[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42698-42699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-18314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-11-002, et al.]


Wisvest-Connecticut, LLC, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

July 11, 2003.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

[Docket No. EL03-11-002]

1. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLC v. ISO New England Inc.

    Take notice that on July 7, 2003, the New England Power Pool 
(NEPOOL) Participants Committee and ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) 
submitted for filing changes to NEPOOL Market Rule and Procedure No. 11 
in compliance with the Commission's order in Wisvest Connecticut, LLC 
v. ISO New England, Inc., 103 FERC Sec.  61,302 (2003).
    The NEPOOL Participants Committee and ISO-NE state that copies of 
these materials were sent to all persons identified on the service 
lists in the captioned proceedings, the NEPOOL Participants and the six 
New England state governors and regulatory commissions.
    Comment Date: August 6, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-949-001]

2. Commonwealth Edison Company

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, Commonwealth Edison Company 
(ComEd), tendered for filing a proposed amendment to its FERC Electric 
Service Tariff, Second Revised Vol. No. 5. ComEd states that the 
proposed changes eliminate from Schedule C the reference to use of 
power flow models ``updated by MAIN.'' ComEd also states that the 
proposed change simply identifies the power flow models as ``updated.''
    ComEd states that the change is necessary because as PJM takes over 
determining Available Transfer Capability (ATC), a preliminary phase 
leading to ComEd's integration into PJM, the power flow models used to 
determine ATC in some instances may not be updated by MAIN.
    ComEd asserts that instead, PJM increasingly will be performing the 
updates of the power flow models. ComEd states that the models will be 
the same ones used before integration into PJM, but they will be 
updated by PJM rather than MAIN as the integration proceeds.
    ComEd states that copies of the filing were served upon the public 
utility's jurisdictional customers, the Illinois Commerce Commission, 
and interveners in this docket.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1041-000]

3. Southern Company Services, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, Southern Company Services, Inc. 
(SCS), acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia PowerCompany, 
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and SavannahElectric and 
Power Company (collectively Southern Companies), filed a Notice of 
Cancellation of Service Schedule A and Service Schedule GES of the 
Interchange Contract dated February 25, 1982 between Gulf States 
Utilities Company and Southern Companies (Southern Operating Companies' 
First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 59). SCS states that the 
cancellations were made pursuant to a bilateral amendment to the 
Interchange Contract.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1042-000]

4. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) pursuant to section 
205 of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.12 of the Commission's 
regulations, 18 CFR 35.12 , submitted for filing an unexecuted 
Interconnection and Operating Agreement among American Transmission 
Company LLC , Edison Sault Electric Company and the Midwest ISO.
    Midwest ISO states that a copy of this filing was served on 
American Transmission Company LLC and Edison Sault Electric Company.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1043-000]

5. Southern Company Services, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, Southern Company Services, Inc. 
(SCS), acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, filed a Notice of 
Cancellation of the portions of the Interconnection Agreement dated May 
5, 1980 between Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Alabama Power 
Company (Alabama Power Company's Rate Schedule FERC No. 145) that 
pertain to the supply of emergency service. SCS states that this 
cancellation was made pursuant to a bilateral amendment to the 
Interconnection Agreement.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1044-000]

6. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) pursuant to section 
205 of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.12 of the Commission's 
regulations, 18 CFR 35.12, submitted for filing an unexecuted 
Interconnection and Operating Agreement among American Transmission 
Company LLC, Wisconsin Electric Power Company d/b/a We Energies, and 
Midwest ISO.
    Midwest ISO states that a copy of this filing was served on 
American Transmission Company LLC and Wisconsin Electric Power Company 
d/b/a We Energies.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1045-000]

7. Southern Company Services, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, Southern Company Services, Inc. 
(SCS), acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power 
Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and Savannah 
Electric and Power Company (collectively Southern Companies), filed a 
revised Interim Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service 
and Complementary Services between the Southeastern Power 
Administration (SEPA) and SCS, as agent for Southern Companies (Rate 
Schedule FERC No. 400). SCS states that the revised Interim Agreement 
provides that SEPA may allocate additional capacity and energy to 
certain of its customers and Southern Companies will schedule those 
additional resources to those customers.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1046-000]

8. California Independent System

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, the California Independent System 
Operator

[[Page 42699]]

Corporation (ISO) submitted an amendment (Amendment No. 54) to the ISO 
Tariff. The ISO states that the proposed Tariff changes and 
clarifications in Amendment No. 54 further the Real Time Imbalance 
Energy Market design elements in Phase 1 of the ISO's Comprehensive 
Market Design 2002 (MD02) initiative and complement the market design 
changes that were implemented on October 30, 2002 as part of MD02 Phase 
1A. The ISO states that copies of Amendment No. 54 has been served upon 
the Public Utilities Commission of California, the California Energy 
Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, all entitles 
with effective ISO Scheduling Coordinator agreements, and all parties 
in the proceeding in Docket No. ER02-1656-000.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1048-000]

9. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) pursuant to section 
205 of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.12 of the Commission's 
regulations, 18 CFR 35.12, submitted for filing an unexecuted 
Interconnection and Operating Agreement among American Transmission 
Company LLC, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and the Midwest ISO.
    Midwest ISO states that a copy of this filing was served on 
American Transmission Company LLC and Wisconsin Public Service 
Corporation.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

[Docket No. ER03-1052-000]

10. The Green Power Connection

    Take notice that on July 8, 2003, The Green Power Connection 
pursuant to Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 35.15 and 131.53, submitted for 
filing a Notice of Cancellation of its FERC market-based electric 
tariff filed in Docket No. ER97-3888.
    The Green Power Connection states that copies of this filing have 
not been served on any party because it has not engaged in any sales of 
electric power or entered into any power or related contracts with any 
purchasers.
    Comment Date: July 29, 2003.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov , using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected] or toll-free at (866)208-3676, or for TTY, 
contact (202)502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-18314 Filed 7-17-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P