[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21794-21799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8398]



[[Page 21794]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Academic Partners for Excellence in Environmental Public Health 
Tracking

    Announcement Type: New.
    Funding Opportunity Number: RFA EH-05074.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.283.
    Key Dates:
    Letter of Intent (LOI) Deadline: May 27, 2005.
    Pre-Application Conference Calls: May 16, 2005.
    Application Deadline: June 27, 2005.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Authority: This program is authorized under section 301 of the 
Public Health Service Act, [42 U.S.C. section 241], as amended.
    Purpose: The purpose of the program is to provide expertise and 
support to the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program 
(NEPHTP) in the development and utilization of the National 
Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (NEPHTN). Additional 
information about the NEPHTN and funded activities at state and local 
government levels is provided at http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking. This 
program addresses the ``Healthy People 2010'' focus areas of 
Environmental Health and Public Health Infrastructure.
    Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with the 
following performance goal for the National Center for Environmental 
Health (NCEH): Increase the understanding of the relationship between 
environmental exposures and health effects.
    This announcement contains two separate parts: Part I and Part II 
in order to accommodate the range of specialty activities needed to 
support the development of the NEPHTN. Each applicant can only apply 
for one part. Please indicate in your abstract and in the research plan 
which component your application is directed to. These projects will 
move the nation toward improved environmental public health 
surveillance and response capacity for development of the NEPHTN. 
Detailed description of each project is included under ``Activities.''
    Research Objectives:
     Nature of the research problem
    The environment plays an important role in human development and 
health. Researchers have linked exposures to some environmental hazards 
with specific diseases. Currently, no systems exist at the state or 
national level to track many of the exposures and health effects that 
may be related to environmental hazards. In most cases, existing 
environmental hazard, exposure, and disease tracking systems are not 
linked together. Because existing systems are not linked, it is 
difficult to study and monitor relationships among hazards, exposures, 
and health effects.
    CDC is developing a National Environmental Public Health Tracking 
Network that integrates data about environmental hazards and exposures 
with data about diseases that are possibly linked to the environment. 
However, to develop this Network, methods for data collection, data 
linkage, and data analysis will need to be improved and evaluated. 
Information from this network should guide etiologic research into the 
relationship between environmental factors and human health. 
Ultimately, state and local public health agencies must have a trained 
workforce capable of operating and utilizing an EPHT network to provide 
substantial public health impact.
     Scientific knowledge to be achieved through research 
supported by this program
    Increased understanding of: (1) The relationship between 
environmental hazards, exposures and health effects; (2) the methods 
required to collect, integrate, analyze, and interpret data; and (3) 
effective techniques for dissemination of information to protect and 
improve health.
     Objectives of this research program
    (1) Innovative, cost-effective data collection strategies that 
state and local health departments can use to obtain valid, high 
quality data on environmental health effects, exposures, and hazards.
    (2) Data linkage methods for combined analysis of health and 
environmental data that could be utilized by state and local 
environmental public health programs in building an EPHTN.
    (3) Statistical algorithms that could be used by state and local 
environmental public health programs to analyze trends and detect 
patterns of health effects occurrence, population exposure, or hazard 
levels in the environment that may indicate a problem.
    (4) Greater understanding of the relationship between particular 
health effects and environmental exposures and/or hazards.
    (5) Effective training tools for all areas critical to the 
development, operation, maintenance, and utilization of an EPHTN.
     Identify the types of research and experimental approaches 
that are being sought to achieve the objectives Research to support 
these objectives includes public health surveillance methods 
evaluation, epidemiological studies, and training effectiveness 
evaluations.
    Activities: In conducting activities to achieve the purpose of this 
program, the awardee will be responsible for the activities under 
Awardee Activities, and CDC will be responsible for the activities 
listed under CDC Activities. Awardee activities for this program are as 
follows:
    Awardee Activities: Recipients under Part I must develop and submit 
a research plan to address recipient activities a-h.
    Part I Recipient Activities: Provide lead expertise in the 
development of public health surveillance methods. These should, at a 
minimum, include:
    (a) Evaluating current surveillance methodology and developing 
innovative, cost-effective data collection strategies (including 
consideration of non-traditional data sources) that state and local 
health departments can use to obtain valid, high quality data on 
environmental health effects, exposures, and hazards.
    (b) Developing data linkage methods for combined analysis of health 
and environmental data that could be utilized by state and local 
environmental public health programs in building an EPHTN.
    (c) Developing statistical algorithms that could be used by state 
and local environmental public health programs to analyze trends and 
detect patterns of, and relationships between, health effects 
occurrence, population exposure, or hazard levels in the environment; 
and generating alerts when unusual occurrences of health effect, 
exposure, or hazard are detected.
    (d) Conduct an epidemiology study examining the relationship 
between a health effect and an environmental exposure and/or hazard in 
collaboration with environmental public health tracking program 
partners and CDC. This study should utilize data from a state or local 
environmental public health tracking program, as well as other summary 
or secondary data sources in the design and/or analysis phase. This may 
require the development of a research protocol for Institutional Review 
Board (IRB) review by all cooperating institutions participating in the 
research project. Where CDC scientists are involved, the CDC IRB will 
initially review and approve the protocol, with a minimum of an annual

[[Page 21795]]

review until the research project is completed.
    (e) Provide training for the nation's future Environmental Public 
Health workforce through the provision of student academic tracks in 
the areas of environmental epidemiology, public health surveillance 
methods, and/or internship opportunities.
    (f) Build capacity at the state and local level through the 
communication of project accomplishments, barriers, and lessons learned 
with EPHT (surveillance) Program partners and other critical 
stakeholders at CDC-sponsored seminars, stakeholder meetings, quarterly 
conference calls, and by posting information to an EPHT web forum.
    (g) Participate in workgroups with EPHT Program partners. Applicant 
will also be required to work in conjunction with the CDC Environmental 
Public Health Tracking Program's Standards and Network Development 
workgroup and other relevant workgroups and activities critical to the 
development of the EPHTN.
    (h) Collaborate with the relevant academic partners for excellence 
involved with the EPHT Program on training activities to promote the 
dissemination of knowledge from this focus area to other program 
partners.
    Recipients under Part II must develop and submit a research plan to 
address recipient activities a-h.
    Part II Recipient Activities:
    (a) Develop training tools and provide training to state and local 
health department partners participating in the NEPHT Program, in 
collaboration with CDC and other funded academic partners involved with 
the EPHT program. Training should include, but not be limited to, all 
areas critical to the development, operation, maintenance, and 
utilization and dissemination of information from the Network. These 
should include public health surveillance methods, GIS, spatial 
statistics and other environmental assessment methods, and risk 
communication.
    (b) Collaborate with other funded academic partners to identify and 
develop focus areas for continuous training.
    (c) Develop and conduct at least two regional and one annual 
training workshop for Environmental Public Health Tracking grantees 
covering public health surveillance methods, environmental 
epidemiology, risk communication, Geographic Information Systems, 
(GIS), spatial statistics and other assessment methods, prevention 
effectiveness, program evaluation and other subjects critical to the 
development, maintenance, utilization, and dissemination of information 
from an EPHTN.
    (d) Conduct an assessment of: (1) The key issues that influence 
perceptions concerning the risk posed by environmental hazards or 
exposures; and (2) techniques to communicate information on 
environmental hazards, exposures, or risk most likely to promote 
protective actions. This assessment could include comprehensive 
literature reviews, review of state and local public health 
communications activities, risk perception surveys, convening a panel 
of communications experts, or other assessment strategies. As a product 
of this assessment, develop written guidance on methods to disseminate 
information from an EPHTN that would most effectively communicate this 
information to a variety of audiences representing diverse social and 
cultural backgrounds, including policy makers, healthcare providers, 
and community representatives.
    (e) Develop, test, disseminate, and evaluate communication 
strategies for health effects, exposure and hazard information from a 
surveillance network (EPHTN) that take into account risk perception 
differences among various audiences. Collaborate with CDC to promote 
the dissemination of knowledge from this focus area to other program 
partners.
    (f) Provide training for the nation's future Environmental Public 
Health workforce through the provision of student academic tracks in 
the areas of environmental epidemiology, public health surveillance 
methods, and risk communication strategies and/or internship 
opportunities.
    (g) Build capacity at the state and local level through the 
communication of project accomplishments, barriers, and lessons learned 
with Environmental Public Health Tracking (surveillance) Program 
partners and other critical stakeholders at CDC-sponsored seminars, 
stakeholder meetings, quarterly conference calls, and by posting 
information to an EPHT web forum.
    (h) Participate in workgroups with EPHT Program partners.
    CDC Activities: In a cooperative agreement, CDC staff is 
substantially involved in the program activities, above and beyond 
routine grant monitoring. CDC Activities for this program are as 
follows:
    a. Foster relationships among academic partners and state and local 
health departments by assisting in the sharing of information through 
an EPHT Web site, seminars, an annual stakeholder meeting, quarterly 
conference calls, and other direct interactions.
    b. Convene workgroups to foster the development of the NEPHTN.
    c. Participate in designing, developing, and evaluating 
surveillance methods.
    d. Participate in the development of statistical algorithms to 
analyze trends and detect patterns of health effects occurrence, 
population exposure, or hazard levels in the environment that may 
indicate a problem.
    e. Participate in the protocol development, study implementation, 
data analysis, interpretation of results, and dissemination of 
epidemiology study findings including report writing and oral 
presentation. When involved in a scientific study, the CDC IRB will 
initially review and approve the protocol, with a minimum annual review 
until the research project is completed.
    f. Provide assistance in development of training materials on 
surveillance methods, evaluation, risk communication, and other topics 
for state and local agencies and other EPHT Program partners, including 
the dissemination of information about strategies for communicating 
health effect, exposure, and hazard information from an EPHT network.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. CDC involvement in this 
program is listed in the Activities Section above.
    Mechanism of Support: U19--Research Programs (Cooperative 
Agreements).
    Fiscal Year Funds: 2005.
    Approximate Total Funding: $2,000,000 (This amount is an estimate, 
and is subject to availability of funds.) Approximate Number of Awards: 
Five.
    Approximate Average Award: $400,000 (This amount is for the first 
12-month budget period.)
    Floor of Award Range: $350,000.
    Ceiling of Award Range: $450,000. (This ceiling is for the first 
12-month budget period.)
    Anticipated Award Date: August 1, 2005.
    Budget Period Length: 12 months.
    Project Period Length: Five (5) years. Throughout the project 
period, CDC's commitment to continuation of awards will be conditioned 
on the availability of funds, evidence of satisfactory progress by the 
recipient (as documented in required reports), and the determination 
that continued funding is in the best interest of the Federal 
Government.

[[Page 21796]]

III. Eligibility Information

III.1. Eligible Applicants

    Assistance will be provided to United States Schools of Public 
Health, accredited by the Council on Education of Public Health, which 
are associated with or have access to programs in environmental 
epidemiology, environmental sciences, health education, health/risk 
communication, clinical medicine, and medical informatics. Eligibility 
is open to these applicants because they provide: (1) The technical 
expertise in the wide range of disciplines needed to further develop 
the theoretical and scientific base for environmental public health 
tracking (surveillance), and develop and test for new methodology 
essential to support state and local programs; and (2) a training 
ground for the nation's future environmental public health workforce. 
This wide range of disciplines and expertise is often unavailable or 
difficult to access by state or local public health agencies yet will 
be required for an environmental public health tracking network to 
fulfill all the critical functions of a public health surveillance 
system.

III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching

    Matching funds are not required for this program.

III.3. Other

    If you request a funding amount greater than the ceiling of the 
award range, your application will be considered non-responsive, and 
will not be entered into the review process. You will be notified that 
your application did not meet the submission requirements.
    Special Requirements: If your application is incomplete or non-
responsive to the requirements listed in this section, it will not be 
entered into the review process. You will be notified that your 
application did not meet submission requirements.
     Late applications will be considered non-responsive. See 
section ``IV.3. Submission Dates and Times'' for more information on 
deadlines.
     All documentation submitted as evidence of eligibility as 
outlined in Section III.1 above should be placed directly behind the 
face page (first page) of your application. Applications that fail to 
submit evidence requested above will be considered non-responsive and 
returned without review.

     Note: Title 2 of the United States Code Section 1611 
states that an organization described in Section 501(c)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code that engages in lobbying activities is not 
eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or 
loan.

    Individuals Eligible To Become Principal Investigators: Any 
individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry 
out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to 
develop an application for support. Individuals from under-represented 
racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are 
always encouraged to apply for CDC programs.

IV. Application and Submission Information

IV.1. Address To Request Application Package

    To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398 
(OMB number 0925-0001 rev. 9/2004). Forms and instructions are 
available in an interactive format on the CDC Web site, at the 
following Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/forminfo.htm.
    Forms and instructions are also available in an interactive format 
on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Web site at the following 
Internet address: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html.
    If you do not have access to the Internet, or if you have 
difficulty accessing the forms on-line, you may contact the CDC 
Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section 
(PGO-TIM) staff at: 770-488-2700. Application forms can be mailed to 
you.

IV.2. Content and Form of Application Submission

    Letter of Intent (LOI): Your LOI must be written in the following 
format:
     Maximum number of pages: Two
     Font size: 12-point unreduced
     Double spaced
     Paper size: 8.5 by 11 inches
     Page margin size: One inch
     Printed only on one side of page
     Written in plain language, avoid jargon
    Your LOI must contain the following information:
     Descriptive title of the proposed application
     Component of this announcement, Part I or II, you wish to 
be considered for
     Name, address, E-mail address, telephone number, and fax 
number of the Principal Investigator
     Names of other key personnel
     Participating institutions
     Number and title of this Announcement
    Application: Follow the PHS 398 application instructions for 
content and formatting of your application. For further assistance with 
the PHS 398 application form, contact PGO-TIM staff at 770-488-2700, or 
contact GrantsInfo, Telephone 301-435-0714, E-mail: [email protected].
    Your research plan should address activities to be conducted over 
the entire project period.
    You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative 
agreement from the Federal government.
    Your DUNS number must be entered on line 11 of the face page of the 
PHS 398 application form. The DUNS number is a nine-digit 
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. 
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a 
DUNS number, access http://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711.
    For more information, see the CDC Web site at: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/pubcommt.htm.
    This announcement uses the non-modular budgeting format.
    Additional requirements that may require you to submit additional 
documentation with your application are listed in section ``VI.2. 
Administrative and National Policy Requirements.''

V.3. Submission Dates and Times

    LOI Deadline Date: May 27, 2005.
    CDC requests that you send a LOI if you intend to apply for this 
program. Although the LOI is not mandatory, not binding, and does not 
enter into the review of your subsequent application, the LOI will be 
used to gauge the level of interest in this program, and to allow CDC 
to plan the application review.
    Application Deadline Date: June 27, 2005.
    Explanation of Deadlines: LOIs and Applications must be received in 
the CDC Procurement and Grants Office by 4 p.m. Eastern Time on the 
deadline date. If you submit your LOI or application by the United 
States Postal Service or commercial delivery service, you must ensure 
that the carrier will be able to guarantee delivery by the closing date 
and time. If CDC receives your submission after closing due to: (1) 
Carrier error, when the carrier accepted the package with a guarantee 
for delivery by the closing date and time, or (2) significant weather 
delays or natural disasters, you will be given the opportunity to 
submit documentation of the carriers guarantee. If the documentation 
verifies a carrier problem, CDC will consider the submission as having 
been received by the deadline.

[[Page 21797]]

    This announcement is the definitive guide on LOI and application 
content, submission address, and deadline. It supersedes information 
provided in the application instructions. If your application does not 
meet the deadline above, it will not be eligible for review, and will 
be discarded. You will be notified that you did not meet the submission 
requirements.
    CDC will not notify you upon receipt of your submission. If you 
have a question about the receipt of your LOI or application, first 
contact your courier. If you still have a question, contact the PGO-TIM 
staff at: 770-488-2700. Before calling, please wait two to three days 
after the submission deadline. This will allow time for submissions to 
be processed and logged.

IV.4. Intergovernmental Review of Applications

    Your application is subject to Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
Programs, as governed by Executive Order (EO) 12372. This order sets up 
a system for state and local governmental review of proposed federal 
assistance applications. You should contact your state single point of 
contact (SPOC) as early as possible to alert the SPOC to prospective 
applications, and to receive instructions on your state's process. 
Click on the following link to get the current SPOC list: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.

IV.5. Funding Restrictions

    Restrictions, which must be taken into account while writing your 
budget, are as follows:
     Funds relating to the conduct of research will not be 
released until the appropriate assurances and Institutional Review 
Board approvals are in place.
     Reimbursement of pre-award costs is not allowed.

If you are requesting indirect costs in your budget, you must include a 
copy of your indirect cost rate agreement. If your indirect cost rate 
is a provisional rate, the agreement should be less than 12 months of 
age.

IV.6. Other Submission Requirements

    LOI Submission Address: Submit your LOI by express mail, delivery 
service, fax, or e-mail to: Scientific Review Administrator, Attn: 
Kathleen Shaver Madden, Ph.D., CDC/Office of Public Health Research, 
One West Court Square, Suite 7000, Rm 7018, Mailstop D-72, Decatur, GA 
30030, Tel: 404-371-5253, Fax: 404-371-5215, E-mail: [email protected].
    Application Submission Address: Submit the original and one hard 
copy of your application by mail or express delivery service to: 
Technical Information Management--RFA EH-05074, CDC Procurement and 
Grants Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341.
    At the time of submission, four additional copies of the 
application, and all appendices must be sent to: Scientific Review 
Administrator, Attn: Kathleen Shaver Madden, Ph.D. (RFA EH-05074), CDC/
Office of Public Health Research, One West Court Square, Suite 7000, Rm 
7018, Mailstop D-72, Decatur, GA 30030, Tel: 404-371-5253, Fax: 404-
371-5215, E-mail: [email protected].

V. Application Review Information

V.1. Criteria

    Applicants are required to provide measures of effectiveness that 
will demonstrate the accomplishment of the various identified 
objectives of the cooperative agreement. Measures of effectiveness must 
relate to the performance goals stated in the ``Purpose'' section of 
this announcement. Measures must be objective and quantitative, and 
must measure the intended outcome. These measures of effectiveness must 
be submitted with the application and will be an element of evaluation.
    The goals of CDC-supported research are to advance the 
understanding of biological systems, improve the control and prevention 
of disease and injury, and enhance health. In the written comments, 
reviewers will be asked to evaluate the application in order to judge 
the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial 
impact on the pursuit of these goals.
    The scientific review group will address and consider each of the 
following criteria equally in assigning the application's overall 
score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. The 
application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged 
likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority 
score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important 
work that by its nature is not innovative, but is essential to move a 
field forward.
    The review criteria are as follows:
    Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the 
aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be 
advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or 
methods that drive this field?
    Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and 
analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the 
aims of the project? Does the project scope reflect a clear 
understanding of the purpose and requirements of the cooperative 
agreement and the conceptual framework, intent, and challenges of 
implementing a National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network? 
Are the project scope, key objectives, project milestones, products, 
and performance measures clearly described and appropriate for the 
project? Are the strategy, schedule, and resources appropriate for 
timely completion of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge 
potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics and provide 
plans for mitigating project risk?
    Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or 
methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project 
challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or 
technologies?
    Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well 
suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the 
experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers 
(if any)? Are the resumes/curricula vita of key personnel included? If 
there are several researchers involved, is this there a clear 
description of how the principal investigator will manage the project 
team and, if necessary, coordinate with other academic departments or 
groups participating in this endeavor? Are all researcher and staff 
roles and responsibilities clearly described and linked to project 
activities and milestones?
    Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will 
be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed 
experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific 
environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there 
evidence of institutional support?
    Additional Review Criteria: In addition to the above criteria, the 
following programmatic priorities will be considered in the 
determination of scientific merit and priority score:
    1. Collaborative Relationships: The extent to which the applicant 
identifies key partners to carry out proposed activities and provides 
evidence that these organizations/agencies support, and will be 
actively involved in, carrying out the project. Letters of Support from 
appropriate personnel, such as department chairs, must be provided if 
applicant is utilizing affiliate institutions to provide expertise in 
environmental epidemiology, environmental sciences, health education, 
health communication,

[[Page 21798]]

clinical medicine, or medical informatics. The extent to which the 
applicant describes past and current collaborations with Federal 
agencies, state and local health and environmental agencies, 
professional organizations, community-based organizations, and other 
relevant organizations will be considered.
    Protection of Human Subjects from Research Risks: Does the 
application adequately address the requirements of Title 45 CFR Part 46 
for the protection of human subjects? The involvement of human subjects 
and protections from research risk relating to their participation in 
the proposed research will be assessed.
    Inclusion of Women and Minorities in Research: Does the application 
adequately address the CDC Policy requirements regarding the inclusion 
of women, ethnic, and racial groups in the proposed research? This 
includes: (1) The proposed plan for the inclusion of both sexes and 
racial and ethnic minority populations for appropriate representation; 
(2) The proposed justification when representation is limited or 
absent; (3) A statement as to whether the design of the study is 
adequate to measure differences when warranted; and (4) A statement as 
to whether the plans for recruitment and outreach for study 
participants include the process of establishing partnerships with 
community (ies) and recognition of mutual benefits.
    Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals: If vertebrate animals are to be 
used in the project, the five items described under Section f. of the 
PHS 398 research grant application instructions will be assessed.
    Budget: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested 
period of support in relation to the proposed research.

V.2. Review and Selection Process

    Applications will be reviewed for completeness by the Procurement 
and Grants Office (PGO) and for responsiveness by the National Center 
for Environmental Health (NCEH). Incomplete applications and 
applications that are non-responsive to the eligibility criteria will 
not advance through the review process. Applicants will be notified 
that their application did not meet submission requirements.
    Applications that are complete and responsive to the announcement 
will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate 
peer review group or charter study section convened by the NCEH in 
accordance with the review criteria listed above. As part of the 
initial merit review, all applications may:
     Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed 
to have the highest scientific merit by the review group, generally the 
top half of the applications under review, will be discussed and 
assigned a priority score.
     Receive a written critique.
     Receive a second programmatic level review by the NCEH, 
Office of Science.
    Award Criteria: Criteria that will be used to make award decisions 
during the programmatic review include:
     Scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
     Availability of funds
     Programmatic priorities
     Preference may be given to the establishment of academic 
partnerships in different geographic areas of the United States.

V.3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

    It is anticipated that notification of awards will go out to 
successful applicants on or before August 31, 2005 with a projected 
start date on or before October 1, 2005.

VI. Award Administration Information

VI.1. Award Notices

    Successful applicants will receive a Notice of Award (NoA) from the 
CDC Procurement and Grants Office. The NoA shall be the only binding, 
authorizing document between the recipient and CDC. The NoA will be 
signed by an authorized Grants Management Officer, and mailed to the 
recipient fiscal officer identified in the application.
    Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of 
the application review by mail.

VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

45 CFR Part 74 and Part 92
    For more information on the Code of Federal Regulations, see the 
National Archives and Records Administration at the following Internet 
address: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html.
    The following additional requirements apply to this project:
     AR-1 Human Subjects Requirements
     AR-2 Requirements for Inclusion of Women and Racial and 
Ethnic Minorities in Research
     AR-7 Executive Order 12372
     AR-8 Public Health System Reporting Requirements
     AR-9 Paperwork Reduction Act Requirements
     AR-10 Smoke-Free Workplace Requirements
     AR-11 Healthy People 2010
     AR-12 Lobbying Restrictions
     AR-22 Research Integrity
     AR-24 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
Requirements
    Additional information on these requirements can be found on the 
CDC web site at the following Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/ARs.htm.

VI.3. Reporting

    You must provide CDC with an original, plus two hard copies of the 
following reports:
    1. Interim progress report, (use form PHS 2590, OMB Number 0925-
0001, rev. 9/2004 as posted on the CDC website) no less than 90 days 
before the end of the budget period. The progress report will serve as 
your non-competing continuation application, and must contain the 
following elements:
    a. Current Budget Period Activities Objectives.
    b. Current Budget Period Financial Progress.
    c. New Budget Period Program Proposed Activity Objectives.
    d. Budget.
    e. Measures of Effectiveness.
    f. Additional Requested Information.
    2. Financial status report, no more than 90 days after the end of 
the budget period.
    3. Final financial and performance reports, no more than 90 days 
after the end of the project period.

These reports must be mailed to the Grants Management Specialist listed 
in the ``Agency Contacts'' section of this announcement.

VII. Agency Contacts

    We encourage inquiries concerning this announcement.
    For general questions, contact: Technical Information Management 
Section, CDC Procurement and Grants Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, 
Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: 770-488-2700.
    For scientific/research issues, contact: Mildred Williams-Johnson, 
Ph.D., Scientific Program Administrator, CDC/ATSDR, 1600 Clifton Road, 
NE, Mailstop E17, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: 404-498-0639, E-mail: 
[email protected]. or Judy Qualters, Ph.D; Scientific Program 
Collaborator, 1600 Clifton Road, NE; M/S E-19, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
Telephone: 404-498-1270, E-mail: [email protected].
    For questions about peer review, contact: Kathleen Shiver Madden, 
Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, CDC/

[[Page 21799]]

Office of Public Health Research, One West Court Square, Suite 7000, Rm 
7018, Mailstop D-72, Decatur, GA 30030, Telephone: 404-371-5253, E-
mail: [email protected].
    For financial, grants management, or budget assistance, contact: 
Edna Green, Grants Management Specialist, CDC Procurement and Grants 
Office, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: 770-488-
2743, E-mail: [email protected].

VIII. Other Information

    This and other CDC funding opportunity announcements can be found 
on the CDC Web site, Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov. Click on 
``Funding'' then ``Grants and Cooperative Agreements.'' Additional 
Information about the Environmental Public Health Tracking Program and 
current activities of the academic partners can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking.

    Dated: April 21, 2005.
William P. Nichols,
Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-8398 Filed 4-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P