[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31611-31615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-13174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 61 and 63

[FRL-7490-6]


Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Authority for 
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal 
Sites Not Operated After July 9, 1981: State of New Hampshire 
Department of Environmental Services

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 31612]]

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve New Hampshire 
Department of Environmental Services' (NHDES) request for partial rule 
substitution for inactive waste disposal sites pursuant to section 
112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This action will be effective July 28, 2003, unless EPA receives 
relevant adverse comments by June 27, 2003. If EPA receives such 
comments, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal 
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take 
effect. The incorporation by reference of certain publications in this 
rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 28, 
2003.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed concurrently to the 
addresses below: Steven Rapp, Chief, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor 
Programs Unit (CAP), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, 
One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114 and Philip J. 
O'Brien, Ph.D., Director, Waste Management Division, New Hampshire 
Department of Environmental Services, 6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, 
Concord, NH 03302-0095. Copies of the requests for approval are 
available for public inspection at EPA's Region I Office, Air Permits, 
Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, during normal business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics, 
and Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. EPA Region I, One Congress St., Suite 
1100 (CAP), Boston, MA 02114, (617) 918-1653, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION is organized as follows:

I. Background and Purpose
II. What Requirements Must a State Rule Meet To Substitute for a 
Section 112 Rule?
III. Why is NH DES Seeking Partial Rule Substitution?
IV. When Did the Authority To Implement and Enforce Section 112 
Standards Become Effective in New Hampshire?
V. Opportunities for Public Comments
VI. Summary of EPA's Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background and Purpose

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) first promulgated 
standards to regulate asbestos emissions on April 6, 1973 (see 38 FR 
8826), and added requirements for the control of asbestos emissions at 
inactive waste disposal sites on October 14, 1975 (see 40 FR 48299). 
These standards have since been amended several times and re-codified 
in 40 CFR part 61, subpart M, ``National Emission Standard for 
Asbestos'' (Asbestos NESHAP). On June 28, 2002, NH DES submitted a 
partial rule substitution request to implement and enforce its 
regulation entitled ``Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal Sites 
Not Operated After July 9, 1981'' in lieu of some sections of the 
Asbestos NESHAP rule as they apply to certain inactive waste disposal 
sites. NH DES's request for approval was submitted pursuant to the 
provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart E and was found to be complete on 
July 30, 2002.

II. What Requirements Must a State Rule Meet To Substitute for a 
Section 112 Rule?

    Under CAA section 112(l), EPA may approve State or local rules or 
programs to be implemented and enforced in place of certain otherwise 
applicable Federal rules, emissions standards, or requirements, when 
the State or local rules are determined to be no less stringent than 
the corresponding Federal rules or requirements. The Federal 
regulations governing EPA's approval of State and local rules or 
programs under section 112(l) are located at 40 CFR part 63, subpart E 
(see 58 FR 62262, November 26, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 55810, 
September 14, 2000). Under these regulations, a State air pollution 
control agency has the option to request EPA's approval to substitute a 
State rule for the applicable section 112 Federal rule (National 
Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)). Upon 
approval, the State agency is given the authority to implement and 
enforce its rule in place of the NESHAP.
    Section 112(l)(5) of the Act requires that a State's NESHAP program 
contain adequate authorities to assure compliance with each applicable 
Federal requirement, adequate resources for implementation, and an 
expeditious compliance schedule. These are also requirements for an 
adequate operating permits program under 40 CFR part 70. On September 
24, 2001, EPA promulgated full approval of the State's operating 
permits program as administered by NH DES (see 66 FR 48806). In 
addition, on May 16, 2001, EPA provided ``up-front'' approval of NH 
DES's request to implement and enforce alternative requirements in the 
form of title V permit terms and conditions for subpart S, ``National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper 
Industry'' (Pulp and Paper MACT I), and subpart MM, ``National Emission 
Standards for Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, 
Sulfite and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills'' (Pulp and Paper MACT 
II) (see 66 FR 27032). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has 
satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the 
previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria 
for any subsequent submittals. NH DES has affirmed that it still meets 
the up-front approval criteria.
    Additionally, the ``rule substitution'' option requires EPA to 
``make a detailed and thorough evaluation of the State's submittal to 
ensure that it meets the stringency and other requirements'' of 40 CFR 
63.93 (see 58 FR 62274). A rule will be approved if EPA finds: (1) The 
State or local rules are `no less stringent'' than the corresponding 
Federal regulations, (2) the State or local government has adequate 
authorities to implement and enforce the rules, and (3) the schedule 
for implementation and compliance is ``no less stringent'' than the 
deadlines established in the otherwise applicable Federal rule. See 40 
CFR 63.93(b). After reviewing NH DES's partial rule substitution 
request and equivalency demonstration for the Asbestos NESHAP as it 
applies to certain inactive waste disposal sites, EPA has determined 
this request meets all the requirements necessary for approval under 
CAA section 112(l) and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93.

III. Why Is NH DES Seeking Partial Rule Substitution?

    In New Hampshire, virtually all known inactive waste disposal sites 
not operated after July 9, 1981, are concentrated in two neighboring 
communities, Nashua and Hudson. Due to dumping practices by a former 
asbestos manufacturing plant, over 250 sites are known to exist in 
these two areas on properties that are actively in use for residential, 
commercial, industrial, recreational and public purposes. The asbestos 
manufacturing plant operated in Nashua, and until the late 1970's 
disposed of its asbestos containing waste by delivering it to the 
property owners for use as fill (i.e., in low-lying areas). The 
material exists in and around schoolyards, roadways, parking lots, and 
shopping centers as well as within wooded areas, along riverbanks, and 
within conservation areas.
    The requirements of 40 CFR 61.151, the portion of the Asbestos 
NESHAP that applies to inactive waste disposal sites, were established 
with traditional industrial/commercial dumpsites in mind, rather than 
dumpsites spread throughout a developed and active community setting. 
Consequently, certain aspects of Sec.  61.151 are not well suited for 
inactive waste disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981 in New 
Hampshire.

[[Page 31613]]

    For example, Sec.  61.151 of the Asbestos NESHAP requires unfenced/
non-posted sites to be covered with a minimum of six inches of soil if 
vegetated or a minimum of 24 inches of soil if not vegetated. If the 
site is not fenced and posted, other viable capping materials can be 
used but only with EPA approval pursuant to 40 CFR 61.151(c). This 
means that neither asphalt nor concrete can be used as a surface 
treatment without EPA approval. In these communities, asbestos waste is 
currently buried beneath parking lots, driveways, and sidewalks. NHDES 
is substituting performance based specifications for the ``one-size-
fits-all'' cover specifications in 40 CFR 61.151.
    As another example, 40 CFR 61.151(d) requires the owner/operator of 
an inactive waste disposal site to supply notice at least 45 days in 
advance of excavating or disturbing any asbestos-containing waste at 
the site. Due to the built-up nature of these inactive waste disposal 
sites, the need to disturb asbestos on short notice is a common 
occurrence and needs to be addressed. For instance, asbestos waste 
often must be disturbed to replace broken water lines as well as to 
repair or replace cover materials exposed due to storm water runoff. 
NHDES's proposed substitute rules reduce the length of the notice 
period but also require all persons who disturb asbestos waste to be 
qualified and to employ specific safe work practices and engineering 
controls.
    In addition, the general provisions of 40 CFR part 61, subpart A 
generally apply to new stationary sources that are not yet constructed 
or to existing stationary sources that are actively operating. Inactive 
waste disposal sites are already constructed and are no longer 
operating or allowed to emit pollutants. Therefore, NHDES is proposing 
to substitute general requirements that are more relevant to inactive 
waste disposal sites. For example, the alternative rules address site 
monitoring, maintenance, and reporting requirements in a manner 
appropriate to closed nonoperating sources that by their nature cannot 
be constructed or modified to increase their emissions.
    NH DES is seeking partial rule substitution because its alternative 
rules apply only to a subset of the inactive waste disposal sites 
subject to 40 CFR 61.151, namely those inactive waste disposal sites 
not operating after July 9, 1981.

IV. When Did the Authority To Implement and Enforce Section 112 
Standards Become Effective in New Hampshire?

    On October 2, 1996, EPA approved New Hampshire's program under 
section 112(l)(5) and 40 CFR 63.91 for receiving delegation of section 
112 standards that are unchanged from Federal standards as promulgated. 
This delegation mechanism only applied to part 70 sources (see 61 FR 
51370). On May 9, 2002, the NH DES submitted a request to EPA to 
receive straight delegation of authority to implement and enforce 
NESHAPs and New Source Performance Standards (NSPSs) for both major and 
area sources under a new delegation mechanism. NH DES sought to take 
delegation of these standards by incorporating the standards into NH 
DES's regulations. On September 19, 2002, EPA approved this delegation 
mechanism (see 67 FR 59001). Among other standards, NH DES incorporated 
by reference the Asbestos NESHAP, with the exception of 40 CFR 61.151, 
standard for inactive waste disposal sites for asbestos mills and 
manufacturing and fabricating operations.
    NH DES did not request straight delegation of Sec.  61.151 because 
it had submitted a partial rule substitution pursuant to 40 CFR 63.93 
for a portion of that rule. NH DES's request for rule substitution 
applies only to those inactive waste disposal sites not operating after 
July 9, 1981 which are subject to 40 CFR 61.151 (i.e., sites operated 
by certain asbestos mills, manufacturers, and fabricating facilities). 
NH DES's request seeks no change in delegation relative to inactive 
asbestos waste disposal sites operating after July 9, 1981 (i.e., NH 
DES will continue to regulate such facilities according to Sec.  61.151 
standards).

V. Opportunities for Public Comments

    EPA views the approval of NH DES's request to use its regulation 
for inactive waste disposal sites as a partial rule substitute for 
applicable requirements in the Asbestos NESHAP as a noncontroversial 
action since the State program is in operation and is no less stringent 
than the Asbestos NESHAP. EPA anticipates no adverse comments. 
Therefore, EPA is publishing this direct final rule without prior 
proposal. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal 
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will 
serve as the proposal for this action should relevant adverse comments 
be filed. This action will be effective July 28, 2003, without further 
notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comments by June 27, 2003.
    If EPA receives such comments, then it will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this 
direct final rule will not take effect. All public comments received 
will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed 
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule. Any 
parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such 
comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be 
effective July 28, 2003, and no further action will be taken on the 
proposed rule.

VI. Summary of EPA's Action

    After reviewing the request for approval of the NH DES's 
Administrative Rules for Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal 
Sites not operated after July 9, 1981, EPA has determined that this 
request meets all of the requirements necessary to qualify for partial 
rule substitution approval under CAA section 112(l) and 40 CFR 63.91 
and 63.93. EPA has determined that NH DES's asbestos rule is equivalent 
to or not less stringent than the Federal Asbestos NESHAP. Therefore, 
EPA hereby approves NH DES's rule to be used in place of the Federal 
Asbestos NESHAP, as it applies to those inactive waste disposal sites 
not operating after July 9, 1981, that are subject to 40 CFR 61.151. As 
of the effective date of this action, NH DES's asbestos rule is 
enforceable by the EPA and citizens under the CAA. Although NH DES has 
primary implementation and enforcement responsibility, EPA retains the 
right, pursuant to CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable 
emission standard or requirement under CAA section 112.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory 
action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review.'' This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled, 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks,'' because it is not an ``economically significant'' action under 
Executive Order 12866.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

[[Page 31614]]

    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources 
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time 
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and 
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and 
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to 
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; 
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; 
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; 
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 
601 et. seq. generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory 
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment 
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any 
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit 
enterprises, and small governmental entities with jurisdiction over 
populations of less than 50,000. This final rule will not have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because 
approvals under 40 CFR 63.93 do not create any new requirements, but 
simply allows the State to implement and enforce equivalent 
requirements in place of the Federal requirements that EPA is already 
imposing. Therefore, because this approval does not create any new 
requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, 
or to the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, 
EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome 
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent 
with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a 
plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
    EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector.
    This Federal action allows New Hampshire to implement equivalent 
alternative requirements to replace pre-existing requirements under 
Federal law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the 
private sector, result from this action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action simply allows New 
Hampshire to implement equivalent alternative requirements to replace a 
Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air 
Act. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000), 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, 
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the 
Federal government and Indian tribes.''
    This final rule does not have tribal implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship 
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
This Federal action allows the State of New Hampshire to implement an 
equivalent regulation to replace pre-existing requirements under 
Federal law and does not have tribal implications. Thus, Executive 
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is 
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under 
Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or 
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate 
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the 
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the 
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is 
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible 
alternatives considered by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does 
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or 
safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions 
Concerning

[[Page 31615]]

Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA 
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides 
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This 
action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA did not 
consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

K. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 28, 2003. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 61

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 
112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412.

    Dated: April 15, 2003.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

0
40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are amended as follows:

PART 61--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
2. Section 61.04 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(1) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  61.04  Address.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Inactive waste disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981 
within the State of New Hampshire must comply with the New Hampshire 
Regulations Applicable To Hazardous Air Pollutants, March 2003. The 
Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by 
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may 
obtain a copy from the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 
U.S. EPA, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC. You may examine this material at the above EPA office or at the 
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 
700, Washington, DC.
* * * * *

PART 63--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
4. Section 63.14 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(5) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  63.14  Incorporation by reference.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (5) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air 
Pollutants, March, 2003. Incorporation by Reference approved for Sec.  
63.99(a)(29)(iii) of subpart E of this part.
* * * * *

Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal 
Authorities

0
5. Section 63.99 is amended by adding paragraphs (a)(29)(iii) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  63.99  Delegated Federal authorities.

    (a) * * *
    (29) New Hampshire.
    (i) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (iii) Affected inactive waste disposal sites not operated after 
July 9, 1981 must comply with the New Hampshire Regulations Applicable 
to Hazardous Air Pollutants, March, 2003, (incorporated by reference as 
specified in Sec.  63.14) as described as follows:
    (A) The material incorporated in the New Hampshire Regulations 
Applicable to Hazardous Air Pollutants, March, 2003, (incorporated by 
reference as specified in Sec.  63.14) pertains to inactive waste 
disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981 in the State of New 
Hampshire's jurisdiction, and has been approved under the procedures in 
40 CFR 63.93 to be implemented and enforced in place of the Federal 
NESHAPs for Inactive Waste Disposal Sites (40 CFR 61.151).
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 03-13174 Filed 5-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P