[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1428-1431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-27]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC05-28-000, et al.]


Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

December 30, 2004.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

[[Page 1429]]

1. Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C., Cedar Brakes II, 
L.L.C., El Paso Marketing, L.P., Okwari CB Holdings LP, and 
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.

[Docket No. EC05-28-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Mesquite Investors, L.L.C. 
(Mesquite), Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C. (CB I), Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (CB 
II), El Paso Marketing, L.P. (El Paso Marketing), Okwari CB Holdings LP 
(Okwari CB) and Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. (CCG) 
(jointly, Applicants) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power 
Act requesting that the Commission authorize: (i) The transfer of all 
of Mesquite's membership interests in CB I and CB II to Okwari CB; (ii) 
the subsequent sale and transfer of up to 51 percent of the membership 
interests thus obtained by Okwari CB to as yet unidentified purchasers; 
and (iii) the assignment of power purchase agreements from El Paso 
Marketing to CCG. Applicants requested privileged treatment for certain 
exhibits pursuant to 18 CFR 33.9 and 388.112. Applicants also requested 
expedited consideration of this Application.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

2. Detroit Edison Company, DTE Energy Trading, Inc., DTE Edison 
America, Inc., DTE Energy Marketing Inc., DTE Georgetown L.P., DTE 
River Rouge No. 1, L.L.C. and Crete Energy Venture, L.L.C.

[Docket Nos. ER97-324-007, ER97-3834-012, ER98-3026-008, ER99-3368-004, 
ER00-1746-002, ER00-1816-003 and ER02-963-004]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, The Detroit Edison Company, 
DTE Energy Trading, Inc., DTE Edison America, Inc., DTE Energy 
Marketing, Inc., DTE Georgetown, L.P., DTE River Rouge No. 1, L.L.C., 
and Crete Energy Venture, L.L.C. (collectively, the DTE Parties) 
tendered for filing a joint market power update analysis in compliance 
with the Commission's order in Acadia Power Partners, L.L.C., 107 FERC 
] 61,168 (2004).
    The DTE Parties state that copies of the filing were served on 
parties on the official service lists in the above-captioned 
proceedings.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

3. Cleo Power LLC, Cleco Marketing & Trading LLC, Cleco Evangeline LLC 
and Perryville Energy Partners, LLC.

[Docket Nos. ER99-3855-003, ER99-2300-005, ER99-2928-002 and ER02-1406-
004]

    Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Cleco Power LLC, Cleco 
Evangeline LLC, and Perryville Energy Partners, LLC submitted 
generation market power screens and related analyses.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.

4. Black Hills Colorado, LLC, Black Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills 
Pepperell Power Associates, Inc., Black Hills Power, Inc., Fountain 
Valley Power, LLC, Harbor Cogeneration Company, LLC and Las Vegas 
Cogeneration II, LLC

[Docket Nos. ER00-1952-002, ER03-802-002, ER96-1635-009, ER99-2287-002, 
ER01-1784-005, ER99-1248-004 and ER03-222-004]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Black Hills Colorado, LLC, 
Black Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills Pepperell Power Associates, 
Inc., Black Hills Power, Inc., Fountain Valley Power, LLC, Harbor 
Cogeneration Company, LLC, and Las Vegas Cogeneration II, LLC, filed 
with the Commission updated market power analyses.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

5. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, Arizona Public Service Company, 
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation and APS Energy Services Company, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER00-2268-008, ER99-4124-006, ER00-3312-007 and ER99-4122-
009]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, the Pinnacle West Capital 
Corporation (PWCC), the Arizona Public Service Company (APS), the 
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation (PWEC) and APS Energy Services 
Company, Inc. (APSES) (collectively, the Pinnacle West Companies), 
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's order issued 
December 20, 2004 in Docket No. ER00-2268-005, et al., FERC ] 61,295 
(2004).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

6. Entergy Services, Inc.,

[Docket No. ER04-35-003]

    Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Entergy Services, Inc., on 
behalf of the Entergy Operating Companies, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 
Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy 
Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc., tendered its 
compliance filing in response to the Commission's order in Entergy 
Services, Inc., 109 FERC ] 61,216 (2004).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.

7. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER04-435-006]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing revisions to its Wholesale 
Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT), FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 5, in compliance with the Commission's Order issued 
September 22, 2004 in Docket Nos. ER04-435-002 and ER04-435-004, 108 
FERC ] 61,301.
    SCE states that copies of this filing were served on parties on the 
official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

8. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER04-474-003]

    Take notice that on December 22, 2004, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
(PJM) submitted a substitute interconnection service agreement among 
PJM, Industrial Power Generating Corporation, and Monongahela Power 
Company, The Potomac Edison Company, and West Penn Power Company, all 
doing business as Allegheny Power consistent with PJM Interconnection, 
L.L.C., 109 FERC ] 61,030 (2004), issued on October 7, 2004 in Docket 
Nos. ER04-474-000 and ER04-474-001.
    PJM states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the 
official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.

9. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and Public 
Utilities With Grandfathered Agreements in the Midwest ISO Region

[Docket Nos. ER04-691-014 and EL04-104-013]

    Take notice that on December 22, 2004, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted proposed 
revisions to the Midwest ISO's Open Access Transmission and Energy 
Markets Tariff (EMT), FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No. 1, and 
supplementary information and explanations concerning certain matters, 
in order to make typographical corrections and clarifying changes to 
the EMT.
    The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the service requirements 
set

[[Page 1430]]

forth in 18 CFR 385.2010. The Midwest ISO states it has electronically 
served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO 
Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-
Transmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, 
as well as all state commissions within the region. Midwest ISO further 
states that in addition, the filing has been electronically posted on 
the Midwest ISO's Web site at www.midwestiso.org under the heading 
``Filings to FERC'' for other interested parties in this matter. The 
Midwest ISO will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon 
request.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.

10. CalPeak Power--Border, LLC, CalPeak Power--Enterprise, LLC and 
CalPeak Power--Vaca Dixon, LLC

[Docket Nos. ER05-302-001, ER05-303-001 and ER05-304-001]

    Take notice that on December 22, 2004 CalPeak Power--Border, LLC 
(Border), CalPeak Power--Enterprise, LLC (Enterprise) and CalPeak 
Power--Vaca Dixon, LLC (Vaca Dixon) (collectively, CalPeak Entities), 
submitted for filing corrections to certain terms contained in 
schedules to the reliability must-run service agreements between Border 
and the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO), 
Enterprise and the ISO, and Vaca Dixon and the ISO, originally filed on 
December 6, 2004. CalPeak Entities request an effective date of January 
1, 2005.
    CalPeak Entities state that copies of the filing were served upon 
the ISO, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Pacific Gas & Electric 
Company, the California Public Utilities Commission and the California 
Electricity Oversight Board.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.

11. Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC

[Docket No. ER05-364-000]

    Take notice that on December 21, 2004, Michigan Electric 
Transmission Company, LLC (METC) submitted an executed Cost 
Reimbursement Agreement between METC and Michigan Public Power Agency, 
an executed Cost Reimbursement Agreement between METC and Michigan 
South Central Power Agency, and an executed Cost Reimbursement 
Agreement between METC and Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2005.

12. Arroyo Energy LP

[Docket No. ER05-375-000]

    Take notice that on December 21, 2004, as amended on December 23, 
2004, Arroyo Energy LP (Arroyo) filed a notice of succession to notify 
the Commission that, as a result of a name change, Arroyo Energy LP has 
succeeded to the Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 of BS Energy LP.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

13. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER05-376-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a Service Agreement for Wholesale 
Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service Agreement No. 
133 under the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff, FERC Electric 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE and the Metropolitan 
Water District of Southern California (MWD). The purpose of the WDAT 
Service Agreement is to specify the terms and conditions under which 
SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service from MWD's Small Hydro 
Facilities to the California Independent System Operator Controlled 
Grid.
    SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and MWD.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

14. MidAmerican Energy Company

[Docket No. ER05-377-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, MidAmerican Energy Company 
(MidAmerican), filed with the Commission a Network Integration 
Transmission Service Agreement and a Network Operating Agreement 
between MidAmerican Energy Company and the City of Buffalo, Iowa 
(Buffalo). MidAmerican requests an effective date of January 1, 2005, 
for these Agreements.
    MidAmerican states it has served a copy of the filing on Buffalo, 
the Iowa Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission and the 
South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

15. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 [Docket No. ER05-378-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company (PG&E) submitted its Transmission Owner Tariff for the 
Transmission Access Charge Balancing Account. PG&E requests an 
effective date of April 1, 2005.
    PG&E states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
California Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

16. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER05-380-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) submitted a Letter Agreement between SCE and the Southern 
California Water Company (SCWC). SCE states that the purpose of the 
Letter Agreement is to provide an interim arrangement pursuant to which 
SCE will commence the engineering, design and procurement of equipment 
and material for, and construction of certain additional facilities, as 
described in Exhibit A of the Letter Agreement, required in order for 
SCWC's generation plant to operate in parallel with SCE's electric 
system.
    SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and SCWC.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

17. California Independent System

[Docket No. ER05-381-000 Operator Corporation]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing revisions to the 
Transmission Control Agreement (TCA) for acceptance by the Commission. 
The ISO states that the purpose of the revisions are to: (1) Identify 
the transmission interests (i.e., the transmission facilities and 
Entitlements) that the City of Pasadena, California (Pasadena) will be 
turning over to the ISO's Operational Control, by including those 
interests in a new Appendix A to the TCA, (2) identify the Encumbrances 
associated with those interests, by listing the Encumbrances in a new 
Appendix B to the TCA; and (3) identify the persons to contact at 
Pasadena for notice purposes by expanding Appendix F to the TCA. The 
ISO requests an effective date of January 1, 2005.
    The ISO states that this filing has been served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California; the California Energy 
Commission; the California Electricity Oversight Board; Pacific Gas and 
Electric Company; San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Southern California 
Edison Company; the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning,

[[Page 1431]]

and Riverside, California (the Southern Cities); the City of Vernon, 
California; Trans-Elect NTD Path 15, LLC; Western Area Power 
Administration--Sierra Nevada Region; Pasadena; and all parties with 
effective Scheduling Coordinator Agreements under the ISO Tariff. The 
ISO states it has posted this filing on the ISO Home Page.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

 18. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER05-382-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a Service Agreement for Wholesale 
Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service Agreement No. 
134 under the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff, FERC Electric 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE and The Metropolitan 
Water District of Southern California (MWD). SCE states that the 
purpose of the WDAT Service Agreement is to specify the terms and 
conditions under which SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service 
from MWD's Etiwanda Power Plant to the California Independent System 
Operator Controlled Grid.
    SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and MWD.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

19. Port Washington Generating Station LLC

[Docket No. ER05-383-000]

    Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Port Washington Generating 
Station LLC (PWGS) submitted for filing under section 205 of the 
Federal Power Act, a Power Purchase Agreement providing for sales of 
test power between PWGS and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. PWGS 
states that the test power provides the terms and conditions pursuant 
to which, prior to the commencement of commercial operations, PWGS will 
sell test power from its Port Washington Unit 1 facility to Wisconsin 
Electric.
    PWGS states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public 
Service Commission of Wisconsin.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

20. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER05-384-000]

    Take notice, that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing notice of cancellation of its First 
Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 292 and First Revised Rate Schedule FERC 
No. 318. SCE requests an effective date of January 1, 2005.
    SCE states that copies of this filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and the Metropolitan 
Water District of Southern California and Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Linda Mitry,
 Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-27 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P