[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 137 (Thursday, July 17, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42450-42452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-18125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-48163; File No. SR-Phlx-2003-46]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the 
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to an Extension of 
Interpretation of PACE Guarantees in Securities Subject to ITS Plan 
Exemption

July 10, 2003.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given 
that on June 26, 2003, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' 
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Phlx. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons and to grant accelerated 
approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal is intended to coincide with the Commission's 
extension of a de minimis exemption from the trade-through provisions 
of the Intermarket Trading System (``ITS'') Plan with respect to 
certain transactions in the Nasdaq-100 Index (``QQQs''), the Dow Jones 
Industrial Average (``DIAMONDs''), and the Standard & Poor's 500 Index 
(``SPDRs'').\3\ The Commission's original exemption expired on June 4, 
2003. The Exchange Rule that mirrors the Commission's exemption 
similarly expired on June 4, 2003.\4\ The Commission recently extended 
the effectiveness of the exemption to March 4, 2004.\5\ In order to 
avoid a lapse in the effectiveness of the corresponding Exchange Rule, 
this order is approving the Exchange's proposal to extend the rule from 
June 5, 2003 until March 4, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46428 (August 28, 
2002), 67 FR 56607 (September 4, 2002) at 56607 (``ITS Exemption 
Order'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46761 (November 1, 
2002), 67 FR 68222 (November 8, 2002)(order approving SR-Phlx-2002-
49).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47950 (May 30, 
2003), 68 FR 33748 (June 5, 2003)(order extending ITS Exemption 
Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Phlx proposes to extend a limited exemption in transactions in 
certain exchange-traded fund (``ETFs'') shares from Supplementary 
Material Section .10(a)(iii) of Exchange Rule 229, Philadelphia Stock 
Exchange Automated Communication and Execution System (``PACE'') beyond 
June 4, 2003.\6\ The text of the proposed rule change is available at 
the Office of the Secretary, Phlx and at the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ PACE is the Exchange's Automated Communication and Execution 
System. PACE provides a system for the automatic execution of orders 
on the Exchange equity floor under predetermined conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Phlx included statements 
concerning

[[Page 42451]]

the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any 
comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these 
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. 
The Phlx has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C 
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the time 
period of a current limited exemption from Phlx Rule 229.10(a)(iii). 
The exemption applies to the ETFs tracking the QQQs, DIAMONDs and 
SPDRs,\7\ and correlates with an exemption from the ITS Plan issued by 
the Commission (the ``ITS Exemption'').\8\ The Commission's ITS 
Exemption exempted any transactions in the three ETFs that are effected 
at prices at or within three cents away from the best bid and offer 
quoted in the Consolidated Quote System from the trade-through 
provisions of the ITS Plan through June 4, 2003. On May 30, 2003, the 
Commission issued an order extending the ITS Exemption from June 4, 
2003 through March 4, 2004.\9\
    Phlx Rule 229.10(a)(iii) requires a Phlx specialist to execute 
certain orders that are traded-through by another market center. It 
provides generally that if 100 or more shares print through the limit 
price on any exchange(s) eligible to compose the PACE Quote \10\ after 
the time of entry of any such order into PACE, the specialist shall 
execute all such orders at the limit price without waiting for an 
accumulation of 1000 shares to print at the limit price on the New York 
market.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange does not currently trade DIAMONDs or SPDRs but 
may determine to do so in the future. The Exchange does trade QQQs. 
The Nasdaq-100[reg], Nasdaq-100 Index[reg], Nasdaq[reg], The Nasdaq 
Stock Market[reg], Nasdaq-100 SharesSM, Nasdaq-100 
TrustSM , Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking StockSM, 
and QQQSM are trademarks or service marks of The Nasdaq 
Stock Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq'') and have been licensed for use for 
certain purposes by the Phlx pursuant to a License Agreement with 
Nasdaq. The Nasdaq-100 Index[reg] (the ``Index'') is determined, 
composed, and calculated by Nasdaq without regard to the Licensee, 
the Nasdaq-100 TrustSM, or the beneficial owners of 
Nasdaq-100 SharesSM. Nasdaq has complete control and sole 
discretion in determining, comprising, or calculating the Index or 
in modifying in any way its method for determining, comprising, or 
calculating the Index in the future.
    \8\ See note 3, supra.
    \9\ See note 5, supra.
    \10\ PACE Quote is defined in Phlx Rule 229 as the best bid/ask 
quote among the American Stock Exchange LLC, Boston Stock Exchange, 
Inc., Cincinnati Stock Exchange, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., 
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., Pacific Exchange, Inc. and the Phlx, 
or the Intermarket Trading System/Computer Assisted Execution System 
(``ITS/CAES'') quote, as appropriate.
    \11\ To be understood, Section .10(a)(iii) must be read in 
conjunction with the preceding section of the PACE Rule. 
Supplementary Material Section .10(a)(ii) provides as follows:
    Non-Marketable Limit Orders--Unless the member organization 
entering orders otherwise elects, round-lot limit orders up to 500 
shares and the round-lot portion of PRL limit orders up to 599 
shares which are entered at a price different than the PACE Quote 
will be executed in sequence at the limit price when an accumulative 
volume of 1000 shares of the security named in the order prints at 
the limit price or better on the New York market after the time of 
entry of any such order into PACE. For each accumulation of 1000 
shares which have been executed at the limit price on the New York 
market, the specialist shall execute a single limit order of a 
participant up to a maximum of 500 shares for each round-lot limit 
order up to 500 shares or the round-lot portion of a PRL limit order 
up to 599 shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Prior to the Commission's issuance of the ITS Exemption, although 
the specialist had this obligation the specialist was, in turn, 
entitled to ``satisfaction'' of those orders pursuant to section 8(d) 
of the ITS Plan. Now, where trading through is no longer prohibited by 
the ITS Plan, as enumerated in the ITS Exemption, the specialist does 
not have recourse to seek ``satisfaction'' for these orders and is 
responsible for those executions. Moreover, the Exchange believes that 
the provision now unduly burdens the specialist by requiring the 
specialist to execute orders in situations where the specialist does 
not have access to trading at that price. Thus, the Phlx believes that 
its provision guaranteeing an execution no longer makes sense.
    The corresponding limited exemption contained in the last sentence 
of Exchange Rule 229.10(a)(iii) was initially put in effect on a pilot 
basis for the period September 4, 2002 to October 4, 2002.\12\ The 
pilot was subsequently extended to November 3, 2002.\13\ Although 
Exchange Rule 229.10(a)(iii) was most recently revised to provide that 
its limited exemption shall be in effect ``for so long as the exemption 
granted by such Order remains in effect with respect to such exchange-
traded funds,'' the Exchange stated in the proposed rule change 
adopting that language that ``[t]his exemption, which went into effect 
on September 4, 2002 and will remain in effect until June 4, 2003, 
allows Participants to execute transactions, through automatic 
execution or otherwise, without attempting to access the quotes of 
other Participants when the expected price improvement would not be 
significant.'' \14\ (emphasis added)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46481 (September 
10, 2002), 67 FR 58669 (September 17, 2002) (notice of immediate 
effectiveness of pilot for the period September 4, 2002 to October 
4, 2002).
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46615 (October 8, 
2002), 67 FR 63723 (October 15, 2002) (notice of immediate 
effectiveness of extension of pilot to November 3, 2002).
    \14\ See note 4, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with section 
6(b) of the Act \15\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section 
6(b)(5) of the Act \16\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade; to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities; to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system; and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and is not 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers or dealers. By adopting the extension of the current exemption, 
the Exchange avoids burdening specialists with the obligation to fill 
an order in circumstances where an external event triggered the 
execution obligation and the specialist could not access trading at 
that price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the

[[Page 42452]]

proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than 
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such 
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Phlx. All submissions should refer to File No. 
SR-Phlx-2003-46 and should be submitted by August 7, 2003.

IV. Discussion

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities 
exchange.\17\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed 
rule is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act 
\18\ because it is designed to facilitate transactions in securities; 
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system; and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest; and is not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ In approving this rule proposal, the Commission notes that 
it has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, 
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of the publication of 
notice thereof in the Federal Register, and for granting approval 
retroactively to June 5, 2003, the effective date of the Commission's 
extension of the ITS exemption. The Commission believes that by 
extending the Exchange's proposed exemption for its members, the 
Exchange removes the specialist's obligation to provide trade-through 
protection in situations where it will not be permitted to seek 
satisfaction through ITS from the primary market.
    This obligation was one the Phlx assumed voluntarily in order to 
make its market more attractive to sources of order flow, not an 
obligation the Act imposes on a market. The Commission believes that 
the business decision to potentially forego order flow by no longer 
providing print protection is a judgment the Act allows the Phlx to 
make.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The Commission notes that the Phlx's proposed rule change 
will remain in effect only until the expiration of the extension of 
Commission's ITS Exemption Order on March 4, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\20\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2003-46) is approved on 
an accelerated basis and is effective retroactively to June 5, 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-18125 Filed 7-16-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P