[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33930-33931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-14233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG03-72-000, et al.]


Whiting Clean Energy, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

May 29, 2003.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Whiting Clean Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. EG03-72-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2003, Whiting Leasing LLC (WL), 801 
East 86th Avenue, Merrillville, Indiana 46410, filed with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an Application for 
Determination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status pursuant to part 365 
of the Commission's Regulations and Section 32 of the Public Utility 
Holding Company Act, as amended (the Application).
    WL states that it is an Indiana Corporation that will own and lease 
a gas-fired combined cycle cogeneration facility rated at approximately 
525 MW capacity and that the facility will be used for the generation 
of electricity exclusively for sale at wholesale. WL further states 
that copies of this application have been served upon the Indiana 
Utility Regulatory Commission and the Securities and Exchange 
Commission.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2003.

2. Phibro Inc.

[Docket No. ER95-430-024]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Phibro Inc., tendered for filing 
an updated market power analysis in compliance with the Commission's 
orders authorizing Phibro Inc., to engage in wholesale sales of 
electric power at market-based rates.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

3. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-1783-001]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf 
of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy 
Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, 
Inc., (collectively, the Entergy Operating Companies) tendered for 
filing a compliance refund report in accordance with the Commission's 
letter order in Docket No. ER02-1783-000 issued April 11, 2003.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

4. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER03-142-004]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing revised rate sheets for its 
Transmission Owner Tariff (TO Tariff), FERC Electric Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 6, and for its Existing Transmission Contracts with 
the city of Colton, California. SCE states that the purpose of this 
filing is to comply with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
Order On Compliance and Rehearing dated May 12, 2003,103 FERC ] 61,166.
    SCE states that copies of this filing were served upon the Service 
List compiled by the Secretary in this docket.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

5. San Diego Gas & Electric Company

[Docket No. ER03-217-003]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, San Diego Gas & Electric Company 
(SDG&E) pursuant to FERC's Order issued January 24, 2003, 102 FERC ] 
61,063, tendered for filing Service Agreements Nos. 17 and 18 to its 
FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 6. SDG&E states that 
these agreements were accepted for filing on January 24, 2003, 
conditioned upon SDG&E's filing of designations for both 
interconnection agreements in compliance with Order No. 614 and Section 
35.9(a) of the Commission's Regulations.
    SDG&E states that copies of the filing have been served on 
Termoelectrica de Mexicali S. de R.L. de C.V., Termoelectrica U.S., 
LLC, and on the California Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

6. Virginia Electric and Power Company

[Docket No. ER03-519-001]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Virginia Electric and Power 
Company, doing business as Dominion Virginia Power, tendered for filing 
an amendment to its February 11, 2003 filing of the revised Generator 
Interconnection and Operating Agreement (Interconnection Agreement) 
between Dominion Virginia Power and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, 
Inc. (ODEC) to interconnect ODEC's Marsh Run CT Project with Dominion 
Virginia Power's transmission system. Dominion Virginia Power states 
the amendment is in response to the Commission's April 11, 2003 letter 
requesting additional information regarding the Interconnection 
Agreement.
    Dominion Virginia Power states that copies of the filing were 
served upon ODEC and the Virginia State Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

7. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-787-001]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Midwest Independent Transmission 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted for filing, pursuant to 
Section 205 of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.12 of the 
Commission's regulations, an executed Interconnection and Operating 
Agreement among Interstate Power and Light Company, a wholly owned 
subsidiary of Alliant Energy and Flying Cloud Power Partners, LLC.
    Midwest ISO states that a copy of this filing was sent to 
Interstate Power and Light Company and Flying Cloud Power Partners, 
LLC.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

[[Page 33931]]

8. Lamar Power Partners, LP

[Docket No. ER03-874-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Lamar Power Partners, LP tendered 
for filing a Notice of Cancellation pursuant to 18 CFR 35.15 in order 
to reflect the cancellation of its market-based rate tariff, designated 
as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, originally accepted for 
filing in Docket No. ER00-1844-000.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003

9. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER03-875-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation (CAISO) submitted an amendment to the CAISO Tariff 
(Amendment No. 52). CAISO states that Amendment No. 52 eliminates the 
requirement that System Resources submitting Energy bids into the CAISO 
Real Time Markets limit such bids to $0/MWh. The CAISO proposes that 
System Resources be permitted to submit bids above $0/MWh in the CAISO 
Real Time Markets.
    CAISO states that it has served copies of Amendment No. 52 upon the 
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, the California 
Energy Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, and upon 
all parties with effective Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements 
under the CAISO Tariff. In addition, the ISO states that it is posting 
Amendment No. 52 on the CAISO Home Page.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

10. Illumina Energy Solutions, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-876-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Illumina Energy Solutions, Inc., 
(Illumina) petitioned the Commission for acceptance of Illumina Rate 
Schedule FERC No. 1; the granting of certain blanket approvals, 
including the authority to sell electricity at market-based rates; and 
the waiver of certain Commission regulations.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

11. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER03-877-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing a Facilities Agreement under SCE's 
Transmission Owner Tariff (Tariff) between SCE and Southern California 
Public Power Authority (SCPPA).
    SCE states that the Facilities Agreement specifies the terms and 
conditions pursuant to which SCE will engineer, design, construct, 
install and own the Reliability Upgrades to SCE's electrical system as 
a result of SCPPA's intent to construct and interconnect the Magnolia 
Power Project to the City of Burbank's Olive Substation and transmit a 
maximum of 200 MW of generation through the Los Angeles Department of 
Water and Power's electrical system.
    SCE states that copies of this filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and SCPPA.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

12. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER03-878-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
(PJM), submitted for filing a construction service agreement among PJM, 
Waymart Wind Farm L.P., and PPL Electric Utilities Corporation. PJM 
requests a waiver of the Commission's 60-day notice requirement to 
permit the requested May 12, 2003 effective date for the agreement.
    PJM states that copies of this filing were served upon the parties 
to the agreement and the state regulatory commissions within the PJM 
region.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

13. Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-881-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc. 
(DEMI) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) its request to amend the Western Systems Power 
Pool (WSPP) Agreement to include DEMI as a participant. DEMI requests 
that the Commission allow the amendment to the WSPP Agreement to become 
effective on May 27, 2003.
    DEMI states that a copy of this filling has been served upon the 
WSPP Executive Committee Chair, WSPP Operating Committee Chair, WSPP 
General Counsel, and Arizona Public Service Company.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

14. Valero Refining Company, California

[Docket No. ER03-884-000]

    Take notice that on May 27, 2003, Valero Refining Company--
California, tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation, pursuant to 
18 CFR 35.15, giving notice of cancellation of its market-based 
electric tariff filed with the Commission and approved by letter order 
issued April 23, 2002.
    Comment Date: June 17, 2003.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected] or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, 
contact (202) 502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-14233 Filed 6-5-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P