[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 82 (Friday, April 29, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22283-22287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

27 CFR Part 9

[Notice No. 40; Ref: T.D. ATF-454]
RIN 1513-AA50


Santa Rita Hills Viticultural Area Proposed Name Abbreviation to 
Sta. Rita Hills (2003R-091P)

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a petition, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 
Trade Bureau proposes to modify the name of the existing ``Santa Rita 
Hills'' American viticultural area by abbreviating its name to ``Sta. 
Rita Hills.'' We propose this change to prevent possible confusion 
between wines bearing the Santa Rita Hills appellation and wines 
bearing the Santa Rita brand name used by a Chilean winery. The size 
and boundaries of the existing viticultural area will remain unchanged. 
We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe 
the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify 
wines they may purchase. We invite comments on this proposed amendment 
to our regulations.

DATES: We must receive written comments on or before June 28, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any one of the following addresses:
     Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and 
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 40, P.O. Box 14412, 
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
     202-927-8525 (facsimile).
     [email protected] (e-mail).
     http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm (an online 
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site).
     http://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal; 
follow instructions for submitting comments).
    You may view copies of this notice, the petition, and any comments 
we receive on this proposal by appointment at the TTB Library, 1310 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call 202-
927-2400. You may also access copies of the notice and comments online 
at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
    See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific 
instructions and requirements for submitting comments and for 
information on how to request a public hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Butler, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax 
and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Procedures Division, 1310 G. St., 
NW., Washington, DC 20220; telephone 202-927-8210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background on Viticultural Areas

TTB Authority

    Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA 
Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels 
provide the consumer with adequate information regarding a product's 
identity and prohibits the use of misleading information on those 
labels. The FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to 
issue regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations.
    Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the 
establishment of definitive American viticultural areas and the use of 
their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine 
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains 
the list of approved viticultural areas.

Definition

    Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) 
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries 
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations. 
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given 
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes 
grown in an area to its geographic origin. The establishment of 
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the 
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify 
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is 
neither an approval nor an

[[Page 22284]]

endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area.

Requirements

    Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure 
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any 
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region 
as a viticultural area. Petitioners may use the same procedure to 
request changes involving existing viticultural areas. Section 9.3(b) 
of the TTB regulations requires the petition to include--
     Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally 
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
     Historical or current evidence that supports setting the 
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
     Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as 
climate, elevation, physical features, and soils, that distinguish the 
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
     A description of the specific boundary of the proposed 
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological 
Survey (USGS) maps; and
     A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed 
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.

Sta. Rita Hills Petition

General Background

    TTB received a petition from a group of 11 viticulturists and 
vintners in the established Santa Rita Hills viticultural area (27 CFR 
9.162) in Santa Barbara County, California, proposing to abbreviate the 
name of the viticultural area as ``Sta. Rita Hills.'' The 11 people who 
signed this petition are: Richard R. Longoria, owner of Richard 
Longoria Wines; Mary Melville, Retail Marketing Manager for Melville 
Vineyards and Winery; Norman Huber, owner of Huber Vineyard; Wesley D. 
Hagen, Vineyard Manager at Close Pepe Estate; J. Richard Sanford, 
Managing Partner for Sanford Winery; David Lafond, General Manager of 
Santa Barbara Winery and Lafond Winery; John M. Sundheim, Vice 
President of Arita Hills, Inc. (vineyard); Peter Work, owner of the 
winery Wine @ Work; Deborah Hall, owner of Gypsy Canyon (Olivestone); 
Ashley Parker Snider, Executive Vice President of Fess Parker Winery 
and Vineyard; and M. Perry Osborne, owner/trustee for Hill Top Ranch.
    The petitioners are requesting abbreviation of the name of the 
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area as ``Sta. Rita Hills'' in order to 
prevent confusion between wine bearing the ``Santa Rita Hills'' 
appellation and wines bearing the ``Santa Rita'' brand name. The 
petitioners do not believe such confusion is likely, but recognize the 
legitimate concerns of Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, the Chilean producer of 
Santa Rita brand wines. The petitioners believe it would be in the best 
interests of all parties, including consumers in the United States and 
abroad, to abbreviate the name of the viticultural area to ``Sta. Rita 
Hills.'' Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita endorses this proposal. TTB has given 
recognition to viticultural areas under names different from those 
originally proposed in similar circumstances.
    According to the petitioners, abbreviating the viticultural area 
name as suggested above would accommodate Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita's 
brand and trademark rights without compromising the accuracy of the 
viticultural area's name. As discussed more fully below:
     The term ``Sta.'' is a recognized abbreviation for the 
word ``Santa,'' as evidenced by standard dictionaries of abbreviations.
     Of particular significance is the use of the abbreviation 
``Sta.'' in the United States to refer to wines made from grapes grown 
in such well-known appellations as Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, 
the Santa Cruz Mountains, and the Santa Maria Valley.
     Historic evidence demonstrates that ``Sta. Rita'' has been 
used as an abbreviation for the ``Santa Rita Hills'' region. Such 
evidence also shows the term ``Sta.'' was frequently used with other 
California place names, such as Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, and Santa 
Rosa.
     The use of abbreviations in viticultural area names is not 
uncommon; approved viticultural areas include names like ``Mt. Veeder'' 
(27 CFR 9.123), ``Mt. Harlan'' (27 CFR 9.131), ``St. Helena'' (27 CFR 
9.149), and ``Isle St. George'' (27 CFR 9.51). The petitioners believe 
the name ``Sta. Rita Hills'' fits comfortably within these precedents.

Background for Petition

    The current petition notes that on March 31, 1998, a group of 
viticulturists and vintners in Santa Barbara County, California, 
petitioned the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF, TTB's 
predecessor agency) to establish the ``Santa Rita Hills'' viticultural 
area in the western portion of the Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area. 
ATF published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register 
on September 11, 1998 (see Notice No. 866, 63 FR 48658).
    ATF received comments from 35 parties. Eleven parties, mostly Santa 
Barbara County winemakers, grape growers, and public officials, 
supported the proposed viticultural area. The remaining 24 parties were 
opposed, not to the establishment of the viticultural area, but to its 
proposed name.
    Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, a publicly traded Chilean company that has 
produced and sold wines under the brand name ``Santa Rita'' for more 
than 120 years, led this opposition. Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita commented 
that recognition of the ``Santa Rita Hills'' viticultural area would 
cause widespread consumer confusion and would damage Vi[ntilde]a Santa 
Rita's vested trademark rights.
    On May 31, 2001, ATF published a final rule in the Federal Register 
approving Santa Rita Hills as an American viticultural area (see T.D. 
ATF-454, 66 FR 29476). ATF concluded that the region was locally known 
as the Santa Rita Hills and that it was geographically, viticulturally, 
and climatically distinct from the surrounding Santa Ynez Valley 
viticultural area.
    ATF recognized the similarities between the Santa Rita trademark 
and brand name and the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area, but 
concluded that consumers would not be confused by wines bearing the 
Santa Rita brand name and wines labeled with the Santa Rita Hills 
viticultural area.
    The current petition states that Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita and the 
petitioners have since negotiated in good faith about the use of the 
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area name. The petitioners, with the 
agreement of Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, believe that abbreviating the name 
``Santa Rita Hills'' to ``Sta. Rita Hills'' would be in the best 
interest of everyone, including consumers in the United States and 
abroad. Moreover, the requested modification will, by agreement, 
obviate the need for further legal proceedings.

Avoiding Conflict With the Existing Santa Rita Brand Name

    TTB regulations recognize that consumers can be confused when an 
American viticultural area and a brand name contain the same or similar 
terms but are used for different wines (see 27 CFR 4.39(i)). When 
confronted with a proposed viticultural area name that is similar to an 
existing brand or trademark, TTB solicits public comment for other 
potential names that might avoid such a dilemma. Upon occasion, TTB has 
modified the proposed viticultural area name to avoid conflict.
    For example, in 1981, ATF considered recognizing a new AVA called 
``The Pinnacles'' (46 FR 49601; Oct. 7, 1981).

[[Page 22285]]

That brand name, however, was already in use by a California winery. 
ATF thus determined the proposed name was ``inappropriate'' due to 
``trademark claims by another winery and the possibility of consumer 
confusion that would result if the proposed name were approved'' (see 
47 FR 25517; June 14, 1982). After soliciting alternative proposals, 
ATF recognized the viticultural area under the name ``Chalone'' (27 CFR 
9.24).
    Similarly, in 1992, ATF proposed establishing the Spring Mountain 
viticultural area (58 FR 8726; February 17, 1993). Spring Mountain 
Vineyards protested, claiming that its brand name, ``Spring Mountain,'' 
would be ``rendered worthless'' by establishment of a viticultural area 
of the same name. At Spring Mountain Vineyards' suggestion, the 
petitioners amended their petition to request the name ``Spring 
Mountain District'', which was approved (27 CFR 9.143).
    More recently, ATF considered recognizing the Diamond Mountain 
viticultural area (66 FR 29695; June 1, 2001). Diamond Mountain 
Vineyards objected, claiming the name would cause consumer confusion 
and conflict with its trademark right in the ``Diamond Mountain 
Vineyards'' brand. ATF agreed, noting consumers might confuse wines 
labeled with the Diamond Mountain viticultural area name with wines 
bearing the brand name ``Diamond Mountain Vineyards.'' Sufficient name 
evidence was provided for recognition of the ``Diamond Mountain 
District'' name and, therefore, ATF approved the viticultural area 
under this alternative name (see 27 CFR 9.166).
    The current petition states that the requested modification to the 
viticultural area's name is intended to reconcile competing and 
legitimate claims to the ``Santa Rita'' name. The petition contends 
that modifying the viticultural area's name to feature the abbreviation 
``Sta.'' would reduce the potential for consumer confusion. The 
petitioners feel that abbreviating the viticultural area's name would 
be consistent with TTB's policy of minimizing, when possible, the 
potential for consumer confusion between existing brand names and newly 
created viticultural areas.

Name Evidence for Sta. Rita Hills

    Below, we discuss the evidence provided in the petition showing 
that ``Sta. Rita Hills'' is an appropriate name for the Santa Rita 
Hills viticultural area. According to the petition, ``Sta. Rita Hills'' 
is equally accurate and appropriate name for the area, since the term 
``Sta.'' is a well-recognized abbreviation for ``Santa.'' This 
abbreviation is confirmed by authoritative sources such as the ``Gale 
Press Abbreviations Dictionary'' and ``The Oxford Dictionary of 
Abbreviations.'' The petition included copies of these sources. Based 
on this, the petitioners state that the terms ``Santa Rita Hills'' and 
``Sta. Rita Hills'' are functionally identical.
    The abbreviation ``Sta.'' has been used in reference to the Santa 
Rita Hills region, as well as other California regions, for over a 
century, according to the petition. The petition included copies of 
historic dise[ntilde]os, or sketches, that were presented, along with 
land grant petitions, to the governors of Mexican California. There 
were no official surveyors in the region at that time; therefore, each 
dise[ntilde]o graphically defined the tract of land solicited. On these 
dise[ntilde]os, the term ``Sta. Rita'' was used to describe ``Santa 
Rita.'' Likewise, ``Sta. Clara'' denotes ``Santa Clara,'' ``Sta. Rosa'' 
denotes ``Santa Rosa,'' and ``Sta. Izabel'' denotes ``Santa Izabel.''
    According to the petition, the ``Sta.'' abbreviation continues to 
be used throughout the United States today, especially in connection 
with California wines. The Wine Enthusiast's Web site advertises a 
``wine boot camp'' in ``Sta. Barbara Cty,'' and the term ``Sta. 
Barbara'' is used in wine reviews (see http://www.dooyou.co.uk/product/141787.html--visited on 8/19/02). Top restaurants and retailers from 
around the United States use the terms ``Sta. Barbara,'' ``Sta. Cruz 
Mountains,'' and ``Sta. Maria Valley'' as appellations for fine wines 
(references: http://www.renaissancehollywood.com/docs/twistwine.pdf; 
http://www.ambrosiaonhuntington.com/html/wines.html; http://www.circa1886.com/cabernet_sauvignon_circa_restaurant_charleston.asp?subject=circa1886; http://www.northsidewine.com/level3/us_west.htm; http://www.hotelastor.com/wine.htm; http://www.capitalraleigh.com/dining/wine_list.htm; and http://www.villacreek.com/pages/winelist.html--all visited on 10/11/2002). 
Babcock Winery & Vineyards uses the abbreviation ``Sta. Barbara'' on 
its distributors list (www.babcockwinery.com/distributionlist.html--
visited on 10/11/2002).
    Internet searches reveal many additional uses of the abbreviation 
``Sta.'' with California place names. A tourism page promoting Santa 
Barbara County uses the abbreviation ``Sta. Barbara'' for addresses 
within the city (http://www.maintour.com/socal/stabarb.html--visited on 
10/11/2002). Ship schedules refer to ``Sta. Barbara'' (http://www.gso.uri.edu/unols/schedules/Sproul/Sproul99.html--visited on 8/19/
02), as do high school athletic calendars (http://www.ouhsd.k12.ca.us/sites/cihs/handbook/december.htm--visited on 10/11/2002).
    The term ``Sta. Rita'' is used as an abbreviation for ``Santa 
Rita'' throughout the United States and in Spanish-speaking countries. 
For example, a simple Internet search performed by a petitioner found a 
University of Arizona faculty Web site that uses the term ``N. Sta. 
Rita St.'' to refer to ``North Santa Rita Street,'' located in Tucson, 
Arizona (http://www.bened.arizona.edu/ransdell/english_102_108.htm--
visited on 8/19/2002). Another Web site concerning husbandry and 
breeding of reptiles and amphibians abbreviates the ``Santa Rita 
Mountains,'' a range in Arizona, as ``Sta. Rita Mts.'' (http://www.herper.com/MantidNA3.html, and http://www. 
herper.com?PhasmidNA2.html--both visited on 8/19/2002).
    The petition states that use of the ``Sta.'' abbreviation is 
consistent with practices of the United States Board on Geographic 
Names, the body responsible for standardizing geographic names used by 
the Federal Government and printed on Federal maps. The Board's 
guidelines specify that the term ``Saint'' may be abbreviated ``St.''. 
Particularly in regions where place names are derived from the Spanish 
language, as in Southern California, abbreviating the term ``Santa,'' 
the Spanish feminine form of the English word ``Saint,'' as ``Sta.'' is 
consistent with the Board's general approach to abbreviations.

TTB Finding

    Based on the information provided in the current petition, we 
believe that it is appropriate to modify the name of the Santa Rita 
Hills viticultural area by using the abbreviation ``Sta.'' in place of 
``Santa.'' If this proposal is adopted, the name of the viticultural 
area would be modified to read Sta. Rita Hills. Vina Santa Rita will be 
able to obtain future label approvals of its use of its Santa Rita 
brand name on wines imported into the United States because it is 
distinguishable from Sta. Rita Hills. Please note that even if this 
proposed rule is not adopted, Vina Santa Rita will be able to continue 
to use its Santa Rita brand name on labels approved before July 7, 1986 
(see 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)). Accordingly, we set forth below proposed 
amendments to the TTB regulation concerning the Santa Rita

[[Page 22286]]

Hills viticultural area, found at 27 CFR 9.162.

Impact on Current Wine Labels

General

    Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a 
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true 
place of origin. If we adopt the proposed modification of the name for 
the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area, the abbreviated ``Sta. Rita 
Hills'' name will be recognized as a name of viticultural significance. 
Consequently, wine bottlers using ``Sta. Rita Hills'' in a brand name, 
including a trademark, or in another label reference as to the origin 
of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is eligible to use 
the viticultural area's name as an appellation of origin. Accordingly, 
the proposed regulatory text set forth below in Sec.  9.162(a) 
specifies that ``Sta. Rita Hills'' is a term of viticultural 
significance for purposes of part 4 of the TTB regulations.
    For a wine to be eligible to use as an appellation of origin the 
name of a viticultural area specified in part 9 of the TTB regulations, 
at least 85 percent of the grapes used to make the wine must have been 
grown within the area represented by that name. If the wine is not 
eligible to use the viticultural area name as an appellation of origin 
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in 
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain 
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area name 
appears in another reference on the label in a misleading manner, the 
bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label. Accordingly, if a 
new label or a previously approved label uses the name ``Sta. Rita 
Hills'' for a wine that does not meet the 85 percent standard, the new 
label will not be approved, and the previously approved label will be 
subject to revocation.
    Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a 
viticultural area name that was used as a brand name on a label 
approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.

Use of the Name ``Santa Rita Hills'

    Since July 30, 2001, the name of this viticultural area has been 
expressed as ``Santa Rita Hills.'' If a final rule abbreviating this 
viticultural area's name takes effect, we will approve wine labels 
showing ``Sta. Rita Hills,'' and not ``Santa Rita Hills,'' as the 
viticultural area appellation.
    If a final rule is adopted, under our authority pursuant to 27 CFR 
13.72(a)(2), we propose a transition period during which vintners may 
continue to use approved labels that carry ``Santa Rita Hills'' as the 
name of the viticultural area. However, one year after the effective 
date of that final rule, certificates of label approval showing ``Santa 
Rita Hills'' as an appellation of origin will be revoked by operation 
of that final rule (see 27 CFR 13.51). We have added a statement to 
this effect as a new paragraph (d) in Sec.  9.162.

Public Participation

Comments Sought

    We invite comments from interested members of the public on whether 
we should modify the name of the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area to 
``Sta. Rita Hills.'' We are especially interested in the use of the 
Sta. Rita Hills name as it applies to the region within the established 
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area's boundaries. We are also interested 
in comments on the impact, if any, that the abbreviation of the 
viticultural area's name may have on current wine labels. Please 
support your comments with specific information about the proposed 
modification or impact on current wine labels.

Submitting Comments

    Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this 
notice. Your comments must include this notice number and your name and 
mailing address. Your comments must be legible and written in language 
acceptable for public disclosure. We do not acknowledge receipt of 
comments, and we consider all comments as originals. You may submit 
comments in one of five ways:
     Mail: You may send written comments to TTB at the address 
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
     Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile 
transmission to 202-927-8525. Faxed comments must--
    (1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
    (2) Contain a legible, written signature; and
    (3) Be no more than five pages long. This limitation assures 
electronic access to our equipment. We will not accept faxed comments 
that exceed five pages.
     E-mail: You may e-mail comments to [email protected]. Comments 
transmitted by electronic mail must--
    (1) Contain your e-mail address;
    (2) Reference this notice number on the subject line; and
    (3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by 11-inch paper.
     Online form: We provide a comment form with the online 
copy of this notice on our Web site at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. Select the ``Send comments via e-mail'' link under 
this notice number.
     Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To submit comments to us via 
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit http://www.regulations.gov and 
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing 
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right 
to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether to hold a public 
hearing.

Confidentiality

    All submitted material is part of the public record and subject to 
disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you 
consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.

Public Disclosure

    You may view copies of this notice, the petition, and any comments 
we receive by appointment at the TTB Library at 1310 G Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20220. You may also obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 
11-inch page. Contact our librarian at the above address or telephone 
202-927-2400 to schedule an appointment or to request copies of 
comments.
    For your convenience, we will post this notice and any comments we 
receive on this proposal on the TTB Web site. We may omit voluminous 
attachments or material that we consider unsuitable for posting. In all 
cases, the full comment will be available in the TTB Library. To access 
the online copy of this notice and submitted comments, visit http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. Select the ``View Comments'' link 
under this notice number to view the posted comments.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    We certify that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting, 
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived 
from the use of a viticultural area name would be the result of a 
proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area. 
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.

Executive Order 12866

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as 
defined by Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Therefore, it requires 
no regulatory assessment.

[[Page 22287]]

Drafting Information

    The principal author of this document is Rita Butler, Regulations 
and Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9

    Wine.

Proposed Regulatory Amendment

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we propose to amend 
title 27, chapter 1, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.

Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas

    2. In subpart C, amend Sec.  9.162 by revising the section heading, 
revising paragraph (a) and the introductory text of paragraphs (b) and 
(c), and adding a new paragraph (d), to read as follows:


Sec.  9.162  Sta. Rita Hills.

    (a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this 
section is ``Sta. Rita Hills''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, 
``Sta. Rita Hills'' is a term of viticultural significance.
    (b) Approved Maps. The appropriate maps for determining the 
boundary of the Sta. Rita Hills viticultural area are five United 
States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Series maps titled:
* * * * *
    (c) Boundary. The Sta. Rita Hills viticultural area is located in 
Santa Barbara County, California. The boundary is as follows:
* * * * *
    (d) From July 30, 2001, until [1 day prior to effective date of the 
final rule], this viticultural area was named ``Santa Rita Hills''. 
Effective [effective date of final rule], this viticultural area is 
abbreviated to ``Sta. Rita Hills.'' Existing certificates of label 
approval showing ``Santa Rita Hills'' as the appellation of origin are 
revoked by operation of this regulation on [date one year after the 
effective date of final rule].

    Signed: April 13, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-8575 Filed 4-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P