[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 129 (Monday, July 7, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40176-40178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-16969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP Charleston-03-105]
RIN 1625-AA00


Security Zones; Charleston Harbor, Cooper River, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the temporary fixed security 
zones for the waters under the Highway 17 bridges over Charleston 
Harbor and the Don Holt I-526 Bridge over the Cooper River. These 
security zones are needed for national security reasons to protect the 
public and ports from potential subversive acts. Vessels are prohibited 
from anchoring, mooring, or loitering within these zones, unless 
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Charleston, South 
Carolina or his designated representative.

DATES: This regulation is effective from 12 midnight on July 15, 2003, 
until 11:59 p.m. January 15, 2004. Comments and related material must 
reach the Coast Guard on or before September 5, 2003.

ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Coast Guard 
Marine Safety Office Charleston, 196 Tradd Street, Charleston, South 
Carolina 29401. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Charleston maintains 
the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received 
from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as 
being available in the docket, are part of [COTP Charleston-03-105], 
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or 
copying at the Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Charleston, between 
7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Kevin D. Floyd, Coast Guard Marine 
Safety Office Charleston, at (843) 747-7411

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rule making (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). 
Publishing a NPRM and delaying the effective date of this rule would be 
contrary to national security since immediate action is necessary to 
protect the public, ports and waterways of the United States.
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    Based on the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the World 
Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Arlington, VA, there is an 
increased risk that subversive terrorist activity could be launched by 
vessels or persons in close proximity to the Port of Charleston, S.C., 
against bridges within the security zones continued by this rule. If a 
bridge were damaged or destroyed, the Port of Charleston would be 
isolated from access to the sea, crippling the local economy and 
negatively impacting national security. These temporary security zones 
are necessary to protect the safety of life and property on the 
navigable waters, prevent potential terrorist threats aimed at the 
bridges crossing the main shipping channels in the Port of Charleston, 
SC and to ensure the continued unrestricted access to the sea from the 
Port.
    A similar temporary rule was issued on October 18, 2001 creating 
temporary security zones around these bridges that rule expired on 
January 15, 2002 (see COTP Charleston 01-124 in Quarterly Report of 
temporary rules, 67 FR 9194, February 28, 2002). Those security zones 
were extended by another temporary rule published on February 28, 2002 
(67 FR 9201) that expired on June 15, 2002. Those security zones were 
again extended by a temporary rule published in the Federal Register on 
July 3, 2002 (67 FR 44555) which expired on December 16, 2002. These 
security zones were again extended by a temporary rule published in the 
Federal Register on December 16, 2002 (67 FR 76991) and will expire on 
July 15, 2003.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so 
minimal so that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the

[[Page 40177]]

regulating policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The limited 
geographic area impacted by the security zones will not restrict the 
movement or routine operation of commercial or recreational vessels 
through the Port of Charleston. Also, an individual may request a 
waiver of these regulations from the Coast Guard Captain of the Port.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Coast 
Guard considered whether this rule would have a significant economic 
effect on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities because the limited geographic area encompassed by the 
security zones will not restrict the movement or routine operation of 
commercial or recreational vessels through the Port of Charleston. 
Also, an individual may request a waiver of these regulations from the 
Coast Guard Captain of the Port of Charleston.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the 
rule will affect your small business and you have questions concerning 
its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Small businesses may also send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information requirements 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Although this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationships between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is 
not necessary. A ``Environmental Assessment'' and a ``Finding of No 
Significant Impact'' are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reports and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is amending 
33 CFR part 165, as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; and 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.

    A new temporary Sec.  165.T-07-105 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T-07-105  Security Zones; Charleston Harbor, Cooper River, 
South Carolina

    (a) Regulated area. (1) A temporary fixed security zone is 
established for the waters around the Highway 17 bridges, to encompass 
all waters of the Cooper River within a line connecting the following 
points: 32[deg]48.23' N, 079[deg]55.3' W; 32[deg]48.1' N, 
079[deg]54.35' W; 32[deg]48.34'

[[Page 40178]]

N, 079[deg]55.25' W; 32[deg]48.2' N, 079[deg]54.35' W.
    (2) Another temporary fixed security zone is established for the 
waters around the Interstate 526 Bridge spans (Don Holt Bridge) in 
Charleston Harbor and on the Cooper River and will encompass all waters 
within a line connecting the following points: 32[deg]53.49' N, 
079[deg]58.05' W; 32[deg]53.42' N, 079[deg]57.48' W; 32[deg]53.53' N, 
079[deg]58.05' W; 32[deg]53.47' N, 079[deg]57.47' W.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.33 of this part, vessels are allowed to transit through these 
zones but are prohibited from mooring, anchoring, or loitering within 
these zones unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port.
    (c) Authority. In addition to 33 U.S.C. 1321, the authority for 
this section includes 33 U.S.C. 1226.
    (d) Effective period. This section is effective from 12 midnight on 
July 15, 2003, until 11:59 p.m. January 15, 2004.

    Dated: June 16, 2003.
Gary W. Merrick,
Commander, Coast Guard, Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 03-16969 Filed 7-3-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P