[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24502-24504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-11284]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) issued during the period of April 2003.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222 
of the Act must be met.
    (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the

[[Page 24503]]

workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated; and
    (2) That sales or production, or both, of the firm or sub-division 
have decreased absolutely, and
    (3) That increases of imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate 
subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat 
thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production of such 
firm or subdivision.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that 
increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations 
at the firm.

None

    In the following case, the investigation revealed that the criteria 
for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2) (A) (I.C) 
(Increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (II.C) (has shifted production to a 
country not under the free trade agreement with U.S.) have not been 
met.

TA-W-51,066; Komag, Inc., Materials Technology Div. (KMT), Santa Rosa, 
CA

    The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.C.) 
(Increased imports) and (a) (2)(B) (II.B) (No shift in production to a 
foreign country) have not been met.

TA-W-50,562; Hubble Lighting, Inc., Martin, TN
TA-W-51,397; McCrosky Tool Corp., Meadville, PA
TA-W-51,463; Fishing Vessel (F/V) Kingtail, Port Townsend, WA
TA-W-51,343; Q Media Services, Westborough, MA
TA-W-51,052; Fremont Wire Co., Leggett and Platt, Inc., Div., Fremont, 
IN
TA-W-51,128; DT Precision Assembly Industries, Erie, PA
TA-W-50,475; Dynamatic Corp., Kenosha, WI
TA-W-51,454; Heiting Tool & Die, Inc., Appleton, WI
TA-W-51,374; Independent Tool & Manufacturing, Inc., Meadville, PA
TA-W-50,817; Alltrista Consumer Products Co., formerly Diamond Brands, 
Inc., a Div. of Jarden Corp., Strong ME
TA-W-51,151; North Star Steel, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cargill, 
Inc., Kingman, AZ
TA-W-51,229; Uniloy Milacron, Manchester, MI
TA-W-50,497; Fishing Vessel (F/V) Northern Star, King Cove, AK
TA-W-51,419; Vaisala, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vaisala Oyj, 
Columbus Operations, Plain City, OH
TA-W-51,465; Little Narrows, Inc., Kodiak, AK
TA-W-50,604; Cessna Aircraft Co., Wichita, KS
TA-W-51,263; Caterpillar, Inc., Hydraulics & Hydraulic Systems Business 
Unit, Joliet, IL: ``All workers of the V/P/M Section, Cylinders 
Section, and Hyraulic Systems Business Unit, Joliet, IL are denied 
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance.

    The workers firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-50,541; Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc., Plymouth, MN
TA-W-51,527; Robert Half Technology, a Robert Half International Co., 
Oklahoma City, OK
TA-W-51,447; Netmanage, Inc., Bellingham Engineering, Bellingham, WA
TA-W-51,451; Aetna, Tyler, TX
TA-W-51,328; Flour Facility and Plant Services, Inc., Basf Wilmington 
Site, Wilmington, NC
TA-W-51,358; Dollar Financial Group, Inc., Berwyn, PA
TA-W-51,184; ABN Amro Bank, N.V., Miami, FL
TA-W-51,191; Getronicswang Company LLC, d/b/a Getronics, Valley View, 
OH
TA-W-51,193; Journey Bottling Co., LLC, Santa Rosa, CA
TA-W-51,210; Intel Corp., Ethernet Switching Operations (ESO), Santa 
Clara, CA
TA-W-51,099; Allegheny Ludlum, Melt Shop and Rolling Mill Div., 
Houston, PA
TA-W-51,025; Zyquest, Inc., Depere, WI
TA-W-51,520 Bethlehem Steel Railroads-PBNE, Martin Tower Facility, 
Bethlehem, PA

    The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.A) (no 
employment declines) have not been met.

TA-W-51,496; Fishing Vessel (F/V) Au, Jeneau, AK
T-W-51,513; State of Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission 
Permit S04T64695F, Togiak, AK
TA-W-51,154A; Progress Casting Group, Inc., Plymouth, MN

    The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.B.) (Sales 
or production, or both, did not decline) and (II.C) (has shifted 
production to a country not under the free trade agreement with the 
U.S.) have not been met.

TA-W-50,677; J.D. Phillips Corp., Alpena, MI

    The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The 
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer 
to trade-affected companies.

TA-W-50,456; J and A Industrial Sheetmetal Co., Bend, OR
TA-W-50,778; Great Northern Bark Company, Libby, MT

    The following certification has been issued. The requirement of 
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 has been met.

TA-W-51,246; Cold Metal Products, Youngstown, OH

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued; the date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met.

TA-W-50,744; Warren Fabricating Corp., Niles, OH: January 28, 2002.
TA-W-51,039; Calvin Klein, Inc., New York, NY: March 31, 2002.
TA-W-51,108; Defender, Inc./Starr Supporter, Philadelphia, PA: February 
27, 2002.
TA-W-50,788; Republic Engineered Products LLC, a/k/a/ Republic 
Technologies International LLC, Canton, OH: April 17, 2003.
TA-W-50,812; Federal-Mogul, Power Train Div., Blacksburg, VA: January 
24, 2002.
TA-W-50,826; Allegheny Steel Co., a subsidiary of Allegheny 
Technologies, Massillon, OH: January 30, 2002.
TA-W-51,325; Powerwave Technologies, Santa Ana, CA: March 13, 2002.
TA-W-51,105; Dinaire, LLC, Buffalo, NY: February 25, 2002.
TA-W-50,445; Coe Manufacturing Co., Painesville, OH: December 18, 2001.
TA-W-51,404; Texstyle, Inc., Manchester, KY: March 21, 2002.
TA-W-51,259; TTM Technologies, Inc., Burlington Facility, Redmond, WA: 
March 20, 2002.
TA-W-51,223; PPG Fiberglass Products, Shelby, NC: March 17, 2002.
TA-W-51,069; Micron Technology, Inc., Lehi, UT: March 3, 2002.

[[Page 24504]]

TA-W-51,363; Weyerhaeuser Co., Western Manufacturing Purchasing, 
Lebanon, OR: March 27, 2002.
TA-W-51,271; James Moore & Son, Brownsville, TN: March 13, 2002.
TA-W-51,378; American Quality Ceramics, Bangs, Texas: March 31, 2002.
TA-W-50,622; Dallas Semiconductor/Maxim, Dallas, TX: January 9, 2002.
TA-W-51,274; RFD Publications, LLC, Wilsonville, OR: March 19, 2002.
TA-W-51,442; Stora Enso, Oyj, Stora Enso, Duluth Paper Mill, Duluth, 
MN: March 31, 2002.
TA-W-50,709; Coilcraft, Inc., Cary, IL: January 20, 2002.
TA-W-51,154; Progress Casting Group, Inc., Albert Lea, MN: March 7, 
2002.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met.

TA-W-51,329; Dana Corp., Perfect Circle Div., Richmond Machining Plant, 
Richmond, IN: March 26, 2002.
TA-W-50,847; Elmer's Products, Inc., Guilford Road, Bainbridge, NY: 
January 31, 2002.
TA-W-51,087; Wacker Siltronic Corp., Portland, OR: March 6, 2002.
TA-W-51,133; The Relizon Co., Newark, OH: March 13, 2002.
TA-W-51,179; Standard Corp., Duncan SC: March 14, 2002.
TA-W-50,642; Motorola, Inc., Broadband Communications Sector, Headend 
Infrastructure Unit, Fort Worth, TX: November 27, 2001.
TA-W-51,435; Breg, Inc., including leased workers of Secure Staffing, 
Express Personnel, The Eastridge Group, Kelly Services, Omni Express, 
and Westaff, Vista, CA: April 4, 2002.
TA-W-51,142; Vaisala, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vaisala Oyj, 
Sunnyvalle, CA: March 11, 2002.
TA-W-50,896; The Eaton Corp., Powertrain and Specialty Controls 
Operation, (including leased workers from Spherion Staffing and Adecco 
Staffing), Rochester Hills, MI: January 15, 2002.
TA-W-51,406; Torque Traction Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., a wholly 
owned subsidiary of Dana Corp., Whitsett, NC: March 24, 2002.
TA-W-51,212; Siemens VDO Automotive, VDO North America, LLC, Cheshire, 
CT: March 14, 2002.
TA-W-51,414; Windsor Forestry Tools, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of 
Blount, Inc., Milan, TN: March 20, 2002.
TA-W-51,351; Trade Wind Apparel, Inc., Commerce, GA: March 26, 2002.
TA-W-51,318; Ametek Specialty Motors, Chambersburg, PA: March 25, 2002.
TA-W-51,294; Acraline Products, Inc., Tipton, IN: March 24, 2002.
TA-W-51,300; Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, a wholly owned 
subsidiary of Fujitsu Ten Limited, Rushville, IN: March 21, 2002.
TA-W-51,446; Fishing Vessel (F/V) Lady Marion, Homer, AK: April 3, 
2002.
TA-W-51,452; Finegood Moldings, Inc., d/b/a Good Companies, Laminating 
Department, Carson, CA: April 1, 2002.
TA-W-51,461; Gilliam Candy Co., a division of Gilliam Candy Brands, 
Inc., Paducah, KY: April 3, 2002.
TA-W-51,508; Andrew Corporation, Rigid Waveguide Assemblies, Orland 
Park, IL: April 3, 2002.
TA-W-50,681; West Mill Clothes, Inc., Woodside, NY: January 23, 2002.
TA-W-51,316; Medsep Corp., d/b/a Pall Medical, Covina, CA: March 19, 
2002.
TA-W-51,375; U.S. Repeating Arms Co., Inc., New Haven, CT: March 31, 
2002.
TA-W-51,263; Caterpillar, Inc., Hydraulics & Hydraulic Systems Business 
Unit, Joliet, IL: March 6, 2002--All workers of the Miscellaneous 
Fabrication section of Caterpillar, Inc., Hydraulics and Hydraulic 
Systems Business Unit, Joliet, IL engaged in the production of tilt 
braces are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance.
    The following certification has been issued. The requirement of 
upstream supplier to a trade certified primary firm has been met.

TA-W-51,276; Radio Frequency Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Alcatel 
N.A. Cable Systems, Inc., Corvallis, OR: March 21, 2002.

    Also, pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade 
Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning 
transitional adjustment assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA) and 
in accordance with Section 250(a), subchaper D, chapter 2, title II, of 
the Trade Act as amended, the Department of Labor presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA issued 
during the month of April 2003.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
certification of eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA the following group 
eligibility requirements of section 250 of the Trade Act must be met:
    (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, (including 
workers in any agricultural firm or appropriate subdivision thereof) 
have become totally or partially separated from employment and either--
    (2) That sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely,
    (3) That imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have 
increased, and that the increases imports contributed importantly to 
such workers' separations or threat of separation and to the decline in 
sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    (4) That there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm 
or subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by the firm or 
subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA-TAA

    In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
criteria (3) and (4) were not met. Imports from Canada or Mexico did 
not contribute importantly to workers' separations. There was no shift 
in production from the subject firm to Canada or Mexico during the 
relevant period.

None

    The investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have 
not been met for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the workers of the subject firm did 
not produce an article within the meaning of section 250(a) of the 
Trade Act, as amended.

None

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA-TAA

None

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the month of April 2003.
    Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room 
C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to 
persons who write to the above address.

    Dated: April 28, 2003.
Terrence Clark,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 03-11284 Filed 5-6-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P