[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39292-39315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-16188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 104, 160, and 165

46 CFR Parts 2, 31, 71, 91, 115, 126, and 176

[USCG-2003-14749]
RIN 1625-AA46


Vessel Security

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

[[Page 39293]]


ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments and notice of 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This interim rule provides security measures for certain 
vessels calling on U.S. ports. It requires the owners or operators of 
vessels to designate security officers for vessels, develop security 
plans based on security assessments, implement security measures 
specific to the vessel's operation, and comply with Maritime Security 
Levels. This interim rule is one of six interim rules in today's 
Federal Register that comprise a new subchapter on the requirements for 
maritime security mandated by the Maritime Transportation Security Act 
of 2002. These six interim rules implement national maritime security 
initiatives concerning general provisions, Area Maritime Security 
(ports), vessels, facilities, Outer Continental Shelf facilities, and 
the Automatic Identification System. Where appropriate, they align 
these domestic maritime security requirements with those of the 
International Ship and Port Facility Security Code and recent 
amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at 
Sea. To best understand these interim rules, first read the interim 
rule titled ``Implementation of National Maritime Security 
Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792).

DATES: Effective date. This interim rule is effective from July 1, 2003 
until November 25, 2003, with the exception of amendatory instructions 
2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, and 19 which are effective July 
1, 2003. The Coast Guard intends to finalize these amendments by 
November 25, 2003. On July 31, 2003, the Director of the Federal 
Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain 
publications listed in this rule.
    Comments. Comments and related material must reach the Docket 
Management Facility on or before. Comments on collection of information 
sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) must reach OMB on or 
before July 31, 2003.
    Meeting. A public meeting will be held on July 23, 2003, from 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m., in Washington, DC.

ADDRESSES: Comments. To ensure that your comments and related material 
are not entered more than once in the docket, please submit them by 
only one of the following means:
    (1) Electronically to the Docket Management System Web site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.
    (2) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (USCG-2003-14749), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) By fax to the Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251.
    (4) By delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif 
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    You must also mail comments on collection of information to the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk Officer, 
U.S. Coast Guard.
    Meeting. A public meeting will be held on July 23, 2003 in 
Washington, DC at the Grand Hyatt Washington, DC, 1000 H Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20001.
    Availability. Electronic forms of all comments received into any of 
our dockets can be searched by the name of the individual submitting 
the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an 
association, business, labor unit, etc.) and is open to the public 
without restriction. You may also review the Department of 
Transportation's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register 
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call Lieutenant Kevin Oditt (G-MP), U.S. Coast Guard by telephone 202-
267-1103, toll-free telephone 1-800-842-8740 ext. 7-1103, or electronic 
mail [email protected].
    If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the 
docket, call Ms. Dorothy Beard, Chief, Dockets, Department of 
Transportation, and telephone 202-366-5149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to the short timeframe given to 
implement these National Maritime Transportation Security initiatives, 
as directed by the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA), and to 
ensure all comments are in the public venue for these important 
rulemakings, we are not accepting comments containing protected 
information for these interim rules. We request you submit comments, as 
explained in the Request for Comments section below, and discuss your 
concerns or support in a manner that is not security sensitive. We also 
request that you not submit proprietary information as part of your 
comment.
    The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this 
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or 
copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket 
on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related material. Your comments will be considered for the 
final rule we plan to issue before November 25, 2003, to replace this 
interim rule. If you choose to comment on this rule, please include 
your name and address, identify the specific docket number for this 
interim rule (USCG-2003-14749), indicate the specific heading of this 
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each 
comment. If you have comments on another rule, please submit those 
comments in a separate letter to the docket for that rulemaking. You 
may submit your comments and material by mail, hand delivery, fax, or 
electronic means to the Docket Management Facility at the address under 
ADDRESSES. Please submit your comments and material by only one means. 
If you submit them by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound 
format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and 
electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know 
that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period. We may change this rule in 
view of them.

Public Meetings

    We will hold a public meeting on July 23, 2003, in Washington, DC 
at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, at the address listed under ADDRESSES. The 
meeting will be from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. to discuss all of the maritime 
security interim rules, and the Automatic Identification System (AIS) 
interim rule, found in today's Federal Register. In addition, you may 
submit a request for other public meetings to the Docket Management 
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why another one 
would be beneficial. If we determine that other meetings would aid this 
rulemaking, we will hold them at a time and place

[[Page 39294]]

announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for this 
rulemaking and are making this rule effective upon publication. Section 
102(d)(1) of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA, 
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 STAT. 2064) requires the publication of an interim 
rule as soon as practicable without regard to the provisions of chapter 
5 of title 5, U.S. Code (Administrative Procedure Act). The Coast Guard 
finds that harmonization of U.S. regulations with maritime security 
measures adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 
December 2002, and the need to institute measures for the protection of 
U.S. maritime security as soon as practicable, furnish good cause for 
this interim rule to take effect immediately under both the 
Administrative Procedure Act and section 808 of the Congressional 
Review Act.

Background and Purpose

    A summary of the Coast Guard's regulatory initiatives for maritime 
security can be found under the Background and Purpose section in the 
preamble to the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National 
Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere 
in today's Federal Register.

Discussion of Comments Addressing Vessel Issues in the Notice of 
Meeting

    For a discussion of comments on vessels at the public meetings and 
in the docket, see the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National 
Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere 
in today's Federal Register.

Discussion of Interim Rule

    This interim rule regulates the owners or operators of certain 
classes of vessels, in order to provide greater security to these 
vessels and to other vessels or ports with which a vessel interfaces. 
The interim rule adds part 104, Vessel Security, to the new subchapter 
H, Maritime Security of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulation. A 
general description of the process used in developing subchapter H and 
its component parts appears in the interim rule titled ``Implementation 
of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792).
    The MTSA and the International Ship and Port Facility Security 
(ISPS) Code use different terms to define similar, if not identical, 
persons or things. These differing terms sometimes match up with the 
terms used in subchapter H, but sometimes they do not. For a table of 
the terms used in subchapter H and their related terms in the MTSA and 
the ISPS Code, see the Discussion of Interim Rule section in the 
preamble for the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National 
Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792), published elsewhere 
in today's Federal Register.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to require certain vessels to 
perform security assessments, develop security plans, and implement 
security measures and procedures in order to reduce the risk of and to 
mitigate the results of an act that threatens the security of the crew, 
the vessel, or the public. This rulemaking combines international 
requirements and existing domestic policy and is published as a part of 
a new subchapter on maritime security. The MTSA mandates vessels that 
are required to conduct security assessments and develop security plans 
to submit their vessel security plan within 6 months of the publication 
of this interim rule. It also mandates that the vessels shall be in 
compliance with their approved security plan within 12 months of the 
publication of this interim rule. However, consistent with customary 
international law, the requirements in part 104 do not apply to vessels 
engaged in innocent passage through the territorial sea of the U.S. or 
in transit passage through the navigable waters of the U.S. that form 
part of an international strait.
    Part 104 consists of four Subparts: Subpart A (General), subpart B 
(Vessel Security Requirements), subpart C (Vessel Security Assessment), 
and subpart D (Vessel Security Plan). Where appropriate, the 
requirements discussed in part 104 are consistent with requirements in 
the ISPS Code, and include the requirements discussed below.

Compliance

    U.S. flag vessel compliance with this part will be verified during 
inspections by the Coast Guard as provided in 46 CFR part 2. 46 CFR 
subchapters D, H, I, K, L, and T will be amended to require that a 
certificate of inspection be based on the condition that the vessel 
meets the requirements of 33 CFR subchapter H and specifically this 
part.
    Foreign vessels that have on board a valid International Ship 
Security Certificate that attests to the vessel's compliance with 
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS) and 
the ISPS Code, part A, and the relevant provisions in the ISPS Code, 
part B, of will be deemed in compliance with this part, except for 
those sections otherwise specified. Foreign vessel compliance will be 
verified during Port State Control verification exams.
    The interim rule also affects the Notice of Arrival rule in part 
160 of title 33, U.S. Code. These changes provide the Coast Guard with 
additional information essential to our exercise of Port State Control 
functions and to our imposition of control and compliance measures on 
foreign vessels bound for a port or place in the U.S., consistent with 
MTSA and with SOLAS regulation XI-2/9. A foreign vessel already covered 
by the Notice of Arrival rule will have to provide information about 
its International Ship Security Certificate and its implementation of 
an approved security plan.
    As required by SOLAS Chapter XI-2 Regulation 3 and the ISPS Code, 
part A, section 5, the Coast Guard has published additional 
requirements for vessels calling in the U.S. in Sec. Sec.  104.240 and 
104.255 of 33 CFR 104. These sections provide the U.S. requirements for 
setting and communicating changes in Maritime Security Level, 
completing Declarations of Security, and additional instructions for 
all vessels when Maritime Security Level 3 is set.

Waivers

    The waiver section details procedures for requesting a waiver for 
the benefit of vessel owners or operators who find specific 
requirements of the rulemaking to be unnecessary.

Equivalents

    The equivalents section details procedures for requesting an 
equivalency for specific requirements of the rulemaking. Equivalents 
are intended to allow vessel owners or operators to provide an 
alternative provision or arrangement that provides the same level of 
security as a specific requirement contained within this part.

Alternative Security Program

    This part makes provision to allow owners or operators of vessels 
on domestic voyages only to implement an Alternative Security Program 
that has been reviewed and accepted by the Commandant (G-MP), to meet 
the requirements of this part. Alternative Security Programs must be 
comprehensive and based on a security assessment to demonstrate it 
meets the intent of each section of this part. Owners or operators are 
required to implement an appropriate Alternative Security Program in 
its entirety to be deemed in compliance with this part.

[[Page 39295]]

    We also strongly encourage industry groups to develop and submit 
``model programs,'' which would include a model Vessel Security Plan 
and assessment of their own. A model program is one that, once 
submitted and reviewed and approved by Commandant (G-MP), may be used 
as a template for other vessels in the fleet. However, a Vessel 
Security Plan constructed using a model plan would still require 
submission for approval by the Coast Guard.
    The process of the review and acceptance of model programs will be 
the same as the process used for the Alternative Security Program. The 
submission of a model program will need to include a general assessment 
for the applicable segment of the industry for which the model program 
is intended. The submission must also include how owners or operators 
will implement the model program including performing an operational 
and vessel-specific assessment and verification of implementation. Once 
these model programs are accepted, the programs could be used by 
industry to develop vessel-specific plans and assessments for Coast 
Guard approval.

Evaluating Submissions of Waivers, Equivalents, and Alternative 
Security Programs

    In our evaluation of waivers, equivalencies, and Alternative 
Security Programs, the Coast Guard will accept a self-assessment or 
demonstration using any risk management tools acceptable to the Coast 
Guard. This demonstration may be requested to show that the proposed 
waiver, equivalency or Alternative Security Program is at least as 
effective as that intended by this interim rule.

Owner or Operator Responsibilities

    The owner or operator of a vessel is generally responsible for all 
requirements imposed by this part. These requirements include ensuring 
the following: The performance of all vessel security duties; defining 
the security organizational structure for each vessel; providing each 
person(s) exercising security duties or responsibilities within that 
structure with the support needed to fulfill those obligations; that 
personnel receive training, drills, and exercises enabling them to 
perform their assigned security duties; and that adequate coordination 
of security issues between vessels and facilities take place.

Company Security Officer (CSO)

    This interim rule requires that each vessel owner or operator 
appoint a Company Security Officer, designated in writing, for their 
fleet of vessels or for each individual vessel that is owned or 
operated by the company. The Company Security Officer may be a full 
time or collateral position. A Company Security Officer may perform 
other duties within the owner's or operator's organization provided he 
or she is able to perform the duties and responsibilities required of 
the Company Security Officer. The Company Security Officer may also be 
the Vessel Security Officer, provided he or she is also able to perform 
the duties and responsibilities required of the Company Security 
Officer. Generally, this provision is for vessels operating on 
restricted routes in a single COTP zone and for unmanned vessels.
    The Company Security Officer must have a general knowledge in a 
range of issues, such as company security organization, relevant 
international laws, domestic regulations, current security threats and 
patterns, risk assessment methodology, and in conducting audits, 
inspections, and control procedures.
    The CSO may delegate the duties imposed on the Company Security 
Officer by this part, but remains responsible for the performance of 
those duties. The most important duties of the Company Security Officer 
include ensuring that: A Vessel Security Assessment is conducted; a 
Vessel Security Plan is developed, approved, maintained, and 
implemented; the Vessel Security Plan is modified when necessary; 
vessel security activities are audited as appropriate; problems 
identified by audits or inspections are addressed in a timely fashion; 
adequate security training; and communication and cooperation between 
the vessel and facilities.

Vessel Security Officer (VSO)

    This interim rule requires that a Vessel Security Officer is 
designated in writing for each vessel. The Vessel Security Officer must 
have a general knowledge in a range of issues, such as security 
administration, relevant international laws, domestic regulations, 
current security threats and patterns, risk assessment methodology, and 
in conducting audits, inspections, and control procedures. The most 
important duties that must be performed by the Vessel Security Officer 
includes implementing a Vessel Security Plan; ensuring that adequate 
training is provided to vessel personnel; ensuring the vessel is 
operating in accordance with the plan and in continuous compliance with 
part 104; and periodically auditing and updating the Vessel Security 
Assessment and Vessel Security Plan. The Vessel Security Officer may 
assign security duties to other vessel personnel; however, the Vessel 
Security Officer remains responsible for security duties.

Training

    Required training for vessel personnel must be specified in the 
Vessel Security Plan. Specific security training courses for the Vessel 
Security Officer and vessel personnel will not be required by the Coast 
Guard. While formal training may be necessary, we will not mandate 
specifics. Vessel owners or operators must certify that security 
personnel are, in fact, properly trained to perform their duties. The 
types of training required must also be consistent with the training 
requirements described in this subpart. The Vessel Security Officer is 
also required to ensure that vessel security persons possess necessary 
training to maintain the overall security of the facility.

Drills and Exercises Requirements

    Exercises are required to ensure the adequacy of the Facility 
Security Plans and are required to be conducted at least once each 
calendar year, with not more than 18 months between exercises. Drills, 
which are smaller in scope than exercises, must be conducted at least 
every 3 months.
    Exercises may be vessel specific, or as part of a cooperative 
exercise program with applicable Facility and Vessel Security Plans or 
Port exercises. Exercises for security may be combined with other 
required exercises, as appropriate.

Security Systems and Equipment Maintenance

    Procedures and/or policies must be developed and implemented to 
ensure security systems and equipment are tested and operated in 
accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer and ready for use.

Security Measures

    Security measures for specific activities must be scalable in order 
to provide increasing levels of security at increasing Maritime 
Security (MARSEC) Levels. An effective security program relies on 
detailed procedures that clearly indicate the preparation and 
prevention activities that will occur at each threat level and the 
organizations, or personnel, who are responsible for carrying out those 
activities. Security Measures must be developed for the following 
activities:
    [sbull] Security measures for access control;

[[Page 39296]]

    [sbull] Security measures for restricted areas;
    [sbull] Security measures for handling cargo;
    [sbull] Security measures for delivery of vessel stores and 
bunkers; and
    [sbull] Security measures for monitoring.

Security Incident Procedures

    Each vessel owner or operator must develop security incident 
procedures for responding to transportation security incidents. The 
security incident procedures must explain the vessel's reaction to an 
emergency, including the notification and coordination with local, 
State, and federal authorities and Under Secretary of Emergency 
Preparedness and Response. The security incident procedures must also 
explain actions for securing the vessel and evacuating passengers and 
crew.

Declaration of Security (DoS)

    A Declaration of Security provides a means for ensuring that 
critical security concerns are properly addressed prior to and during a 
vessel-to-facility interface. The Declaration of Security addresses 
security by delineating responsibilities for security arrangements and 
procedures between a vessel and a facility. This requirement is similar 
to the existing U.S. practice for vessel-to-facility oil transfer 
proceedings.
    Only certain passenger vessels and vessels carrying Certain 
Dangerous Cargoes will complete a Declaration of Security for every 
evolution regardless of the Maritime Security Level. At Maritime 
Security Levels 2 and 3, all vessels and facilities would need to 
complete the Declaration of Security.
    Vessels that frequently call on the same facility may execute a 
continuing Declaration of Security--a single Declaration of Security 
for multiple visits.
    All Declarations of Security must state the security activities for 
which the facility and vessel are responsible during vessel-to-vessel 
or vessel-to-facility interfaces. Declarations of Security must be kept 
as part of the vessel's recordkeeping.
    Vessels that are operating at a higher Security Level than the port 
that the vessel is calling at may request a Declaration of Security 
with the facility, and the facility must complete a Declaration of 
Security with the vessel. Additionally, a facility may request that a 
vessel complete a Declaration of Security with the facility as 
appropriate for that facility's Security Plan or direction of the COTP. 
If the facility owner or operator requires a Declaration of Security, 
the vessel must comply. The conditions under which a vessel may request 
a Declaration of Security from the facility must be included in the 
Vessel Security Plan.

Vessel Security Assessment (VSA)

    This interim rule requires all vessels covered by part 104 to 
conduct a Vessel Security Assessment, which is an essential and 
integral part of the process for developing and updating the required 
Vessel Security Plan. The Vessel Security Assessment is based in part 
on an on-scene security survey, which details the overall assessment of 
the vessel including any existing security measures, and includes a 
written report documenting the vulnerabilities and mitigation 
strategies of the vessel. As discussed in the interim rule 
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792), 33 CFR 101.510 lists the various assessment tools that may 
be used to meet the risk assessment requirements in parts 104 through 
106 of this subchapter. The assessment tools listed are sufficient to 
enable the development of the Vessel Security Program. This list is 
also provided to ensure that the Vessel Security Assessment is 
consistent with other modal assessments. We are working with other 
agencies to develop assessment tools that are sensitive to the 
diversity of the National Marine Transportation System to ensure 
consistent levels of security throughout the entire System. The 
designated Company Security Officer must conduct the on-scene survey by 
examining and evaluating existing vessel protective measures, 
procedures, and operations. Using the information obtained in the on-
scene survey, the Company Security Officer must ensure the completion 
ot the Vessel Security Assessment. The Vessel Security Assessment 
identifies and evaluates, in writing, existing security measures; key 
vessel operations; the likelihood of possible threats to key vessel 
operations; and weaknesses, including human factors in the 
infrastructure, policies, and procedures of the vessel.
    It also includes a written summary of how the assessment was 
conducted; each vulnerability found during the assessment; and 
countermeasures that could be used to address each vulnerability. The 
Vessel Security Assessment must be reviewed and updated each time the 
Vessel Security Plan is revised and when the Vessel Security Plan is 
submitted for re-approval every 5 years.

Vessel Security Plan (VSP)

    This interim rule requires each vessel owner or operator to develop 
an effective Vessel Security Plan that incorporates detailed 
preparedness, prevention, and response activities for each Maritime 
Security Level, along with the organizations or personnel responsible 
for carrying out those activities. The requirements discussed in this 
part are consistent with requirements in the ISPS Code.
    The Vessel Security Plan is a document, written in English, that is 
prepared in response to the Vessel Security Assessment and approved by 
the Coast Guard. A single Vessel Security Plan can apply to more than 
one vessel to the extent that they share physical characteristics and 
operations.
    In addition to other things, the Vessel Security Plan must: respond 
specifically to any recommendations made by the Vessel Security 
Assessment; describe how, at each Maritime Security Level, the vessel 
will apply the security measures required in these regulations; state 
the Master's authority; must detail the organizational structure of 
security for the vessel; detail the duties and responsibilities of all 
vessel and company personnel with a security role; detail the vessel's 
relationship with the Company, facilities, other vessels, and relevant 
authorities with security responsibility; provide regular audit of the 
Vessel Security Plan and its amendment in response to experience or 
changing circumstances; and establish the procedures needed to assess 
the continuing effectiveness of security procedures and all security 
related equipment and systems, including procedures for identifying and 
responding to equipment or systems failure or malfunction.
    The responsibility for barge security lies not only with the barge 
owner or operator but also with the towing vessel, fleeting facility, 
and facility where the barge is moored. Hence, security plans for 
vessels and facilities that interface with unmanned vessels (e.g. 
unmanned barges) must include additional provisions to address the risk 
of the unmanned vessels that they will receive or handle. Given the 
simple design of a typical barge and the wide range of products that 
may be transported within a single tow or moored within a single 
fleeting area, the security assessments of facilities and towing 
vessels should include the barge sizes and cargos that would result in 
a worst-case scenario (i.e. greatest potential consequence due to cargo 
volatility, toxicity, or environmental damage), and the most probable 
vulnerability scenarios.
    Vessel and facility security plans must address how the vessel or 
facility will apply the necessary security measures when engaged with a 
barge.

[[Page 39297]]

Therefore, the security plans need to include procedures and security 
measures to protect the towing vessel or the facility that controls the 
barge(s). In addition, the security plans need to include procedures 
for interfacing with other vessels and facilities, including how it 
will transfer custody of the barge to the next facility or towing 
vessel.
    Facilities and towing vessels are not required to have a copy of 
the security plan for each barge it handles if the facility or towing 
vessel security plan includes appropriate procedures and security 
measures to ensure the security of all barges in its care. It is the 
responsibility of all Security Officers (barge's Vessel Security 
Officer, the towing vessel's Vessel Security Officer, the Company 
Security Officer, and the Facility Security Officer) to coordinate 
plans and ensure, possibly through a written contract or other 
agreement, that each party that receives the barge understands and is 
capable of implementing specific security measures for it. This may 
entail providing a copy of the applicable sections of a barge's Vessel 
Security Plan to the parties involved.
    As a result, a barge's Vessel Security Plan may be minimal in 
content, containing personnel contact information and an assessment of 
the worst-case damage it might produce. The security plan must explain 
how security will be coordinated with each towing vessel, fleeting 
facility, and facility that handles the barge. Existing plans and 
procedures, such as vessel response plans, may be used or referenced as 
part of the Vessel Security Plan.
    Like other Vessel Security Plans, the barge's Vessel Security Plan 
must also include specific security incident procedures to mitigate the 
consequences of damage and/or a release of the barge's cargo.
    Foreign vessels required to comply with SOLAS are not required to 
submit their Vessel Security Plans to the Coast Guard for approval. 
Pursuant to SOLAS and the ISPS Code, these plans are required to be 
approved by the flag administration or Recognized Security Organization 
(RSO). Approval can only be granted by the flag administration or the 
RSO after verification that the Vessel Security Plan meets the 
requirements of SOLAS and the ISPS Code, part A, taking into account 
the ISPS Code, part B. Even so, the Coast Guard will verify that 
foreign SOLAS vessels have an approved Vessel Security Plan that fully 
complies with SOLAS and the ISPS Code, and thereby meets the 
requirements of this part, through an aggressive Port State Control 
program. Noncompliance will subject the vessel to a range of control 
and compliance measures, which could include denial of entry into port. 
If, during an expanded examination, those sections of the Vessel 
Security Plan the port state is allowed to review are not written in 
English, a vessel may be delayed while translator services are 
acquired. To properly reflect the full range of legal authorities to 
control vessel movement in such cases, and without affecting other 
legal authorities, this rule amends the authority provision in 33 CFR 
part 165 to cite the anti-terrorism authorities in 33 U.S.C. 1226 as an 
additional basis for taking action under 33 CFR part 165.
    However, in certain cases foreign vessel owners or operators will 
be required to submit the Vessel Security Plan to the U.S. for 
approval. Generally, these vessels fall into three categories: (1) A 
commercial vessel meeting the applicability standards of these 
regulations from a nation not signatory to SOLAS; (2) Canadian 
commercial vessels operating solely on the Great Lakes that (a) are 
greater than 100 gross register tons or (b) carry more than 12 
passengers; and (3) other foreign commercial vessels meeting the 
applicability standards of this part, but below 500 gross tonnage, ITC 
and above 100 gross register tons.

Submission and Approval of Security Plan

    The Vessel Security Plan, including the Vessel Security Assessment 
report, must be submitted to and reviewed by the Commanding Officer, 
Marine Safety Center (MSC). Once the MSC finds that the plan meets the 
security requirements in part 104, the submitter will receive an 
approval letter that may contain conditions of the approval.
    If the MSC requires more time than is indicated in the requirements 
of the interim rule to review a submitted Vessel Security Plan, the MSC 
may return to the submitter a written acknowledgement stating that the 
Coast Guard is currently reviewing the Vessel Security Plan submitted 
for approval, and that the vessel may continue to operate so long as 
the vessel remains in compliance with the submitted Vessel Security 
Plan.
    If the MSC finds that the Vessel Security Plan does not meet the 
security requirements, the plans would be returned to the vessel with a 
disapproval letter with an explanation of why the plan does not meet 
the part 104 requirements.
    The Coast Guard must review Vessel Security Plans every time:
    [sbull] The Vessel Security Assessment is altered;
    [sbull] Failures are identified during an exercise of the Vessel 
Security Plan; and
    [sbull] There is a change in ownership or operational control of 
the vessel or there are amendments to the Vessel Security Plan.

Existing Regulations

    33 CFR part 120, Security of Vessels, currently exists but applies 
only to cruise ships. Until July 2004, 33 CFR part 120 will remain in 
effect. Vessels that were required to comply with part 120 will now 
also be required to meet the requirements of this part including Sec.  
104.295, titled Additional requirements--Cruise Ships. The requirements 
in Sec.  104.295 generally capture the existing requirements in part 
120 that are specific for cruise ships and captures additional detail 
to the requirements of SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code.
    The Coast Guard Notice of Arrival regulation, 33 CFR part 160, is 
being amended by this interim rule to require the advance submission of 
additional security related information. This information is essential 
to assist Coast Guard officials in exercising Port State Control 
functions, including what control and compliance measures, if any, 
should be imposed on vessels bound for a port or place in the U.S., 
consistent with 46 U.S.C. 70103 and 70110 or SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.
    The Notice of Arrival amendments also provide an initial indication 
to the U.S. that owners and operators are taking responsibility for 
fully complying with the requirements in this part. For example, 
vessels will be required to provide a statement that the vessel is in 
compliance with the ISPS Code prior to entry into ports in the U.S. by 
informing the National Vessel Movement Center of the type and status of 
its International Ship Security Certificate. Those vessels required to 
have on board an approved Vessel Security Plan will also have to 
declare in the Notice of Arrival submission that they are implementing 
their Vessel Security Plan. Furthermore, because it is not the intent 
of the ISPS Code to allow consecutive Interim International Ship 
Security Certificates, the owner or operator of a vessel holding a 
consecutive Interim International Ship Security Certificate will also 
be required to provide an explanation as to why the vessel holds a 
consecutive Interim International Ship Security Certificate prior to 
entry.
    The information we are requiring in this Notice of Arrival 
amendment contains elements similar to those we mandate to verify 
compliance with the International Management Code for the Safe 
Operation of Ships and for

[[Page 39298]]

Pollution Prevention. Most of this information will be required only 
after the new SOLAS amendments and ISPS Code go into effect, in July 
2004. However, after January 1, 2004, if a foreign vessel already 
possesses an International Ship Security Certificate and an approved 
Vessel Security Plan, we will require it to provide some basic 
information about the International Ship Security Certificate and 
declare if it is implementing the Vessel Security Plan. The purpose of 
collecting this data in the first half of 2004 is to help us gauge 
international progress toward meeting the July 1, 2004, entry into 
force date.

Regulatory Assessment

    This interim rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that 
Order. It requires an assessment of potential costs and benefits under 
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It is significant under the regulatory 
policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security. A Cost 
Assessment is available in the docket as indicated under ADDRESSES.

Cost Assessment

    For the purposes of good business practice or regulations 
promulgated by other Federal and State agencies, many companies already 
have spent a substantial amount of money and resources to upgrade and 
improve security. The costs shown in this assessment do not include the 
security measures these companies have already taken to enhance 
security.
    We realize that every company engaged in maritime commerce would 
not implement the interim rule exactly as presented in this assessment. 
Depending on each company's choices, some companies could spend much 
less than what is estimated herein while others could spend 
significantly more. In general, we assume that each company would 
implement the interim rule based on the type of vessels or facilities 
it owns or operates and whether it engages in international or domestic 
trade.
    This assessment presents the estimated cost if vessels are 
operating at Maritime Security Level 1, the current level of operations 
since the events of September 11, 2001. We also estimated the costs for 
operating for a brief period at Maritime Security Level 2, an elevated 
level of security.
    We do not anticipate that implementing the interim rule will 
require additional manning aboard vessels; existing personnel can 
assume the duties envisioned.
    The interim rule will affect about 10,300 U.S. flag SOLAS, domestic 
(non-SOLAS), and about 70 foreign non-SOLAS vessels.
    The estimated cost of complying with the interim rule is Present 
Value (PV) $1.368 billion (2003-2012, 7 percent discount rate). 
Approximately PV $248 million of this total is attributable to U.S. 
flag SOLAS vessels. Approximately PV $1.110 billion is attributable to 
domestic vessels (non-SOLAS), and PV $10 million is attributable to 
foreign non-SOLAS vessels. In the first year of compliance, the cost of 
purchasing equipment, hiring security officers, and preparing paperwork 
is an estimated $218 million (non-discounted, $42 million for the U.S. 
flag SOLAS fleet, $175 million for the domestic fleet, $1 million for 
the foreign non-SOLAS fleet). Following initial implementation, the 
annual cost of compliance is an estimated $176 million (non-discounted, 
$32 million for the U.S. flag SOLAS fleet, $143 million for the 
domestic fleet, $1 million for the foreign non-SOLAS fleet).
    For the U.S. flag SOLAS fleet, approximately 52 percent of the 
initial cost is for hiring Company Security Officers and training 
personnel, 29 percent is for vessel equipment, 12 percent is for 
assigning Vessel Security Officers to vessels, and 7 percent is 
associated with paperwork (Vessel Security Assessment and Vessel 
Security Plan). Following the first year, approximately 72 percent of 
the cost is for Company Security Officers and personnel training, 3 
percent is for vessel equipment, 10 percent is for drilling, 15 percent 
is for Vessel Security Officers, and less than 1 percent is associated 
with paperwork. Company Security Officers and training are the primary 
cost drivers for U.S. flag SOLAS vessels.
    For the domestic fleet, approximately 51 percent of the initial 
cost is for hiring Company Security Officers and training personnel, 29 
percent is for vessel equipment, 14 percent is for assigning Vessel 
Security Officers to vessels, and 6 percent is associated with 
paperwork (Vessel Security Assessments and Vessel Security Plans). 
Following the first year, approximately 61 percent of the cost is for 
Company Security Officers and training, 6 percent is for vessel 
equipment, 11 percent is for drilling, 22 percent is for VSOs, and less 
than 1 percent is associated with paperwork. As with SOLAS vessels, 
Company Security Officers are the primary cost driver for the domestic 
fleet.
    We estimated approximately 135,000 burden hours for paperwork 
during the first year of compliance (33,000 hours for U.S.-flag SOLAS, 
101,000 hours for the domestic fleet, 1,000 hours for the foreign non-
SOLAS fleet). We estimated approximately 12,000 burden hours annually 
following full implementation of the interim rule (2,000 hours for 
U.S.-flag SOLAS, 10,000 hours for the domestic fleet, less than 1,000 
hours for the foreign non-SOLAS fleet).
    We also estimated the annual cost for going to an elevated security 
level, Maritime Security Level 2, in response to increased threats. The 
duration of the increased security level will be entirely dependent on 
intelligence received. For this assessment, we estimated costs for 
Maritime Security Level 2 using the following assumptions: all ports 
will go to Maritime Security Level 2 at once, each elevation will last 
21 days, and the elevation will occur twice a year. The estimated cost 
associated with these conditions is $235 million annually.

Benefit Assessment

    This interim rule is one of six interim rules that implement 
national maritime security initiatives concerning general provisions, 
Area Maritime Security (ports), vessels, facilities, Outer Continental 
Shelf (OCS) facilities, and AIS. The Coast Guard used the National Risk 
Assessment Tool (N-RAT) to assess benefits that would result from 
increased security for vessels, facilities, OCS facilities, and ports. 
The N-RAT considers threat, vulnerability, and consequences for several 
maritime entities in various security-related scenarios. For a more 
detailed discussion on the N-RAT and how we employed this tool, refer 
to Applicability of National Maritime Security Initiatives in the 
interim rule titled ``Implementation of National Maritime Security 
Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792), published elsewhere in today's Federal 
Register. For this benefit assessment, the Coast Guard used a team to 
calculate a risk score for each entity and scenario before and after 
the implementation of required security measures. The difference in 
before and after scores indicated the benefit of the proposed action.
    We recognized that the interim rules are a ``family'' of rules that 
will reinforce and support one another in their implementation. We have 
ensured, however, that risk reduction that is credited in one 
rulemaking is not also credited in another. For a more detailed 
discussion on the benefit assessment and how we addressed the potential 
to double-count the risk reduced, refer to Benefit Assessment in the 
interim rule

[[Page 39299]]

titled ``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' 
(USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register.
    We determined annual risk points reduced for each of the six 
interim rules using the N-RAT. The benefits are apportioned among the 
Vessel, Facility, OCS Facility, AMS, and AIS requirements. As shown in 
Table 1, the implementation of Vessel Security Plans for the affected 
population reduces 781,285 risk points annually through 2012. The 
benefits attributable for part 101--General Provisions--were not 
considered separately since it is an overarching section for all the 
parts.

                            Table 1.--Annual Risk Points Reduced by the Interim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Annual risk points reduced by rulemaking
                                                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               OCS
                Maritime entity                     Vessel      Facility     facility
                                                   security     security     security    AMS plans       AIS
                                                    plans        plans        plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessels........................................      778,633        3,385        3,385        3,385        1,448
Facilities.....................................        2,025      469,686  ...........        2,025  ...........
OCS Facilities.................................           41  ...........        9,903  ...........  ...........
Port Areas.....................................          587          587  ...........      129,792          105
                                                --------------
    Total......................................      781,285      473,659       13,288      135,202        1,553
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Once we determined the annual risk points reduced, we discounted 
these estimates to their present value (7 percent discount rate, 2003-
2012) so that they could be compared to the costs. We presented the 
cost effectiveness, or dollars per risk point reduced, in two ways: 
first, we compared the first-year cost and first-year benefit because 
first-year cost is the highest in our assessment as companies develop 
security plans and purchase equipment. Second, we compared the 10-year 
PV cost and the 10-year PV benefit. The results of our assessment are 
presented in Table 2.

                    Table 2.--First-Year and 10-Year PV Cost and Benefit of the Interim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Interim rule
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Item                    Vessel         Facility      OCS facility
                                  security plans  security plans  security plans     AMS Plans         AIS *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Year Cost (millions)......            $218          $1,125              $3            $120             $41
First-Year Benefit..............         781,285         473,659          13,288         135,202           1,553
First-Year Cost Effectiveness ($/           $279          $2,375            $205            $890         $26,391
 Risk Point Reduced)............
10-Year PV Cost (millions)......          $1,368          $5,399             $37            $477             $42
10-Year PV Benefit..............       5,871,540       3,559,655          99,863       1,016,074          11,671
10-Year PV Cost Effectiveness ($/           $233          $1,517            $368            $469         $3,624
 Risk Point Reduced)............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Cost less monetized safety benefit.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
considered whether this interim rule would have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. This interim rule does not require a general notice of proposed 
rulemaking and, therefore, is exempt from the requirements of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Although this interim rule is exempt, we 
have reviewed it for potential economic impacts on small entities. An 
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis discussing the impact of this 
interim rule on small entities is available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES.

U.S. Flag SOLAS Vessels

    We estimated that 88 companies that own U.S. flag SOLAS vessels 
will be affected by the interim rule. We researched these companies and 
found revenue data for 32 of them (36 percent). The revenue impacts for 
these vessels are presented in Table 3. In this analysis, we considered 
the impacts to small businesses during the first year of 
implementation, when companies will be conducting assessments, 
developing security plans, and purchasing equipment. We also considered 
annual revenue impacts following the first year, when companies will 
have the assessments and plans complete, but will need to conduct 
quarterly drilling.

            Table 3.--Estimated Revenue Impacts for Small Businesses That Own U.S. Flag SOLAS Vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Initial                             Annual
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Number of small  Percent of small   Number of small  Percent of small
    Percent impact on annual revenue        entities with     entities with     entities with     entities with
                                            known revenue     known revenue     known revenue     known revenue
                                                data              data              data              data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-3.....................................                 8                25                 8                25
3-5.....................................                 3                 9                 3                 9

[[Page 39300]]

 
5-10....................................                 1                 3                 4                13
10-20...................................                 6                19                 4                13
20-30...................................                 4                13                 3                 9
30-40...................................                 1                 3                 2                 6
40-50...................................                 3                 9                 2                 6
50...........................                 6                19                 6                19
                                         -------------------
  Total.................................                32               100                32               100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We assume that the remaining 56 entities that did not have revenue 
data are very small businesses. We assume that the interim rule may 
have a significant economic impact on these businesses.

Domestic Vessels

    We estimated that 1,683 companies that own domestic vessels will be 
affected by the interim rule. We researched these companies and found 
revenue data for 822 of them (49 percent). The revenue impacts for 
these vessels are presented in Table 4. As with U.S. flag SOLAS 
vessels, we considered the impacts to small businesses during the first 
year of implementation, when companies will be conducting assessments, 
developing security plans, and purchasing equipment. We also considered 
annual revenue impacts following the first year, when companies will 
have the assessments and plans complete, but will need to conduct 
quarterly drilling.

               Table 4.--Estimated Revenue Impacts for Small Businesses That Own Domestic Vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Initial                             Annual
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Number of small  Percent of small   Number of small  Percent of small
    Percent impact on annual revenue        entities with     entities with     entities with     entities with
                                            known revenue     known revenue     known revenue     known revenue
                                                data              data              data              data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-3.....................................               366                45               393                48
3-5.....................................                86                10                87                11
5-10....................................               171                21               170                21
10-20...................................                85                10                64                 8
20-30...................................                34                 4                37                 5
30-40...................................                19                 2                16                 2
40-50...................................                 9                 1                16                 2
50...........................                52                 6                39                 5
                                         -------------------
  Total.................................               822               100               822               100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We assumed that the remaining 861 entities that did not have 
revenue data are very small businesses. We assumed that the interim 
rule may have a significant economic impact on these businesses.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this interim rule so that they can better 
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the 
interim rule would affect your small business, organization, or 
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its 
provisions or options for compliance, please consult Lieutenant Kevin 
Oditt (G-MP), U.S. Coast Guard by telephone 202-267-1103, toll-free 
telephone 1-800-842-8740 ext. 7-1103, or electronic mail 
[email protected].
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This interim rule calls for a collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5 
CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprises reporting, 
recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other, similar 
actions. The title and description of the information collections, a 
description of those who must collect the information, and an estimate 
of the total annual burden follow. The estimate covers the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing sources of data, gathering 
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection.
    This interim rule modifies two existing OMB-approved collections--
1625-0077 [formerly 2115-0622] and

[[Page 39301]]

1625-0100 [formerly 2115-0557]. Summaries of the revised collections 
follow.
    Title: Security Plans for Ports, Vessels, Facilities, and Outer 
Continental Shelf Facilities and Other Security-Related Requirements.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0077
    Summary of the Collection of Information: The Coast Guard requires 
security assessments and plans for vessels. This interim rule provides 
a framework to ensure adequate security planning, drilling, and 
communication procedures by requiring vessels to develop and submit for 
approval Vessel Security Assessments and Vessel Security Plans.
    Need for Information: The primary need for information is to 
identify the adequate security mitigating measures that will be 
implemented when needed.
    Proposed Use of Information: The information will be used to 
identify and communicate the security mitigating measures to the Coast 
Guard and necessary personnel.
    Description of the Respondents: The Company Security Officer for 
owners and operators of the affected vessels or another designated 
person is responsible for developing the Vessel Security Assessment and 
the Vessel Security Plan.
    Number of Respondents: 2,202 Company Security Officers at the 
affected companies.
    Frequency of Response: Vessel Security Assessments and Vessel 
Security Plans are to be submitted for approval initially, and will be 
reviewed annually.
    Burden of Response: Development burden for the Vessel Security 
Assessments and Vessel Security Plans is estimated to be approximately 
eight to 80 hours depending on the size of the company and the number 
and types of vessels the company owns. Updating the assessments and 
plans is estimated to be approximately one to four hours depending on 
the size of the company and the number and types of vessels the company 
owns.
    Estimate of Total Annual Burden: Vessel Security Assessments and 
Vessel Security Plans will have a total burden in the initial year of 
135,269 hours. Annually, the total burden of the assessments and the 
plans is 11,700 hours. For a summary of all revisions to this existing 
OMB-approved collection, refer to Collection of Information in the 
interim rule titled ``Implementation of National Maritime Security 
Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal 
Register.
    Title: Advance Notice of Arrival.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0100.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: The Coast Guard requires 
pre-arrival messages from any vessel entering a port or place in the 
United States. This interim rule adds the requirement to communicate 
security-related information about the vessel to the Coast Guard.
    Need for Information: The primary need for information is to 
identify the adequate security mitigating measures that will be 
implemented when needed.
    Proposed Use of Information: The information will be used to 
identify and communicate the security mitigating measures to the Coast 
Guard and necessary personnel.
    Description of the Respondents: Respondents are owners and 
operators of vessels that arrive at or depart from a port or place in 
the United States after departing from foreign ports.
    Number of Respondents: The existing OMB-approved collection number 
of respondents is 10,367. This rule will not increase the number of 
respondents.
    Frequency of Response: The existing OMB-approved collection number 
of responses is 68,289. This rule will not increase the number of 
responses.
    Burden of Response: The existing OMB-approved collection burden of 
response is approximately 2.5 hours. Because the already approved Cargo 
Declaration requirement (Table 160.206(a)(8), per Final Rule of May 22, 
2003; USCG-2002-11865; 68 FR 27908) has been suspended, this rule will 
not have a net increase in the burden.
    Estimate of Total Annual Burden: The existing OMB-approved total 
annual burden is 174,179 hours. This rule will not increase the burden. 
However, due to an adjustment in the way the Coast Guard calculates the 
burden, we estimate the total annual burden to be 173,904.
    As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3507(d)), we have submitted a copy of this interim rule to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review of the collection of 
information. Due to the circumstances surrounding this temporary rule, 
we asked for ``emergency processing'' of our request. We received OMB 
approval for these collections of information on June 16, 2003. They 
are valid until December 31, 2003.
    We ask for public comment on the collection of information to help 
us determine how useful the information is; whether it can help us 
perform our functions better; whether it is readily available 
elsewhere; how accurate our estimate of the burden of collection is; 
how valid our methods for determining burden are; how we can improve 
the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information; and how we can 
minimize the burden of collection.
    If you submit comments on the collection of information, submit 
them both to OMB and to the Docket Management Facility where indicated 
under ADDRESSES, by the date under DATES.
    You need not respond to a collection of information unless it 
displays a currently valid control number from OMB. We received OMB 
approval for these collections of information on June 16, 2003. They 
are valid until December 31, 2003.

Federalism

    An interim rule has implications for federalism under Executive 
Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State 
or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a 
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. See the Federalism 
section in the interim rule preamble titled ``Implementation of 
National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792) published 
elsewhere in today's Federal Register for a discussion of our analysis 
under this Executive Order.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. This interim rule is exempted from assessing the effects of 
the regulatory action as required by the Act because it is necessary 
for the national security of the U.S. (2 U.S.C. 1503(5)).

Taking of Private Property

    This interim rule will not effect a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This interim rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13045,

[[Page 39302]]

Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. While this interim rule is an economically significant rule, it 
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that 
may disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This interim rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order. Although it is a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, it is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.
    This interim rule has a positive effect on the supply, 
distribution, and use of energy. The interim rule provides for security 
assessments, plans, procedures, and standards, which will prove 
beneficial for the supply, distribution, and use of energy at increased 
levels of maritime security.

Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreement Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501-2582) prohibits 
Federal agencies from engaging in any standards or related activities 
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the U.S. 
Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety and security, are not 
considered unnecessary obstacles. The Act also requires consideration 
of international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the 
basis for U.S. standards. We have assessed the potential effect of this 
interim rule and have determined that it would likely create obstacles 
to the foreign commerce of the U.S. However, because these regulations 
are being put in place in order to further a legitimate domestic 
objective, namely to increase the security of the U.S., any obstacles 
created by the regulation are not considered unnecessary obstacles.

Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this interim rule 
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a), (34)(c) and 
(34)(d), of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, this interim rule is 
categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. This 
interim rule concerns security assessments, plans, training, and the 
establishment of security positions that will contribute to a higher 
level of marine safety and security for vessels and U.S. ports. A 
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    This rulemaking will not significantly impact the coastal zone. 
Further, the rulemaking and the execution of this interim rule will be 
done in conjunction with appropriate state coastal authorities. The 
Coast Guard will, therefore, comply with the requirements of the 
Coastal Zone Management Act while furthering its intent to protect the 
coastal zone.

List of Subjects

33 CFR Part 104

    Incorporation by reference, Maritime security, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Vessels.

33 CFR Part 160

    Administrative practice and procedure, Harbors, Hazardous material 
transportation, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirement, Vessels, Waterways.

46 CFR Part 2

    Marine safety, Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Vessels.

46 CFR Part 31

    Cargo vessels, Inspection and certification, Maritime security.

46 CFR Part 71

    Inspection and certification, Maritime security, Passenger vessels.

46 CFR Part 91

    Cargo vessels, Inspection and Certification, Maritime security.

46 CFR Part 115

    Fire prevention, Inspection and certification, Marine safety, 
Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.

46 CFR Part 126

    Cargo vessels, Inspection and certification, Marine safety, 
Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

46 CFR Part 176

    Fire prevention, Inspection, Marine safety, Maritime security, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard adds 33 CFR 
part 104 and amends 33 CFR part 160 and part 165, and 46 CFR parts 2, 
31, 71, 91, 115, 126, and 176 as follows:
0
1. Add part 104 to subchapter H of chapter I title 33 of the CFR to 
read as follows:

PART 104--VESSEL SECURITY

Subpart A--General
Sec.
104.100 Definitions.
104.105 Applicability.
104.110 Exemptions.
104.115 Compliance dates.
104.120 Compliance documentation.
104.125 Noncompliance.
104.130 Waivers.
104.135 Equivalents.
104.140 Alternative Security Programs.
104.145 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Directive.
104.150 Right to appeal.
Subpart B--Vessel Security Requirements
104.200 Owner or operator.
104.205 Master.
104.210 Company Security Officer (CSO).
104.215 Vessel Security Officer (VSO).
104.220 Company or vessel personnel with security duties.
104.225 Security training for all other vessel personnel.
104.230 Drill and exercise requirements.
104.235 Vessel recordkeeping requirements.
104.240 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level coordination and 
implementation.
104.245 Communications.
104.250 Procedures for interfacing with facilities and other 
vessels.
104.255 Declaration of Security (DoS).
104.260 Security systems and equipment maintenance.
104.265 Security measures for access control.
104.270 Security measures for restricted areas.
104.275 Security measures for handling cargo.
104.280 Security measures for delivery of vessel stores and bunkers.
104.285 Security measures for monitoring.
104.290 Security incident procedures.
104.292 Additional requirements--passenger vessels and ferries.
104.295 Additional requirements--cruise ships.
104.297 Additional requirements--vessels on international voyages.

[[Page 39303]]

Subpart C--Vessel Security Assessment (VSA)
104.300 General.
104.305 Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) requirements.
104.310 Submission requirements.
Subpart D--Vessel Security Plan (VSP)
104.400 General.
104.405 Format of the Vessel Security Plan (VSP).
104.410 Submission and approval.
104.415 Amendment and audit.

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department 
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.

Subpart A--General


Sec.  104.100  Definitions.

    Except as specifically stated in this subpart, the definitions in 
part 101 of this subchapter apply to this part.


Sec.  104.105  Applicability.

    (a) This part applies to the owner or operator of any:
    (1) Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU), cargo, or passenger 
vessel subject to the International Convention for Safety of Life at 
Sea, 1974, (SOLAS);
    (2) Foreign commercial vessel greater than 100 gross register tons 
not subject to SOLAS;
    (3) Commercial vessel greater than 100 gross register tons subject 
to 46 CFR subchapter I, except commercial fishing vessels inspected 
under 46 CFR part 105;
    (4) Vessel subject to 46 CFR subchapter L;
    (5) Passenger vessel subject to 46 CFR subchapters H or K;
    (6) Other passenger vessel carrying more than 12 passengers that is 
engaged on an international voyage;
    (7) Barge subject to 46 CFR subchapters D or O;
    (8) Barge subject to 46 CFR subchapter I that carries Certain 
Dangerous Cargoes in bulk, or that is engaged on an international 
voyage;
    (9) Tankship subject to 46 CFR subchapters D or O; and
    (10) Towing vessel greater than 8 meters in registered length that 
is engaged in towing a barge or barges subject to this part.
    (b) An owner or operator of any vessel not covered in paragraph (a) 
of this section is subject to parts 101 through 103 of this subchapter.
    (c) Foreign vessels that have on board a valid International Ship 
Security Certificate (ISSC) that attests to the vessel's compliance 
with SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code, part A (Incorporated by 
reference, see Sec.  101.115 of this chapter), and having taken into 
account the relevant provisions in the ISPS Code, part B, will be 
deemed to be in compliance with this part, except for Sec. Sec.  
104.240, 104.255, 104.292, and 104.295 as appropriate.
    (d) Except pursuant to international treaty, convention, or 
agreement to which the U.S. is a party, this part does not apply to any 
foreign vessel that is not destined for, or departing from, a port or 
place subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. and that is in:
    (1) Innocent passage through the territorial sea of the U.S.; or
    (2) Transit through the navigable waters of the U.S. that form a 
part of an international strait.


Sec.  104.110  Exemptions.

    This part does not apply to warships, naval auxiliaries or other 
vessels owned or operated by a government and used only on government 
non-commercial service.


Sec.  104.115  Compliance dates.

    (a) On or before December 29, 2003, each vessel owner or operator 
must submit to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center for each 
vessel the Vessel Security Plan described in subpart D of this part for 
review and approval.
    (b) On or before June 30, 2004, each vessel must be operating in 
compliance with this part.
    (c) On or before July 1, 2004, foreign vessels must carry on board 
a valid International Ship Security Certificate that certifies that the 
verifications required by Section 19.1 of part A of the ISPS Code 
(Incorporated by reference, see Sec.  101.115 of this chapter) have 
been completed, that the vessel meets the applicable requirements of 
SOLAS Chapter XI-2 (Incorporated by reference, see Sec.  101.115 of 
this chapter) and the ISPS Code, part A, and that the vessel is 
provided with an approved security plan.


Sec.  104.120  Compliance documentation.

    (a) Each vessel owner or operator subject to this part must ensure, 
no later than 1 July 2004, that copies of the following documents are 
carried on board the vessel and are made available to the Coast Guard 
upon request:
    (1) The approved Vessel Security Plan (VSP) and any approved 
revisions or amendments thereto, and a letter of approval from the 
Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC);
    (2) The VSP submitted for approval and a current acknowledgement 
letter from the Commanding Officer, MSC, stating that the Coast Guard 
is currently reviewing the VSP submitted for approval, and that the 
vessel may continue to operate so long as the vessel remains in 
compliance with the submitted plan;
    (3) For vessels operating under a Coast Guard-approved Alternative 
Security Program as provided in Sec.  104.140, a copy of the 
Alternative Security Program the vessel is using and a letter signed by 
the vessel owner or operator, stating which Alternative Security 
Program the vessel is using and certifying that the vessel is in full 
compliance with that program; or
    (4) For foreign vessels, a valid International Ship Security 
Certificate that attests to the vessel's compliance with SOLAS Chapter 
XI-2 and the ISPS Code, part A (Incorporated by reference, see Sec.  
101.115 of this subchapter), and having taken into account the relevant 
provisions in the ISPS Code, part B.
    (b) Each owner or operator of an unmanned vessel subject to this 
part must maintain the documentation described in paragraphs (a)(1), 
(2), or (3) of this section. The letter required by each of those 
paragraphs must be carried on board the vessel. The plan or program 
required by each of those paragraphs must not be carried on board the 
vessel, but must be maintained in a secure location. During scheduled 
inspections, the plan or program must be made available to the Coast 
Guard upon request.


Sec.  104.125  Noncompliance.

    When a vessel is not in compliance with the requirements of this 
part, the vessel owner or operator must notify the cognizant COTP and 
request a waiver to continue operations.


Sec.  104.130  Waivers.

    Any vessel owner or operator may apply for a waiver of any 
requirement of this part that the owner or operator considers 
unnecessary in light of the nature or operating conditions of the 
vessel. A request for a waiver must be submitted in writing with 
justification to the Commandant (G-MP) at 2100 Second St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20593. The Commandant (G-MP) may require the vessel 
owner or operator to provide additional data for determining the 
validity of the requested waiver. The Commandant (G-MP) may grant, in 
writing, a waiver with or without conditions only if the waiver will 
not reduce the overall security of the vessel, its passengers, its 
crew, or its cargo, or facilities or ports that the vessel may visit.


Sec.  104.135  Equivalents.

    For any measure required by this part, the vessel owner or operator 
may

[[Page 39304]]

propose an equivalent as provided in Sec.  101.130 of this subchapter.


Sec.  104.140  Alternative Security Programs.

    A vessel owner or operator may use an Alternative Security Program 
as approved under Sec.  101.120 of this subchapter if:
    (a) The Alternative Security Program is appropriate to that class 
of vessel;
    (b) The vessel does not engage on international voyages; and
    (c) The Alternative Security Program is implemented in its 
entirety.


Sec.  104.145  Maritime Security (MARSEC) Directive.

    Each vessel owner or operator subject to this part must comply with 
any instructions contained in a MARSEC Directive issued under Sec.  
101.405 of this subchapter.


Sec.  104.150  Right to appeal.

    Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under 
this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal as described 
in Sec.  101.420 of this subchapter.

Subpart B--Vessel Security Requirements


Sec.  104.200  Owner or operator.

    (a) Each vessel owner or operator must ensure that the vessel 
operates in compliance with the requirements of this part.
    (b) For each vessel, the vessel owner or operator must:
    (1) Define the security organizational structure for each vessel 
and provide all personnel exercising security duties or 
responsibilities within that structure with the support needed to 
fulfill security obligations;
    (2) Designate, in writing, by name or title, a Company Security 
Officer (CSO), a Vessel Security Officer (VSO) for each vessel, and 
identify how those officers can be contacted at any time;
    (3) Ensure personnel receive training, drills, and exercises 
enabling them to perform their assigned security duties;
    (4) Ensure vessel security records are kept;
    (5) Ensure that adequate coordination of security issues takes 
place between vessels and facilities; this includes the execution of a 
Declaration of Security (DoS);
    (6) Ensure coordination of shore leave for vessel personnel or crew 
change-out, as well as access through the facility of visitors to the 
vessel (including representatives of seafarers' welfare and labor 
organizations), with facility operators in advance of a vessel's 
arrival;
    (7) Ensure security communication is readily available;
    (8) Ensure coordination with and implementation of changes in 
Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level;
    (9) Ensure that security systems and equipment are installed and 
maintained;
    (10) Ensure that vessel access, including the embarkation of 
persons and their effects, are controlled;
    (11) Ensure that restricted areas are controlled;
    (12) Ensure that cargo and vessel stores and bunkers are handled in 
compliance with this part;
    (13) Ensure restricted areas, deck areas, and areas surrounding the 
vessel are monitored;
    (14) Provide the Master, or for vessels on domestic routes only, 
the CSO, with the following information:
    (i) Parties responsible for appointing vessel personnel, such as 
vessel management companies, manning agents, contractor, 
concessionaires (for example, retail sales outlets, casinos, etc.);
    (ii) Parties responsible for deciding the employment of the vessel, 
including time or bareboat charters or any other entity acting in such 
capacity; and
    (iii) In cases when the vessel is employed under the terms of a 
charter party, the contract details of those documents, including time 
or voyage charters; and
    (15) Give particular consideration to the convenience, comfort, and 
personal privacy of vessel personnel and their ability to maintain 
their effectiveness over long periods.


Sec.  104.205  Master.

    (a) Nothing in this part is intended to permit the Master to be 
constrained by the Company, the vessel owner or operator, or any other 
person, from taking or executing any decision which, in the 
professional judgment of the Master, is necessary to maintain the 
safety and security of the vessel. This includes denial of access to 
persons--except those identified as duly authorized by the cognizant 
government authority--or their effects, and refusal to load cargo, 
including containers or other closed cargo transport units.
    (b) If, in the professional judgment of the Master, a conflict 
between any safety and security requirements applicable to the vessel 
arises during its operations, the Master may give precedence to 
measures intended to maintain the safety of the vessel, and take such 
temporary security measures as seem best under all circumstances. In 
such cases:
    (1) The Master must, as soon as practicable, inform the nearest 
COTP. If the vessel is on a foreign voyage, the Master must promptly 
inform the Coast Guard at 1-800-424-8802, direct telephone at 202-267-
2675, fax at 202-267-2165, TDD at 202-267-4477, or E-mail at [email protected] and if subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign 
government, the relevant maritime authority of that foreign government;
    (2) The temporary security measures must, to the highest possible 
degree, be commensurate with the prevailing Maritime Security (MARSEC) 
Level; and
    (3) The owner or operator must ensure that such conflicts are 
resolved to the satisfaction of the cognizant COTP, or for vessels on 
international voyages, the Commandant (G-MP), and that the possibility 
of recurrence is minimized.


Sec.  104.210  Company Security Officer (CSO).

    (a) General. (1) Each vessel owner or operator must designate in 
writing a CSO.
    (2) A vessel owner or operator may designate a single CSO for all 
its vessels to which this part applies, or may designate more than one 
CSO, in which case the owner or operator must clearly identify the 
vessels for which each CSO is responsible.
    (3) A CSO may perform other duties within the owner or operator's 
organization, provided he or she is able to perform the duties and 
responsibilities required of a CSO.
    (4) The CSO may delegate duties required by this part, but remains 
responsible for the performance of those duties.
    (b) Qualifications. (1) The CSO must have general knowledge, 
through training or equivalent job experience, in the following:
    (i) Security administration and organization of the company's 
vessel(s);
    (ii) Vessel, facility, and port operations relevant to that 
industry;
    (iii) Vessel and facility security measures, including the meaning 
and the consequential requirements of the different Maritime Security 
(MARSEC) Levels;
    (iv) Emergency preparedness and response and contingency planning;
    (v) Security equipment and systems and their operational 
limitations;
    (vi) Methods of conducting audits, inspection and control and 
monitoring techniques; and
    (vii) Techniques for security training and education, including 
security measures and procedures.
    (2) In addition to knowledge and training in paragraph (b)(1) of 
this section, the CSO must have general knowledge through training or 
equivalent job experience in the following, as appropriate:
    (i) Relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations;

[[Page 39305]]

    (ii) Relevant government legislation and regulations;
    (iii) Responsibilities and functions of other security 
organizations;
    (iv) Methodology of Vessel Security Assessment;
    (v) Methods of vessel security surveys and inspections;
    (vi) Instruction techniques for security training and education, 
including security measures and procedures;
    (vii) Handling sensitive security information and security related 
communications;
    (viii) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
    (ix) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
    (x) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of 
persons who are likely to threaten security;
    (xi) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
    (xii) Methods of physical screening and non-intrusive inspections;
    (xiii) Security drills and exercises, including drills and 
exercises with facilities; and
    (xiv) Assessment of security drills and exercises.
    (c) Responsibilities. In addition to those responsibilities and 
duties specified elsewhere in this part, the CSO must, for each vessel 
for which he or she has been designated:
    (1) Keep the vessel apprised of potential threats or other 
information relevant to its security;
    (2) Ensure a Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) is carried out;
    (3) Ensure a Vessel Security Plan (VSP) is developed, approved, and 
maintained;
    (4) Ensure the VSP is modified when necessary;
    (5) Ensure vessel security activities are audited;
    (6) Arrange for Coast Guard inspections under 46 CFR part 2;
    (7) Ensure the timely or prompt correction of problems identified 
by audits or inspections;
    (8) Enhance security awareness and vigilance within the owner's or 
operator's organization;
    (9) Ensure relevant personnel receive adequate security training;
    (10) Ensure communication and cooperation between the vessel and 
the port and facilities with which the vessel interfaces;
    (11) Ensure consistency between security requirements and safety 
requirements;
    (12) Ensure that when sister-vessel or fleet security plans are 
used, the plan for each vessel reflects the vessel-specific information 
accurately;
    (13) Ensure compliance with an Alternative Security Program or 
equivalents approved under this subchapter, if appropriate; and
    (14) Ensure security measures give particular consideration to the 
convenience, comfort, and personal privacy of vessel personnel and 
their ability to maintain their effectiveness over long periods.


Sec.  104.215  Vessel Security Officer (VSO).

    (a) General. (1) A VSO may perform other duties within the owner's 
or operator's organization, provided he or she is able to perform the 
duties and responsibilities required of the VSO for each such vessel.
    (2) For manned vessels, the VSO must be a member of the crew.
    (3) For unmanned vessels, the same person may serve as the VSO for 
more one than one unmanned vessel. If a person serves as the VSO for 
more than one unmanned vessel, the name of each unmanned vessel for 
which he or she is the VSO must be listed in the Vessel Security Plan 
(VSP).
    (4) The VSO of any unmanned barge and the VSO of any towing vessel 
interfacing with the barge must coordinate and ensure the 
implementation of security measures applicable to both vessels during 
the period of their interface.
    (5) The VSO may assign security duties to other vessel personnel; 
however, the VSO remains responsible for these duties.
    (b) Qualifications. The VSO must have general knowledge, through 
training or equivalent job experience, in the following:
    (1) Those items listed in Sec.  104.210 (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this 
part;
    (2) Vessel layout;
    (3) The VSP and related procedures, including scenario-based 
response training;
    (4) Crowd management and control techniques;
    (5) Operations of security equipment and systems; and
    (6) Testing and calibration of security equipment and systems, and 
their maintenance while at sea.
    (c) Responsibilities. In addition to those responsibilities and 
duties specified elsewhere in this part, the VSO must, for each vessel 
for which he or she has been designated:
    (1) Regularly inspect the vessel to ensure that security measures 
are maintained;
    (2) Ensure maintenance and supervision of the implementation of the 
VSP, and any amendments to the VSP;
    (3) Ensure the coordination and handling of cargo and vessel stores 
and bunkers in compliance with this part;
    (4) Propose modifications to the VSP to the Company Security 
Officer (CSO);
    (5) Ensure that any problems identified during audits or 
inspections are reported to the CSO, and promptly implement any 
corrective actions;
    (6) Ensure security awareness and vigilance on board the vessel;
    (7) Ensure adequate security training for vessel personnel;
    (8) Ensure the reporting and recording of all security incidents;
    (9) Ensure the coordinated implementation of the VSP with the CSO 
and the relevant Facility Security Officer, when applicable;
    (10) Ensure security equipment is properly operated, tested, 
calibrated and maintained; and
    (11) Ensure consistency between security requirements and the 
proper treatment of vessel personnel affected by those requirements.


Sec.  104.220  Company or vessel personnel with security duties.

    Company and vessel personnel responsible for security duties must 
have knowledge, through training or equivalent job experience, in the 
following, as appropriate:
    (a) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
    (b) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
    (c) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of 
persons who are likely to threaten security;
    (d) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
    (e) Crowd management and control techniques;
    (f) Security related communications;
    (g) Knowledge of emergency procedures and contingency plans;
    (h) Operation of security equipment and systems;
    (i) Testing and calibration of security equipment and systems, and 
their maintenance while at sea;
    (j) Inspection, control, and monitoring techniques;
    (k) Relevant provisions of the Vessel Security Plan (VSP);
    (l) Methods of physical screening of persons, personal effects, 
baggage, cargo, and vessel stores; and
    (m) The meaning and the consequential requirements of the different 
Maritime Security (MARSEC) Levels.


Sec.  104.225  Security training for all other vessel personnel.

    All other vessel personnel, including contractors, whether part-
time, full-time, temporary, or permanent, must have knowledge of, 
through training or equivalent job experience in the following:

[[Page 39306]]

    (a) Relevant provisions of the Vessel Security Plan (VSP);
    (b) The meaning and the consequential requirements of the different 
Maritime Security (MARSEC) Levels, including emergency procedures and 
contingency plans;
    (c) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
    (d) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of 
persons who are likely to threaten security; and
    (e) Techniques used to circumvent security measures.


Sec.  104.230  Drill and exercise requirements.

    (a) General. Drills and exercises must test the proficiency of 
vessel personnel in assigned security duties at all Maritime Security 
(MARSEC) Levels and the effective implementation of the Vessel Security 
Plan (VSP). They must enable the Vessel Security Officer (VSO) to 
identify any related security deficiencies that need to be addressed.
    (b) Drills. (1) The VSO must ensure that at least one security 
drill is conducted at least every 3 months, except when a vessel is out 
of service due to repairs or seasonal suspension of operation provided 
that in such cases a drill must be conducted within one week of the 
vessel's reactivation. Security drills may be held in conjunction with 
non-security drills where appropriate.
    (2) Drills must test individual elements of the VSP, including 
response to security threats and incidents. Drills should take into 
account the types of operations of the vessel, vessel personnel 
changes, and other relevant circumstances. Examples of drills include 
unauthorized entry to a restricted area, response to alarms, and 
notification of law enforcement authorities.
    (3) If the vessel is moored at a facility on the date the facility 
has planned to conduct any drills, the vessel may, but is not required 
to, participate in the facility's scheduled drill.
    (4) Drills must be conducted within one week whenever the 
percentage of vessel personnel with no prior participation in a vessel 
security drill on that vessel exceeds 25 percent.
    (c) Exercises. (1) Exercises must be conducted at least once each 
calendar year, with no more than 18 months between exercises.
    (2) Exercises may be:
    (i) Full scale or live;
    (ii) Tabletop simulation or seminar;
    (iii) Combined with other appropriate exercises; or
    (iv) A combination of the elements in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through 
(iii) of this section.
    (3) Exercises may be vessel-specific or part of a cooperative 
exercise program to exercise applicable facility and vessel security 
plans or comprehensive port exercises.
    (4) Each exercise must test communication and notification 
procedures, and elements of coordination, resource availability, and 
response.
    (5) Exercises are a full test of the security program and must 
include the substantial and active participation of relevant company 
and vessel security personnel, and may include facility security 
personnel and government authorities depending on the scope and the 
nature of the exercises.


Sec.  104.235  Vessel recordkeeping requirements.

    (a) Unless otherwise specified in this section, the Vessel Security 
Officer must keep records of the activities as set out in paragraph (b) 
of this section for at least 2 years and make them available to the 
Coast Guard upon request.
    (b) Records required by this section may be kept in electronic 
format. If kept in an electronic format, they must be protected against 
unauthorized deletion, destruction, or amendment. The following records 
must be kept:
    (1) Training. For each security training session, the date of each 
session, duration of session, a description of the training, and a list 
of attendees;
    (2) Drills and exercises. For each drill or exercise, the date 
held, description of drill or exercise, list of participants; and any 
best practices or lessons learned which may improve the Vessel Security 
Plan (VSP);
    (3) Incidents and breaches of security. Date and time of 
occurrence, location within the port, location within the vessel, 
description of incident or breaches, to whom it was reported, and 
description of the response;
    (4) Changes in Maritime Security (MARSEC) Levels. Date and time of 
notification received, and time of compliance with additional 
requirements;
    (5) Maintenance, calibration, and testing of security equipment. 
For each occurrence of maintenance, calibration, and testing, the date 
and time, and the specific security equipment involved;
    (6) Security threats. Date and time of occurrence, how the threat 
was communicated, who received or identified the threat, description of 
threat, to whom it was reported, and description of the response;
    (7) Declaration of Security (DoS). Manned vessels must keep on 
board a copy of the last 10 DoSs and a copy of each continuing DoS for 
at least 90 days after the end of its effective period; and
    (8) Annual audit of the VSP. For each annual audit, a letter 
certified by the VSO stating the date the audit was completed.
    (c) Any records required by this part must be protected from 
unauthorized access or disclosure.


Sec.  104.240  Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level coordination and 
implementation.

    (a) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that, prior to 
entering a port, all measures are taken that are specified in the 
Vessel Security Plan (VSP) for compliance with the MARSEC Level in 
effect for the port.
    (b) When notified of an increase in the MARSEC Level, the vessel 
owner or operator must ensure:
    (1) If a higher MARSEC Level is set for the port in which the 
vessel is located or is about to enter, the vessel complies, without 
undue delay, with all measures specified in the VSP for compliance with 
that higher MARSEC Level;
    (2) The COTP is notified as required by Sec.  101.300(c) when 
compliance with the higher MARSEC Level has been implemented; and
    (3) For vessels in port, that compliance with the higher MARSEC 
Level has taken place within 12 hours of the notification.
    (c) For MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the Vessel Security Officer must 
brief all vessel personnel of identified threats, emphasize reporting 
procedures, and stress the need for increased vigilance.
    (d) An owner or operator whose vessel is not in compliance with the 
requirements of this section must inform the COTP and obtain approval 
prior to entering any port, prior to interfacing with another vessel or 
with a facility or to continuing operations.
    (e) For MARSEC Level 3, in addition to the requirements in this 
part, a vessel owner or operator may be required to implement 
additional measures, pursuant to 33 CFR part 6, 160 or 165, as 
appropriate, which may include but are not limited to:
    (1) Arrangements to ensure that the vessel can be towed or moved if 
deemed necessary by the Coast Guard;
    (2) Use of waterborne security patrol;
    (3) Use of armed security personnel to control access to the vessel 
and to deter, to the maximum extent practical, a TSI; or
    (4) Screening the vessel for the presence of dangerous substances 
and devices underwater or other threats.


Sec.  104.245  Communications.

    (a) The Vessel Security Officer must have a means to effectively 
notify vessel

[[Page 39307]]

personnel of changes in security conditions on board the vessel.
    (b) Communications systems and procedures must allow effective and 
continuous communication between the vessel security personnel, 
facilities interfacing with the vessel, vessels interfacing with the 
vessel, and national or local authorities with security 
responsibilities.
    (c) Communication systems and procedures must enable vessel 
personnel to notify, in a timely manner, shore side authorities or 
other vessels of a security threat or incident on board.


Sec.  104.250  Procedures for interfacing with facilities and other 
vessels.

    (a) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that there are 
measures for interfacing with facilities and other vessels at all 
MARSEC Levels.
    (b) For each U.S. flag vessel that calls on foreign ports or 
facilities, the vessel owner or operator must ensure procedures for 
interfacing with those ports and facilities are established.


Sec.  104.255  Declaration of Security (DoS).

    (a) Each vessel owner or operator must ensure procedures are 
established for requesting a DoS and for handling DoS requests from a 
facility or other vessel.
    (b) At MARSEC Level 1, the Master or Vessel Security Officer (VSO), 
or their designated representative, of any cruise ship or manned vessel 
carrying Certain Dangerous Cargoes, in bulk, must complete and sign a 
DoS with the VSO or Facility Security Officer (FSO), or their 
designated representative, of any vessel or facility with which it 
interfaces.
    (1) For a vessel-to-facility interface, prior to arrival of a 
vessel to a facility, the FSO and Master, VSO, or their designated 
representatives must coordinate security needs and procedures, and 
agree upon the contents of the DoS for the period of time the vessel is 
at the facility. Upon a vessel's arrival to a facility and prior to any 
passenger embarkation or disembarkation or cargo transfer operation, 
the FSO or Master, VSO, or designated representatives must sign the 
written DoS.
    (2) For a vessel engaging in a vessel-to-vessel interface, prior to 
the interface, the respective Masters, VSOs, or their designated 
representatives must coordinate security needs and procedures, and 
agree upon the contents of the DoS for the period of time the vessel is 
at the facility. Upon the vessel-to-vessel interface and prior to any 
passenger embarkation or disembarkation or cargo transfer operation, 
the respective Masters, VSOs, or designated representatives must sign 
the written DoS.
    (c) At MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the Master, VSO, or designated 
representative of any vessel required to comply with this part must 
sign and implement a DoS prior to any vessel-to-vessel interface.
    (d) At MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the Master, VSO, or designated 
representative of any vessel required to comply with this part must 
sign and implement a DoS with the FSO of any facility on which it calls 
prior to any cargo transfer operation or passenger embarkation or 
disembarkation.
    (e) At MARSEC Levels 1 and 2, VSOs of vessels that frequently 
interface with the same facility may implement a continuing DoS for 
multiple visits, provided that:
    (1) The DoS is valid for the specific MARSEC Level;
    (2) The effective period at MARSEC Level 1 does not exceed 90 days; 
and
    (3) The effective period at MARSEC Level 2 does not exceed 30 days.
    (f) When the MARSEC Level increases beyond the level contained in 
the DoS, the continuing DoS becomes void and a new DoS must be signed 
and implemented in accordance with this section.
    (g) The COTP may require at any time, at any MARSEC Level, any 
manned vessel subject to this part to implement a DoS with the VSO or 
FSO prior to any vessel-to-vessel or vessel-to-facility interface when 
he or she deems it necessary.


Sec.  104.260  Security systems and equipment maintenance.

    (a) Security systems and equipment must be in good working order 
and inspected, tested, calibrated and maintained according to the 
manufacturer's recommendation.
    (b) The results of testing completed under paragraph (a) of this 
section shall be recorded in accordance with Sec.  104.235. Any 
deficiencies shall be promptly corrected.
    (c) The Vessel Security Plan (VSP) must include procedures for 
identifying and responding to security system and equipment failures or 
malfunctions.


Sec.  104.265  Security measures for access control.

    (a) General. The vessel owner or operator must ensure the 
implementation of security measures to:
    (1) Deter the unauthorized introduction of dangerous substances and 
devices, including any device intended to damage or destroy persons, 
vessels, facilities, or ports;
    (2) Secure dangerous substances and devices that are authorized by 
the owner or operator to be on board; and
    (3) Control access to the vessel.
    (b) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that:
    (1) The locations providing means of access to the vessel where 
access restrictions or prohibitions are applied for each Maritime 
Security (MARSEC) Level to prevent unauthorized access. ``Means of 
access'' include, but are not limited, to all:
    (i) Access ladders;
    (ii) Access gangways;
    (iii) Access ramps;
    (iv) Access doors, side scuttles, windows, and ports;
    (v) Mooring lines and anchor chains; and
    (vi) Cranes and hoisting gear;
    (2) The identification of the types of restriction or prohibition 
to be applied and the means of enforcing them; and
    (3) The means of identification required to allow individuals to 
access the vessel and remain on the vessel without challenge are 
established.
    (c) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that an identification 
system is established for checking the identification of vessel 
personnel or other persons seeking access to the vessel that:
    (1) Allows identification of authorized and unauthorized persons at 
any MARSEC Level;
    (2) Is coordinated, when practicable, with identification systems 
at facilities used by the vessel;
    (3) Is updated regularly;
    (4) Uses disciplinary measures to discourage abuse;
    (5) Allows temporary or continuing access for vessel personnel and 
visitors, including seafarer's chaplains and union representatives, 
through the use of a badge or other system to verify their identity; 
and
    (6) Allow certain long-term, frequent vendor representatives to be 
treated more as employees than as visitors.
    (d) The vessel owner or operator must establish in the approved 
Vessel Security Plan (VSP) the frequency of application of any security 
measures for access control, particularly if these security measures 
are applied on a random or occasional basis.
    (e) MARSEC Level 1. The vessel owner or operator must ensure 
security measures in this paragraph are implemented to:
    (1) Screen persons, baggage (including carry-on items), personal 
effects, and vehicles for dangerous substances and devices at the rate 
specified in the approved Vessels Security Plan (VSP);

[[Page 39308]]

    (2) Conspicuously post signs that describe security measures 
currently in effect and clearly state that:
    (i) Boarding the vessel is deemed valid consent to screening or 
inspection; and
    (ii) Failure to consent or submit to screening or inspection will 
result in denial or revocation of authorization to board;
    (3) Check the identification of any person seeking to board the 
vessel, including vessel passengers and crew, facility employees, 
vendors, personnel duly authorized by the cognizant government 
authorities, and visitors. This check includes confirming the reason 
for boarding by examining at least one of the following:
    (i) Joining instructions;
    (ii) Passenger tickets;
    (iii) Boarding passes;
    (iv) Work orders, pilot orders, or surveyor orders;
    (v) Government identification; or
    (vi) Visitor badges issued in accordance with an identification 
system required in paragraph (c) of this section;
    (4) Deny or revoke a person's authorization to be on board if the 
person is unable or unwilling, upon the request of vessel personnel, to 
establish his or her identity or to account for his or her presence on 
board. Any such incident must be reported in compliance with this part;
    (5) Deter unauthorized access to the vessel;
    (6) Identify access points that must be secured or attended to 
deter unauthorized access;
    (7) Lock or otherwise prevent access to unattended spaces that 
adjoin areas to which passengers and visitors have access;
    (8) Provide a designated secure area on board or in liaison with a 
facility, for conducting inspections and screening of people, baggage 
(including carry-on items), personal effects, vehicles and the 
vehicle's contents;
    (9) Ensure vessel personnel are not required to engage in or be 
subjected to screening, of the person or of personal effects, by other 
vessel personnel, unless security clearly requires it. Any such 
screening must be conducted in a way that takes into full account 
individual human rights and preserves the individual's basic human 
dignity;
    (10) Ensure the screening of all unaccompanied baggage;
    (11) Ensure checked persons and their personal effects are 
segregated from unchecked persons and their personal effects;
    (12) Ensure embarking passengers are segregated from disembarking 
passengers;
    (13) Ensure, in liaison with the facility, a defined percentage of 
vehicles to be loaded aboard passenger vessels are screened prior to 
loading at the rate specified in the approved VSP;
    (14) Ensure, in liaison with the facility, all unaccompanied 
vehicles to be loaded on passenger vessels are screened prior to 
loading; and
    (15) Respond to the presence of unauthorized persons on board, 
including repelling unauthorized boarders.
    (f) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner 
or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Increasing the frequency and detail of screening of people, 
personal effects, and vehicles being embarked or loaded onto the vessel 
as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved VSP;
    (2) X-ray screening of all unaccompanied baggage;
    (3) Assigning additional personnel to patrol deck areas during 
periods of reduced vessel operations to deter unauthorized access;
    (4) Limiting the number of access points to the vessel by closing 
and securing some access points;
    (5) Denying access to visitors who do not have a verified 
destination;
    (6) Deterring waterside access to the vessel, which may include, in 
liaison with the facility, providing boat patrols; and
    (7) Establishing a restricted area on the shoreside of the vessel, 
in close cooperation with the facility.
    (g) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner or operator 
must ensure the implementation of additional security measures, as 
specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved VSP. The additional 
security measures may include:
    (1) Screening all persons, baggage, and personal effects for 
dangerous substances and devices;
    (2) Performing one or more of the following on unaccompanied 
baggage:
    (i) Screen unaccompanied baggage more extensively, for example, x-
raying from two or more angles;
    (ii) Prepare to restrict or suspend handling unaccompanied baggage; 
or
    (iii) Refuse to accept unaccompanied baggage on board;
    (3) Being prepared to cooperate with responders and facilities;
    (4) Limiting access to the vessel to a single, controlled access 
point;
    (5) Granting access to only those responding to the security 
incident or threat thereof;
    (6) Suspending embarkation and/or disembarkation of personnel;
    (7) Suspending cargo operations;
    (8) Evacuating the vessel;
    (9) Moving the vessel; and
    (10) Preparing for a full or partial search of the vessel.


Sec.  104.270  Security measures for restricted areas.

    (a) General. The vessel owner or operator must ensure the 
designation of restricted areas in order to:
    (1) Prevent or deter unauthorized access;
    (2) Protect persons authorized to be on board;
    (3) Protect the vessel;
    (4) Protect sensitive security areas within the vessel;
    (5) Protect security and surveillance equipment and systems; and
    (6) Protect cargo and vessel stores from tampering.
    (b) Designation of Restricted Areas. The vessel owner or operator 
must ensure restricted areas are designated on board the vessel, as 
specified in the approved plan. Restricted areas must include, as 
appropriate:
    (1) Navigation bridge, machinery spaces and other control stations;
    (2) Spaces containing security and surveillance equipment and 
systems and their controls and lighting system controls;
    (3) Ventilation and air-conditioning systems and other similar 
spaces;
    (4) Spaces with access to potable water tanks, pumps, or manifolds;
    (5) Spaces containing dangerous goods or hazardous substances;
    (6) Spaces containing cargo pumps and their controls;
    (7) Cargo spaces and spaces containing vessel stores;
    (8) Crew accommodations; and
    (9) Any other spaces or areas vital to the security of the vessel.
    (c) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that security measures 
and policies are established to:
    (1) Identify which vessel personnel are authorized to have access;
    (2) Determine which persons other than vessel personnel are 
authorized to have access;
    (3) Determine the conditions under which that access may take 
place;
    (4) Define the extent of any restricted area;
    (5) Define the times when access restrictions apply; and
    (6) Clearly mark all restricted areas and indicate that access to 
the area is restricted and that unauthorized

[[Page 39309]]

presence within the area constitutes a breach of security.
    (d) Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level 1. The vessel owner or 
operator must ensure the implementation of security measures to prevent 
unauthorized access or activities within the area. These security 
measures may include:
    (1) Locking or securing access points;
    (2) Monitoring and using surveillance equipment;
    (3) Using guards or patrols; and
    (4) Using automatic intrusion detection devices, which if used must 
activate an audible and/or visual alarm at a location that is 
continuously attended or monitored, to alert vessel personnel to 
unauthorized access.
    (e) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner 
or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Increasing the frequency and intensity of monitoring and access 
controls on existing restricted access areas;
    (2) Restricting access to areas adjacent to access points;
    (3) Providing continuous monitoring of each area, using 
surveillance equipment; and
    (4) Dedicating additional personnel to guard or patrol each area.
    (f) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the vessel 
owner or operator must ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Restricting access to additional areas; and
    (2) Searching restricted areas as part of a security sweep of the 
vessel.


Sec.  104.275  Security measures for handling cargo.

    (a) General. The vessel owner or operator must ensure that security 
measures relating to cargo handling, some of which may have to be 
applied in liaison with the facility, are specified in order to:
    (1) Deter tampering;
    (2) Prevent cargo that is not meant for carriage from being 
accepted and stored on board the vessel;
    (3) Identify cargo that is approved for loading onto the vessel;
    (4) Include inventory control procedures at access points to the 
vessel;
    (5) Coordinate security measures with the shipper or other 
responsible party in accordance with an established agreement and 
procedures; and
    (6) Be able to check cargo for dangerous substances and devices at 
the rate specified in the approved Vessel Security Plan. Means to check 
cargo include:
    (i) Visual examination;
    (ii) Physical examination;
    (iii) Detection devices such as scanners; or
    (iv) Canines.
    (b) Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the 
vessel owner or operator must ensure the implementation of measures to:
    (1) Routinely check cargo and cargo spaces prior to and during 
cargo handling;
    (2) Check that cargo to be loaded matches the cargo documentation, 
or that cargo markings or container numbers match the information 
provided with shipping documents;
    (3) Ensure, in liaison with the facility, that vehicles to be 
loaded on board car carriers, RO-RO, and passenger ships are subjected 
to screening prior to loading, in accordance with the frequency 
required in the VSP; and
    (4) Check, in liaison with the facility, seals or other methods 
used to prevent tampering.
    (c) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner 
or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved Vessel 
Security Plan (VSP). These additional security measures may include:
    (1) Increasing the frequency and detail of checking cargo and cargo 
spaces;
    (2) Intensifying checks to ensure that only the intended cargo, 
container, or other cargo transport units are loaded;
    (3) Intensifying screening of vehicles to be loaded on car-
carriers, RO-RO, and passenger vessels;
    (4) In liaison with the facility, increasing frequency and detail 
in checking seals or other methods used to prevent tampering;
    (5) Increasing the frequency of the use of scanning/detection 
equipment, mechanical devices, or canines; or
    (6) Coordinating enhanced security measures with the shipper or 
other responsible party in accordance with an established agreement and 
procedures.
    (d) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures for MARSEC 
Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Suspending loading or unloading of cargo;
    (2) Being prepared to cooperate with responders and facilities; or
    (3) Verifying the inventory and location of any hazardous materials 
carried on board.


Sec.  104.280  Security measures for delivery of vessel stores and 
bunkers.

    (a) General. The vessel owner or operator must ensure that security 
measures relating to the delivery of vessel stores and bunkers are 
implemented to:
    (1) Check vessel stores for package integrity;
    (2) Prevent vessel stores from being accepted without inspection;
    (3) Deter tampering; and
    (4) Prevent vessel stores and bunkers from being accepted unless 
ordered. For vessels that routinely use a facility, a vessel owner or 
operator may establish and implement standing arrangements between the 
vessel, its suppliers, and a facility regarding notification and the 
timing of deliveries and their documentation.
    (b) Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the 
vessel owner or operator must ensure the implementation of measures to:
    (1) Check vessel stores before being accepted;
    (2) Check that vessel stores and bunkers match the order prior to 
being brought on board or being bunkered; and
    (3) Ensure that vessel stores are controlled or immediately and 
securely stowed following delivery.
    (c) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner 
or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved Vessel 
Security Plan (VSP). These additional security measures may include:
    (1) Intensifying inspection of the vessel stores during delivery; 
or
    (2) Checking vessel stores prior to receiving them on board.
    (d) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures for MARSEC 
Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved VSP. These

[[Page 39310]]

additional security measures may include:
    (1) Checking all vessel stores more extensively;
    (2) Restricting or suspending delivery of vessel stores and 
bunkers; or
    (3) Refusing to accept vessel stores on board.


Sec.  104.285  Security measures for monitoring.

    (a) General. (1) The vessel owner or operator must ensure the 
implementation of security measures and have the capability to 
continuously monitor, through a combination of lighting, watchkeepers, 
security guards, deck watches, waterborne patrols and automatic 
intrusion-detection devices, or surveillance equipment, as specified in 
their approved Vessel Security Plan (VSP), the--
    (i) Vessel;
    (ii) Restricted areas on board the vessel; and
    (iii) Area surrounding the vessel.
    (2) The following must be considered when establishing the 
appropriate level and location of lighting:
    (i) Vessel personnel should be able to detect activities on and 
around the vessel, on both the shore side and the waterside;
    (ii) Coverage should facilitate personnel identification at access 
points;
    (iii) Coverage may be provided through coordination with the port 
or facility; and
    (iv) Lighting effects, such as glare, and its impact on safety, 
navigation, and other security activities.
    (b) Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the 
vessel owner or operator must ensure the implementation of security 
measures, which may be done in coordination with a facility, to:
    (1) Monitor the vessel, particularly vessel access points and 
restricted areas;
    (2) Be able to conduct emergency searches of the vessel;
    (3) Ensure that equipment or system failures or malfunctions are 
identified and corrected;
    (4) Ensure that any automatic intrusion detection device sets off 
an audible or visual alarm, or both, at a location that is continually 
attended or monitored;
    (5) Light deck and vessel access points during the period between 
sunset and sunrise and periods of limited visibility sufficiently to 
allow visual identification of persons seeking access to the vessel; 
and
    (6) Use maximum available lighting while underway, during the 
period between sunset and sunrise, consistent with safety and 
international regulations.
    (c) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required 
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the vessel owner 
or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Increasing the frequency and detail of security patrols;
    (2) Increasing the coverage and intensity of lighting, alone or in 
coordination with the facility;
    (3) Using or increasing the use of security and surveillance 
equipment;
    (4) Assigning additional personnel as security lookouts;
    (5) Coordinating with boat patrols, when provided; or
    (6) Coordinating with shoreside foot or vehicle patrols, when 
provided.
    (d) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures for MARSEC 
Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure the implementation of additional security 
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved VSP. These 
additional security measures may include:
    (1) Cooperating with responders and facilities;
    (2) Switching on all lights;
    (3) Illuminating the vicinity of the vessel;
    (4) Switching on all surveillance equipment capable of recording 
activities on, or in the vicinity of, the vessel;
    (5) Maximizing the length of time such surveillance equipment can 
continue to record;
    (6) Preparing for underwater inspection of the hull; and
    (7) Initiating measures, including the slow revolution of the 
vessel's propellers, if practicable, to deter underwater access to the 
hull of the vessel.


Sec.  104.290  Security incident procedures.

    For each Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure the Vessel Security Officer (VSO) and vessel 
security personnel are able to:
    (a) Respond to security threats or breaches of security and 
maintain critical vessel and vessel-to-facility interface operations, 
to include:
    (1) Prohibiting entry into affected area;
    (2) Denying access to the vessel, except to those responding to the 
emergency;
    (3) Implementing MARSEC Level 3 security measures throughout the 
vessel;
    (4) Stopping cargo-handling operations; and
    (5) Notifying shoreside authorities or other vessels of the 
emergency;
    (b) Evacuating the vessel in case of security threats or breaches 
of security;
    (c) Reporting security incidents as required in Sec.  101.305;
    (d) Briefing all vessel personnel on possible threats and the need 
for vigilance, soliciting their assistance in reporting suspicious 
persons, objects, or activities; and
    (e) Securing non-critical operations in order to focus response on 
critical operations.


Sec.  104.292  Additional requirements--passenger vessels and ferries.

    (a) At all Maritime Security (MARSEC) Levels, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure security sweeps are performed, prior to getting 
underway, after any period the vessel was unattended.
    (b) As an alternative to the identification checks and passenger 
screening requirements in Sec.  104.265 (e)(1), (e)(3), and (e)(8), the 
owner or operator of a passenger vessel or ferry may ensure security 
measures are implemented that include:
    (1) Searching selected areas prior to embarking passengers and 
prior to sailing; and
    (2) Implementing one or more of the following:
    (i) Performing routine security patrols;
    (ii) Providing additional closed-circuit television to monitor 
passenger areas; or
    (iii) Securing all non-passenger areas.
    (c) Passenger vessels certificated to carry more than 2000 
passengers, working in coordination with the terminal, may be subject 
to additional vehicle screening requirements in accordance with a 
MARSEC Directive or other orders issued by the Coast Guard.
    (d) At MARSEC Level 2, a vessel owner or operator must ensure, in 
addition to MARSEC Level 1 measures, the implementation of the 
following:
    (1) Search selected areas prior to embarking passengers and prior 
to sailing;
    (2) Passenger vessels certificated to carry less than 2000 
passengers, working in coordination with the terminal, may be subject 
to additional vehicle screening requirements in accordance with a 
MARSEC Directive or other orders issued by the Coast Guard; and
    (3) As an alternative to the identification and screening 
requirements in Sec.  104.265(e)(3), intensify patrols, security sweeps 
and

[[Page 39311]]

monitoring identified in paragraph (b) of this section.
    (e) At MARSEC Level 3, a vessel owner or operator may, in addition 
to MARSEC Levels 1 and 2 measures, as an alternative to the 
identification checks and passenger screening requirements in Sec.  
104.265(e)(3), ensure that random armed security patrols are conducted, 
which need not consist of vessel personnel.


Sec.  104.295  Additional requirements--cruise ships.

    (a) At all MARSEC Levels, the owner or operator of a cruise ship 
must ensure the following:
    (1) Screen all persons, baggage, and personal effects for dangerous 
substances and devices;
    (2) Check the identification of all persons seeking to board the 
vessel; this check includes confirming the reason for boarding by 
examining joining instructions, passenger tickets, boarding passes, 
government identification or visitor badges, or work orders;
    (3) Perform security patrols; and
    (4) Search selected areas prior to embarking passengers and prior 
to sailing.
    (b) At MARSEC Level 3, the owner or operator of a cruise ship must 
ensure that security briefs to passengers about the specific threat are 
provided.


Sec.  104.297  Additional requirements--vessels on international 
voyages.

    (a) An owner or operator of a U.S. flag vessel, which is subject to 
the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS), 
must be in compliance with the applicable requirements of SOLAS Chapter 
XI-1, SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code, part A (Incorporated by 
reference, see Sec.  101.115 of this subchapter).
    (b) Owners or operators of U.S. flag vessels that are required to 
comply with SOLAS, must ensure an International Ship Security 
Certificate (ISSC) as provided in 46 CFR Sec.  2.01-25 is obtained for 
the vessel. This certificate must be issued by the Coast Guard.
    (c) Owners or operators of vessels that require an ISSC in 
paragraph (b) of this section must request an inspection in writing, at 
least 30 days prior to the desired inspection date to the Officer in 
Charge, Marine Inspection for the Marine Inspection Office or Marine 
Safety Office of the port where the vessel will be inspected to verify 
compliance with this part and applicable SOLAS requirements. The 
inspection must be completed and the initial ISSC must be issued prior 
to July 1, 2004.

Subpart C--Vessel Security Assessment (VSA)


Sec.  104.300  General.

    (a) The Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) is a written document that 
is based on the collection of background information and the completion 
and analysis of an on-scene survey.
    (b) A single VSA may be performed and applied to more than one 
vessel to the extent that they share physical characteristics and 
operations.
    (c) Third parties may be used in any aspect of the VSA if they have 
the appropriate skills and if the Company Security Officer (CSO) 
reviews and accepts their work.
    (d) Those involved in a VSA should be able to draw upon expert 
assistance in the following areas:
    (1) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
    (2) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
    (3) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of 
persons who are likely to threaten security;
    (4) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
    (5) Methods used to cause a security incident;
    (6) Effects of dangerous substances and devices on vessel 
structures and equipment;
    (7) Vessel security requirements;
    (8) Vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-facility interface business 
practices;
    (9) Contingency planning, emergency preparedness and response;
    (10) Physical security requirements;
    (11) Radio and telecommunications systems, including computer 
systems and networks;
    (12) Marine engineering; and
    (13) Vessel and port operations.


Sec.  104.305  Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) requirements.

    (a) Background. The vessel owner or operator must ensure that the 
following background information is provided to the person or persons 
who will conduct the on-scene survey and assessment:
    (1) General layout of the vessel, including the location of:
    (i) Each actual or potential point of access to the vessel and its 
function;
    (ii) Spaces that should have restricted access;
    (iii) Essential maintenance equipment;
    (iv) Cargo spaces and storage;
    (v) Storage of unaccompanied baggage; and
    (vi) Vessel stores;
    (2) Threat assessments, including the purpose and methodology of 
the assessment, for the area or areas in which the vessel operates or 
at which passengers embark or disembark;
    (3) The previous VSA, if any;
    (4) Emergency and stand-by equipment available to maintain 
essential services;
    (5) Number of vessel personnel and any existing security duties to 
which they are assigned;
    (6) Existing personnel training requirement practices of the 
vessel;
    (7) Existing security and safety equipment for the protection of 
personnel, visitors, passengers, and vessels personnel;
    (8) Escape and evacuation routes and assembly stations that have to 
be maintained to ensure the orderly and safe emergency evacuation of 
the vessel;
    (9) Existing agreements with private security companies providing 
waterside or vessel security services; and
    (10) Existing security measures and procedures, including:
    (i) Inspection and control procedures;
    (ii) Identification systems;
    (iii) Surveillance and monitoring equipment;
    (iv) Personnel identification documents;
    (v) Communication systems;
    (vi) Alarms;
    (vii) Lighting;
    (viii) Access control systems; and
    (ix) Other security systems.
    (b) On-scene survey. The vessel owner or operator must ensure that 
an on-scene survey of each vessel is conducted. The on-scene survey is 
to verify or collect information required in paragraph (a) of this 
section. It consists of an actual survey that examines and evaluates 
existing vessel protective measures, procedures, and operations for:
    (1) Ensuring performance of all security duties;
    (2) Controlling access to the vessel, through the use of 
identification systems or otherwise;
    (3) Controlling the embarkation of vessel personnel and other 
persons and their effects, including personal effects and baggage 
whether accompanied or unaccompanied;
    (4) Supervising the handling of cargo and the delivery of vessel 
stores;
    (5) Monitoring restricted areas to ensure that only authorized 
persons have access;
    (6) Monitoring deck areas and areas surrounding the vessel; and
    (7) The ready availability of security communications, information, 
and equipment.
    (c) Analysis and recommendations. In conducting the VSA, the 
Company Security Officer (CSO) must analyze the vessel background 
information and the

[[Page 39312]]

on-scene survey, and while considering the requirements of this part, 
provide recommendations for the security measures the vessel should 
include in the Vessel Security Plan (VSP). This includes but is not 
limited to the following:
    (1) Restricted areas;
    (2) Response procedures for fire or other emergency conditions;
    (3) Security supervision of vessel personnel, passengers, visitors, 
vendors, repair technicians, dock workers, etc.;
    (4) Frequency and effectiveness of security patrols;
    (5) Access control systems, including identification systems;
    (6) Security communication systems and procedures;
    (7) Security doors, barriers, and lighting;
    (8) Any security and surveillance equipment and systems;
    (9) Possible security threats, including but not limited to:
    (i) Damage to or destruction of the vessel or an interfacing 
facility or vessel by dangerous substances and devices, arson, 
sabotage, or vandalism;
    (ii) Hijacking or seizure of the vessel or of persons on board;
    (iii) Tampering with cargo, essential vessel equipment or systems, 
or vessel stores;
    (iv) Unauthorized access or use, including presence of stowaways;
    (v) Smuggling dangerous substances and devices;
    (vi) Use of the vessel to carry those intending to cause a security 
incident and/or their equipment;
    (vii) Use of the vessel itself as a weapon or as a means to cause 
damage or destruction;
    (viii) Attacks from seaward while at berth or at anchor; and
    (ix) Attacks while at sea; and
    (10) Evaluating the potential of each identified point of access, 
including open weather decks, for use by individuals who might seek to 
breach security, whether or not those individuals legitimately have 
access to the vessel.
    (d) VSA report. (1) The vessel owner or operator must ensure that a 
written VSA report is prepared and included as part of the VSP. The VSA 
report must contain:
    (i) A summary of how the on-scene survey was conducted;
    (ii) Existing security measures, procedures, and operations;
    (iii) A description of each vulnerability found during the 
assessment;
    (iv) A description of security countermeasures that could be used 
to address each vulnerability;
    (v) A list of the key vessel operations that are important to 
protect;
    (vi) The likelihood of possible threats to key vessel operations; 
and
    (vii) A list of identified weaknesses, including human factors, in 
the infrastructure, policies, and procedures of the vessel.
    (2) The VSA report must address the following elements on board or 
within the vessel:
    (i) Physical security;
    (ii) Structural integrity;
    (iii) Personnel protection systems;
    (iv) Procedural policies;
    (v) Radio and telecommunication systems, including computer systems 
and networks; and
    (vi) Other areas that may, if damaged or used illicitly, pose a 
risk to people, property, or operations on board the vessel or within a 
facility.
    (3) The VSA must list the persons, activities, services, and 
operations that are important to protect, in each of the following 
categories:
    (i) Vessel personnel;
    (ii) Passengers, visitors, vendors, repair technicians, facility 
personnel, etc.;
    (iii) Capacity to maintain safe navigation and emergency response;
    (iv) Cargo, particularly dangerous goods or hazardous substances;
    (v) Vessel stores;
    (vi) Any vessel security communication and surveillance systems; 
and
    (vii) Any other vessel security systems, if any.
    (4) The VSA must account for any vulnerabilities in the following 
areas:
    (i) Conflicts between safety and security measures;
    (ii) Conflicts between vessel duties and security assignments;
    (iii) The impact of watch-keeping duties and risk of fatigue on 
vessel personnel alertness and performance;
    (iv) Security training deficiencies; and
    (v) Security equipment and systems, including communication 
systems.
    (5) The VSA must discuss and evaluate key vessel measures and 
operations, including:
    (i) Ensuring performance of all security duties;
    (ii) Controlling access to the vessel, through the use of 
identification systems or otherwise;
    (iii) Controlling the embarkation of vessel personnel and other 
persons and their effects (including personal effects and baggage 
whether accompanied or unaccompanied);
    (iv) Supervising the handling of cargo and the delivery of vessel 
stores;
    (v) Monitoring restricted areas to ensure that only authorized 
persons have access;
    (vi) Monitoring deck areas and areas surrounding the vessel; and
    (vii) The ready availability of security communications, 
information, and equipment.
    (6) The VSA must be documented and the VSA report retained by the 
vessel owner or operator with the VSP. The VSA and VSP must be 
protected from unauthorized access or disclosure.


Sec. Sec.  104.310  Submission requirements.

    (a) A completed Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) report must be 
submitted with the Vessel Security Plan (VSP) required in Sec.  104.410 
of this part.
    (b) A vessel owner or operator may generate and submit a report 
that contains the VSA for more than one vessel subject to this part, to 
the extent that they share similarities in physical characteristics and 
operations.

Subpart D--Vessel Security Plan (VSP)


Sec.  104.400  General.

    (a) The Company Security Officer (CSO) must ensure a Vessel 
Security Plan (VSP) is developed and implemented for each vessel. The 
VSP:
    (1) Must identify the CSO and VSO by name or position and provide 
24-hour contact information;
    (2) Must be written in English;
    (3) Must address each vulnerability identified in the Vessel 
Security Assessment (VSA);
    (4) Must describe security measures for each MARSEC Level;
    (5) Must state the Master's authority as described in Sec.  
104.205; and
    (6) May cover more than one vessel to the extent that they share 
similarities in physical characteristics and operations, if authorized 
and approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center.
    (b) Except for foreign vessels that have on board a valid 
International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) that attests to the 
vessel's compliance with SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code, part A 
(Incorporated by reference, see Sec.  101.115 of this subchapter), and 
having taken into account the relevant provisions in the ISPS Code, 
part B, the VSP must be submitted for approval to the Commanding 
Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC), 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 
6302, Nassif Building, Washington, DC 20590-0001, in a written or 
electronic format. Format for submitting the VSP electronically can be 
found at http://www.uscg.mil/HQ/MSC.
    (c) The VSP is sensitive security information and must be protected 
in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
    (d) If the VSP is kept in an electronic format, procedures must be 
in place to

[[Page 39313]]

prevent its unauthorized deletion, destruction, or amendment.


Sec.  104.405  Format of the Vessel Security Plan (VSP).

    (a) A vessel owner or operator must ensure that the VSP consists of 
the individual sections listed in this paragraph (a). If the VSP does 
not follow the order as it appears in the list, the vessel owner or 
operator must ensure that the VSP contains an index identifying the 
location of each of the following sections:
    (1) Security organization of the vessel;
    (2) Personnel training;
    (3) Drills and exercises;
    (4) Records and documentation;
    (5) Response to change in MARSEC Level;
    (6) Procedures for interfacing with facilities and other vessels;
    (7) Declarations of Security (DoS);
    (8) Communications;
    (9) Security systems and equipment maintenance;
    (10) Security measures for access control;
    (11) Security measures for restricted areas;
    (12) Security measures for handling cargo;
    (13) Security measures for delivery of vessel stores and bunkers;
    (14) Security measures for monitoring;
    (15) Security incident procedures;
    (16) Audits and Vessel Security Plan (VSP) amendments; and
    (17) Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) Report.
    (b) The VSP must describe in detail how the requirements of subpart 
B of this part will be met.


Sec.  104.410  Submission and approval.

    (a) On or before December 29, 2003, each vessel owner or operator 
must either:
    (1) Submit one copy of their Vessel Security Plan (VSP) for review 
and approval to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC) and 
a letter certifying that the VSP meets applicable requirements of this 
part; or
    (2) If implementing a Coast Guard approved Alternative Security 
Program, meet the requirements in Sec.  101.120(b) of this subchapter.
    (b) Vessels built on or after July 1, 2004, must comply with the 
requirements in paragraph (a) of this section 60 days prior to 
beginning operations.
    (c) The Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC), will 
examine each submission for compliance with this part, and either:
    (1) Approve it and specify any conditions of approval, returning to 
the submitter a letter stating its acceptance and any conditions, or
    (2) Disapprove it, returning a copy to the submitter with a brief 
statement of the reasons for disapproval.
    (d) A VSP may be submitted and approved to cover more than one 
vessel where the vessel design and operations are similar.
    (e) Each company or vessel, owner or operator, that submits one VSP 
to cover two or more vessels of similar design and operation must 
address vessel-specific information that includes the physical and 
operational characteristics of each vessel.
    (f) A plan that is approved by the MSC is valid for 5 years from 
the date of its approval.


Sec.  104.415  Amendment and audit.

    (a) Amendments. (1) Amendments to a Vessel Security Plan that are 
approved by the MSC may be initiated by:
    (i) The vessel owner or operator; or
    (ii) The Coast Guard upon a determination that an amendment is 
needed to maintain the vessel's security. The Coast Guard will give the 
vessel owner or operator written notice and request that the vessel 
owner or operator propose amendments addressing any matters specified 
in the notice. The company owner or operator will have at least 60 days 
to submit its proposed amendments. Until amendments are approved, the 
company owner or operator shall ensure temporary security measures are 
implemented to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard.
    (2) Proposed amendments must be sent to the marine safety center at 
the address shown in Sec.  104.400(b) of this part. If initiated by the 
company or vessel, owner or operator, the proposed amendment must be 
submitted at least 30 days before the amendment is to take effect 
unless the Marine Safety Center (MSC) allows a shorter period. The MSC 
will approve or disapprove the proposed amendment in accordance with 
Sec.  104.410 of this part.
    (3) If the owner or operator has changed, the Vessel Security 
Officer (VSO) must amend the Vessel Security Plan (VSP) to include the 
name and contact information of the new vessel owner or operator and 
submit the affected portion of the VSP for review and approval in 
accordance with Sec.  104.410 of this part.
    (b) Audits. (1) The CSO or VSO must ensure an audit of the VSP is 
performed annually, beginning no later than one year from the initial 
date of approval and attach a letter to the VSP certifying that the VSP 
meets the applicable requirements of this part.
    (2) The VSP must be audited if there is a change in the company's 
or vessel's ownership or operator, or if there have been modifications 
to the vessel, including but not limited to physical structure, 
emergency response procedures, security measures, or operations.
    (3) Auditing the VSP as a result of modifications to the vessel may 
be limited to those sections of the VSP affected by the vessel 
modifications.
    (4) Unless impracticable due to the size and nature of the company 
or the vessel, personnel conducting internal audits of the security 
measures specified in the VSP or evaluating its implementation must:
    (i) Have knowledge of methods of conducting audits and inspections, 
and control and monitoring techniques;
    (ii) Not have regularly assigned security duties; and
    (iii) Be independent of any security measures being audited.
    (5) If the results of an audit require amendment of either the VSA 
or VSP, the VSO or CSO must submit, in accordance with Sec.  104.410 of 
this part, the amendments to the MSC for review and approval no later 
than 30 days after completion of the audit and a letter certifying that 
the amended VSP meets the applicable requirements of this part.

PART 160--PORTS AND WATERWAY SAFETY--GENERAL

0
2. Revise the authority citation for part 160 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation 0170. Subpart D is also 
issued under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 125 and 46 U.S.C. 3715.

0
3. In Sec.  160.203, add paragraph (f) to read as follows:


Sec.  160.203  Exemptions.

* * * * *
    (f) U.S. vessels need not submit the International Ship and Port 
Facility Code (ISPS) Notice information (Entry (9) to Table 160.206).

0
4. In Sec.  160.206, in the table in paragraph (a), add paragraph (9) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  160.206  Information required in an NOA.

* * * * *

[[Page 39314]]



                                      Table 160.206.--NOA Information Items
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Vessels carrying CDC
                                                                             -----------------------------------
                                                               Vessels not                       Towing vessels
                   Required information                       carrying CDC                         controlling
                                                                                   Vessels      vessels carrying
                                                                                                       CDC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
(9) International Ship and Port Facility Code (ISPS)
 Notice *:
    (i) The date of issuance for the vessel's                             X                 X                 X
     International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC), if
     any;.................................................
    (ii) Whether the ISSC, if any, is an initial Interim                  X                 X                 X
     ISSC, subsequent and consecutive Interim ISSC, or
     final ISSC;..........................................
    (iii) Declaration that the approved ship security                     X                 X                 X
     plan, if any, is being implemented;..................
    (iv) If a subsequent and consecutive Interim ISSC, the                X                 X                 X
     reasons therefor;....................................
    (v) The name and 24-hour contact information for the                  X                 X                 X
     Company Security Officer; and........................
    (vi) The name of the Flag Administration, or the                      X                 X                X
     recognized security organization(s) representing the
     vessel flag Administration that issued the ISSC......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The information required by items 9(i)-(iii) need not be submitted before January 1, 2004. All other
  information required by item 9 need not be submitted before July 1, 2004.

* * * * *

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
5. Revise the authority citation for part 165 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L. 
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
No. 0170.
* * * * *

PART 2--VESSEL INSPECTIONS

0
6. Revise the authority citation for part 2 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 46 U.S.C. 3103, 3205, 
3306, 3307, 3703; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 12234, 45 
FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation 0170; subpart 2.45 also issued under the authority of Act 
Dec. 27, 1950, Ch. 1155, secs. 1, 2, 64 Stat. 1120 (see 46 U.S.C. 
App. Note prec. 1).


0
7. In Sec.  2.01-25, add new paragraph (a)(1)(viii) to read as follows:


Sec.  2.01-25  International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea 
(SOLAS), 1974.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (viii) International Ship Security Certificate.
* * * * *

PART 31--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
8. Revise the authority citation for part 31 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 43 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3307, 
3703; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; Executive Order 
12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Executive Order 
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; Department of 
Homeland Security Delegation 0170; Section 31.10-021 also issued 
under the authority Sec.  4109, Public Law 101-380, 104 Stat. 515.


0
9. Revise Sec.  31.05-1(a) to read as follows:


Sec.  31.05-1  Issuance of certificate of inspection--TB/ALL.

    (a) When a tank vessel is found to comply with all applicable 
regulations, including the applicable provisions of subchapters E, F, 
J, O, Q, S, and W of this chapter and of 33 CFR parts 104, 155, and 
157, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection will issue a certificate 
of inspection to the vessel or to its owners.
* * * * *

PART 71--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
10. Revise the authority citation for part 71 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3205, 3306, 3307; 
46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 
1980 Comp., p. 277; Executive Order 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 
Comp., p. 351; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 0170.


0
11. Add new Sec.  71.25-47 to read as follows:


Sec.  71.25-47  Vessel security.

    At each inspection for certification and periodic inspection, the 
inspector shall examine the vessel to determine that it meets vessel 
security requirements in 33 CFR part 104.

PART 91--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
12. Revise the authority citation for part 91 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 3205, 3306, 3307; 46 
U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 12234; 45 FR 58801; 3 CFR, 1980 
Comp., p. 277; Executive Order 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 
Comp., p. 351; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 0170.


0
13. Add new Sec.  91.25-47 to read as follows:


Sec.  91.25-47  Vessel security.

    At each inspection for certification and periodic inspection, the 
inspector shall examine the vessel to determine that it meets vessel 
security requirements in 33 CFR part 104.

PART 115--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
14. Revise the authority citation for part 115 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3307; 
46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 49 U.S.C. App. 1804; Executive Order 11735, 
38 FR 21243, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 743; Executive Order 12234, 
45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation 0170.

0
15. Revise Sec.  115.404(a) to read as follows:


Sec.  115.404  Subsequent inspections for certification.

    (a) An inspection for renewal of a Certificate of Inspection is 
conducted to determine if the vessel is in satisfactory condition, fit 
for the service intended, and complies with all applicable regulations. 
It normally includes inspection and testing of the structure,

[[Page 39315]]

machinery, equipment, and on a sailing vessel, rigging and sails. The 
owner or operator must conduct all tests as required by the OCMI, and 
make the vessel available for all specific inspections and drills 
required by subpart H of this part. In addition, the OCMI may require 
the vessel to get underway.
* * * * *

PART 126--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
16. Revise the authority citation for part 126 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 3205, 3306, 3307; 46 
U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 111735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR 1971-
1975 Comp., p. 793; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 0170.


0
17. Add new Sec.  126.490 to read as follows:


Sec.  126.490  Vessel security.

    At each inspection for certification and periodic inspection, the 
inspector shall examine the vessel to determine that it meets vessel 
security requirements in 33 CFR part 104.

PART 176--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
18. Revise the authority citation for part 176 to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3307; 
46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 49 U.S.C. App. 1804; Executive Order 11735, 
38 FR 21243, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation 0170.


0
19. Revise Sec.  176.404(a) to read as follows:


Sec.  176.404  Subsequent inspections for certification.

    (a) An inspection for renewal of a Certificate of Inspection is 
conducted to determine if the vessel is in satisfactory condition, fit 
for the service intended, and complies with all applicable regulations. 
It normally includes inspection and testing of the structure, 
machinery, equipment, and on a sailing vessel, rigging and sails. The 
owner or operator must conduct all tests as required by the OCMI, and 
make the vessel available for all specific inspections and drills 
required by subpart H of this part. In addition, the OCMI may require 
the vessel to get underway.
* * * * *

    Dated: June 23, 2003.
Thomas H. Collins,
Admiral, Coast Guard Commandant.
[FR Doc. 03-16188 Filed 6-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P