire detection and fixed fire
suppression in Fire Area HH. Control room emergency ventilation systems
are routed through Fire Area HH in the auxiliary building. Fire Area HH
is equipped with a fire detection system (covering approximately 96
percent of Fire Area HH), but no fixed suppression system is installed.
In summary, FENOC has requested an exemption from the 10 CFR Part
50, Appendix R, Section III.G.3 requirement for a fixed fire
suppression system in Fire Area HH and for fire detection in the
approximately 4 percent of Fire Area HH not equipped with a fire
detection system.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the Commission may, upon application
by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1) the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. These special circumstances
are described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), in that the application of
these regulations in this circumstance is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the regulations.
The underlying purpose of appendix R, section III.G, is to provide
features capable of limiting fire damage so that: (1) One train of
systems necessary to achieve and maintain hot shutdown conditions from
either the control room or emergency control station(s) is free of fire
damage; and (2) systems necessary to achieve and maintain cold shutdown
from either the control room or emergency control station(s) can be
repaired within 72 hours.
Fire Area HH consists of the Air Conditioning (A/C) Equipment Room
(Room 603), the Records and Storage Area (Room 603A), and Vestibule
(Room 603B). Room 603 consists of approximately 3,150 square feet of
floor area, with an in situ combustible loading consisting of cable
insulation; heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) duct
insulation; and small quantities of grease, lube oil, and miscellaneous
combustibles. Combustibles are located throughout the room, and in
proximity to the cables of interest. Rooms 603A and 603B do not contain
combustibles or equipment.
Existing fire protection capability in the area consists of a fire
detection system that protects the A/C Equipment Room (Room 603) and
manual (not fixed) fire suppression capability consisting of portable
fire extinguishers and standpipe hose stations for the protection of
the entire area. Rooms 603A and 603B are not equipped with detection.
Room 603A is separated from Room 603 by a 12-inch thick concrete
masonry unit wall and a Underwriters Laboratory Class B fire door with
a louvered opening. Room 603A is no longer used as a records storage
area. The louvered opening is equipped with a fire damper held open by
a fusible link. The door is normally locked and placarded with a sign
that states, ``Storage of Any Kind is Forbidden'' and ``Door Must
Remain Locked.'' Room 603B is a vestibule separated from Room 603 by a
2-hour rated barrier.
Fire Area HH has 3-hour rated fire barriers on the walls and
floors. The fire barrier between Room 603 and the stairwell and
elevator, Fire Area UU, is 2-hour rated. All cables are within
[[Page 43720]]
conduit or cabinets. There are no cable trays in Area HH.
Fire damage to the circuits for the Control Room Emergency
Ventilation System (CREVS) in Fire Area HH could disable the Control
Room HVAC.
The installed ionization smoke detection system will alert the
Control Room operators to summon the fire brigade to respond and
manually extinguish the fire. Standpipe hose stations are available to
the fire brigade. No combustibles are stored in Rooms 603A and 603B,
and these rooms are separated from Room 603, therefore a fire in Room
603A or 603B is not expected to damage the cables of interest.
FENOC performed an analysis to determine the impact of a fire in
Fire Area HH. For example, assuming a 500kW fire in Room 603, the room
would not exceed 250 [deg]F for at least 20 minutes. Even with this
relatively large fire size for the equipment in the room, the room
temperature would not be high enough to cause area-wide cable damage.
Also, 20 minutes would provide time for the fire brigade to respond to
the fire alarm that would annunciate in the control room. The 20-minute
response time allows 5 minutes for the detection system to actuate and
15 minutes for the fire brigade to respond.
FENOC verified that a number of the motor control centers in Room
603 were remote from the cables of interest and therefore, would not be
expected to impact them. Other combustible sources were considered to
cause damage to the cables of interest and are discussed in the risk
analysis.
A floor drain is provided in Room 603. Based on the configuration
of the room, it is expected that if any of the combustible liquids leak
from their enclosures the liquids would flow to the floor drain and not
flow to below the circuits of interest, where if ignited, could cause a
fire that would impact the cables of interest.
Loss of the Control Room HVAC is not expected to have an immediate
effect on the ability to shutdown the plant from the Control Room. With
no reduction in Control Room heat load, FENOC calculated that it will
take 30 minutes before the Control Room will reach a temperature of 105
[deg]F. Although procedural guidance to mitigate a temporary loss of
HVAC is provided (i.e., by reducing the Control Room heat load), the
operators may need to or choose to abandon the Control Room due to high
temperatures.
FENOC has identified a few pinch points where a single fire could
potentially fail both trains of CREVS circuits. These pinch points are
in the area near the C6714 and C6715 cabinets, around C6705 cabinet,
and a transient fire affecting the CREVS controls and compressors
located in Room 603. Since the room configuration does not assure that
safe shutdown will not be challenged, the licensee has performed a risk
analysis to determine the probability that the existing configuration
will challenge safe shutdown as discussed below.
Alternate shutdown capability can be provided by evacuating the
Control Room and shutting down the plant from the Auxiliary Shutdown
Panel. Plant procedures include instructions for these manual operator
actions if Control Room cooling is disabled.
The licensee performed a risk analysis of Room 603, and determined
that the fire frequency of fires that could impact the CREVS is 8.25E-
5/year. The risk analysis also estimates the likelihood that the
Control Room operators would fail to take actions to shed Control Room
heating loads in order to keep the Control Room habitable. This
conditional probability of failure to shed control room heat loads was
evaluated as 0.05 (5E-2). The risk analysis also estimates the
likelihood that safe shutdown would fail if a fire affecting the CREVS
required control room evacuation. This conditional probability was
calculated to be 0.079 (7.9E-2). Therefore, the probability that both
the CREVS cables would be damaged by a fire and the mitigation from
outside the control room would fail would be:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fail to
Fail to shed shutdown from
Fire frequency x heat loads x alt. shutdown = Total
panel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.25E-5/year..................................... .. 5E-2 .. 7.9E-2 .. 3.3.E-7/year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This value is the frequency that a fire in the area may challenge
safe shutdown. The value may be smaller (for example, this value does
not take credit for manual suppression). FENOC also provides the
overall core-damage frequency for DBNPS as 1.2E-5/year.
The NRC staff examined the licensee's submittals to determine if
the configuration in Fire Area HH would meet the underlying purpose of
the rule, 10 CFR part 50, appendix R. The NRC staff has compared the
configuration to the three defense-in-depth elements described in 10
CFR part 50, appendix R:
1. To prevent fires from starting,
2. To detect rapidly, control, and extinguish promptly those fires
that do occur, and
3. To provide protection for structures, systems and components
important to safety so that a fire that is not promptly extinguished by
the fire suppression activities will not prevent the safe shutdown of
the plant.
The combustibles and ignition sources in Fire Area HH are limited
to those expected in an area of this type. The licensee has control
over transient combustibles and hot work performed in this area.
Combustible liquids are installed within equipment, and cables are
installed within cabinets and conduits; no cable trays are installed in
the area. According to the licensee's analysis, if the combustible
liquids were to escape their enclosure, they would flow to the floor
drain and not to an area of Room 603 where, if ignited, could affect
the cables of interest. There is substantial separation (2-hour rated
barriers) between this area and other exposing fire areas.
Room 603 is equipped with an ionization smoke detection system
which annunciates to the control room for rapid plant response. The
other rooms, 603A and 603B, do not contain combustibles and are
separated from Room 603, and therefore are not considered to be an
ignition source that could damage the cables of interest. In the
unusual event that a fire did occur in either Room 603A or 603B, it is
expected that the fire detectors in Room 603 would actuate. Fire
suppression equipment (hose stations and fire extinguishers) are
available for suppression of a fire were it to occur.
Based on the room size and expected fire types, a fire creating a
hot layer that causes area wide damage is not expected.
The licensee identified combustibles and pinch points in Fire Area
HH. These may be subjected to fires in the area, which could challenge
safe shutdown. FENOC states that there are only a few pinch points and
only a few
[[Page 43721]]
fire hazards that could affect the pinch points. Although it is
unlikely that a fire will affect the pinch points, if such damage were
to occur and the CREVS was to be made inoperable, means to achieve safe
shutdown remain available. First, the operators could shed loads to
reduce the heat load in the Control Room so that Control Room
abandonment is not required. Secondly, if Control Room abandonment is
required, the alternate shutdown panel is available to shutdown the
plant. The licensee performed a risk analysis of these configurations
which is described above.
The risk analysis in the February 25, 2005, submittal is generally
consistent with the NRC's fire protection significance determination
process (Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix F). The results of
the analysis are consistent with a change that would be acceptable when
compared to the acceptance criteria described in Regulatory Guide
1.174, ``An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-
Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis,''
Revision 1.
The evaluation that FENOC prepared assesses the impact of the
change. This evaluation uses a combination of risk-insights and
deterministic methods to show that sufficient safety margins are
maintained.
The NRC staff examined the licensee's rationale to support the
exemption request and concluded that adequate defense-in-depth and
safety margins exist. Although fixed suppression is not installed in
the area, the configuration of the area makes it unlikely that the
cables of interest will be damaged by a fire in the area. Also, if the
cables of interest are damaged, adequate assurance remains to
demonstrate that the plant can be brought to a safe shutdown condition.
Based upon the above, the NRC staff concludes that application of
the regulation is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of
the rule. Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), the requested exemption is acceptable.
5.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants FENOC an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, appendix R, section III.G.3 to install
a fixed fire suppression system in Fire Area HH for DBNPS and to
install fire detection in the approximately 4 percent of Fire Area HH
(i.e., Rooms 603A and 603B) not currently covered by a fire detection
system. This exemption is based on the limited combustibles located in
the fire area (including no storage of combustibles in Rooms 603A and
603B), the limited ignition sources in the fire area, administrative
controls on both transient combustibles and hot work, the configuration
of Room 603 that avoids in-situ combustible liquids from affecting the
cables of interest, the fire detection and manual suppression
capability available, and the availability of alternate means to
achieve shutdown if a fire were to occur and cause damage to the cables
of interest.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment (70 FR 42112).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 21 day of July 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Ledyard B. Marsh,
Director, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5-4012 Filed 7-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P