[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22359-22360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-10369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-122-815]


Alloy Magnesium from Canada: Final Results of Countervailing Duty 
New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper 
Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 28, 2003, the Department published the preliminary 
results of this new shipper review of the countervailing duty order on 
alloy magnesium from Canada. This new shipper review covers imports of 
subject merchandise from Magnola Metallurgy, Inc.

[[Page 22360]]

    The period for which we are measuring subsidies, or the period of 
review, is from January 1 through December 21, 2001.
    We invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary 
results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made 
no changes to our calculations. Therefore, the final results do not 
differ from the preliminary results. The final net subsidy rate for 
Magnola is listed in the section entitled ``Final Results of the 
Review.''

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brown, Office 1, Group 1, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482-4987.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Since the publication of the preliminary results of new shipper 
review on January 28, 2003, (see Alloy Magnesium from Canada: 
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review, 68 FR 
4175 (January 28, 2003) (``Preliminary Results'')), the following 
events have occurred. On February 27, 2003, we received case briefs 
from the Government of Quebec (``GOQ'') and Magnola Metallurgy, Inc. 
(``Magnola''), (collectively, ``the respondents''), and U.S. Magnesium, 
LLC., the petitioner. The respondents and the petitioner submitted 
rebuttal briefs on March 4, 2003.

Scope of the Review

    The products covered by this review are shipments of alloy 
magnesium from Canada. Magnesium alloys contain less than 99.8 percent 
magnesium by weight with magnesium being the largest metallic element 
in the alloy by weight, and are sold in various ingot and billet forms 
and sizes. The alloy magnesium subject to review is currently 
classifiable under item 8104.19.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheading is 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description 
of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.
    Secondary and granular magnesium are not included in the scope of 
this order. Our reasons for excluding granular magnesium are summarized 
in Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure and 
Alloy Magnesium From Canada, 57 FR 6094 (February 20, 1992).

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum'' 
from Susan H. Kuhbach, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import 
Administration to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration, dated April 21, 2003 (``Decision Memorandum''), 
which is hereby adopted by this notice. Attached to this notice as 
Appendix I is a list of the issues which parties have raised and to 
which we have responded in the Decision Memorandum. Parties can find a 
complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the 
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on 
file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU'') in Room B-099 of the main 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ under the heading ``Canada.'' The paper copy and 
electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    We have made no changes to our preliminary findings as a result of 
either our analysis of the comments received or of any new information 
or evidence of changed circumstances. Therefore, the final results do 
not differ from the preliminary results of this review.

Final Results of Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5)(i), we calculated a subsidy 
rate for Magnola, the sole producer/exporter subject to this new 
shipper review. For the period January 1, 2001, through December 31, 
2001, we determine the net subsidy rate for Magnola as stated below.

                            Net Subsidy Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Manufacturer/Exporter                       Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnola Metallurgy, Inc.................................    7.00 percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We will disclose our calculations to the interested parties in 
accordance with section 351.224(b) of the regulations.

Assessment Rates

    The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to the Customs Service within 15 days of publication of these 
final results. For the period January 1, 2001, through December 31, 
2001, the assessment rates applicable to all non-reviewed companies are 
the cash deposit rates in effect at the time of entry.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The Department also intends to instruct Customs to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the rate of 7.00 percent 
on the f.o.b. value of all shipments of the subject merchandise from 
Magnola entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the date of publication of these final results.
    The cash deposit rate that will be applied to non-reviewed 
companies covered by these orders is that established in Pure and Alloy 
Magnesium From Canada; Final Results of the Second (1993) 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 62 FR 48607 (September 16, 
1997) or the company-specific rate published in the most recent final 
results of an administrative review in which a company participated.
    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: April 21, 2003.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

APPENDIX I

List of Comments and Issues in the Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Emploi-Qu[eacute]bec Manpower Training Program is an export 
subsidy
Comment 2: The Manpower Training Program is not countervailable
Comment 3: Magnola Metallurgy's company specific Average Useful Life 
(``AUL'')
Comment 4: Magnola Metallurgy's discount rate
[FR Doc. 03-10369 Filed 4-25-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S