[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31116-31120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-12315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-2004-0117; FRL-7357-8]


Cloquintocet Mexyl; Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to 
Establish a Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of apesticide 
petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a 
certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket ID number OPP-2004-0117, must be 
received on or before July 2, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or 
through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions 
asprovided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bipin Gandhi, Registration Division 
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone 
number: (703) 308-8380; e-mail address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agriculturalproducer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS 111)
     Animal production (NAICS 112)
     Food manufacturing (NAICS 311)
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532)
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this 
action under docket identification (ID) number OPP-2004-0117. The 
official public docket consists of the documents specifically 
referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other 
information related to this action. Although a part of the official 
docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials 
that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and 
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 
1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open 
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' 
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through 
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may 
use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public 
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official 
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that 
are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be 
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly 
available docket materials through the docket facility identified in 
Unit I.B.1. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the 
appropriate docket ID number.
    Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. 
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public 
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic 
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be 
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in 
printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent 
feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in 
EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the 
index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the 
document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. 
Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you 
may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through 
the docket facility identified in Unit I.B. EPA intends to work towards 
providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket 
materials through EPA's electronic public docket.
    For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is 
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, 
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public 
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment 
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose 
disclosure is

[[Page 31117]]

restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing 
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in 
the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public 
docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, 
will be available in the public docket.
    Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or 
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public 
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will 
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where 
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph 
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief 
description written by the docket staff.

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand 
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the 
appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of 
your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the 
specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the 
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider 
these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is 
otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit 
I.D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or information 
protected by statute.
    1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as 
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, 
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in 
the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the 
outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter 
accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be 
identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact 
you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties 
or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's 
policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or 
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included 
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, 
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot 
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you 
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to 
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for 
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number 
OPP-2004-0117. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which 
means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact 
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected], 
Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2004-0117. In contrast to EPA's 
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous 
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket 
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail 
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses 
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as 
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and 
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
    iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM 
that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I.C.2. These 
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file 
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
    2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records 
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2004-0117.
    3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to:Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide 
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 
2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket 
ID Number OPP-2004-0117. Such deliveries are only accepted during the 
docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.

D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?

    Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI 
electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. You 
may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part 
or all of that information as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, 
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify 
electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that 
is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in 
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes 
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not 
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit 
the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside 
of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information 
not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's 
electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any 
questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult 
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your 
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used 
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you 
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this 
notice.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket 
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page 
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal 
Register citation.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA has received a pesticide petition as follows proposing the 
establishment and/or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain 
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408 
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. 
EPA has determined that this petition contains data or information 
regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however, 
EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at

[[Page 31118]]

this time or whether the data support granting of the petition. 
Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, 
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: May 14, 2004.
Betty Shackleford,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Summary of Petition

    The petitioner summary of the pesticide petition is printed below 
as required by FFDCA section 408(d)(3). The summary of the petition was 
prepared by the petitioner and represents the view of the petitioner. 
The summary may have been edited by EPA if the terminology used was 
unclear, the summary contained extraneous material, or the summary 
unintentionally made the reader conclude that the findings reflected 
EPA's position and not the position of the petitioner. The petition 
summary announces the availability of a description of the analytical 
methods available to EPA for the detection and measurement of the 
pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why no such method is 
needed.

Syngenta Crop Protection Inc.

PP 4E6831

    EPA has received a pesticide petition (4E6831) from Syngenta Crop 
Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, North Carolina, 27419-
8300 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR 180.560 by 
establishing tolerances for the combined residues of cloquintocet-
mexyl, (acetic acid, [(5-chloro-8-quinolinyl)oxy-, 1-methylhexyl ester) 
(CAS Reg. No. 99607-70-2) and its acid metabolite (5-chloro-8-
quinolinoxyaceticacid) when used as an inert ingredient (safener) in 
pesticide formulations containing either the herbicide clodinafop-
propargyl or pinoxaden in a 1:4 ratio of safener to active ingredient 
in or on the following raw agricultural commodities: Wheat, grain at 
0.10 parts per million (ppm); wheat, forage at 0.2 ppm; wheat, hay at 
0.50 ppm; wheat, straw at 0.10 ppm; barley, grain at 0.01 ppm; barley, 
hay at 0.10 ppm; and barley, straw at 0.10 ppm. EPA has determined that 
the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set 
forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully 
evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether 
the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be 
needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry

    1. Plant metabolism. Syngenta's previous Notice of Filing (NOF) 
indicated the metabolism of cloquintocet-mexyl in wheat is well 
understood, as published in the Federal Register of April 19, 2000 (65 
FR 20972) (FRL-6554-3). Total residues in all crop samples are low. 
Metabolism involves primarily rapid hydrolysis of the parent to the 
resulting acid followed by conjugation.
    2. Analytical method. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. has submitted 
practical analytical methodology for detecting and measuring combined 
levels of cloquintocet-mexyl and its acid metabolite 5-chloro-8-
quinolinoxylacetic acid. The method is based upon acid hydrolysis 
extraction, which converts the parent and all conjugates to the acid 
metabolite. The acid metabolite is subject to commodity specific 
cleanup procedures and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) 
determination with triple stage quadruple mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). 
The limit of quantitation (LOQ), as demonstrated by the lowest 
acceptable recovery samples, is 0.01 ppm for grain and 0.02 ppm for 
forage, hay and straw.
    3. Magnitude of residues. In support of registration of 
cloquintocet-mexyl on wheat, a total of 21 field trials were conducted 
by the petitioner on wheat per EPA region requirements in 16 states 
(CO, NC, ND,NM, MT, MO, TX, CA, KS, SD, OK, IL, WA, NE, AK, MN). In 
support of registration of pinoxaden on barley, a total of 12 field 
trials were conducted on barley per EPA region requirements in 10 
states (VA, SD, MN, WI, ND, CO, CA, ID, WA, MT). The magnitude of the 
residue program supports the setting of tolerances on all types of 
wheat and barley crops.

B. Toxicological Profile

    1. Acute toxicity. Cloquintocet-mexyl has a low order of acute 
toxicity. The acute toxicity profile of cloquintocet-mexyl was 
published previously in the Federal Register in the petitioner's (NOF) 
(65 FR 20972) (FRL-6554-3) (April 19, 2000). EPA has published the 
acute toxicity endpoints in the Federal Register in its final rule (65 
FR 38757) (FRL-6592-4) (June 22, 2000).
    2. Genotoxicity. Cloquintocet-mexyl was negative in all 
genotoxicity tests. The genotoxicity of cloquintocet-mexyl was 
published previously in Federal Register in the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 
20972) (FRL-6554-3) (April 19, 2000).
    3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. Cloquintocet-mexyl is 
not a reproductive or developmental toxicant. The toxicity of 
cloquintocet-mexyl was published previously in the Federal Register in 
the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 2000). EPA has published 
the reproductive and developmental toxicity endpoints in the Federal 
Register in its final rule (65 FR 38757, June 22, 2000).
    4. Subchronic toxicity. The subchronic toxicity profile 
ofcloquintocet-mexyl was published previously in the Federal Register 
in the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 2000). EPA has 
previously published the subchronic toxicity endpoints in the Federal 
Register in its final rule (65 FR 38757, June 22, 2000).
    5. Chronic toxicity. The chronic toxicity profile of cloquintocet-
mexyl was published previously in the Federal Register in the 
petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 2000). EPA has published the 
chronic toxicity endpoints in the Federal Register in its final rule 
(65 FR 38757, June 22, 2000). The Agency classified cloquintocet-mexyl 
as ``not likely to be a human carcinogen.''
    6. Animal metabolism. The metabolism of cloquintocet-mexyl in 
animals is well understood, as was published previously in the Federal 
Register in the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 2000). In 
rats, approximately 50% of an oral dose of cloquintocet-mexyl was 
rapidly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract and excreted via 
urine and bile. The administered dose was excreted independent of sex 
and was essentially complete within 48 hours. Ninety-five percent of 
the excreted dose was associated with one metabolite, the acid residue 
of cloquintocet-mexyl, 5-chloro-8-quinlinoxyacetic acid.
    7. Metabolite toxicology. The main metabolite in both plants and 
animals is 5-chloro-8-quinolinoxyacetic acid. As this is the main 
metabolite in rats, rabbits and mice, its toxicology has been tested 
throughout the toxicology database for cloquintocet-mexyl. The toxicity 
of cloquintocet-mexyl metabolites was discussed previously in the 
Federal Register in the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 2000).
    8. Endocrine disruption. There is no evidence that cloquintocet-
mexyl has any effect on endocrine function, as was discussed previously 
in the Federal Register in the petitioner's NOF (65 FR 20972, April 19, 
2000).

[[Page 31119]]

C. Aggregate Exposure

    1. Dietary exposure. Tier I acute and chronic dietaryexposure 
evaluations were made by the Agency using the Dietary Exposure 
Evaluation Model (DEEMTM), version 7.87 from Exponent. 
DEEMTM default processing factors were used in these 
assessments. All consumption data for these assessments was taken from 
the USDA's Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) with 
the 1994-96 consumption database and the Supplemental CSFII children's 
survey (1998) consumption database. These exposure assessments included 
uses on wheat and barley. Secondary residues in animal commodities were 
estimated based on theoretical worst-case, yet nutritionally adequate 
animal diets and transfer information from metabolism studies.
    i. Food. For the purposes of assessing the potential dietary 
exposure under the proposed tolerances, Syngenta Crop Protection has 
estimated aggregate exposure from all crops for which tolerances are 
established or proposed. These assessments utilized proposed tolerances 
on wheat and barley commodities and calculated residue values for 
secondary animal commodities. Percent of crop treated values for wheat 
and barley were estimated based upon economic, pest and competitive 
pressures. An acute reference dose of 1.0 milligram/kilogram body 
weight/day (mg/kg bwt/day) was based on a no observable adverse effect 
level (NOAEL) of 100 mg/kg bwt/day from a developmental toxicity study 
in the rat and an uncertainly factor of 100X. No additional FQPA safety 
factor was applied. The cloquintocet-mexyl Tier I acute (deterministic) 
dietary exposure assessment was based upon tolerance residue values. 
For the purpose of aggregate risk assessment, the exposure value was 
expressed in terms of margin of exposure (MOE) which was calculated by 
dividing the NOAEL by the exposure for each population subgroup. In 
addition, exposure was expressed as a percent of the acute reference 
dose (%RfD). Acute exposure to the most sensitive subpopulation 
(children 1-2 years) resulted in a MOE of 606,061 (0.02% of the acute 
RfD of 1.0 mg/kg bwt/day). Since the benchmark MOE for this assessment 
was 100 and since EPA generally has no concern for exposures below 100% 
of the RfD, Syngenta believes that there is a reasonable certainty that 
no harm will result from dietary (food) exposure to residues arising 
from the current and proposed uses for cloquintocet-mexyl. The chronic 
reference dose (RfD) for cloquintocet-mexyl is 0.043 mg/kg bwt/day and 
is based on a combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in the 
rat with a NOAEL of 4.3 mg/kg bwt/day and an uncertainly factor of 
100X. No additional FQPA safety factor was applied. The cloquintocet-
mexyl Tier I chronic dietary exposure assessment was based upon 
tolerance residue values. For the purpose of aggregate risk assessment, 
the exposure values were expressed in terms of margin of exposure (MOE) 
which was calculated by dividing the NOAEL by the exposure for each 
population subgroup. In addition, exposure was expressed as a percent 
of the reference dose (%RfD). Chronic exposure to the most exposed 
subpopulation (children 1-2 years) resulted in a MOE of 62,319 (0.20% 
of the chronic RfD of 0.043 mg/kg bwt/day). Since the benchmark MOE for 
this assessment was 100 and since EPA generally has no concern for 
exposures below 100% of the RfD, Syngenta believes that there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from dietary (food) 
exposure to residues arising from the current and proposed uses for 
cloquintocet-mexyl.
    ii. Drinking water. Another potential source of exposure of the 
general population to residues of cloquintocet-mexyl are residues in 
drinking water. Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs) of 
cloquintocet-mexyl in drinking water were determined by the EPA. The 
EPA ground water model Screening Concentrations in Groundwater (SCI-
GROW) was used to determine acute and chronic estimated environmental 
concentrations (EECs) in ground water and the Agency's surface water 
model GENEEC was used to determine acute and chronic EECs in surface 
water. Based on the EPA's GENEEC and SCI-GROW model outputs, the EECs 
for acute exposures are estimated to be 0.038 ppb for surface water and 
0.0060 ppb for ground water. The EECs for chronic exposures are 
estimated to be 0.053 ppb for surface water and 0.0060 ppb for ground 
water.
    Syngenta's acute Drinking Water Levels of Comparisons (DWLOC) were 
calculated based on an acute reference dose of 1.0 mg/kg/day. The most 
sensitve subpopulation (children 1-2 years) generated an acute DWLOC of 
approximately 9,998 ppb. Thus, the acute DWLOC is considerably higher 
than the acute EEC of 0.006 ppb.
    Syngenta's Chronic Drinking Water Levels of Comparison (DWLOC) were 
calculated based on a chronic Population Adjusted Dose (cPAD) of 0.03 
mg/kg/day. The children 1 and 2 years old subpopulation generated the 
lowest chronic DWLOC of approximately 429 ppb. Thus, the chronic DWLOC 
is considerably higher than the chronic EEC of 0.0060 ppb.
    2. Non-dietary exposure. Products containing the safener 
cloquintocet-mexyl will be registered for agricultural uses only and 
will not be available for any residential or public uses. Therefore, 
the aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from food and water.

D. Cumulative Effects

    Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that, when considering whether to 
establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider 
``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a 
particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.'' A discussion of the availability of 
data for determination whether cloquintocet-mexyl has a common 
mechanism of toxicity with other substances was included in the Federal 
Register in EPA's final rule (65 FR 38757, June 22, 2000).

E. Safety Determination

    1. U.S. population. The chronic dietary exposure analysis (food 
only) showed that exposure from all established and proposed 
cloquintocet-mexyl uses would be 0.20% of the cRfD for the most 
sensitive subpopulation, children 1 and 2 years old. In its final rule 
EPA determined that reliable data support using the standard MOE and 
uncertainty factor (100 for combined interspecies and intraspecies 
variability) for cloquintocet-mexyl and that an additional safety 
factor of 10 is not necessary to be protective of infants and children.
    Acute DWLOCs were calculated based on an acute RfD of 1.0 mg/kg/
day. For the acute assessment, children 1 and 2 years old subpopulation 
generated an acute DWLOC of approximately 9,998 ppb. The acute EEC of 
0.006 ppb is considerably less than 9,998 ppb. For the chronic 
assessment, the children 1 and 2 years old subpopulation generated the 
lowest chronic DWLOC of 429 ppb. Thus, the chronic DWLOC of 429 ppb is 
considerably higher than the chronic EEC of 0.006 ppb.
    2. Infants and children. Syngenta has considered the potential 
aggregate exposure from food, water and non-occupational exposure 
routes and concluded that aggregate exposure is not expected to exceed 
100% of the chronic or acute RfD and that there is a reasonable 
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from the 
aggregate exposure to cloquintocet-mexyl.

[[Page 31120]]

F. International Tolerances

    There are no international tolerances for the inert (safener), 
cloquintocet-mexyl.

[FR Doc. 04-12315 Filed 6-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S