[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 116 (Thursday, June 17, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33856-33858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-13601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 147

[CGD08-04-004]
RIN 1625-AA84


Safety Zone; Outer Continental Shelf Facility in the Gulf of 
Mexico for Green Canyon 608

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around a 
petroleum and gas production facility in Green Canyon 608 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. The facility needs to be 
protected from vessels operating outside the normal shipping channels 
and fairways, and placing a safety zone around this area would 
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills and releases 
of natural gas. This rule prohibits all vessels from entering or 
remaining in the specified area around the facility's location except 
for the following: An attending vessel; a vessel under 100 feet in 
length overall not engaged in towing; or a vessel authorized by the 
Eighth Coast Guard District Commander.

DATES: This final rule is effective July 19, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of docket [CGD08-04-004] and are available for inspection or 
copying at Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District (m), Hale Boggs 
Federal Bldg., 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA, between 8 a.m. and 
3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant (LT) Kevin Lynn, Project 
Manager for Eighth Coast Guard District Commander, Hale Boggs Federal 
Bldg., 501 Magazine Street, New Orleans, LA 70130, telephone (504) 589-
6271.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory History

    On March 15, 2004, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) entitled ``Safety Zone; Outer Continental Shelf Facility in the 
Gulf of Mexico for Green Canyon 608'' in the Federal Register (69 FR 
12098). We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public hearing 
was requested, and none was held.

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the Marco Polo 
Tension Leg Platform (the Platform), a petroleum and gas production 
facility in the Gulf of Mexico. The Platform is located in Green Canyon 
(GC 608), at position 27[deg]21[min]43.32[sec] N, 
90[deg]10[min]53.01[sec] W.
    This safety zone is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico. 
For the purposes of this regulation it is considered to be in waters of 
304.8 meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of 
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of 
the United States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles 
from the baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. 
Navigation in the area of the safety zone consists of large commercial 
shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the 
occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area of the Gulf of 
Mexico also includes an extensive system of fairways. The fairway 
nearest the safety zone is the South of Gulf Safety Fairway. 
Significant amounts of vessel traffic occur in or near the various 
fairways in the deepwater area.
    Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, hereafter referred to as Anadarko, 
requested that the Coast Guard establish a safety zone in the Gulf of 
Mexico around the Marco Polo Tension Leg Platform (TLP).
    The request for the safety zone was made due to the high level of 
shipping activity around the site of the facility, high levels of 
production volumes, the number of persons onboard the Platform, and 
environmental safety concerns. Anadarko indicated that the location, 
production level, and personnel levels on board the facility make it 
highly likely that any allision with the facility would result in a 
catastrophic event.
    The Coast Guard has evaluated Anadarko's information and concerns 
against Eighth Coast Guard District criteria developed to determine if 
an Outer Continental Shelf facility qualifies for a safety zone. 
Several factors were considered to determine the necessity of a safety 
zone for the Marco Polo TLP facility: (1) The facility is located 
approximately 35 nautical miles south-southwest of the South of Gulf 
Safety Fairway; (2) the facility has a high daily production capacity 
of petroleum oil and gas; (3) the facility is manned; and (4) the 
facility is a tension leg platform.
    We conclude that the risk of allision to the facility and the 
potential for loss of life and damage to the environment resulting from 
such an accident warrants the establishment of this safety zone. This 
regulation will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil 
spills and natural gas releases and increases the safety of life, 
property, and the environment in the Gulf of Mexico. This regulation is 
issued pursuant to 14 U.S.C. 85 and 43 U.S.C. 1333 as set out in the 
authority citation for 33 CFR part 147.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    We received no comments on the proposed rule. Therefore, we have 
not made any change in the final rule.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs

[[Page 33857]]

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of 
Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not 
significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a 
full regulatory evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of DHS is unnecessary. The impacts on routine navigation are expected 
to be minimal because the safety zone will not overlap any of the 
safety fairways within the Gulf of Mexico.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Since the Platform is located far offshore, few privately 
owned fishing vessels and recreational boats/yachts operate in the 
area. This rule will not impact an attending vessel or vessels less 
than 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing. Alternate routes 
are available for all other vessels impacted by this rule. Use of an 
alternate route may cause a vessel to incur a delay of four to ten 
minutes in arriving at their destinations depending on how fast the 
vessel is traveling. Therefore, the Coast Guard expects the impact of 
this regulation on small entities to be minimal.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and to what degree 
this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1 paragraph (34)(g), of the instruction, from further 
environmental documentation because this rule is not expected to result 
in any significant environmental impact as described in NEPA.
    A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final 
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147

    Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 147 as follows:

[[Page 33858]]

PART 147--SAFETY ZONES

0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  147.837 to read as follows:


Sec.  147.837  Marco Polo Tension Leg Platform Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. Marco Polo Tension Leg Platform, Green Canyon 608 
(GC 608), located at position 27[deg]21'43.32'' N, 90[deg]10'53.01'' W. 
The area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the 
structure's outer edge is a safety zone. These coordinates are based 
upon [NAD 83].
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone 
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in 
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 
District.

    Dated: June 4, 2004.
R.F. Duncan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 04-13601 Filed 6-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P