[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1664-1668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[R03-OAR-2004-WV-0002; FRL-7852-8a]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
West Virginia; Redesignation of the City of Weirton Including the Clay 
and Butler Magisterial Districts SO2 Nonattainment Area and Approval of 
the Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a request by the 
State of West Virginia to redesignate the sulfur dioxide 
(SO2) nonattainment area of the City of Weirton, including 
the Clay and Butler Magisterial Districts in Hancock County, from 
nonattainment to attainment of the national ambient air quality 
standards (NAAQS) for SO2. EPA is also approving the 
maintenance plan for this area submitted by the State of West Virginia 
as a revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). 
This plan provides for the maintenance of the NAAQS for SO2 
for the next ten years. These actions are being taken in accordance 
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on March 11, 2005, without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February 9, 
2005. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform 
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in 
Edocket (RME) ID Number R03-OAR-2004-WV-0002 by one of the following 
methods:
    A. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    B. Agency Web site: http://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA's 
electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method 
for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting 
comments.
    C. E-mail: [email protected].
    D. Mail: R03-OAR-2004-WV-0002, Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality 
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    E. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address. 
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of 
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of 
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R03-OAR-2004-WV-
0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in 
the public docket without change, and may be made available online at 
http://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov 
or e-mail. The EPA RME and the Federal regulations.gov Web sites are an 
``anonymous access'' system which means EPA will not know your identity 
or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your 
comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going 
through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
RME index at http://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the 
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other 
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet 
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME 
or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch 
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of material to be 
incorporated by reference are available at the Air and Radiation Docket 
and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room B108, Washington, DC 20460. Copies of 
the State submittal are available at the West Virginia Department of 
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 7012 MacCorkle 
Avenue, SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25304-2943.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814-2034, or by 
e-mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Under the CAA, EPA may redesignate areas to attainment if 
sufficient data are available to warrant such changes and the area 
meets the criteria contained in section 107(d)(3) of the Act. This 
includes full approval of a maintenance plan for the area. The 
requirements for a maintenance plan are found in section 175A of the 
CAA.
    On December 21, 1993 (58 FR 67334), EPA designated the City of 
Weirton, including the Clay and Butler Magisterial Districts of Hancock 
County, West Virginia (the Weirton area), to nonattainment for 
SO2 based upon monitored values at the Oak Street monitoring 
site in the Weirton, West Virginia area. This action required the State 
to submit a SIP revision for the Weirton area by July 1995. On July 21, 
1995, EPA received a SIP revision submittal for the Weirton area.

[[Page 1665]]

However, models available at the time for air quality planning purposes 
had limited applicability due to the intricate topography of the area. 
An additional issue to that of complex terrain was the lack of 
comprehensive local meteorological data that was representative of the 
specific area. EPA commented on the SIP submittal and encouraged the 
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) to 
consider siting and installing a new meteorological tower so that 
representative local meteorological data could be generated for use in 
refined air quality modeling analyses for attainment planning purposes. 
A 60-meter meteorological tower and acoustical Sound Detection and 
Ranging (SODAR) equipment were installed in Weirton, West Virginia. 
Additional air quality monitors were added to the area surrounding 
Weirton Steel based on ``hot spot'' modeling locations identified by 
EPA. Modeling results indicated the major contributors of ambient 
SO2 levels in the local area to be sources located within 
the Weirton Steel Corporation and the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel 
Corporation. Modeled attainment of the NAAQS required a Consent Order 
(CO) be entered into between Weirton Steel Corporation and the WVDEP, 
and the modification of a permit for Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel 
Corporation issued by WVDEP. These documents serve as the enforceable 
mechanisms which establish and impose the allowable emission limits on 
specific units within each of the facilities sufficient to attain the 
NAAQS for SO2 in the Weirton area.
    On December 29, 2003, West Virginia submitted a formal SIP revision 
for the Weirton area. The SIP revision consisted of the revised 
enforceable operating permit for the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel 
Corporation, and the CO entered into by and between the WVDEP and the 
Weirton Steel Corporation in Hancock County, West Virginia. These 
documents establish and impose allowable SO2 emission limits 
for numerous emission points at both facilities. The SIP submittal also 
included an air quality modeling demonstration that indicated that the 
allowable emission limits would provide for the attainment of the NAAQS 
for SO2 in the Weirton area. On May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24986), 
EPA fully approved West Virginia's December 29, 2003, SIP revision for 
the Weirton area.

II. Summary of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP 
Revision

    On July 27, 2004, the State of West Virginia submitted a request to 
redesignate the Weirton area to attainment for SO2. The July 
27, 2004, submittal also includes a SIP revision consisting of a 
SO2 maintenance plan for the Weirton area. Under the CAA, 
EPA may redesignate nonattainment areas to attainment if sufficient 
data are available to warrant such changes and the area meets the 
criteria contained in section 107(d)(3)(E). This includes full approval 
of a maintenance plan for the area. EPA may approve a maintenance plan 
which meets the requirements of section 175A of the Act.

III. Redesignation Criteria

    Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA, as amended, specifies five 
requirements that must be met to redesignate an area to attainment. 
They are as follows:
    1. The area must meet the applicable NAAQS.
    2. The area must have a fully approved SIP under section 110(k).
    3. The area must show improvement in air quality due to permanent 
and enforceable reductions in emissions.
    4. The area must meet all relevant requirements under section 110 
and part D of the Act.
    5. The area must have a fully approved maintenance plan pursuant to 
section 175A.
    The EPA has reviewed the redesignation request submitted by the 
State of West Virginia for the Weirton area, and finds that the request 
meets the five requirements of section 107(d)(3)(E).

A. The Data Shows Attainment of the NAAQS for SO2 in the 
City of Weirton, Including the Clay and Butler Magisterial Districts 
SO2 Nonattainment Area

    The Weirton area's nonattainment designation was based upon 
monitored values recorded in the area in the 1980's and early 1990's. 
No violations of the SO2 standards have occurred in the 
Weirton area since1994 due to the implementation of enforceable 
measures to reduce ambient SO2 levels. The redesignation 
request for the Weirton area is based upon air quality data for the 
most recent three whole calendar years (2001-2003). A review of the 
ambient air quality data demonstrates that the NAAQS have been achieved 
in the Weirton area. The data was collected and quality assured in 
accordance with 40 CFR part 58, and entered into the Air Quality 
Subsystem (AQS) of the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). 
This data indicates that the ambient air quality attains the annual and 
24-hour health-based primary standards, and the 3-hour secondary 
standard. The primary standards are an annual mean of 0.030 parts per 
million (ppm), not to be exceeded in a calendar year, and a 24-hour 
average of 0.14 ppm, not to be exceeded more than once per calendar 
year. The secondary standard is a 3-hour average of 0.5 ppm, not to be 
exceeded more than once per calendar year. Therefore, West Virginia has 
quality-assured SO2 ambient air monitoring data showing that 
the Weirton area has attained the NAAQS for SO2.
    West Virginia's July 27, 2004, submittal includes a table 
summarizing the monitoring data that has been collected in the Weirton 
area by West Virginia since 1992. The State's submittal is included and 
available for review in both the hard copy and E-Docket for this 
rulemaking. There are currently six monitors operating within the 
Weirton area: Oak Street, Summit Circle, Marland Heights, Williams 
Country Club, McKim Ridge, and Skyview. All of the monitors meet the 
requirements of 40 CFR parts 53 and 58, and are representative of the 
highest ambient concentrations.

B. The Area Has a Fully Approved SIP Under Section 110(k) of the CAA

    EPA fully approved the modeled attainment demonstration for the 
Weirton area and the enforceable documents imposing the allowable 
SO2 emission limits for the contributing sources as a SIP 
revision on May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24986), effective July 6, 2004. As 
stated previously, this dispersion modeling was based upon enforceable 
SO2 emission limits imposed in enforceable documents, in 
addition to a representative background, and demonstrated that the 
maximum SO2 impacts do not violate the NAAQS for 
SO2. The maintenance plan submitted as a SIP revision, and 
the fully approved attainment demonstration (69 FR 24986) show that the 
ambient air quality in the Weirton SO2 nonattainment area 
meets the national standards for SO2.
    The Federal requirements for new source review (NSR) in 
nonattainment areas are contained in section 172(c)(5) of the CAA. EPA 
guidance indicates the requirements of the part D new NSR program will 
be replaced by the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
program when an area has reached attainment and been redesignated, 
provided there are assurances that PSD will become fully effective upon 
redesignation. West Virginia's PSD program was approved into the West 
Virginia SIP on April 11, 1986 (51 FR 12518). The PSD program will 
become fully effective in the Weirton area immediately upon 
redesignation.

[[Page 1666]]

C. The Improvement in Air Quality Is Due to Permanent and Enforceable 
Reductions in Emissions

    As stated previously, the improvement in air quality in the Weirton 
area is due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions. The 
primary sources of SO2 in the Weirton area are the steel 
manufacturing and coke processing facilities located in or adjacent to 
the area. Within these specified industries, SO2 is emitted 
from various point and area sources. A decline in the steel industry 
along with the downsizing of the production workforce has contributed 
to lower emissions from sources in the area. A number of facilities 
within, or adjacent to the nonattainment area have permanently ceased 
operations, and a number of sources have switched to cleaner burning 
fuels that reduce the overall production of criteria pollutants, 
including SO2. West Virginia has submitted and EPA has SIP-
approved documents which make these SO2 reductions permanent 
and enforceable.
    If a new source is constructed or an existing source modified after 
EPA redesignates the area to attainment, the air quality analyses 
required under West Virginia's SIP-approved NSR and/or PSD programs, 
will ensure that such sources are permitted with emissions limits at or 
below those needed to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS 
for SO2 and protection of all applicable PSD increments.

D. The State Has Met All Applicable Requirements for the Area Under 
Section 110 and Part D of the CAA

    The Weirton area has met all applicable and necessary requirements 
of section 110 and subchapter 1, of part D of the CAA. As mentioned 
previously, the modeled attainment demonstration for the Weirton area 
as well as the emission inventory and the enforceable emission 
limitations reflected in that demonstration were fully approved by EPA 
as a SIP revision on May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24986), effective July 6, 2004. 
The West Virginia SIP has approved minor and major source NSR 
requirements including an approved PSD program.
    EPA approval of a transportation conformity SIP revision for the 
area is not required for redesignation because the nature of the area's 
previous SO2 nonattainment problem has been determined to be 
overwhelmingly attributable to stationary sources. The attainment 
demonstration SIP revision which EPA approved on May 5, 2004, contained 
a detailed emissions inventory of the allowable emissions for all of 
the sources of SO2 in the area. Sulfur dioxide emissions 
from area and mobile sources are insignificant in comparison to the 
emissions from stationary sources and estimated background 
concentrations used in the modeled attainment demonstration approved by 
EPA.

E. The Area Has a Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Under Section 175A of 
the CAA

    Section 175A of the CAA sets forth the necessary elements of a 
maintenance plan needed for areas seeking redesignation from 
nonattainment to attainment. The maintenance plan is required to be 
approved as a SIP revision under section 110 of the CAA. Under section 
175A(a) of the CAA, the maintenance plan must show that the NAAQS for 
SO2 will be maintained for at least 10 years after EPA 
approves a redesignation to attainment. The maintenance plan must also 
include contingency measures to address any violation of the NAAQS. 
Eight years after the redesignation, West Virginia must submit a 
revised maintenance plan which demonstrates attainment for the 10 years 
following the initial 10-year period.
    The State of West Virginia submitted an SO2 Maintenance 
Plan for the City of Weirton, including the Clay and Butler Magisterial 
Districts, on July 27, 2004. The maintenance plan and associated 
contingency measures are being approved in the SIP with this 
rulemaking. The major elements of this maintenance plan are described 
in the following paragraphs.
Maintenance Plan Requirements
1. Emissions Inventory
    The maintenance plan indicates that the attainment inventory is the 
emissions inventory used to perform the SIP-approved modeled attainment 
demonstration and provides updates to that inventory for 2001 for 
sources in the City of Weirton nonattainment area. Any future increases 
in emissions and/or significant changes to the stack configuration 
parameters from those modeled in the attainment demonstration due to 
new or modifying stationary sources, would be subject to the West 
Virginia's SIP's minor source NSR and/or PSD requirements including a 
demonstration that the NAAQS and applicable PSD increments are 
protected.
2. Maintenance Demonstration
    The modeled attainment demonstration submitted by West Virginia, 
which was fully approved by EPA on May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24986), showed 
attainment of the SO2 NAAQS. Modeling results submitted 
indicate future NAAQS maintenance of the area. Steel manufacturing and 
coke production are the primary sources of SO2 in the 
Weirton area. The major source changes in the area consist of 
permanent, enforceable shutdowns, which will reinforce the continued 
attainment of the area. A shift in employment from manufacturing to 
commercial business and the declining steel industry and ancillary 
industries in the area indicate a continued decrease in SO2 
emissions from stationary sources. The requirement for minor source NSR 
and PSD review/permitting for any future major source construction or 
modification, and the permanent and enforceable control measures were 
provided in the maintenance plan. As stated previously, subsequent to 
redesignation, any future increases in emissions and/or significant 
changes to the stack configuration parameters from those modeled in the 
attainment demonstration due to new or modifying stationary sources, 
would be subject to the West Virginia's SIP's minor source NSR and/or 
PSD requirements including a demonstration that the NAAQS and 
applicable PSD increments are protected. A projected decrease in 
population along with a decrease in occupied households for the years 
1990-2025 indicates that no new growth is anticipated to impact 
emissions in the area.
3. Continuation of the Monitoring Network
    West Virginia has indicated in the submitted maintenance plan that 
it will continue to monitor SO2 in the Weirton area in 
accordance with 40 CFR parts 53 and 58 to verify continued attainment 
with the NAAQS for SO2. The data will continue to be entered 
into the Air Quality Subsystem (AQS) of the Aerometric Information 
Retrieval System (AIRS).
4. Verification of Continued Attainment
    The WVDEP has committed in the maintenance plan to review the 
monitored data annually, and to review the local monitored 
meteorological data. WVDEP will also assess compliance of local 
targeted facilities to verify continued attainment of the area. The 
state will review and update the annual emissions inventory for the 
Weirton area at a minimum of once every three years.
5. Contingency Plan
    WVDEP has indicated in its submitted maintenance plan that it will 
rely on

[[Page 1667]]

ambient air monitoring data in the Weirton area to track compliance 
with the NAAQS for SO2 and to determine the need to 
implement contingency measures. In the event that an exceedance of the 
NAAQS for SO2 occurs, the State will expeditiously 
investigate and determine the source(s) that caused the exceedance and/
or violation, and enforce any SIP or permit limit that is violated. In 
the event that all sources are found to be in compliance with 
applicable SIP and permit emission limits, the State shall perform the 
necessary analysis to determine the cause(s) of the exceedance, and 
determine what additional control measures are necessary to impose on 
the area's stationary sources to continue to maintain attainment of the 
NAAQS for SO2. The State shall inform any affected 
stationary source(s) of SO2 of the potential need for 
additional control measures. If there is a violation of the NAAQS for 
SO2, the State will notify the stationary source(s) that the 
potential exists for a NAAQS violation. Within six months, the 
source(s) must submit a detailed plan of action specifying additional 
control measures to be implemented no later than 18 months after the 
notification. The additional control measures will be submitted to EPA 
for approval and incorporation into the SIP.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving West Virginia's request to redesignate the City of 
Weirton, including the Clay and Butler Magisterial Districts, 
SO2 nonattainment area to attainment because the State has 
complied with the requirements of section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. In 
addition, EPA is approving West Virginia's maintenance plan for the 
Weirton area as a SIP revision because it meets the requirements of 
section 175A.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's 
Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve 
as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are 
filed. This rule will be effective on March 11, 2005, without further 
notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 9, 2005. If EPA 
receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take 
effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule 
based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so 
at this time.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not 
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct 
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, 
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal 
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of 
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule 
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children 
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP 
submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they 
meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence 
of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary 
consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP 
submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with 
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in 
place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection 
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 11, 2005. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action.
    This action to redesignate the City of Weirton, including the Clay 
and Butler Magisterial Districts, in Hancock County, West Virginia, may 
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. 
(See section 307(b)(2).)

[[Page 1668]]

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides.

40 CFR Part 81

    Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart XX--West Virginia

0
2. Section 52.2520 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(62) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.2520  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (62) The SO2 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan 
for the City of Weirton, including the Clay and Butler Magisterial 
Districts in West Virginia, submitted by the West Virginia Department 
of Environmental Protection on July 27, 2004:
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Letter of July 27, 2004 from the West Virginia Department of 
Environmental Protection, transmitting the redesignation request and 
maintenance plan for the City of Weirton, including the Clay and Butler 
Magisterial Districts in Hancock County, West Virginia.
    (B) The City of Weirton, including the Clay and Butler Magisterial 
Districts, Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan, dated July 27, 2004.
    (ii) Additional Material. Remainder of the State submittal 
pertaining to the revision listed in paragraph (c)(62)(i) of this 
section.

PART 81--[AMENDED]

Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations

0
1. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.


0
2. Section 81.349, the table for ``West Virginia--SO2'' is 
amended by revising the entry for Hancock County to read as follows:


Sec.  81.349  West Virginia.

* * * * *

                                               West Virginia--SO2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Does not meet   Does not meet                    Better than
                Designated area                      primary        secondary       Cannot be        national
                                                    standards       standards      classified       standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hancock County (part):
    The city of Weirton, including Butler and    ..............  ..............  ..............               X
     Clay magisterial districts................
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-418 Filed 1-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P