[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-25198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 172

[Docket No. 1987F-0179]


Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human 
Consumption; Olestra; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of August 5, 2003 (68 FR 
46403). The document denied the requests for a hearing and response to 
objections it has received on the final rule that amended the food 
additive regulations to provide for the safe use of sucrose esterified 
with medium and long chain fatty acids (olestra) as a replacement for 
fats and oils in savory snacks. The document was published with 
inadvertent errors. This document corrects those errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ditto, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition (HFS-255), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint 
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 202-418-3102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 03-19509, appearing on page 46403 
in the Federal Register of Tuesday, August 5, 2003, the following 
corrections are made:
    1. On page 46408, in the second column, under the heading ``D. 
Adequacy of Olestra's Label Statement \33\'' the first sentence is 
corrected to read ``In its fifth objection and request for a hearing, 
CSPI challenges the label statement required by the 1996 final rule, 
claiming that it is not sufficient to protect the public from adverse 
effects associated with consumption of olestra.''
    2. On page 46408, in the third column, under the heading ``E. 
Alleged Procedural Problems in the Olestra Proceeding'' the first 
sentence is corrected to read ``In its sixth objection and hearing 
request, CSPI claims that there were a number of problems with the 
procedures utilized by FDA to reach a decision about the safety of 
olestra.''
    3. On page 46408, in the third column, under heading ``E. Alleged 
Procedural Problems in the Olestra Proceeding'' the second to the last 
sentence on that page is corrected to read ``As in the case with its 
fifth objection and hearing request, CSPI specifically identifies no 
factual issue underlying any of its six procedural complaints.''

    Dated: September 30, 2003.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 03-25198 Filed 10-6-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S