[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2003)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43991-43995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-18855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 82

[FRL-7529-5]
RIN 2060-AK67


Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Ban on Trade of Methyl Bromide 
With Non-Parties to the Montreal Protocol

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: With this action, EPA is proposing to prohibit the import and 
export of methyl bromide (class I, Group VI controlled substance) from 
or to a foreign state that is not a Party to the 1992 Copenhagen 
Amendments to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the 
Ozone Layer (Protocol). EPA is proposing to ban trade in methyl bromide 
with non-Parties to the Copenhagen Amendments to the Protocol in order 
to ensure the United States meets its obligations under the Protocol 
and associated amendments.
    In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of the Federal Register, 
we are adopting these prohibitions as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial action and 
anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this 
action in the preamble to the direct final rule. If we receive no 
relevant adverse comment, we will not take further action on this 
proposed rule. If we receive relevant adverse comment, we will withdraw 
the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We will address all 
public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. 
We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any 
parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on the companion direct final rule must be 
received on or before August 25, 2003, unless a public hearing is 
requested. Comments must then be received on or before 30 days 
following the public hearing. Any party requesting a public hearing 
must notify the contact person listed below by 5 p.m. Eastern Standard 
Time on August 4, 2003. If a hearing is requested it will be held 
August 19, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the companion direct final rule may be submitted 
by mail to Air and Radiation. Send two copies of your comments to: Air 
and Radiation Docket (6102), Air Docket No. A-92-13, Section XIII, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 
NW., Washington, DC 20460. The Docket's hours of operation are 8:30 
a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically, through hand delivery or courier. Refer to 
the companion direct final for detailed instructions on submitting 
comments electronically, or through hand delivery or courier.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this 
proposed rule, contact Kate Choban by telephone at (202) 564-3524, or 
by e-mail at [email protected], or by mail at Kate Choban, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Global Programs Division, 
Stratospheric Program Implementation Branch (6205J), 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, 202-564-3524. Overnight or courier 
deliveries should be sent to 501 3rd Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
20001. You may also visit the Ozone Depletion Web site of EPA's Global 
Programs Division at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/index.html for further 
information about EPA's Stratospheric Ozone Protection

[[Page 43992]]

regulations, the science of ozone layer depletion, and other topics.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action concerns the import and export 
of methyl bromide (class I, Group VI controlled substance) from or to a 
foreign state that is not a Party to the 1992 Copenhagen Amendments to 
the Montreal Protocol on Substances the Deplete the Ozone Layer 
(Protocol). EPA is proposing to ban trade in methyl bromide with non-
Parties to the Copenhagen Amendments to the Protocol in order to ensure 
the United States meets its obligations under the Protocol and 
associated amendments. For further information, please see the 
information provided in the direct final action that is located in the 
``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register publication.

Table of Contents

I. General Information
    A. Regulated entities
    B. How Can I Get Copies Of This Document and Other Related 
Information?
    C. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
    D. How Should I Submit Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
To the Agency?
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), As Amended By the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 
U.S.C. 601 et.seq.
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health & Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions that Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I . National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

I. General Information

A. Regulated Entities

    Entities potentially regulated by this action are those associated 
with the import and export of methyl bromide. Potentially regulated 
categories and entities include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Category                  Examples of regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry.............................  Importers and Exporters of methyl
                                        bromide
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 
provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated 
by this action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now 
aware could potentially be regulated by this action. To determine 
whether your facility, company, business, organization is regulated by 
this action, you should carefully examine the regulations promulgated 
at 40 CFR 82, Subpart A. If you have questions regarding the 
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person 
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this 
action under the Office of Air and Radiation Docket & Information 
Center, Air Docket ID No. A-92-13, Section XIII. The official public 
docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this 
action, any public comments received, and other information related to 
this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket 
does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official 
public docket is the collection of materials that is available for 
public viewing at EPA West, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Room B108, Mail 
Code 6102T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: (202)-566-1742, Fax: (202)-
566-1741. The materials may be inspected from 8:30 am until 4:30 pm 
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may 
be charged for copying docket materials.
    2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' 
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the 
public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and 
comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the 
index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to 
access those documents in the public docket that are available 
electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the 
appropriate docket identification number.
    Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. 
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public 
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic 
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be 
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in 
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all 
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access 
any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket 
facility identified in Unit I.B.
    For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is 
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, 
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public 
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment 
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment 
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that 
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's 
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the 
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
    Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or 
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public 
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the Docket will 
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where 
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph 
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief 
description written by the docket staff.

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments electronically, by mail or through hand 
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the 
appropriate docket identification number in the subject line on the 
first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are 
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after 
the close of comment period will be marked late. EPA is not required to 
consider these late comments. If you plan to submit comments, please 
also notify Kate Choban, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Global 
Programs Division (6205J), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460, (202)-564-3524.
    Information designated as Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
under 40 CFR, Part 2, Subpart 2, must be sent directly to the contact 
person for this notice. However, the Agency is requesting that all 
respondents submit a non-confidential version of their comments to the 
docket as well.

[[Page 43993]]

    1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as 
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing 
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body 
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside 
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying 
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the 
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA 
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further 
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA 
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information 
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the 
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made 
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to 
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for 
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    2. By Mail. Send two copies of your comments to: Air and Radiation 
Docket (6102), Air Docket No. A-92-13, Section XIII, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Mailcode 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC, 20460.
    3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: 501 3rd 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20001, Attention Docket ID No. A-92-13, 
Section XIII. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's 
normal hours of operation as identified under ADDRESSES.
    4. By Facsimile. Fax your comments to: (202) 566-1741, Attention 
Docket ID No. A-92-13, Section XIII.

D. How Should I Submit Confidential Business Information (CBI) to the 
Agency?

    Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI 
electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. 
Send or deliver information identified as CBI only to the mail or 
courier addresses listed in Units C.2 or C.3, as appropriate, to the 
attention of Air Docket ID No. A-92-13, Section XIII. You may claim 
information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of 
that information as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the 
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically 
within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI). 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 2. In addition to one complete 
version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a 
copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as 
CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket and EPA's 
electronic public docket. If you submit the copy that does not contain 
CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM clearly 
that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be 
included in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket 
without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the 
procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

Summary of Supporting Analysis

II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
Agency must determine whether this regulatory action is ``significant'' 
and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the 
Executive Order. The Order defines a ``significant'' regulatory action 
as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, 
or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined by EPA and OMB that this rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' within the meaning of the Executive 
Order and will be signed by the Administrator only after completion of 
review by OMB.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) previously approved the 
information collection requirements that can be used to implement 
today's proposed rule. The previously approved ICR is assigned OMB 
control number 2060-0170 (EPA ICR No. 1432.21).
    There is no additional paperwork burden as a result of this rule. 
Current record keeping will allow EPA to implement the provisions of 
today's action.
    The information collection previously approved will be used to 
implement the trade ban in paragraph 1 qua under Article 4 of the 
Montreal Protocol for methyl bromide. The information collection under 
this rule is authorized under sections 603(b) and 603(d) of the Clean 
Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA). This information collection is 
conducted to meet U.S. obligations under Article 7, Reporting 
Requirements, of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the 
Ozone Layer (Protocol); and to carry out the requirements of Title VI 
of the CAA, including sections 603 and 614.
    The reporting requirements included in this rule are intended to:
    (1) Satisfy U.S. obligations under the international treaty, The 
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer 
(Protocol), to report data under Article 7;
    (2) Fulfill statutory obligations under Section 603(b) of Title VI 
of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA) for reporting and 
monitoring;
    (3) Provide information to report to Congress on the production, 
use and consumption of class I controlled substances as statutorily 
required in Section 603(d) of Title VI of the CAA.
    EPA informs respondents that they may assert claims of business 
confidentiality for any of the information they submit. Information 
claimed confidential will be treated in accordance with the procedures 
for handling information claimed as confidential under 40 CFR part 2, 
Subpart B, and will be disclosed only to the extent, and by means of 
the procedures, set forth in that subpart. If no claim of 
confidentiality is asserted when the information is received by EPA, it 
may be made available to the public without further notice to the 
respondents (40 CFR 2.203).
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources 
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time 
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology

[[Page 43994]]

and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying 
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and 
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any 
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to 
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; 
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or 
otherwise disclose the information.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et. 
seq.

    The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory 
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment 
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any 
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small 
governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of 
today's rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small 
business that is identified by the North American Industry 
Classification System (NAICS) Code in the Table below; (2) a small 
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, 
school district or special district with a population of less that 
50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit 
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not 
dominant in its field.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                              SIC small business
                                                                                               size standard (in
                                                                                                   number of
                          Category                              NAICS Code       SIC Code        employees or
                                                                                                  millions of
                                                                                                   dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Chemical and Allied Products, NEC........................          424690            5169                 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on an analysis of the U.S. exports of methyl bromide to 
specific countries, EPA has determined that only 3 countries of the 50 
to whom U.S. producers of methyl bromide have exported over the past 
three years would be impacted because they have not yet ratified the 
Copenhagen Amendments to the Protocol. Specifically, the rule would ban 
the export of 41 metric tonnes to Cyprus, Cote d'Ivoire, and the United 
Arab Emriates compared to an average export from the entire U.S. of 
5,236 metric tonnes. These countries represent less than 1% of all U.S. 
exports of methyl bromide for the years 2000, 2001, and 2002. So, 
economic impacts for U.S. producers of methyl bromide would be 
extremely minimal. The rule will not constrain U.S. farmers' ability to 
obtain methyl bromide from importers because the major methyl bromide 
exporting countries have already ratified the Copenhagen Amendments.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's proposed rule on 
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This 
proposed rule will not impose any requirements on small entities. None 
of the entities affected by this rule are considered small as defined 
by the NAICS Code listed above.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Pub. 
L. 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA 
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
may result in expenditures by State, local and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
one year. If a written statement is required under section 202, section 
205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify and consider a 
reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least 
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that 
achieves the objectives of the rule, unless the Agency explains why 
this alternative is not selected or the selection of this alternative 
is inconsistent with law.
    Section 203 of the UMRA requires the Agency to establish a plan for 
obtaining input from and informing, educating, and advising any small 
governments that may be significantly or uniquely affected by the rule. 
Section 204 of the UMRA requires the Agency to develop a process to 
allow elected state, local, and tribal government officials to provide 
input in the development of any proposal containing a significant 
Federal intergovernmental mandate.
    EPA has determined that this rule does not contain a Federal 
mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more by 
State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, in any one year. The provisions in today's rule fulfill 
the obligations of the United States under the international treaty, 
The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, as 
well as those requirements set forth by Congress in section 614 of the 
Clean Air Act. Viewed as a whole, all of today's amendments do not 
create a Federal mandate resulting in costs of $100 million or more in 
any one year for State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or for the private sector. Thus, today's rule is not subject to the 
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. EPA has also 
determined that this rule contains no regulatory requirements that 
might significantly or uniquely affect small governments; therefore, 
EPA is not required to develop a plan with regard to small governments 
under section 203. Finally, because this proposal does not contain a 
significant intergovernmental mandate, the Agency is not required to 
develop a process to obtain input from elected state, local, and tribal 
officials under section 204.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of

[[Page 43995]]

power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    Under Section 6 of Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a 
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial 
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless 
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct 
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA 
consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation that has 
federalism implications and that preempts State law, unless the Agency 
consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the regulation.
    This rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132. Today's rule is expected to 
primarily affect importers and exporters of methyl bromide. EPA is not 
aware of any current uses of methyl bromide by public sector entities. 
Thus, the requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply 
to this rule.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' This proposed rule does not 
have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities 
of Indian tribal governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable 
duties on communities of Indian tribal governments. Thus, Executive 
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

G. Applicability of Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From 
Environmental Health & Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies 
to any rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' 
as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health 
or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a 
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets 
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or 
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the 
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and 
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    EPA interprets E.O. 13045 as applying only to those regulatory 
actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the 
analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the potential to 
influence the regulation. This is not such a rule, and therefore E.O. 
13045 does not apply. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it 
implements specific trade measures adopted under the Montreal Protocol 
and required by section 614 of the CAA.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in 
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 
(May 22, 2001)) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

I. The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Pub. L. No. 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA 
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides 
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This 
rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
    Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary 
consensus standards.

    Dated: July 11, 2003.
Linda J. Fisher,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 03-18855 Filed 7-24-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P