[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33553-33555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-13577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM281; Special Conditions No. 25-265-SC]


Special Conditions: Raytheon Aircraft MU-300-10 and 400 
Airplanes; High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Raytheon Aircraft 
Company Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes modified by Elliott Aviation 
Technical Products Development, Inc. These airplanes will have novel 
and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology 
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category 
airplanes. The modification incorporates the installation of a 
Honeywell AZ-252 Advanced Air Data Computer and optional BA-250 and AM-
250 Altimeters. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain 
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the protection of these 
systems from the effects of high-intensity-radiated fields (HIRF). 
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that 
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety 
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is June 3, 2004. 
Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments on these special conditions may be mailed in 
duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, Attn: Rules Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM281, 1601 Lind 
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98055-4056; or delivered in duplicate 
to the Transport Airplane Directorate at the above address. Comments 
must be marked: Docket No. NM281. Comments may be inspected in the 
Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 
p.m.

[[Page 33554]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight 
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
Washington, 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2799; facsimile (425) 227-
1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public 
comment hereon is unnecessary as the substance of these special 
conditions has been subject to the public comment process in several 
prior instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA, 
therefore, finds that good cause exists for making these special 
conditions effective upon issuance; however, we invite interested 
persons to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written 
comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a 
specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for any 
recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that you send 
us two copies of written comments.
    We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a 
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel 
concerning these special conditions. The docket is available for public 
inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you wish to 
review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section 
of this preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing 
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is 
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change 
these special conditions in light of the comments received.
    If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on 
these special conditions, include with your comments a pre-addressed, 
stamped postcard on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the 
date on the postcard and mail it back to you.

Background

    On March 22, 2004, Elliott Aviation Technical Products Development, 
Inc., Quad City Airport, P.O. Box 100, Moline, Illinois 61266-0100, 
applied for a supplemental type certificate (STC) to modify Raytheon 
Aircraft Company Models MU-300-10 (Diamond II) and 400 (Beechjet) 
airplanes. The Raytheon airplanes are small transport category 
airplanes powered by two turbojet engines, with maximum takeoff weights 
of up to 15,780 pounds. These airplanes operate with a 2-pilot crew and 
can seat up to 9 passengers. The proposed modification incorporates the 
installation of a Honeywell AZ-252 Advanced Air Data Computer with 
optional pilot's BA-250 Altimeter and Co-pilot's AM-250 Altimeter. The 
information this equipment presents is flight critical. The avionics/
electronics and electrical systems to be installed on these airplanes 
have the potential to be vulnerable to high-intensity radiated fields 
(HIRF) external to the airplane.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Elliott Aviation must show 
that the Raytheon Aircraft Company Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes, 
as changed, continue to meet the applicable provisions of the 
regulations incorporated by reference in Type Certificate No. A16SW, or 
the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for the 
change. The regulations incorporated by reference in the type 
certificate are commonly referred to as the ``original type 
certification basis.''
    The regulations incorporated by reference in Type Certificate No. 
A16SW include 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
40; Sec. Sec.  25.1351(d), 25.1353(c)(5), and 25.1450 as amended by 
Amendment 25-41; Sec. Sec.  25.29, 25.255, and 25.1353(c)(6) as amended 
by Amendment 25-42; Sec.  25.361(b) as amended by Amendment 25-46; and 
14 CFR part 36 as amended by Amendment 36-1 through 36-12.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
regulations (i.e., part 25, as amended) do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for modified Model MU-300-10 and 400 
airplanes, because of a novel or unusual design feature, special 
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
conditions, the Raytheon Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes must comply 
with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 
and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued in 
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and become part of the type certification 
basis in accordance with Sec.  21.101.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should Elliott Aviation apply at a later date for 
supplemental type certificate to modify any other model included on the 
same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design 
feature, these special conditions would also apply to the other model 
under the provisions of Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The modified Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes will incorporate 
avionics/electrical systems that will perform critical functions. These 
systems may be vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane.

Discussion

    There is no specific regulation that addresses protection 
requirements for electrical and electronic systems from HIRF. Increased 
power levels from ground-based radio transmitters and the growing use 
of sensitive avionics/electrical and electronic systems to command and 
control airplanes have made it necessary to provide adequate 
protection.
    To ensure that a level of safety is achieved equivalent to that 
intended by the regulations incorporated by reference, special 
conditions are needed for the Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes. These 
special conditions require that new avionics/electronics and electrical 
systems that perform critical functions be designed and installed to 
preclude component damage and interruption of function due to both the 
direct and indirect effects of HIRF.

High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)

    With the trend toward increased power levels from ground-based 
transmitters, plus the advent of space and satellite communications, 
coupled with electronic command and control of the airplane, the 
immunity of critical digital avionics/electronics and electrical 
systems to HIRF must be established.
    It is not possible to precisely define the HIRF to which the 
airplane will be exposed in service. There is also uncertainty 
concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. 
Furthermore, coupling of electromagnetic energy to cockpit-installed 
equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined. Based on 
surveys and analysis of existing HIRF emitters, an adequate level of 
protection exists when compliance is shown with either HIRF protection 
special condition paragraph 1 or 2 below:
    1. A minimum threat of 100 volts rms (root-mean-square) per meter 
electric field strength from 10 KHz to 18 GHz.
    a. The threat must be applied to the system elements and their 
associated

[[Page 33555]]

wiring harnesses without the benefit of airframe shielding.
    b. Demonstration of this level of protection is established through 
system tests and analysis.
    2. A threat external to the airframe of the field strengths 
indicated in the following table for the frequency ranges indicated. 
Both peak and average field strength components from the table are to 
be demonstrated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Field strength
                                                           (volts per
                       Frequency                             meter)
                                                       -----------------
                                                          Peak   Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz........................................       50       50
100 kHz-500 kHz.......................................       50       50
500 kHz-2 MHz.........................................       50       50
2 MHz-30 MHz..........................................      100      100
30 MHz-70 MHz.........................................       50       50
70 MHz-100 MHz........................................       50       50
100 MHz-200 MHz.......................................      100      100
200 MHz-400 MHz.......................................      100      100
400 MHz-700 MHz.......................................      700       50
700 MHz-1 GHz.........................................      700      100
1 GHz-2 GHz...........................................     2000      200
2 GHz-4 GHz...........................................     3000      200
4 GHz-6 GHz...........................................     3000      200
6 GHz-8 GHz...........................................     1000      200
8 GHz-12 GHz..........................................     3000      300
12 GHz-18 GHz.........................................     2000      200
18 GHz-40 GHz.........................................      600      200
-------------------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak of the root-mean-
 square (rms) over the complete modulation period.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The threat levels identified above are the result of an FAA review 
of existing studies on the subject of HIRF, in light of the ongoing 
work of the Electromagnetic Effects Harmonization Working Group of the 
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the 
Raytheon Aircraft Company Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes. Should 
Elliott Aviation Technical Products Development, Inc. apply at a later 
date for a change to the type certificate to include another model 
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, these special 
conditions would apply to that model as well under the provisions of 14 
CFR 21.101.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
on the Raytheon Aircraft Company Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes. It 
is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant 
who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplanes.
    The substance of the special conditions for these airplanes has 
been subjected to the notice and comment procedure in several prior 
instances and has been derived without substantive change from those 
previously issued. Because a delay would significantly affect the 
certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has 
determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and 
impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special 
conditions immediately. The FAA is requesting comments to allow 
interested persons to submit views that may not have been submitted in 
response to the prior opportunities for comment described above.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.


0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of 
the supplemental type certification basis for Raytheon Aircraft Company 
Model MU-300-10 and 400 airplanes modified by Elliott Aviation 
Technical Products Development, Inc.
    1. Protection from Unwanted Effects of High-Intensity Radiated 
Fields (HIRF). Each electrical and electronic system that performs 
critical functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the 
operation and operational capability of these systems to perform 
critical functions are not adversely affected when the airplane is 
exposed to high intensity radiated fields.
    2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following 
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would 
contribute to or cause a failure condition that would prevent the 
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3, 2004.
Franklin Tiangsing,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-13577 Filed 6-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U