[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 40 (Monday, March 1, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9552-9553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-4482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD05-04-019]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Ice Conditions, Upper Potomac River, Upper 
Chesapeake Bay and Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone encompassing a 
portion of the upper Potomac River, upper Chesapeake Bay and Chesapeake 
& Delaware Canal. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the 
safety of life, property and to facilitate commerce. Due to the threat 
of ice to navigation, this safety zone imposes shaft horsepower, 
intake, and hull restrictions on vessels that are operating within the 
safety zone.

DATES: This rule is effective from January 25, 2004, to March 15, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket CGD05-04-019 and are available for 
inspection or copying at Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 
2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 9 a.m. 
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Dulani Woods, Coast Guard 
Activities Baltimore, at (410) 576-2513.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Coast Guard finds 
that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM and for making this 
regulation effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal 
Register. Publishing a NPRM and delaying its effective date would be 
contrary to public interest, since immediate action is needed to 
protect mariners against potential hazards associated with ice 
conditions on the upper Potomac River, upper Chesapeake Bay, and 
Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

Background and Purpose

    During a moderate or severe winter, frozen waterways present 
numerous hazards to vessels. Ice in a waterway may hamper a vessel's 
ability to maneuver, and could cause visual aids to navigation to be 
submerged, destroyed or moved off station. Ice abrasions and ice 
pressure could also compromise a vessel's watertight integrity, and 
non-steel hulled vessels would be exposed to a greater risk of hull 
breach.
    When ice conditions develop to a point where vessel operations 
become unsafe, it becomes necessary to impose operating restrictions to 
ensure the safe navigation of vessels. Captains of the Port have the 
authority (33 CFR part 160, subpart B) to restrict and manage vessel 
movement by implementing a safety zone. The Captain of the Port 
Baltimore is establishing a safety zone on a portion of the upper 
Potomac River, upper Chesapeake Bay, and the Chesapeake & Delaware 
Canal that will restrict access to the Canal to only those vessels with 
steel hulls, keel hull coolers or upper and lower intake. Also, on the 
Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, access will be restricted to vessels 
with a minimum of 3000 total shaft horsepower.
    The purpose of this regulation is to promote maritime safety, and 
to protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the 
potential hazards due to ice conditions that become a threat to 
navigation. This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing a portion 
of the upper Potomac River bounded by the Harry W. Nice Bridge (US 301) 
the Key Bridge, including the waters of the Anacostia River downstream 
from the Highway 50 Bridge. This rule also establishes a safety zone 
encompassing a portion of the upper Chesapeake Bay, and the Chesapeake 
& Delaware Canal, from a line drawn between Swan Point and North Point 
and the Maryland and Delaware state lines, near Chesapeake City, 
Maryland.

Discussion of Temporary Final Rule

    This rule limits access to the safety zone to those vessels 
authorized to enter and operate safely within the zone. Vessels not 
meeting the operating requirements established by this temporary rule 
will not be allowed to enter the safety zone. During an emergency 
situation, a vessel not meeting the operating requirements may obtain 
permission from the Captain of the Port Baltimore prior to entering the 
safety zone during the effective period. The Captain of the Port will 
notify the maritime community, via marine broadcasts, of the current 
ice conditions and the restrictions imposed under those conditions.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This temporary rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' 
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an 
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of 
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it 
under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies 
and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a 
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of DHS is unnecessary.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    This will have virtually no impact on any small entities. 
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under section 605 (b) of the 
regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 605(b)) that this rule will not 
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.

[[Page 9553]]

    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-743-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that this rule does not have 
implications for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal government and Indian tribes. We invite your 
comments on how this rule might impact tribal governments, even if that 
impact may not constitute a ``tribal implication'' under the Order.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and 
concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' 
is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T05-019 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T05-019  Safety zone; Ice Conditions, Upper Potomac River, 
Upper Chesapeake Bay, and Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, Maryland.

    (a) Location. (1) The following area is a safety zone: All waters 
located on the upper Chesapeake Bay and Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, 
from a line drawn between Swan Point (located at position latitude 
3908[min]42[sec] N, longitude 
07616[min]44[sec] W) and North Point (located at 
position latitude 3911[min]43[sec] N, longitude 
07626[min]34[sec] W) and the Maryland and Delaware state 
lines (located along longitude 07546[min]46[sec] W), 
near Chesapeake City, Maryland.
    (2) All waters located on the upper Potomac River bounded by the 
Harry W. Nice Bridge (US 301) upstream to the Key Bridge, including the 
waters of the Anacostia River downstream from the Highway 50 Bridge to 
the confluence with the Potomac River.
    (b) Regulations. (1) All vessels transiting the regulated area in 
the Upper Potomac River, except vessels with steel hulls are required 
to comply with the general regulations governing safety zones in 33 CFR 
165.23 of this part.
    (2) All vessels transiting the regulated area in the Upper 
Chesapeake Bay and the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, except vessels 
with steel hulls, keel hull coolers or an upper and lower intake, and a 
minimum of 3000 total shaft horsepower are required to comply with the 
general regulations governing safety zones in 33 CFR 165.23 of this 
part.
    (3) Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be contacted 
on VHF-FM marine band radio, channels 13 and 16. The Captain of the 
Port can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 16 or at 
(410) 576-2693.
    (c) Definitions.
    Captain of the Port means the Commander, Coast Guard Activities 
Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
    Shaft horsepower means a measure of the actual mechanical energy 
per unit time delivered to a turning shaft.
    Steel Hull vessel means only vessels with steel hulls.
    (d) Effective period. This section is effective from January 25, 
2004, to March 15, 2004.

    Dated: January 25, 2004.
Curtis A. Springer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 04-4482 Filed 2-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P