[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 29 (Monday, February 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7475-7478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-595]



[[Page 7475]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-894]


Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 
Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People's Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 14, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Villanueva, Matthew Renkey, John 
Conniff or Kit Rudd, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3208, (202) 482-2312, (202) 482-1009, or 
(202) 482-1385, respectively.

Final Determination

    We determine that certain tissue paper products from the People's 
Republic of China (``PRC'') are being, or are likely to be, sold in the 
United States at less than fair value (``LTFV'') as provided in section 
735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). The estimated 
margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ``Final Determination 
Margins'' section of this notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Case History

    On September 21, 2004, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published its preliminary determination of sales at LTFV, 
affirmative preliminary determination of critical circumstances, and 
postponement of the final determination in the antidumping 
investigation of certain tissue paper products from the PRC. See 
Certain Tissue Paper Products and Certain Crepe Paper Products from the 
People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Determinations of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Affirmative Preliminary Determination of 
Critical Circumstances and Postponement of Final Determination for 
Certain Tissue Paper Products, 69 FR 56407 (September 21, 2004) 
(``Preliminary Determination'').
    During the investigation, the Department examined sales information 
from two exporters of subject merchandise that were selected as 
Mandatory Respondents.\1\ In addition, 12 companies requested separate 
rates and we refer to them, collectively, as the Section A 
Respondents.\2\ We invited interested parties to comment on our 
Preliminary Determination. Based on our analysis of the comments we 
received, we have made changes to our determinations for the two 
Mandatory Respondents. As a result of those changes, the rate assigned 
to companies which received a separate rate also changed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ China National Aero-Technology Import & Export Xiamen 
Corporation (``China National'') and Fujian Naoshan Paper Industry 
Group Co., Ltd. (``Fujian Naoshan'').
    \2\ Fujian Xinjifu Enterprises, Co., Ltd. (``Fujian Xinjifu''), 
Qingdao Wenlong Co., Ltd. (``Qingdao Wenlong''), Hunan Winco Light 
Industry Products Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Hunan Winco''), 
Fuzhou Light Industry Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Fuzhou Light''), 
Fujian Nanping Investment & Enterprise Co. (``Fujian Nanping''), 
Guilan Qifeng Paper Co. Ltd. (``Guilin Qifeng''), Ningbo Spring 
Stationary Limited Company (``Ningbo Spring''), Everlasting Business 
& Industry Corporation, Ltd. (``Everlasting''), Anhui Light 
Industrial Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Anhui Light''), Samsam 
Production Limited & Guangzhou Baxi Printing Products Limited 
(``Samsam''), Max Fortune Industrial Limited (``Max Fortune''), and 
Fuzhou Magicpro Gifts Co., Ltd. (``Magicpro'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 24, 2004, the Department issued a memorandum in 
response to ministerial error allegations filed by China National and 
Petitioners \3\ on September 24, 2004, and October 1, 2004. See 
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Tissue Paper Products from 
the People's Republic of China (``China''): Analysis of Allegations of 
Ministerial Errors. On December 1, 2004, China National again filed 
comments regarding alleged ministerial errors. The Department replied 
to these ministerial error allegations via a letter dated January 3, 
2005. The Department conducted verification of the Mandatory 
Respondents: Fujian Naoshan from November 1-7, 2004, and China National 
from December 6-17, 2004. See the ``Verification'' section below for 
additional information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts Inc.; Eagle Tissue 
LLC; Flower City Tissue Mills Co.; Garlock Printing & Converting, 
Inc.; Paper Service Ltd.; Putney Paper Co., Ltd.; and the Paper, 
Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union 
AFL-CIO, CLC (collective ``Petitioners'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 12, 2005, Mandatory Respondents and Petitioners 
submitted case briefs; on January 18, 2005, those same parties 
submitted rebuttal briefs. Also on January 18, 2005, two Section A 
Respondents filed case briefs; no party filed a rebuttal brief in 
response to these case briefs. On January 24, 2005, the Department held 
a public hearing in accordance with section 351.310(d)(l) of the 
Department's regulations. Representatives for the Mandatory Respondents 
and Petitioners attended.

Mandatory Respondents

    On October 18, 2004, Petitioners filed pre-verification comments 
regarding Fujian Naoshan. On October 19, 2004, Fujian Naoshan filed its 
sales reconciliation documentation. China National filed revised 
financial statements on October 21, 2004, and on October 25, 2004, it 
filed dye-specific factors of production (``FOP'') information. On 
October 29, 2004, China National submitted its sales reconciliation 
documentation. On November 10, 2004, China National, Fujian Naoshan, 
and Petitioners submitted information regarding surrogate values. On 
November 12, 2004, China National submitted comments on surrogate value 
information. On November 17, 2004, Petitioners submitted comments on 
China National's November 12, 2004, submission. On November 29, 2004, 
Petitioners replied to surrogate value comments submitted by Fujian 
Naoshan. On December 2, 2004, Petitioners submitted pre-verification 
comments for China National.
    On December 21, 2004, China National submitted the minor 
corrections that had been presented at verification. On January 7, 
2005, Petitioners submitted information regarding a potential 
undisclosed affiliation for Fujian Naoshan, and supplemented this 
information with a January 10, 2005, filing. On January 12, 2005, China 
National submitted an affidavit from one of its counsel from a Chinese 
law firm concerning certain issues relating to China National's 
verification. Petitioners further clarified the information in their 
January 7 and January 10, 2005 filings with a letter submitted on 
January 14, 2005. On January 14, 2005, Fujian Naoshan submitted a reply 
to Petitioners' January 7 and January 10, 2005, filings. (Fujian 
Naoshan's additional arguments regarding this issue were included in 
its rebuttal brief.) Also on January 14, 2005, China National submitted 
an affidavit from an industry source regarding tissue paper basis 
weights. On January 18, 2005, China National filed a revised FOP 
database, pursuant to a request from the Department.

Section A Respondents

    On October 18, 2004, Magicpro notified the Department that it would 
no longer participate in the investigation. On October 21, 2004, Fujian 
Xinjifu notified the Department that it would not participate in the 
verification of its section A response. On October 25, 2004, Hunan 
Winco submitted new factual information regarding its

[[Page 7476]]

separate rates claim. On January 14, 2005, a certain Section A 
Respondent submitted an affidavit regarding certain information that 
had been placed on the record concerning Fujian Naoshan.

Scope Comments

    Parties did not submit comments regarding scope during the course 
of this investigation. However, the Department issued a scope ruling 
based on a request from CSS Industries, Inc. that considered whether 
jumbo rolls should be included within the scope of this investigation. 
The Department determined in its ruling that jumbo rolls were not 
covered by this investigation. See the memorandum entitled ``Final 
Scope Ruling: Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Tissue Paper Products 
From the People's Republic of China (A-570-894); CSS Industries, 
Inc.,'' dated December 1, 2004.

Scope of Investigation

    The tissue paper products subject to investigation are cut-to-
length sheets of tissue paper having a basis weight not exceeding 29 
grams per square meter. Tissue paper products subject to this 
investigation may or may not be bleached, dye-colored, surface-colored, 
glazed, surface decorated or printed, sequined, crinkled, embossed, 
and/or die cut. The tissue paper subject to this investigation is in 
the form of cut-to-length sheets of tissue paper with a width equal to 
or greater than one-half (0.5) inch. Subject tissue paper may be flat 
or folded, and may be packaged by banding or wrapping with paper or 
film, by placing in plastic or film bags, and/or by placing in boxes 
for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer. Packages of tissue 
paper subject to this investigation may consist solely of tissue paper 
of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors and/or 
styles.
    The merchandise subject to this investigation does not have 
specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Subject merchandise 
may be under one or more of several different subheadings, including: 
4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40; 4808.30; 
4808.90; 4811.90; 4823.90; 4820.50.00; 4802.90.00; 4805.91.90; 
9505.90.40. The tariff classifications are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of 
these investigations is dispositive.
    Excluded from the scope of this investigation are the following 
tissue paper products: (1) Tissue paper products that are coated in 
wax, paraffin, or polymers, of a kind used in floral and food service 
applications; (2) tissue paper products that have been perforated, 
embossed, or die-cut to the shape of a toilet seat, i.e., disposable 
sanitary covers for toilet seats; (3) toilet or facial tissue stock, 
towel or napkin stock, paper of a kind used for household or sanitary 
purposes, cellulose wadding, and webs of cellulose fibers (HTSUS 
4803.00.20.00 and 4803.00.40.00).

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issue of applying total adverse facts available (``AFA'') 
raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation 
are addressed in the Memorandum to Barabara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration from James C. Doyle, 
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Regarding Application of Total 
Adverse Facts Available to China National Aero-Technology Import and 
Export Xiamen Corporation (``China National'') in the Final 
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Certain Tissue Paper 
Products from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') (``China 
National AFA Memo''), and the Memorandum to Barabara E. Tillman, Acting 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration from James C. 
Doyle, Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Regarding Application of 
Total Adverse Facts Available to Fujian Naoshan (``Naoshan'') in the 
Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Certain Tissue 
Paper Products from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') (``Fujian 
Naoshan AFA Memo''), both dated February 3, 2005, and which are hereby 
adopted by this notice. All other issues raised in the case and 
rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated February 3, 2005, which is also 
hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). A 
list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an 
Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Main Commerce 
Building, Room B-099, and is accessible on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
memorandum are identical in content.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the 
information submitted by the Mandatory Respondents for use in our final 
determination. See the Department's verification reports on the record 
of this investigation in the CRU with respect to China National and 
Fujian Naoshan. For all verified companies, we used standard 
verification procedures, including examination of relevant accounting 
and production records, as well as original source documents provided 
by the respondents.

Period of Investigation

    The period of investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2003, through 
December 31, 2003.
    This period corresponds to the two most recent fiscal quarters 
prior to the month of the filing of the petition. See section 
351.204(b)(1) of the Department's regulations.

Surrogate Country

    In the Preliminary Determination, we stated that we had selected 
India as the appropriate surrogate country to use in this investigation 
for the following reasons: (1) India is at a level of economic 
development comparable to that of the PRC; (2) Indian manufacturers 
produce comparable merchandise and are significant producers of certain 
tissue paper products; (3) India provides the best opportunity to use 
appropriate, publicly available data to value the FOPs. See Preliminary 
Determination. We received no comments from interested parties 
concerning our selection of India as the surrogate country. For the 
final determination, we have determined to continue to use India as the 
surrogate country and, accordingly, have calculated the PRC-wide rate 
using Indian data. We have obtained and relied upon publicly available 
information wherever possible.

Separate Rates

    In the Preliminary Determination, the Department found that several 
companies which provided responses to Section A of the antidumping 
questionnaire were eligible for a rate separate from the PRC-wide rate. 
No party submitted comments challenging these separate rate 
determinations, so we continue to find that those companies remain 
eligible for a separate rate. For a complete listing of all the 
companies that received a separate rate, see the ``Final Determination 
Margins'' section below.
    The Department found that one Section A Respondent, Hunan Winco, 
did not provide sufficient information to support its request for a 
separate rate. Accordingly, Hunan Winco has not overcome the 
presumption that it is part of the PRC-wide entity and its entries will 
be subject to the PRC-wide rate. See

[[Page 7477]]

Issues and Decision Memo at Comment 5. Magicpro, another Section A 
Respondent, stated that it was withdrawing from the investigation. 
Section A Respondent Fujian Xinjifu stated that it would not 
participate in the verification of its response. As such, these two 
companies did not overcome the presumption that they are part of the 
PRC-wide entity, and their entries will be subject to the PRC-wide 
rate. We have also found that China National and Fujian Naoshan are not 
entitled to separate rates. See the ``Facts Available'' section below.
    The margin we calculated in the Preliminary Determination for the 
companies receiving a separate rate was 91.32 percent. The rates of the 
selected Mandatory Respondents have changed since the Preliminary 
Determination as we are applying total AFA to them. The rate for 
Section A Respondents that are eligible for a separate rate is thus now 
the same as the PRC-wide rate, which is 112.64 percent. This rate was 
calculated by revising the petition margin and is the only rate 
available for use in this final determination. See the ``PRC-Wide 
Rate'' and ``Margins for Cooperative Exporters Not Selected'' sections 
below, and the Memorandum from Kit L. Rudd, Case Analyst to the File 
Through Alex Villanueva, Program Manager, Regarding the Calculation and 
Corroboration of the PRC-Wide Rate, (``PRC-Wide Rate Calculation 
Memo'').

Critical Circumstances

    As described below in the ``Facts Available'' section, we are 
applying total AFA to China National and Fujian Naoshan. As part of 
total AFA for China National and Fujian Naoshan, we determine that they 
are not eligible for separate rates and are therefore part of the PRC-
wide entity. See Fujian Naoshan AFA Memo and China National AFA Memo. 
No party submitted comments challenging the Department's critical 
circumstances finding in the Preliminary Determination with regard to 
the PRC-wide entity. As such, the Department continues to find that 
critical circumstances exist for the PRC-wide entity, including China 
National and Fujian Naoshan. Additionally, for this final determination 
we continue to find that critical circumstances do not exist with 
regard to imports of certain tissue paper products from the PRC for all 
the Section A Respondents granted a separate rate. For further details 
regarding the Department's critical circumstances analysis from the 
Preliminary Determination, see the Memo from Edward C. Yang, Office 
Director to Jeffrey A. May, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, Regarding the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain 
Tissue Paper Products and Certain Crepe Paper Products from the 
People's Republic of China (the ``PRC'')--Partial Affirmative 
Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances for Importers of 
Certain Tissue Paper Products and Crepe Paper Products from the PRC, 
dated September 21, 2004.

The PRC-Wide Rate

    Because we begin with the presumption that all companies within a 
non-market economy (``NME'') country are subject to government control 
and because only the companies listed under the ``Final Determination 
Margins'' section below have overcome that presumption, we are applying 
a single antidumping rate--the PRC-wide rate--to all other exporters of 
subject merchandise from the PRC. Such companies did not demonstrate 
entitlement to a separate rate. See, e.g., Final Determination of Sales 
at Less Than Fair Value: Synthetic Indigo from the People's Republic of 
China, 65 FR 25706 (May 3, 2000). The PRC-wide rate applies to all 
entries of subject merchandise except for entries from the respondents 
which are listed in the ``Final Determination Margins'' section below 
(except as noted). The information used to calculate this PRC-wide rate 
was corroborated with some small changes in accordance with section 
776(c) of the Act. See PRC-Wide Rate Calculation and Corroboration 
Memo, China National AFA Memo and Fujian Naoshan AFA Memo.

Facts Available

    Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides that if an interested party: 
(A) Withholds information that has been requested by the Department; 
(B) fails to provide such information in a timely manner or in the form 
or manner requested, subject to subsections 782(c)(1) and (e) of the 
Act; (C) significantly impedes a determination under the antidumping 
statute; or (D) provides such information but the information cannot be 
verified, the Department shall, subject to subsection 782(d) of the 
Act, use facts otherwise available in reaching the applicable 
determination.
    Section 776(b) of the Act states that if the administering 
authority finds that an interested party has not acted to the best of 
its ability to comply with a request for information, the administering 
authority may, in reaching its determination, use an inference that is 
adverse to that party. The adverse inference may be based upon: (1) The 
petition, (2) a final determination in the investigation under this 
title, (3) any previous review under section 751 or determination under 
section 753, or (4) any other information placed on the record.

Total AFA for China National

    For the final determination, the Department is applying facts 
available to China National because it failed to provide verifiable FOP 
data and basis weight information that the Department had requested, in 
accordance with section 776(a)(2)(D) of the Act. Also, China National 
failed to report sales of subject merchandise to the United States made 
by one of its affiliates, in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and 
(B) of the Act. Moreover, certain information regarding the financial 
statements of China National's three affiliated companies involved in 
the production and sale of subject merchandise calls into question the 
reliability of the data that would be used to calculate a margin.
    Furthermore, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act, the 
Department found that China National failed to cooperate to the best of 
its ability to comply with the Department's request for information, 
and, therefore, finds an adverse inference is warranted in determining 
the facts otherwise available. We also have determined that China 
National is not eligible for a separate rate. For a complete discussion 
of this matter, see the China National AFA Memo.

Total AFA for Fujian Naoshan

    For the final determination, the Department is applying facts 
available to Fujian Naoshan because it failed to disclose information 
regarding a possible relationship between it and another exporter of 
subject merchandise in China, in accordance with sections 776(a)(2) (A) 
through (D) of the Act.
    Furthermore, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act, the 
Department found that Fujian Naoshan failed to cooperate to the best of 
its ability to comply with the Department's request for information, 
and, therefore, finds an adverse inference is warranted in determining 
the facts otherwise available. We also have determined that Fujian 
Naoshan is not eligible for a separate rate. For a complete discussion 
of this matter, see the Fujian Naoshan AFA Memo.

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our findings at verification, additional information 
placed on the

[[Page 7478]]

record of this investigation, and analysis of comments received, we 
have made changes that impact the dumping margins in this proceeding. 
For discussion of these changes, see Issues and Decision Memo, China 
National AFA Memo, Fujian Naoshan AFA Memo, and PRC-Wide Rate 
Calculation and Corroboration Memo.

Margins for Section A Respondents Receiving a Separate Rate

    As we are applying total AFA to the Mandatory Respondents, those 
exporters who responded to Section A of the Department's antidumping 
questionnaire, established their claim for a separate rate, and had 
sales of the merchandise under investigation, but were not selected as 
Mandatory Respondents in this investigation, will receive the same rate 
as the PRC-wide rate, which is 112.64 percent. See PRC-Wide Rate 
Calculation and Corroboration Memo. This rate was calculated by 
revising the petition margin and is the only rate available for use in 
this final determination. See, e.g., Notice of Final Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of 
Critical Circumstances: Certain Crepe Paper From The People's Republic 
of China, 69 FR 70233 (December 3, 2004).

Surrogate Values

    The Department made changes to the surrogate values used to 
calculate the PRC-wide rate from the Preliminary Determination. For a 
complete discussion of the surrogate values, see Issues and Decisions 
Memorandum at Comment 2.

Final Determination Margins

    We determine that the following percentage weighted-average margins 
exist for the POI:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                          Company                               margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC Wide Rate..............................................       112.64
------------------------------------------------------------------------


      Certain Tissue Paper Products From PRC Section A Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qingdao Wenlong Co., Ltd. (``Qingdao Wenlong'')............       112.64
Fujian Nanping Investment & Enterprise Co. (``Fujian              112.64
 Nanping'')................................................
Fuzhou Light Industry Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Fuzhou         112.64
 Light'')..................................................
Guilin Qifeng Paper Co. Ltd. (``Guilin Qifeng'')...........       112.64
Ningbo Spring Stationary Limited Company (``Ningbo                112.64
 Spring'').................................................
Everlasting Business & Industry Corporation, Ltd.                 112.64
 (``Everlasting'').........................................
Anhui Light Industrial Import & Export Co., Ltd. (``Anhui         112.64
 Light'')..................................................
Samsam Production Limited & Guangzhou Baxi Printing               112.64
 Products Limited (``Samsam'').............................
Max Fortune Industrial Limited (``Max Fortune'')...........       112.64
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we are 
directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to continue to 
suspend liquidation of all entries of subject merchandise from the 
Section A Respondents that received a separate rate, that are entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the September 
21, 2004, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination. 
However, with respect to all other PRC exporters, the Department will 
continue to direct CBP to suspend liquidation of all entries of certain 
tissue paper products from the PRC that are entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, on or after 90 days before September 21, 2004, the date of 
publication of the Preliminary Determination. These suspension of 
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

United States International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we have notified the 
ITC of our final determination of sales at LTFV. As our final 
determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of 
the Act, within 45 days the ITC will determine whether the domestic 
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with 
material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of 
sales) for importation of the subject merchandise. If the ITC 
determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not 
exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all securities posted will 
be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does 
exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing 
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all imports of the subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation.

Notification Regarding APO

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 3, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

Comment 1: Treatment of Mixed Packages
Comment 2: Calculation of the Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 3: Request for Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry
Comment 4: Section A Rate--Max Fortune Industrial Limited (``Max 
Fortune'')
Comment 5: Section A Rate--Hunan Winco Light Industry Product Import 
& Export Co. Ltd. (``Hunan Winco'')

 [FR Doc. E5-595 Filed 2-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P