[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42587-42589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-18174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Parts 101 and 122

[CBP Dec. 03-09]


Customs and Border Protection Field Organization; Fargo, ND

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs Regulations pertaining to the 
field organization of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) by 
establishing a new port of entry at Fargo, North Dakota. The new port 
of entry includes Hector International Airport, located in the city of 
Fargo, Cass County, North Dakota, which is currently operated as a 
user-fee airport; and a portion of Clay County in Minnesota. This 
change will assist CBP in its continuing efforts to provide better 
service to carriers, importers, and the general public.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 18, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard L. Balaban, Mission Support, 
Office of Field Operations, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 
(202) 927-0031.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As part of its continuing efforts to provide better service to 
carriers, importers, and the general public, on December 2, 2002, 
Customs (then under the Department of the Treasury) published a 
document in the Federal Register (67 FR 71510) that proposed to amend 
parts 101 and 122 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR parts 101 and 122) 
to establish a port of entry at Fargo, North Dakota, to include Hector 
International Airport, located in the city of Fargo, Cass County, North 
Dakota, which is currently operated as a user-fee airport, and, 
accordingly, to remove Hector International Airport as a user-fee 
airport. As well as including Hector International Airport, the port 
limits of Fargo were also proposed to include a portion of Clay County 
in Minnesota. The proposed change of status for Hector International 
Airport from a user-fee airport to being included within the boundaries 
of a port of entry would subject the airport to the passenger 
processing fee provided for at 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(5)(B).
    The proposal to establish Fargo, North Dakota as a port of entry 
was based on Customs analysis of the following information:
    1. Fargo is serviced by three modes of transportation:
    (a) rail (the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad);
    (b) air (at Hector International Airport, two passenger carriers 
(Northwest and United Express) and five courier-delivery carriers (Air 
Bourne Express, Corporate Express, DHL, FED EX, and UPS)); and
    (c) highway (two U.S. interstate highways: I-29 and I-94);
    2. The Fargo, North Dakota area has a population of approximately 
175,000, with the potential to increase even further;
    3. Regarding the five actual or potential workload criteria:

[[Page 42588]]

    (a) Hector International Airport had 2,911 international air 
passengers for FY 2001, an increase of 61% over FY 2000;
    (b) Hector International Airport had 151 formal consumption entries 
for FY 2001, with no single company accounting for more than half of 
the projected entries; and
    (c) Hector International Airport had 814 scheduled international 
aircraft arrivals for FY 2001, an increase of 65% over FY 2000.
    Customs believed that significant benefits would be provided to the 
North Dakota business community by creating a port of entry at Fargo 
and that the cost of providing the services of one full-time and one 
part-time Customs official would be minimal to the Federal Government.

Conditional Status

    Based on the information above and the level and pace of 
development in the Fargo area, Customs believed that there was 
sufficient justification for the establishment of Fargo, North Dakota, 
as a port of entry on a conditional basis.
    In the Notice, Customs stated that if it is decided to create a 
port of entry at Fargo and to terminate Hector International Airport's 
designation as a user-fee airport, Customs will notify the airport of 
that determination in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
122.15(c). However, it was also noted that the proposal relied on 
potential, rather than actual, workload figures. Therefore, even if the 
proposed port of entry designation were adopted as a final rule, 
Customs would review the actual workload generated within the new port 
of entry in one year. If that review indicated that the actual workload 
was below the port of entry criteria established in T.D. 82-37, as 
revised by T.D. 86-14, procedures may be instituted to revoke the port 
of entry status. In such case, the airport could reapply to become a 
user-fee airport under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 58b.
    The public comment period for the proposed amendments closed 
January 31, 2003.
    On March 1, 2003, the U.S. Customs Service was transferred from the 
Department of the Treasury to the Department of Homeland Security, and 
was redesignated as the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Discussion of Comments

    One comment was received that was favorable to the establishment of 
Fargo as a port of entry.

Comment

    The commenter requested that, should Customs (now CBP) revoke the 
port of entry status of Fargo after the one-year conditional status 
period, Hector International Airport's status should automatically be 
reverted back to a user-fee airport. The commenter stated that it was 
concerned that there could be a lapse in Customs services if the 
reapplication language contained in the Notice was strictly followed. 
The commenter further stated that Customs and the airport authority 
could coordinate any transition procedures.

CBP Response

    CBP concurs with this comment. Accordingly, the terms and 
conditions in the Memorandum of Agreement between CBP and the airport 
authority will provide for the procedure by which the airport may again 
be designated as a user fee airport, should its status as a port of 
entry be terminated.

Comment

    The same commenter stated that the description of the proposed port 
of entry limits needed to be adjusted to include more of the Fargo-area 
community in North Dakota and less of the Clay County area in 
Minnesota. According to the commenter, the revised geographical limits 
for the new Fargo port of entry would more accurately reflect the area 
served by Fargo's processing facilities and Customs personnel. 
Accordingly, the commenter stated that the port of limit boundaries be 
established as follows:

    Eastern boundary--The proposed Eastern boundary of the port of 
entry in Clay County, Minnesota, needs to be moved west from Clay 
County highway 11 to a north-south line represented by Clay County Road 
78 south of U.S. 10 and Clay County Road 90 north of U.S. 10;
    Southern boundary--The proposed Southern boundary of the port of 
entry in both North Dakota and Minnesota needs to be extended south 
from U.S. Interstate 94 to an east-west line that is in accordance with 
64th Avenue South in Fargo, North Dakota; and
    Western boundary--The proposed Western boundary of the port of 
entry in Cass County, North Dakota, needs to be extended west from U.S. 
Interstate 29 in Fargo to a north-south line represented by 25th Street 
south of the intersection of U.S. Interstate 29 and U.S. 10 and 26th 
Street north of the intersection of U.S. Interstate 29 and U.S. 10 in 
West Fargo.

CBP Response

    CBP concurs with this comment. Accordingly, the description of the 
geographical limits of the port of entry is revised as stated by the 
commenter.

Conclusion

    After further review and consideration of this matter, CBP has 
determined that a port of entry will be established at Fargo--with the 
geographical limits of the port of entry modified as discussed in this 
document--and that Hector International Airport, because it is within 
the limits of this port of entry, will no longer be designated as a 
user-fee airport. This document amends the Customs Regulations to 
reflect this determination. It is noted that the designation of Fargo 
as a port of entry is on a conditional basis for one year. If, after a 
year, it is determined that Fargo does not merit port of entry status, 
a new document will be prepared for the Federal Register removing 
Fargo's designation.

Limits of Port of Entry Limits

    The description of the geographical limits of the Fargo port of 
entry is as follows:
    In Cass County, North Dakota:
    Northern boundary, Cass County highway 20,
    Southern boundary, an east-west line in accordance with 64th Avenue 
South in Fargo, North Dakota, and
    Western boundary, a north-south line represented by 25th Street 
south of the intersection of U.S. Interstate 29 and U.S. 10 and 26th 
Street north of the intersection of U.S. Interstate 29 and U.S. 10 in 
West Fargo.
    In Clay County, Minnesota:
    Northern boundary, Clay County highway 22.
    Southern boundary, an east-west line in accordance with 64th Avenue 
South in Fargo, Cass County, North Dakota, and
    Eastern boundary, a north-south line represented by Clay County 
Road 78 south of U.S. 10 and Clay County Road 90 north of U.S. 10.

Authority

    This amendment is promulgated pursuant to Customs authority under 5 
U.S.C. 301 and 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, and 1624.

Inapplicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 
12866

    Although Customs solicited public comments, no notice and public 
procedure was required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 because this matter 
relates to agency management and organization. Accordingly, this 
document is not subject to the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Further, matters involving agency 
management and organization

[[Page 42589]]

are not subject to Executive Order 12866.

Drafting Information

    The principal author of this document was Gregory R. Vilders, 
Attorney, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Regulations Branch. 
However, personnel from other offices participated in its development.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101

    Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports, 
Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies), Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Shipments, User fee facilities.

119 CFR Part 122

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft, 
Airports, Air transportation, Commercial aircraft, Customs duties and 
inspection, Freight, Imports, Organization and functions (Government 
agencies), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Amendments to the Regulations

0
For the reasons stated above, parts 101 and 122 of the Customs 
Regulations (19 CFR parts 101 and 122) are amended as set forth below:

PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS

0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 and specific authority 
citation for Sec.  101.3 continue to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note 23, 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624, 1646a; 
Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
* * * * *

0
2. In Sec.  101.3, the list of ports in paragraph (b)(1) is amended by 
adding, in alphabetical order, under the State of North Dakota, 
``Fargo'' in the ``Ports of entry'' column and ``CBP Dec. 03-'' in the 
adjacent ``Limits of port'' column.

PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS

0
3. The general authority citation for part 122 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1431, 1433, 1436, 
1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a:
* * * * *

0
4. In Sec.  122.15, the list of user fee airports in paragraph (b) is 
amended by removing ``Fargo, North Dakota'' in the column headed 
``Location'' and, on the same line, by removing ``Hector International 
Airport'' in the column headed ``Name''.

    Dated: July 14, 2003.
Robert C. Bonner,
Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection.
Tom Ridge,
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 03-18174 Filed 7-17-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P