[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7928-7931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER02-2516-003, et al.]


Westar Energy, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings

February 9, 2005.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Westar Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-2516-003]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar) 
tendered for filing First Revised Sheet Nos. 5 and 5 as part of its 
First Revised FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 227, between Westar and 
the City of Axtell, Kansas (Axtell). Westar states that the purpose of 
this filing is to remove an unexecuted second amendment that was never 
agreed to by Westar and Axtell and that never went into effect, which 
was erroneously filed with the Commission.
    Westar states that copies of the filing were served upon the City 
of Axtell, Kansas and the Kansas Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

2. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER03-86-009, ER03-83-008]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2004, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted an amendment 
to its January 8, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER03-86-008 and ER03-83-
007 regarding proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Open Access 
Transmission Tariff (OATT) to remove all TRANSLink references from the 
OATT in compliance to the Commission's order issued December 29, 2004, 
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. 109 FERC 61,374 
(2004). The Midwest ISO requests an effective date of October 30, 2004.
    The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of 
this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member 
representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the 
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all State 
commissions within the region. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that 
the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site 
at http://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for 
other interested parties in this matter and that it will provide hard 
copies to any interested parties upon request.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

3. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-836-006]

    Take notice that on January 14, 2005, New York Independent System 
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) submitted a motion to temporarily defer the

[[Page 7929]]

schedule set forth in its July 6, 2004 compliance filing in Docket No. 
ER03-486-004 for the implementation of a non-bid based self-supply 
option for Operating Reserve.
    NYISO states that it has served a copy of the filing on all parties 
on the official service list in this proceeding, including the New York 
Public Service Commission, and to the electric utility regulatory 
agencies in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2005.

4. FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC

[Docket No. ER03-1333-002]

    Take notice that, on February 4, 2005, FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC 
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission order issued 
November 17, 2003, in Docket No. EL01-118-000, et al. Investigation of 
Terms and Conditions of Public Utility Market-Based Rate 
Authorizations, 105 FERC ] 61,218 (2003). FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC 
states that it is amending its market-based rate tariff to include the 
market behavior rules.
    FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC states that copies of the filing were 
served on parties on the official service list in the above-captioned 
proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

5. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER04-539-007]

    Take notice that, on February 4, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
(PJM) submitted its responses to the Commission's deficiency letter 
issued January 5, 2005 in Docket No. ER04-539-006, amending PJM's 
filings of October 26, 2004 and December 6, 2004 in Docket No. ER04-
539-006.
    PJM states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the 
official service list in this proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

6. Mitchell Electric Membership Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-350-001]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Mitchell Electric Membership 
Corporation (Mitchell) tendered for filing additional information to 
supplement its petition for acceptance of initial rate schedule, 
waivers and blanket authority filed on December 16, 2004 in Docket No. 
ER05-350-000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

7. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-540-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company (Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions to its Market Based 
Power Sales and Resale Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 8. Wisconsin Electric states that the changes would 
permit it to sell power into the Midwest Independent System Operator's 
(Midwest ISO) Day 2 Energy Market at market-based rates in the region 
described in Wisconsin Electric's Tariff as the ``Restricted Area.'' 
Wisconsin Electric requests an effective date concurrent with the 
commencement of the Midwest ISO's Day 2 Energy Market, now scheduled to 
occur on April 1, 2005.
    Wisconsin Electric states that copies of the filing were served on 
all of its customers under the Market Rate Tariff, as well as the 
regulatory bodies in Wisconsin and Michigan.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

8. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-541-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 13 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 3 Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

9. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-542-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 19 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Searsburg Station, a hydro-electric generating 
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

10. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-543-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 10 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Bellow Falls Project, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

11. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-544-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 11 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Comerford Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

12. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-545-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 21 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Vernon Station, a hydro-electric generating 
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.

[[Page 7930]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

13. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-546-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 18 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Moore Development, a hydro-electric generating 
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

14. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-547-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 14 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 4 Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

15. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-548-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 20 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Sherman Development, a hydro-electric generating 
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

16. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-549-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 15 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 5 Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

17. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-550-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 12 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 2 Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

18. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-551-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 22 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Wilder Project, a hydro-electric generating 
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

19. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-552-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 16 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the Harriman Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

20. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-553-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company 
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and 
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original 
Service Agreement No. 17 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric 
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the 
interconnection of the McIndoes Falls Development, a hydro-electric 
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
    NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on 
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

21. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER05-554-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, PacifiCorp tendered for 
filing Generation Interconnection Agreements between PacifiCorp and 
Roseburg Forest Products Inc.; TDY Industries, Inc., a California 
corporation d/b/a Wah Chang; and Warm Springs Power Enterprises. 
PacifiCorp also filed a Transmission Service Agreement between 
PacifiCorp and Warm Springs Power Enterprises.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

22. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. ER05-556-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company (Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions to its Market-Based 
Power Sales and Resale Transmission Tariff, Wisconsin Electric's FERC 
Electric Tariff, Original

[[Page 7931]]

Volume No. 8 which reflect administrative updates, including the fact 
that Wisconsin Electric is no longer a transmission provider. Wisconsin 
Electric requests an effective date of April 5, 2005.
    Wisconsin Electric states that copies of the filing were served on 
all of its customers under the Market Rate Tariff, as well as the 
regulatory bodies in Wisconsin and Michigan.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

23. Grant Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER05-557-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Grant Energy, Inc. (Grant) 
filed an application for authorization to sell energy, capacity and 
ancillary services at market-based rates. Grant states that it intends 
to engage in wholesale electric power and energy purchases and sales as 
a marketer and is not in the business of generating or transmitting 
electric power. Grant requests an effective date of March 1, 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

24. People's Electric Cooperative

[Docket No. ER05-558-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, People's Electric Cooperative 
(People's) submitted an amendment to its Rate Schedule No. 1 for 
service to Chickasaw Tribal Utility Authority (CTUA) to add a new 
delivery point for service to CTUA.
    People's states that a copy of the filing was served on CTUA and 
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

25. United States Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administrative

[Docket No. NJ05-2-000]

    Take notice that on February 4, 2005, the United States Department 
of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) submitted new 
tariff sheets to incorporate into its Open Access Transmission Tariff 
the Large Generator Interconnection Procedures and Large Generator 
Interconnection Agreement, as set forth in the Commission's Order No. 
2003, Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and 
Procedures, 104 FERC ] 61,103 (2003) and Order No. 2003-A, 
Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, 
106 FERC ] 61,220 (2004). Bonneville also submitted Revised Tariff 
Sheet Nos. 133-135 to amend its existing Interconnection Procedures so 
that they do not apply to generation interconnections.
    Bonneville states that an electronic copy of the filing has been 
sent to all of its transmission customers and has been posted on the 
Bonneville Transmission Business Line's Web site.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-633 Filed 2-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P