[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 23, 2003)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43481-43482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-18739]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2003 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 43481]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 279-0406; FRL-7534-5]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) emissions from mobile sources, specifically marine
vessels. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate this
emission source under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by August 22, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 or e-mail to
[email protected].
You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revision and EPA's
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal
business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revision
at the following locations:
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 1001 ``I'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
A copy of the rule may also be available via the Internet at http://www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/drdbltxt.htm. Please be advised that this is not
an EPA website and may not contain the same version of the rule that
was submitted to EPA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvonne Fong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4117.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the rule revision?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
C. Public comment and final action.
III. Background information
A. Why was this rule submitted?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What Rule Did the State Submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1.--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule
Local agency No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD............................ 1631 Pilot Credit Generation 10/04/02........... 12/12/02
Program for Marine
Vessels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 7, 2003, this rule submittal was found to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.
B. Are There Other Versions of This Rule?
We approved a version of Rule 1631 into the SIP on February 7,
2002. The SCAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on
October 4, 2002 and CARB submitted them to us on December 12, 2002.
C. What Is the Purpose of the Rule Revision?
The rule revision will allow mobile source emission reduction
credits (MSERCs) to be generated from marine vessel engine
remanufacture, in addition to engine replacement, and will allow
participating marine vessels to travel beyond district waters twice per
year for maintenance or repair. The MSERCs can be used by stationary
sources in the SCAQMD's Regional Clean Air Incentive Market (RECLAIM)
program to meet declining emission limits. The TSD has more information
about this rule.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How Is EPA Evaluating the Rule?
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act) and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and
193).
Guidance and policy documents that we used to define specific
evaluation criteria include the following:
1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992.
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
4. ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,''
January 2001, Office of Air and Radiation, EPA-452/R-01-001. This
guidance document applies to discretionary economic incentive programs
(EIPs) and represents the agency's interpretation of what EIPs should
contain in order to meet the requirements of the CAA. Because this
guidance is non-binding and does not represent final agency
[[Page 43482]]
action, EPA is using the guidance as an initial screen to determine
whether approvability issues arise.
B. Does the Rule Meet the Evaluation Criteria?
We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, SIP relaxations, and EIPs. The TSD
has more information on our evaluation.
C. Public Comment and Final Action
Because EPA believes the submitted rule fulfills all relevant
requirements, we are proposing to fully approve it as described in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act. We will accept comments from the public
on this proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we receive convincing new
information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final
approval action that will incorporate this rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Background Information
A. Why Was This Rule Submitted?
NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. Table 2 lists some of the national
milestones leading to the submittal of these local agency
NOX rules.
Table 2.--Ozone Nonattainment Milestones
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Event
------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 3, 1978.......................... EPA promulgated a list of ozone
nonattainment areas under the
Clean Air Act as amended in
1977. 43 FR 8964; 40 CFR
81.305.
May 26, 1988........................... EPA notified Governors that
parts of their SIPs were
inadequate to attain and
maintain the ozone standard
and requested that they
correct the deficiencies
(EPA's SIP-Call). See section
110(a)(2)(H) of the pre-
amended Act.
November 15, 1990...................... Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-
549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified
at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
May 15, 1991........................... Section 182(a)(2)(A) requires
that ozone nonattainment areas
correct deficient RACT rules
by this date.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not
have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This proposed rule does
not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 9, 2003.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 03-18739 Filed 7-22-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P