[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 20, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27552-27554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-12621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EG03-66-000, et al.]


Allegheny Energy Supply Conemaugh, LLC; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Filings.

May 13, 2003.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification:

1. Allegheny Energy Supply Conemaugh, LLC

[Docket No. EG03-66-000]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Allegheny Energy Supply Conemaugh, 
LLC filed an amendment to its Application for Determination of Exempt 
Wholesale Generator Status pursuant to section 32(a)(1) of the Public 
Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (PUHCA) to correct the 
description of the eligible facility.
    Comment Date: May 22, 2003.

2. Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Electric Transmission 
Company, LLC

[Docket No. EL03-12-003]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Michigan Electric Transmission 
Company, LLC (METC) submitted for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission), a substitute Generator 
Interconnection & Operating Agreement (GIOA) with Kinder Morgan 
Michigan LLC in compliance with the Commission's April 22, 2003, Order 
in Docket No. EL03-12-002.
    A copy of the filing was served on all parties compiled on the 
official service list in Docket No. EL03-12.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

3. Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Electric Transmission 
Company, LLC

[Docket No. EL03-12-004]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, Michigan Electric Transmission 
Company, LLC (METC) submitted for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission), a Generator Interconnection & 
Operating Agreement (GIOA) with Kinder Morgan Michigan LLC. METC 
requests that the Commission accept the GIOA and allow it to replace 
the GIOA submitted by METC on May 7, 2003, in compliance with the 
Commission's April 22, 2003, Order in Docket No. EL03-12-002. METC 
explains that the appropriate Order No. 614 designations were 
inadvertently omitted from the May 7 Compliance Filing, and this 
submission reflects the appropriate designations. There are no 
additional changes.
    A copy was served on all parties compiled on the official service 
list in Docket No. EL03-12.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

4. Horsehead Industries, Inc.

[ER00-2333-001]

    Take notice that on May 6, 2003, Horsehead Industries, Inc., 
submitted for filing a revised Triennial Market Analysis through its 
unincorporated division Zinc Corporation of America.
    Comment Date: May 27, 2003.

5. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-2014-011]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Entergy Services, Inc., (Entergy) 
tendered for filing a Second Informational Report regarding Entergy's 
implementation of the

[[Page 27553]]

Generator Operating Limits as required by the Commission's Order issued 
March 13, 2003, in Docket No. ER02-2014-006.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

6. American Electric Power Service Corporation; Commonwealth Edison 
Company; Dayton Power and Light Company; Virginia Electric and Power 
Company; PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER03-262-004]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, New PJM Companies and PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C. filed a second errata for a single exhibit that 
was inadvertently omitted from the filing in Docket No. ER03-262-004 
submitted on May 6, 2003.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

7. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-363-002]

    Take notice that on May 2, 2003, Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf 
of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy 
Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, 
Inc., (collectively, the Entergy Operating Companies) filed an 
amendment to its filing for approval of the Long-Term Firm Point-to-
Point Transmission Service Agreement between Entergy Services, Inc., as 
agent for the Entergy Operating Companies, and City Water and Light of 
The City of Jonesboro, Arkansas.
    Comment Date: May 23, 2003.

8. Unitil Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER03-483-001]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Unitil Power Corp. submitted for 
filing information concerning the rate impact of the Amended System 
Agreement as required by the Commission's letter order issued on March 
21, 2003, in Docket No. ER03-483-000.
    Unitil Power Corp., states that a copy of the filing was served on 
the service list in Docket No. ER03-483-000 and on the New Hampshire 
Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

9. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER03-551-001]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 
(BGE), submitted for filing a revised Interconnection Agreement dated 
May 7, 2003, between BGE and Constellation Power Source Generation, 
Inc., pursuant to Commission Order dated April 10, 2003. BGE states 
that the revised Interconnection Agreement has been designated as 
Original Service Schedule No. 871 under PJM's Open Access Transmission 
Tariff.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

10. MidAmerican Energy Company

[Docket No. ER03-825-000]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, MidAmerican Energy Company 
(MidAmerican), filed with the Commission a Construction and Expense 
Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Ames, Iowa (Ames), dated April 
30, 2003, in order to facilitate the provisions of service pursuant to 
MidAmerican's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    MidAmerican requests an effective date of May 8, 2003, for the 
Agreement with Ames, and accordingly seeks a waiver of the Commission's 
notice requirement. MidAmerican states that it has served a copy of the 
filing on Ames, the Iowa Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce 
Commission and the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

11. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER03-826-000]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Southern California Edison Company 
(SCE) tendered for filing the amended Service Agreement for Wholesale 
Distribution Service (Amended Service Agreement) and the amended Added 
Facilities Agreement (Amended Added Facilities Agreement) between the 
City of Colton (Colton) and SCE. SCE states that the purpose of the 
amendments is to reflect required changes to these agreements due to 
the interconnection of the Agua Mansa Project to Colton's electrical 
system.
    SCE states that copies of this filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and Colton.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2004.

12. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER03-829-000]

    Take notice that on May 7, 2003, Florida Power Corporation (Florida 
Power) doing business as Progress Energy Florida (Progress Florida), 
tendered for filing cost support updates for its interchange service 
agreements pursuant to part 35 of the Commission's regulations. Florida 
Power states that it also filed revised rate schedule sheets 
incorporating necessary rate changes reflecting the cost updates. 
Florida Power indicates that the filing also updates the Real Power 
Loss Factors in the Open Access Transmission Tariffs of Florida Power 
and Carolina Power and Light Company.
    Florida Power states that copies of the filing letter (which 
identifies the updated charges) have been served on the counter-parties 
to the interchange service agreements and the interested state utility 
commissions. The entire submittal has been posted on the Florida Power 
and Carolina Power & Light Company Web site at: www.progress-energy.com.
    Comment Date: May 28, 2003.

13. Minnesota Power

[Docket No. ER03-831-000]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, Minnesota Power tendered for 
filing Original Sheet Nos. 39, 40, 41, and 42 of the Second Revised 
Rate Schedule FERC No. 125, designated as required by Commission Order 
No. 614, for wholesale service to the Public Utilities Commission of 
Brainerd, Minnesota (Brainerd). Minnesota Power states that this filing 
includes an extension of the term of the Electric Service Agreement 
between Brainerd and Minnesota Power and a wheeling rate for energy 
wheeled by Brainerd over Minnesota Power facilities. Minnesota Power 
requests an effective date of February 28, 2003, for this filing.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

14. Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-832-000]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, Alliant Energy Corporate Services, 
Inc. (Alliant Energy) on behalf of Interstate Power Company (IPC) 
tendered for filing a Negotiated Capacity Transaction (Agreement) 
between IPC and Wisconsin Power & Light Company (WPL) for the period 
May 1 through October 31, 2003. The Agreement was negotiated to provide 
service under the Alliant Energy System Coordination and Operating 
Agreement among IES Utilities Inc., IPC, WPL and Alliant Energy.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

15. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER03-834-000]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, Tampa Electric Company (Tampa 
Electric) tendered for filing Notices of Cancellation of the service 
agreements under its Market-Based Sales Tariff with Florida Power 
Corporation (FPC), Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. (Duke 
Energy), and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (Enron). Tampa Electric 
proposes that the cancellations be made effective on July 7, 2003.
    Tampa Electric states that copies of the filing have been served on 
FPC, Duke Energy, Enron, and the Florida Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

[[Page 27554]]

16. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER03-835-000]

    Take notice that on May 8, 2003, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), 
submitted amendments to the Schedule 2 chart of the PJM Open Access 
Transmission Tariff (PJM Tariff) to incorporate into the Sixth Revised 
version of the PJM Tariff the revenue requirements for Reactive Supply 
and Voltage Control from General Sources Service (Reactive Service) 
that the Commission accepted for WPS Westwood Generation, LLC 
(Westwood), Liberty Electric Power, LLC (Liberty), Armstrong Energy 
Limited Partnership, LLLP (Armstrong), Handsome Lake Energy, LLC 
(Handsome Lake), Pleasants Energy, LLC (Pleasants) and Safe Harbor 
Water Power Corporation (Safe Harbor). PJM states that it also filed an 
amendment to the Schedule 2 chart in the Fifth Revised version of the 
PJM Tariff to reflect Handsome Lake's revised Reactive Service revenue 
requirements that were effective prior to the requested effective date 
of the Sixth Revised version of the PJM Tariff, but not previously 
incorporated into the Fifth Revised version of the PJM Tariff.
    Consistent with the requested effective date of the Sixth Revised 
version of the PJM Tariff and the effective dates of the Commission's 
acceptance of the parties' Reactive Service revenue requirements, PJM 
requests the following effective dates for the revised sheets of the 
Sixth Revised version of the PJM Tariff filed in this docket: (1) First 
Revised Sheet No. 230--March 20, 2003, (incorporating Westwood's 
Liberty's, Armstrong's and Handsome Lake's revenue requirements); and 
(2) Second Revised Sheet No. 230--April 1, 2003, (incorporating 
Pleasants' and Safe Harbor's revenue requirements). PJM also requests 
an effective date of February 1, 2003, for the Eighth Revised Sheet No. 
112A of the Fifth Revised volume of the PJM Tariff (incorporating 
Handsome Lake's revenue requirements).
    PJM states that copies of this filing have been served on all PJM 
members, Westwood, Liberty, Armstrong, Handsome Lake, Pleasants, Safe 
Harbor, and each state electric utility regulatory commission in the 
PJM region.
    Comment Date: May 29, 2003.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected] or toll-free at (866)208-3676, or for TTY, 
contact (202)502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-12621 Filed 5-19-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P