[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16013-16015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-7865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC03-69-000, et al.]


FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

March 25, 2003.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC and FPL Energy New England Transmission, 
LLC

[Docket No. EC03-69-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC and 
FPL Energy New England Transmission, LLC tendered for filing with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) pursuant to section 
203 of the Federal Power Act a request for authorization to engage in 
an intra-corporate transfer of jurisdictional facilities whereby FPL 
Energy Seabrook, LLC will transfer its undivided interest in the 
interconnecting transmission facilities for Seabrook Station to its 
direct, wholly-owned subsidiary FPL Energy New England Transmission, 
LLC.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

2. Almagre Power Holdings, LLC, Mesquite Colorado HoldCo, L.L.C., 
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C.

[Docket No. EC03-70-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, Almagre Power Holdings, LLC 
(Almagre), Mesquite Colorado HoldCo, L.L.C. (Mesquite Colorado) and 
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C. (Mesquite Investors) (jointly, Applicants) 
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an 
application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act for 
authorization to effectuate a transfer of all of Mesquite Colorado's 
membership interests in Front Range Power Company, L.L.C. (Front Range) 
from Mesquite Colorado to Almagre. Applicants also requested expedited 
consideration of the Application and privileged treatment for certain 
exhibits pursuant to 18 CFR 33.9 and 388.112.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

3. Jamaica Bay Peaking Facility, LLC

[Docket No. EG03-49-000]

    Take notice that on March 20, 2003 Jamaica Bay Peaking Facility, 
LLC (the Applicant), with its principal offices at 700 Universe 
Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408, filed with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) an application for a determination 
of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the 
Commission's regulations.
    The Applicant states that it is a Delaware corporation and is the 
owner and operator of a nominal 54 megawatt dual fuel (oil and gas) 
fired simple cycle peak electric generating facility (Facility) to be 
located in Far Rockaway, Queens County, New York. The Facility will 
sell energy, capacity, and ancillary services into the wholesale 
generation market.
    Comment Date: April 15, 2003.

4. FPL Energy New England Transmission, LLC

[Docket No. EG03-50-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, FPL Energy New England 
Transmission, LLC, c/o FPL Energy, LLC, 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno 
Beach, FL 33408, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

[[Page 16014]]

Commission (Commission) an application for determination of exempt 
wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's 
regulations.
    The applicant states that it is a limited liability company that 
will engage directly or indirectly and exclusively in the business of 
owning and/or operating eligible facilities in the United States. The 
applicant proposes to own an undivided interest in the interconnecting 
transmission facilities of the Seabrook Nuclear Generating Station, an 
undivided interest of which is owned by the applicant's parent, FPL 
Energy Seabrook, LLC.
    Comment Date: April 15, 2003.

5. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-1420-003]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, Oklahoma Gas and Electric 
Company (OGE) filed a Supplemental Status Report informing the 
Commission of recent developments with regard to OGE's efforts to join 
the Midwest ISO.
    OGE states that a copy of the filing has been served on all parties 
to this proceeding, and on the Arkansas Public Service Commission and 
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

6. ISO New England

[Docket No. ER02-2330-010]

    Take notice that on March 20, 2003, ISO New England Inc., submitted 
a compliance filing providing a status report on the implementation of 
Standard Market Design in New England.
    Comment Date: April 10, 2003.

7. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-2330-011]

    Take notice that on March 20, 2003, ISO New England Inc. submitted 
a compliance report on its consideration of a Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) proposed scarcity premium proposal in response 
to the requirements of the Commission's Order dated December 20, 2002.
    New England Inc., states that copies of said filing have been 
served upon all parties to this proceeding, and upon NEPOOL 
Participants.
    Comment Date: April 10, 2003.

8. Northern Indiana Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER03-640-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, Northern Indiana Public Service 
Company (Northern Indiana) filed a Service Agreement for Network 
Integration Transmission Service, a Network Operating Agreement, and 
Services Agreement with the Town of Argos, Indiana (Argos). Northern 
Indiana has requested an effective date of March 1, 2003.
    Northern Indiana states that copies of this filing have been sent 
to Argos, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, and the Indiana 
Office of Utility Consumer Counselor.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

9. Southern Company Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-641-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, Southern Company Services, 
Inc., acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, 
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and Savannah Electric 
and Power Company (collectively referred to as Operating Companies), 
tendered for Commission review information and replacement tariff 
sheets concerning the accrual of post-retirement benefits other than 
pensions as set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 
106 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in agreements and 
tariffs of the Operating Companies (jointly and individually). The 
following Commission approved rate schedules are affected:

Alabama Power--RateSchedule No. 145
Georgia Power--RateSchedule No. 803
Georgia Power--RateSchedule Nos. 824, 825 and 826
Georgia Power--RateSchedule Nos. 836, 837, and 838
Gulf Power--RateSchedule No. 82
Gulf Power--RateSchedule No. 84
Mississippi Power--RateSchedule No. 135
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 15
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 30
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 33
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 47
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 51
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 53
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 59
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 62
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 70
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 76
SoCos.--RateSchedule No. 77
SoCos--RateSchedule No. 93

    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

10. American Electric Power Service Corporation

[Docket No. ER03-642-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, American Electric Power Service 
Corporation (AEPSC) on its own behalf and on behalf of AEP Texas 
Central Company (AEPTC), formerly Central Power and Light Company (CPL) 
submitted for filing to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) an interconnection agreement (Agreement) between CPL and 
the City of Brownsville, Texas (Brownsville) that includes a Facility 
Schedule No. 5 that provides for a new point of interconnection located 
at Brownsville's soon to be completed Palo Alto Substation. AEPSC 
states that no changes other than the addition of Facility Schedule No. 
5 have been made to the interconnection agreement presently on file at 
the Commission that has been in effect since April 4, 2001. 
Additionally AEPSC has re-designated the Agreement to be a service 
agreement under the Open Access Transmission Service Tariff of the 
American Electric Power System whereby requiring it to cancel the 
interconnection agreement presently on file at the Commission that is 
designated as a CPL rate schedule.
    AEPSC seeks an effective date of March 17, 2003 for the Agreement 
and the Notice of Cancellation. AEPSC seeks waiver of the Commission's 
notice requirements if the Palo Alto Substation is not energized on the 
expected date in June 2003. AEPSC states that it has served copies of 
the filing on Brownsville and the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

11. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No.ER03-647-000]

    Take notice that on March 21, 2003, the New York Independent System 
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) filed revisions to its ISO Market Administration 
and Control Area Services Tariff (the Services Tariff) to implement the 
``ICAP Demand Curve''. The NYISO has requested that the Commission 
expedite its review of this filing to permit an effective date in less 
than sixty days. Accordingly, the NYISO has requested an effective date 
of May 21, 2003, or the date that the Commission issues an Order 
accepting the filing, whichever is earlier.
    The NYISO states it has served a copy of this filing upon all 
parties that have executed service agreements under the NYISO's Open 
Access Transmission Tariff or the Services Tariff and upon the New York 
State Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: April 11, 2003.

12. ZWHC LLC

[Docket No. QF87-365-006]

    Take notice that on March 20, 2003, ZWHC LLC (ZWHC) filed with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an application for 
recertification of a facility as a

[[Page 16015]]

qualifying small power production facility pursuant to Section 292.207 
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that 
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. ZWHC states that the 
facility is a 18 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi 
Mountains, Kern County, California. ZWHC also states that the facility 
is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. ZWHC 
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in 
the upstream ownership of the Facility.
    Comment Date: April 21, 2003.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov , using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected] or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, 
contact (202) 502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-7865 Filed 4-1-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P