[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8635-8637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-4262]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[DOCKET NO. 70-734]
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for
General Atomics' Request To Amend Special Nuclear Material License SNM-
696
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering an amendment to General Atomics' (GA's) NRC
Special Nuclear Material License SNM-696. The proposed amendment will
revise the material possession limits in its license to reflect the
actual amount of inventory currently on its site. An Environmental
Assessment (EA) was performed by the NRC staff in support of its review
of GA's license amendment request, in accordance with the requirements
of 10 CFR Part 51. The conclusion of the EA is a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed licensing action.
II. Supplementary Information
Background
GA was formerly authorized by the NRC and its predecessor, the
Atomic Energy Commission, to use special
[[Page 8636]]
nuclear material in nuclear fuel fabrication and research and
development pursuant to its license SNM-696. However, following
submittal by GA of applications dated September 26, 1995, and June 14
and July 19, 1996, on September 26, 1996, the NRC amended GA's license
to authorize only activities incident to decommissioning. On April 29,
1998, the NRC further amended GA's license to incorporate the
Decommissioning Plan. 63 FR 20671.
Since issuance of these license amendments, GA has decommissioned a
number of areas of its site and has removed a significant amount of
licensed material. GA has removed this material by either transferring
the material to licensed recipients or shipping the material to a
licensed disposal facility.
By license application dated October 31, 2002 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML023160041), GA requested that its license SNM-696 be amended to
reduce the limits in its license to reflect the reduction in its
inventory of special nuclear material that has resulted from its
ongoing decommissioning activities. The initial application indicated
that the license authorized GA to acquire, deliver, receive, possess,
use and transfer SNM. GA submitted a corrected application dated
November 7, 2002 (ADAMS Accession No. ML023220032), deleting the words
``acquire,'' ``receive,'' and ``use,'' from the initial application, to
correctly reflect that GA is authorized only to possess, transfer, and
ship special nuclear material.
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would be to amend GA's license to reflect the
reduced amount of special nuclear material remaining on its site. The
previous and revised possession limits are listed in the following
table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous
SNM Chemical or physical possession Revised possession limit
form limit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Uranium................... Enriched up to \1\ 200 Less than 10 kilograms U-235.
19.99% U-235.
B. Uranium................... Enriched 20-100% U- \2\ 5000 Less than 1,000 gm.\3\
235.
C. U-233..................... Any................. \2\ 2000 Less than 100 gm U-233.\3\
D. Plutonium................. Encapsulated and/or \2\ 2000 Less than 100 gm total Pu.\3\
sealed sources.
E. Plutonium................. Bred but unseparated \2\ 1000 Less than 50 gm total Pu.\3\
F. Plutonium................. Plated calibration \2\ 5 Less than 5 grams total Pu.\3\
sources.
G. Plutonium................. Solutions, \2\ 5 Less than 5 grams total Pu.\3\
precipitates,
solids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Gram.
\2\ Kilogram.
\3\ The sum total quantity of strategic special nuclear material possessed at any one time must be less than
1,000 grams computed by the formula: Grams = grams U-235 in uranium enriched to 20% or more plus 2 x (grams U-
233 + grams plutonium).
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would bring the possession limits section of
GA's license into conformance with the amounts of special nuclear
material actually remaining on site.
Cumulative Impacts
NRC has found no other current or planned activities in the area
that would result in cumulative impacts.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
An alternative to the proposed action would be for the NRC staff to
deny the licensee's request. The licensee would then continue to be
authorized to possess larger quantities of special nuclear material on
the site; however, it would also continue to be prohibited from
acquiring, receiving, or using special nuclear material, in accordance
with its current license.
Affected Environment
The affected environment is the GA site in La Jolla, California. It
is described in the Site Decommissioning Plan, dated October 11, 1996.
Since the Site Decommissioning Plan was approved, GA has decontaminated
and decommissioned several areas of the site, and these areas have been
released for unrestricted use and have been deleted from GA's license.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
There are no environmental impacts of the proposed action. The
license amendment revises the license to reflect the current condition
of the site, and does not authorize any change in activities.
State Consultation
NRC staff discussed this proposed action with Ms. Sudana Kwok,
Project Manager of GA's byproduct material license with the California
Department of Health Services, Radiologic Health Branch. The DHS/RHB is
in agreement with the proposed action and has no comments.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the staff
concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect
on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the staff has
determined that preparation of an environmental impact statement is not
warranted.
IV. Further Information
The following documents are related to the proposed action.
References
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) title 10, chapter I--Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, part 51, Environmental Protection Regulations
for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) title 10, chapter I--Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, part 70, Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear
Material.
General Atomics, Docket No. 70-734; SNM-696; Submittal of Corrected
Revised Section 1 (Material License Limits) of Part II ``Specifications
Volume'' of SNM-696, November 7, 2002 (ADAMS Accession No. 023220032).
Nuclear Regulatory Commission; General Atomics Amendment 75;
December 9, 2002; NRC Form 374 Sections 6., 7., and 8 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML023250261).
These references may be examined and/or copied for a fee at the
NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The references with ADAMS
accession numbers may also be viewed in the NRC's Electronic Public
Document Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Any
questions with respect to his action should be referred to Ms. Mary
Adams, Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T-8
[[Page 8637]]
A33, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone (301) 415-7249.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of February, 2003.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Daniel M. Gillen,
Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and
Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 03-4262 Filed 2-21-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P