[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32386-32391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-51742: File No. SR-NASD-2005-030]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities 
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment 
No. 1 Thereto Relating to Proposed Uniform Branch Office Registration 
Form (``Form BR'') and Amendments to the Uniform Application for 
Securities Industry Registration or Transfer (``Form U4'') and the 
Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration (``Form 
U5'')

May 25, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on March 11, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. On May 12, 2005, 
NASD amended the proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 1''). The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASD is proposing to adopt the Form BR and to make conforming 
changes to the Form U4 and Form U5 (``Forms''). The proposed Forms are 
available at NASD and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, as 
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule 
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places 
specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to establish a uniform 
branch office registration form (``Form BR'') that would enable broker-
dealers to register branch offices electronically with NASD, the New 
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''), other self-regulatory 
organizations (``SROs''), and states, (as applicable), through the 
Central Registration Depository (``CRD(r)'', the ``CRD system'', or 
``Web CRD'') via a uniform form. The proposed Form BR would replace 
Schedule E of the Uniform Application for Broker-Dealer Registration 
(``Form BD''), the current NYSE Branch Office Application form, and 
certain state branch office forms.\3\

[[Page 32387]]

This rule change also would make certain technical revisions to the 
Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer 
(``Form U4'') and Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry 
Registration (``Form U5'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Currently, broker-dealers register or report branch offices 
or other business locations on Schedule E of the Form BD. NYSE 
member firms are required to submit the NYSE Branch Office 
Application to register a branch office with the NYSE. In addition, 
Connecticut, Florida, Nevada and Vermont have separate branch office 
forms that request similar information for firms seeking to register 
a branch office in those states; moreover, more than 20 states 
require broker-dealers to submit a ``notice filing'' when a firm 
opens or closes a branch office.
    With the implementation of Form BR, NASD anticipates that the 
Commission would eliminate Schedule E from Form BD, and the NYSE 
would retire the current NYSE Branch Office Application. 
Connecticut, Florida, Nevada, and Vermont also have indicated that 
they plan to retire their respective forms and adopt the Form BR. 
Other jurisdictions that currently require ``notice filings'' for 
branch openings and closings have indicated that they also expect to 
adopt the Form BR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Background. A working group composed of NASD and NYSE staff and 
representatives of the North American Securities Administrators 
Association (``NASAA'') and states (hereinafter referred to as the 
``Working Group'') developed the proposed Form BR to enable broker-
dealers to register branch offices electronically with NASD, the NYSE, 
and states that require branch office registration, through a single 
filing with the CRD system. The Working Group derived the majority of 
questions on the proposed Form BR from questions currently on one or 
more of the existing branch office forms and added questions to elicit 
additional information that would be of regulatory value to SROs and 
states. The proposed Form BR would make the branch office registration 
process more efficient by eliminating duplicative forms, reconciling 
inconsistencies among existing branch office forms, and eliminating 
duplicative questions.\4\ To the extent possible, the proposed Form BR 
would use the same terms as those used in existing uniform forms.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The proposed Form BR would be only one component of a 
broader project regarding the registration of branch offices through 
the CRD system. NASD is planning enhancements to the CRD system to 
coincide with the implementation of Form BR that would enable firms 
to designate, and users to identify, each registered person's branch 
office(s). Firms also would be able to obtain a report via Web CRD 
that would list individuals who are currently associated with a 
branch, or were associated with a branch during a specific time 
period. In addition, regulators would be able to obtain reports on 
branch offices within a firm and registered individuals in those 
branches.
    \5\ The ``Explanation of Terms'' section of proposed Form BR 
would include definitions of additional terms used in the context of 
branch office registration and reporting, such as ``closing,'' 
``person-in-charge,'' ``regular branch,'' ``small branch,'' 
``supervisor,'' and ``withdrawal.'' NYSE has made slight 
modifications to the definitions of ``small branch'' and ``regular 
branch.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Form BR was developed on the premise that firms would 
file the Form through Web CRD. In addition to the filing and cost 
efficiencies identified above, Web CRD system functionality would 
enforce certain filing disciplines that would enhance the integrity of 
the data in the CRD system. For example, system cross-checks between 
the Form BR and the ``Office of Employment Address'' section of Form U4 
would provide greater assurances regarding accuracy of the locations 
from which registered representatives are conducting business. In 
addition, regulators would be able to generate reports through CRD 
based on information reported on the Form BR in conjunction with other 
information reported in the CRD system. This should enable regulators 
to gather information and deploy examination resources more 
efficiently.
    Making the Transition to Form BR. Following the implementation 
date, firms would be required to use the Form BR in place of the 
existing NYSE's Branch Office Application, Schedule E of the Form BD, 
and forms required by participating states, and to file a Form BR for 
each branch. In addition, firms would be required to link registered 
individuals to each branch with which they are associated.
    As part of the transition process, and prior to the implementation 
date, NASD would pre-populate the Form BR (i.e., have certain 
information already reported in the CRD system by a firm automatically 
entered onto the Form BR) with certain data elements based on existing 
NASD, NYSE, and jurisdiction branch office data, e.g., Branch Address, 
NASD Branch Number, NYSE Branch Code Number, NASD/NYSE Supervisor/
Person-In-Charge Name and CRD Number, Operational Status, and NYSE/
Jurisdiction Registration Status. To facilitate the transition process, 
firms would be able to provide NASD with a data feed of the name and 
CRD number of the individuals associated with each branch office. 
Alternatively, after a firm files a Form BR for each of its branches, 
it would be able to file an amended Form U4 for each individual, to 
associate that individual with a branch (by providing certain 
information in the ``Office of Employment Address'' section of Form 
U4). If a firm were to not have a branch, it would be able to associate 
an individual (or individuals) with the firm's main office.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Each branch office would be assigned a branch code. The code 
for the main office will be zero (``0'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Highlights of the Proposed Form BR. There would be nine sections in 
the proposed Form BR, as described below. The Form BR would permit 
applicants (i.e., firms) to: (1) Apply for approval of or report a 
branch office (an ``initial'' filing); (2) amend information previously 
reported (an ``amendment'' filing); (3) terminate a branch office 
registration (a ``closing'' filing); or (4) withdraw an initial filing 
prior to approval by a jurisdiction or SRO (a ``withdrawal'' filing).

 Section 1--General Information

    Section 1 would report the applicant's CRD number, name, address, 
Billing Code, branch address, and telephone number. NASD would pre-
populate the applicant's CRD number, name, and address.

 Section 2--Registration/Notice Filing/Type of Office

    Section 2 would ask the applicant to state where the branch would 
be registered (or notice filed), the type of branch office 
registration, and whether it is an NASD office of supervisory 
jurisdiction (``OSJ''). If it is not an OSJ, the applicant would be 
required to provide the branch number for the OSJ that has supervisory 
responsibility over the branch and the CRD number of the supervisor in 
charge of that OSJ. Section 2 also would provide applicants with the 
opportunity to identify a ``person-in-charge'' (who may or may not be a 
registered principal) who has supervisory responsibilities at the 
branch. Consistent with the uniform form concept, Section 2 of the 
proposed Form BR would give applicants the opportunity to designate 
whether the branch office filing is being made on behalf of a broker-
dealer (``BD''), an investment adviser (``IA''), or both. This feature 
would enable firms to register or report IA branches in states that 
require such registration and reporting. Section 2 also would ask for 
NYSE Small Branch information.

 Section 3--Types of Activities/Other Business Names/Websites

    Section 3 would collect information with respect to the types of 
financial industry activities conducted by the applicant and any 
investment-related activities conducted by associated persons at the 
branch location. Section 3 also would ask the applicant to disclose the 
names being used by any associated person to conduct investment-related 
business at the branch other than those names disclosed on the 
applicant's Form BD or Form ADV (``Uniform Application for Investment 
Adviser Registration''). Section 3 also would ask for the website

[[Page 32388]]

addresses used by the branch office other than the applicant's primary 
Web site address.

 Section 4--Branch Office Arrangements

    Consistent with questions currently asked on Schedule E of the Form 
BD, Section 4 of the proposed Form BR would elicit information on 
branch office arrangements, including space sharing arrangements and 
liability for expenses.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NASD notes that Section 4 would not require applicants to 
report insurance agency agreements with the main office pursuant to 
which the branch operates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Section 5--Associated Individuals \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ NASD notes that the title of Section 5--``Associated 
Individuals''--refers to registered individuals who are associated 
with the particular branch office. Applicants would not be required 
to report the names of associated persons who are not registered 
with NASD.

    Section 5, which would have to be completed only for initial branch 
office registration filings, would ask for the names and CRD numbers of 
registered persons associated with a branch.\9\ Individuals identified 
by the firm in this section would populate a dynamic ``branch roster'' 
of registered persons in Web CRD, which would be made available to 
firms. Once the branch has been established, changes to the branch 
roster would automatically be made through Web CRD when: (1) The 
``Office of Employment'' address on the Form U4 is amended when an 
individual leaves a branch for another branch; or (2) the Form U5 is 
amended when an individual leaves a firm. This functionality should 
facilitate a firm's ability to comply with one of the requirements 
contained in Exchange Act Rule 17a-4(l).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Firms would be required to enter the CRD number, and then 
the name would populate in the field.
    \10\ Rule 17a-4(l) requires certain records for the most recent 
two-year period to be maintained at the office to which they relate. 
Among other reports, firms would be able to print a report that 
would list individuals who are currently associated with a branch, 
or who were associated with the branch during a specific time 
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Section 6--NYSE Branch Information

    Only NYSE-registered firms (i.e., firms registered with the NYSE) 
would be able to view Section 6 on Web CRD, and only NYSE-registered 
firms would be required to complete Section 6. The proposed Form BR 
would incorporate the information elicited on the NYSE's current Branch 
Office Application and Office Space-Sharing forms. The CRD system would 
interact with the NYSE's branch office system on NYSE branch office 
registration filings.
    The NYSE's current protocol for requesting approval for new branch 
offices would continue with the proposed Form BR. NYSE members would 
use Form BR to request such approvals, and the information provided by 
NYSE members would be transmitted to the NYSE, which, in turn, would 
communicate its determinations (e.g., approvals) to the requesting NYSE 
firms through the CRD system.

 Section 7--Branch Closing

    Section 7 would be completed by a firm only upon the closing of a 
branch office registered with a jurisdiction or an SRO. Information in 
Section 7 would include, among other things, the date operations 
ceased, or will cease, the location of the branch's books and records, 
and the name and telephone number of the contact person.
    Because a branch office may move from one state to another, 
especially if the office is located near a state border, the proposed 
Form BR and the CRD system have been designed to accommodate such moves 
through amendment filings. Specifically, a firm would be able to file a 
single Form BR amendment that would both close the branch in one state 
and register the branch in another state that also has a registration 
or notice requirement. The Specific Instructions and notifications (the 
latter triggered by the state address change) in Section 1 (General 
Information) and Section 2 (Registration/Notice Filing/Type of Office) 
would advise applicants that the amendment has both changed the branch 
address to another state and closed the branch in the first state. In 
addition, the amendment would serve as a request to open a branch in 
the state to which the branch has moved if it is a state that requires 
registration or notice filing of branches.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For purposes of the proposed Form BR, NASD would view a 
change in location simply as an amendment filing, not a request to 
open a new branch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Section 8--Branch Withdrawal

    Firms would be required to complete Section 8 only upon withdrawal 
of a pending application. Information in this section would include the 
date of withdrawal, the reason for withdrawal, and the name and 
telephone number of the contact person.

 Section 9--Signature

    Section 9 would be the signature page. The language on the 
signature page would be consistent with the current attestations on the 
Form U4 and the Form BD.
    Conforming Changes to Forms U4 and U5. NASD is also proposing 
conforming changes to the Forms U4 and U5 to fully integrate the branch 
office registration and reporting process through the CRD system. 
First, NASD is proposing changes to the ``Office of Employment'' 
address on the Form U4 to parallel the information reported on the Form 
BR, and to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the link between 
registered representatives and their branches. When completing the Form 
U4, the firm/individual would be asked to select the branch office(s) 
from which the registered person will work based on the list of branch 
offices identified by the firm (through the filing of Forms BR). Once 
the branch is selected, the Office of Employment screen would populate 
the Form U4 with the following data elements based on information 
reported on the Form BR: CRD Branch Number, NYSE Branch Code Number, 
address, start and end dates, and type of office. The Form U5 would 
display the same information.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ NASD would remove from the Forms U4 and U5 the specific 
instructions and form fields that currently require reporting of 
information that would be provided via Form BR and would pre-
populate the appropriate fields on the Forms U4 and U5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Working Group would add a question to the Form U4 to 
elicit whether the individual has an independent contractor 
relationship with the branch office. This question, which is currently 
on Schedule E of Form BD, was initially on the proposed Form BR. 
However, the Working Group determined that the question more 
appropriately belongs on Form U4. Third, NASD is proposing changes to 
the Specific Instructions to address the Form U4 and Form U5 changes. 
Fourth, NASD is proposing other technical changes.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ NASD would add to the Forms U4 and U5 registration 
categories that the Commission has previously approved: See 
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50162 (August 6, 2004), 69 FR 
50406 (August 16, 2004) (SR-NASD-2004-078) (Research Analyst (RS) 
and Research Principal (RP)); and 49922 (June 28, 2004), 69 FR 40701 
(July 6, 2004) (SR-PCX-2003-51) (Pacific Stock Exchange positions 
Market Maker (44), Floor Broker (45), and Market Maker acting as a 
Floor Broker (46)). Additionally, NASD would reorganize the 
electronic filing representations on the Form U4, Section 6 
(Regulatory Requests with Affiliated Firms), for submitting a 
fingerprint for registration with an affiliated firm, so that the 
representations would follow a more logical order; the content of 
the representations would not change. Finally, NASD would amend the 
Forms U4 and U5 to reflect the change in name of the Cincinnati 
Stock Exchange (CSE) to the National Stock Exchange (NSX). See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48774 (November 12, 2003), 68 FR 
65332 (November 19, 2003) (SR-CSE-2003-12). In addition, the 
instructions on the Form U4 with respect to submitting fingerprint 
cards would be modified to describe the radio button representation. 
New instructions on the Form U5 would explain the circumstances 
under which the office of employment address would be prepopulated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32389]]

    As noted in Section 2 of this filing, NASD proposes to implement 
the proposed rule change (i.e., make the Form BR effective) in early 
October 2005. NASD would announce the implementation date of the 
proposed rule change and a transition schedule in a Notice to Members 
to be published no later than 60 days following Commission approval. 
The transition schedule would identify key milestones, including: (1) 
The date branch office functionality would be deployed in the CRD 
System; (2) the date by which firms would be required to file a Form BR 
for each branch; and (3) the date by which firms would be required to 
link all registered individuals to each branch with which they are 
associated. NASD proposes to give firms a total of approximately six 
months to complete the transition.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASD believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is 
consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\14\ 
which requires, among other things, that NASD rules must be designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just 
and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest. NASD believes that the proposed rule 
change is designed to accomplish these ends by establishing the Form 
BR, a uniform branch office registration form that would (1) permit 
firms to register their branch offices with NASD, the NYSE, and certain 
states via the CRD system; (2) make the branch office registration 
process more efficient by replacing Schedule E of the Form BD, the 
current NYSE Branch Office Application form, and certain state forms 
with one uniform form; and (3) allow a more effective mechanism for 
linking and tracking a registered representative to a particular branch 
office. The proposed conforming changes to the Form U4 and Form U5 
would be made to update these Forms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change, as amended, 
would result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    The proposed rule change was published for comment in NASD Notice 
to Members 04-55 (August 2004). Twenty-one comments were received in 
response to the Notice. A copy of the Notice and copies of the comment 
letters received in response to the Notice are available at NASD and at 
the Commission. As more fully described below, 12 of the 21 commenters 
supported the proposed rule change (six of these commenters had 
reservations), seven commenters were opposed, and two commenters had 
questions about the proposed Form BR but did not state a position.
    Following receipt of the comments, the Working Group reviewed the 
proposed Form BR to determine whether each of the proposed questions 
had sufficient regulatory value to be kept on the Form BR or, in the 
alternative, should be eliminated or modified, and whether the 
instructions, terminology, format, and proposed questions were 
sufficiently clear and understandable. In response to the comments, the 
Working Group made certain revisions to the proposed Form BR, as 
discussed below.

 Comments Relating to Content of the Proposed Form BR

 Pre-populating the Proposed Form BR

    In response to the five commenters who suggested that NASD pre-
populate the proposed Form BR wherever possible, NASD would pre-
populate a number of questions in Section 1 (General Information) from 
information already reported in Web CRD. Further, applicants would be 
required to complete Section 5 (Associated Individual) only for initial 
branch office filings. To associate a registered individual with a 
branch office after the initial branch office filing, applicants would 
only need to update the address where the individual is employed on 
that individual's Form U4. NASD would populate the following Form BR 
data elements based on existing NASD, NYSE, and jurisdiction branch 
office data: Branch Address, NASD Branch Number, NYSE Branch Code 
Number, NASD/NYSE Supervisor/Person-In-Charge Name and CRD Number, 
Operational Status, and NYSE/Jurisdiction Registration Status. To 
facilitate the transition process, firms would have the option of 
providing to NASD a data feed of the name and CRD number of the 
individuals associated with each branch.

 Section 1--General Information

    As noted above, seven fields would be pre-populated.

 Section 2--Registration/Notice Filing/Type of Office

    Six commenters commented on Section 2. One commenter recommended 
that the Form ask for information only about one supervisor. The 
Working Group decided not to limit the question to one supervisor, 
since there could be more than one supervisor in a branch office. 
However, in response to a comment that it was duplicative to ask 
whether a supervisor was currently associated with the firm, the 
Working Group eliminated that question. The Working Group left intact 
the requirement to check a box requiring the applicant to attest that 
it is not required to register the branch with the NYSE. With respect 
to a comment that the information in Section 2 was already being 
reported on the Form U4, the Working Group eliminated the 
``Disclosure,'' ``SD'' status, and ``Independent Contractor'' fields. 
Applicants would only need to supply the name and/or CRD number of the 
supervisor/person-in-charge.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The individual's firm and regulators would be able to 
access the individual's entire CRD record by selecting the 
individual's CRD number from the current list of individuals 
associated with the branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Section 3--Types of Activities/Other Business Names/Websites

    Section 3, among other things, would include a question about the 
outside activities of associated persons. Six commenters had concerns 
about the scope of information being elicited and the difficulty of 
updating the information when persons join or leave a firm. After 
considering the comments, the Working Group determined that there is a 
regulatory need for information regarding the ``investment-related'' 
activities of associated persons conducted at the branch. Therefore, 
the Working Group eliminated the checklist of financial industry 
activities, business, or services conducted by any associated person of 
the applicant at the branch and replaced it with a question limited to 
a description of any outside ``investment-related'' activities, a term 
that is defined in the Form U4. The Working Group made a corresponding 
change to the Section 3 question eliciting information about business 
conducted by associated persons under names other than those disclosed 
on the applicant's Form BD or Form ADV. That question is now limited to 
``investment-related'' business as well.
    The Working Group also considered a commenter's concerns about the 
costs of gathering information about associated

[[Page 32390]]

persons' activities, and the potential for firm responsibility for 
associated persons' outside business activities. The commenter 
suggested that disclosure should be limited to information about firms. 
The Working Group nonetheless concluded that the questions being asked 
in Section 3, as revised, have significant regulatory value and should 
be retained.

 Section 4--Branch Office Arrangements

    Section 4 elicits information about branch office arrangements and 
payment of expenses. There were eight comments about this section, 
which generally asked for clarification of the questions. Initially, a 
question in Section 4 (taken essentially verbatim from the Schedule E) 
asked whether the branch had a written agreement with the main office 
and whether five percent or more of its registered representatives were 
deemed to be ``independent contractors.'' The Working Group eliminated 
this question in its entirety because: (1) Another question in Section 
4 would ask whether the business location operates under a written 
agreement; and (2) as previously discussed, information about 
independent contractors would be elicited on the Form U4. The Working 
Group added a question that permits applicants to explain any expense 
payment or financial interest arrangement in their own words.

 Section 5--Associated Individuals

    Section 5, as initially proposed, requested, as to each associated 
person at the branch, the person's CRD number, disclosure information, 
SD status, and whether the person is an independent contractor. Seven 
commenters noted that the requested information was duplicative and 
unnecessary. In response, the Working Group eliminated the 
``Disclosure,'' ``SD,'' and ``Independent Contractor'' fields from this 
section. As modified, firms would be required to enter only the 
individual's CRD number (or in the alternative, the individual's 
name).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The individual's firm and regulators would be able to 
access the individual's entire CRD record by ``clicking'' on the 
individual's CRD number when viewing Section 5 of the Form BR in Web 
CRD.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Section 6--NYSE Branch Information

    In response to comments, the Working Group eliminated two questions 
and clarified others.

 Section 7--Branch Closing

    This section elicits information about the date operations would 
cease at the branch office, the location of the branch's books and 
records, and the name and telephone number of a contact person. One 
commenter stated the view that Section 7 made branch closing or 
withdrawal more complicated. Another commenter suggested pre-populating 
Section 7. A third commenter stated that the information being asked 
was already available on the Form U5. The Working Group eliminated a 
question asking whether the office closing was to be listed in the NYSE 
Bulletin, but did not otherwise change the questions on the basis that 
this information has regulatory value.
    In response to comments, the Working Group clarified the 
instructions applicable to this section to indicate that Question 7 
would be asking for the name and telephone number of the contact person 
(not the address of the contact person), as well as the location of the 
books and records of the closed branch. In addition, Question 7 would 
permit a firm to provide multiple locations for the books and records 
of the closed firm if they are being maintained at more than one 
location.

 Section 8--Branch Withdrawal

    Although one commenter questioned the need for this information, 
the Working Group determined to keep the proposed question, which would 
ask for the date and reason for withdrawal and the name and telephone 
number of a contact person, on the basis that this information would be 
of value to regulators.

 Section 9--Signature

    As initially proposed, Section 9 required the signatory to certify 
``under penalty of perjury'' that he or she had signed the form on 
behalf of, and with the authority of, the applicant. The attestation 
also required the signatory and the applicant to represent that the 
applicant would promptly file any required amendments to the Form BR. 
One commenter contended that the signer should not be required to 
attest on behalf of himself and the firm as to the truth of information 
supplied by associated individuals or as to future amendments. Another 
commenter noted that neither the current NYSE Branch Office Application 
nor Schedule E amendments require a signature and suggested that the 
Form BR limit the attestation to ``the best of the member's knowledge 
the application is accurate and complete in all material respects.'' 
The Working Group carefully considered these comments and revised the 
attestation to remove ``under penalty of perjury'' and the statement 
regarding future amendments on behalf of the signatory and the firm. 
The Working Group, however, believes that the integrity of the data to 
be reported on Form BR requires an attestation that the statements are 
``current, true and complete.''

 Other Comments

    Four commenters favored the proposed Form BR only if all states 
were to accept the Form in place of state registration requirements. 
NASD notes in this filing that Connecticut, Florida, Nevada, and 
Vermont have indicated that they plan to retire their respective branch 
registration forms and adopt the Form BR. Several of the states that 
require a ``notice filing'' also have agreed at this time to use the 
proposed Form BR in place of their forms. Although NASD cannot speak 
for other states, it notes that NASAA, which has been an integral part 
of the Working Group involved in the creation of the Form BR, has 
indicated that it expects to formally endorse the Form BR.
    NASD has also considered comments concerning the costs to firms of 
filing the proposed Form BR for each of their branches. One commenter 
contended that the proposed Form BR would have a disproportionate and 
negative impact on broker-dealers affiliated with life insurers if 
NASD's proposed definition of ``branch office'' is implemented. The 
proposed Form BR is not, as this commenter suggests, linked to NASD's 
proposed rule change regarding the definition of branch office. NASD is 
addressing the impact of its proposed definition of branch office in a 
separate rule filing.\17\ As explained above, the purpose of the 
proposed Form BR is to enable broker-dealers to register branch offices 
electronically with NASD, the NYSE, other SROs, and states (as 
applicable) via one uniform form through Web CRD. The proposed Form BR 
would combine in one form Schedule E of the Form BD, NYSE's Branch 
Office Application, and forms required by certain states. As this 
commenter correctly notes, this concept offers the opportunity for 
efficient regulatory compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48897 (December 9, 
2003), 68 FR 70059 (December 16, 2003) (SR-NASD-2003-104) (Notice of 
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by 
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to 
Proposed New Uniform Definition of ``Branch Office'' Under NASD Rule 
3010(g)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and

[[Page 32391]]

publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NASD-2005-030 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20549-0609.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-030. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection 
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the 
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-NASD-2005-030 and should be submitted on or before June 
23, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-2810 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P