[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59803-59806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP San Francisco Bay 04-025]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; San Francisco Bay, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary fixed safety zone 
within the navigable waters adjacent to Alameda Point, San Francisco 
Bay, California, during the filming of a movie scene involving 
pyrotechnics. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of 
mariners transiting in the vicinity of the filming location and for the 
safety of the actors and technicians working with the pyrotechnics. 
Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting 
through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.

[[Page 59804]]


DATES: This rule is effective from 12 p.m. September 30, 2004, to 12 
p.m. on October 6, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of the docket [COTP San Francisco Bay 04-025] and are 
available for inspection or copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety Office 
San Francisco Bay, Coast Guard Island, Alameda, California, 94501, 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ensign John Bannon, U.S. Coast Guard 
Marine Safety Office San Francisco Bay, at (510) 437-3082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Logistical details surrounding 
the event were not finalized and presented to the Coast Guard in time 
to draft and publish an NPRM. As such the event would occur before the 
rulemaking process was complete. Any delay in implementing this rule 
would be contrary to the public interest since immediate action is 
necessary to temporarily close the area in order to protect the 
maritime public from the hazards associated with the pyrotechnics being 
used.
    For the same reasons stated above, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the 
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective 
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    Three Strikes Productions is filming portions of an upcoming major 
motion picture in and around the Aircraft Carrier HORNET Museum located 
at Pier Three, Alameda Point, San Francisco Bay, California. The 
special effects include simulated fire and explosion scenes conducted 
in the waterway in the vicinity of the HORNET, between Piers Two and 
Three at Alameda Point. Set up of equipment and filming is scheduled to 
take place from September 30 to October 6, 2004. This temporary safety 
zone is necessary to protect the public, along with vessels and other 
property from the hazards associated with the event.

Discussion of Rule

    The safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around and 
under the filming area, which is located between Piers Two and Three at 
Alameda Point, CA from September 30 to October 6, 2004. Although actual 
filming will only occur during evening hours, the safety zone is 
required for the entire period to protect the equipment associated with 
the pyrotechnics and filming. The pyrotechnics featured in the scenes 
to be filmed at this location consist of burning propane to simulate a 
fire. The propane fire will be short in duration, and is not expected 
to impact the waterway or the marine environment.
    The safety zone will be located shoreward of a line drawn between 
Alameda Point Pier 2 in approximate position 37[deg] 46'28.0'' N, 
122[deg] 18'20.0'' W and Alameda Point Pier 3 in approximate position 
37[deg] 46'20.0' N, 122[deg] 18'19.0'' W. Entry into, transit through 
or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited, unless authorized by 
the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.
    U.S. Coast Guard personnel will enforce this safety zone. Other 
Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies may assist the Coast 
Guard, including the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Title 33, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 165.23, prohibits any unauthorized person or 
vessel from entering or remaining in a safety zone. Vessels or persons 
violating this section may be subject to the penalties set forth in 33 
U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192. Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1232, any 
violation of the safety zone described herein, is punishable by civil 
penalties (not to exceed $32,500 per violation, where each day of a 
continuing violation is a separate violation), criminal penalties 
(imprisonment from 5 to 10 years and a maximum fine of $250,000) and in 
rem liability against the offending vessel. Any person who violates 
this section using a dangerous weapon, or who engages in conduct that 
causes bodily injury or fear of imminent bodily injury to any officer 
authorized to enforce this regulation also faces imprisonment from 10 
to 25 years.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).
    Although this safety zone will restrict boating traffic within San 
Francisco Bay, the effect of this regulation will not be significant as 
the safety zone will encompass only a small portion of the waterway and 
will be short in duration. The entities most likely to be affected are 
pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    For the same reasons set forth in the above Regulatory Evaluation, 
the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Sec.  605(b) that this rule is 
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners and 
operators of pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities and 
sightseeing. The safety zone will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities for several reasons: 
Vessel traffic can pass safely around the area, vessels engaged in 
recreational activities and sightseeing have ample space outside of the 
safety zone to engage in these activities, and this zone will encompass 
only a small portion of the waterway for a limited period of time. The 
maritime public will be advised of the safety zone via public notice to 
mariners.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the 
rule will affect your small business, organization, or government 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions, options 
for compliance, or assistance in understanding this rule, please 
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's

[[Page 59805]]

responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by 
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further 
environmental documentation because we are establishing a safety zone.
    A final ``Environmental Analysis Checklist'' and a final 
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available for review in 
the docket indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reports and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-043 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T11-043  Safety Zone: San Francisco Bay, CA.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass the navigable waters 
of San Francisco Bay shoreward of a line located between Alameda Point 
Pier Two in approximate position 37[deg]46'28.0'' N, 122[deg]18'20.0'' 
W, and Alameda Point Pier Three in approximate position 
37[deg]46'20.0'' N, 122[deg]18'19.0'' W.
    (b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through, or anchoring 
within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port or his designated representative.
    (2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone may 
contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 415-399-3547 or on 
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to transit the area. 
If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the 
instructions of the Captain of the Port or his designated 
representative.
    (c) Enforcement. All persons and vessels must comply with the 
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated 
on-scene patrol personnel. Patrol personnel comprise of commissioned, 
warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard onboard Coast Guard, 
Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law enforcement 
vessels. Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by 
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel 
shall proceed as directed.
    (d) Effective Dates. The safety zone becomes effective at 12 p.m. 
on

[[Page 59806]]

September 30, 2004, and will remain in effect until October 6, 2004. If 
the event concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the 
Captain of the Port will cease enforcement of the safety zone and will 
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: September 24, 2004.
Gordon A. Loebl,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, San Francisco 
Bay, California.
[FR Doc. 04-22508 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U