[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72330-72362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-29074]



[[Page 72329]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





Environmental Protection Agency





-----------------------------------------------------------------------







40 CFR Part 63



National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paper and 
Other Web Coating; Final Rules

  Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2002 / 
Rules and Regulations  

[[Page 72330]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-7385-5]
RIN 2060-AG58


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paper 
and Other Web Coating

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action finalizes national emission standards for 
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for facilities that coat paper and 
other web substrates and are major sources of hazardous air pollutants 
(HAP) emissions. The standards implement section 112(d) of the Clean 
Air Act (CAA) to protect public health and the environment by reducing 
HAP emissions from new and existing facilities. The CAA requires these 
sources to achieve the maximum degree of reduction in HAP emissions 
that is achievable. The final standards will eliminate approximately 80 
percent of nationwide HAP emissions from facilities that coat paper and 
other web substrates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 4, 2002. The incorporation by reference of 
certain publications listed in today's final rule is approved by the 
Director of the Federal Register as of December 4, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Docket. Docket No. A-99-09 contains supporting information 
used in developing the standards for the paper and other web coating 
source category. The docket is located at the Environmental Protection 
Agency, Office of Air & Radiation Docket & Information Center, Mail 
Code 6102T, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room B108, Washington, DC 
20460, and may be inspected from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Almodovar, Coating and 
Consumer Products Group (C539-03), Emission Standards Division, U.S. 
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone number (919) 541-0283, 
facsimile number (919) 541-5689, electronic mail (e-mail) address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Docket. The docket is an organized and 
complete file of all the information considered by the EPA in the 
development of rulemaking. The docket is a dynamic file because 
material is added throughout the rulemaking process. The docketing 
system is intended to allow members of the public and industries 
involved to readily identify and locate documents so that they can 
effectively participate in the rulemaking process. Along with the 
proposed and promulgated standards and their preambles, the contents of 
the docket will serve as the record in the case of judicial review. 
(See section 307(d)(7)(A) of the CAA.) The regulatory text and other 
materials related to this rulemaking are available for review in the 
docket or copies may be mailed on request from the Air and Radiation 
Docket and Information Center by calling (202) 566-1742. A reasonable 
fee may be charged for copying docket materials.
    WorldWide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket, 
an electronic copy of today's final rule will also be available on the 
WWW through the EPA's Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following 
signature by the EPA Administrator, a copy of the rule will be posted 
on the TTN's policy and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated 
rules at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and 
technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control. If more 
information regarding the TTN is needed, call the TTN HELP line at 
(919) 541-5384.
    Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated 
by this action include those listed on the following table. This table 
is not intended to be exhaustive, but is just a guide to entities 
likely to be regulated by these standards. It lists the types of 
entities that may be regulated, but you should examine the 
applicability criteria in Sec. Sec.  63.3290 and 63.3300 of the rule to 
decide whether your facility is regulated by the standards. If you have 
any questions about whether your facility is subject to the standards, 
call the person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

                         Categories and Entities Potentially Regulated by the Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     NAICS
                    Category                         Codes         Examples of Potentially Regulated Entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper and Other Web Coating.....................       322211  Those facilities with web coating operations b
                                                       322212   that coat substrate used in products including,
                                                     a 322221   but not limited to: corrugated and solid fiber
                                                       322222   boxes; folding paperboard boxes, including
                                                     a 322223   sanitary; flexible packaging (packing paper and
                                                     a 322224   plastics film, coated and laminated); pressure
                                                       322225   sensitive tape and labels, medical tape, duct
                                                       322226   tape, coated and laminated paper, not elsewhere
                                                     a 322299   classified (nec); plastics, foil, and coated
                                                       323111   paper bags; bags: uncoated paper and multiwall;
                                                       323116   die-cut paper and board; converted paper and
                                                       325992   paperboard products, nec (gift wrap, paper
                                                       326111   wallpaper, cigarette paper); commercial
                                                       326112   printing, gravure; manifold business forms;
                                                     a 326113   plastic aseptic packaging; unsupported plastics
                                                        32613   film and sheet; laminated plastics plate, sheet,
                                                       326192   and profile shapes; abrasive products; laminated
                                                      a 32791   aluminum (metal) foil and leaf, flexible
                                                       332999   packaging; photographic equipment and supplies;
                                                       339944   carbon paper and inked ribbons; linoleum,
                                                                asphalted-felt base, and other hard surface
                                                                floor coverings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Facilities in these NAICS codes are expected to be primarily covered under the printing and publishing NESHAP.
 
b Web coating operations refer to the application of a continuous layer of coating material across the entire
  width or any portion of the width of a web substrate, and any associated curing/drying equipment between an
  unwind or feed station and a rewind or cutting station where the continuous web substrate is flexible enough
  to be wound or unwound as rolls.


[[Page 72331]]

    Judicial Review. Under section 307(b) of the CAA, judicial review 
of the final rule is available only by filing a petition for review in 
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 
by February 3, 2003. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an 
objection to the rule which was raised with reasonable specificity 
during the period for public comment can be raised during judicial 
review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements 
established by today's final action may not be challenged separately in 
any civil or criminal proceeding we bring to enforce these 
requirements.
    Outline. The information presented in this preamble is organized as 
follows:

I. What Are the Subject and Purpose of the Rule?
II. Does This Rule Apply to Me?
    A. What Facilities Are Subject to the Rule?
    B. What Is the Affected Source?
III. What Are the Emission Standards?
    A. Emission Limits
    B. Interaction with Other Regulations
IV. When Do I Show Initial Compliance with the Rule?
V. What Testing and Monitoring Must I Do?
    A. Test Methods and Procedures
    B. Monitoring Requirements
VI. What Notification, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements 
Must I Follow?
    A. Initial Notification
    B. Notification of Performance Tests
    C. Notification of Compliance Status
    D. Recordkeeping Requirements
    E. Periodic Reports
VII. What Major Changes Have We Made to the Rule Since Proposal?
    A. Applicability
    B. New Source Emission Limit
    C. Solvent Retained in the Web
    D. Monitoring
VIII. What Are the Environmental, Energy, and Economic Impacts of 
the Rule?
    A. Emission Reductions
    B. Secondary Environmental Impacts
    C. Energy Impacts
    D. Cost Impacts
    E. Economic Impacts
IX. Administrative Requirements
    A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    C. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
    D. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments
    E. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, and Use
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    G. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1966 (SBREFA), 5 
U.S.C. 601, et seq.
    H. Paperwork Reduction Act
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Congressional Review Act

I. What Are the Subject and Purpose of the Rule?

    The CAA requires us to establish standards to control HAP emissions 
from source categories identified under section 112(c) of the CAA. An 
initial source category list was published in the Federal Register on 
July 16, 1992 (57 FR 31576). The source category list identifies 
``Paper and Other Web Coating (Surface Coating)'' as a source category 
because it contains major sources of HAP emissions. Under the CAA, a 
major source is defined as ``* * * any stationary source or group of 
stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common 
control that emits or has the potential to emit, considering controls, 
in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any one HAP or 25 
tpy or more of any combination of HAP.'' We have estimated that there 
are over 400 existing paper and other web coating facilities with 
approximately 203 estimated to be major sources of HAP emissions.
    The purpose of the rule is to reduce emissions of HAP from paper 
and other web coating major sources. The source category is for major 
sources only. Area sources are not included in this source category 
and, therefore, are not subject to the standards. We estimate that 
annual baseline organic HAP emissions from this source category are 
approximately 37,800 megagrams per year (Mg/yr) (42,000 tpy). The final 
rule will eliminate approximately 31,300 Mg/yr (34,500 tpy) of these 
organic HAP emissions (about an 80 percent reduction).
    The organic HAP emitted from the paper and other web coating 
process include toluene, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, xylenes, 
phenol, methylene chloride, ethylene glycol, glycol ethers, hexane, 
methyl isobutyl ketone, cresols and cresylic acid, dimethylformamide, 
vinyl acetate, formaldehyde, and ethyl benzene. These pollutants can 
cause reversible or irreversible toxic effects following sufficient 
exposure. The potential toxic effects include eye, nose, throat, and 
skin irritation, and blood cell, heart, liver, kidney damage, and 
possibly cancer.
    The degree of adverse effects to human health from exposure to HAP 
can range from mild to severe. The extent and degree to which the human 
health effects may be experienced are dependent upon (1) the ambient 
concentration observed in the area (as influenced by emission rates, 
meteorological conditions, and terrain); (2) the frequency and duration 
of exposures; (3) characteristics of exposed individuals (genetics, 
age, preexisting health conditions, and lifestyle) which vary 
significantly with the population; and (4) pollutant-specific 
characteristics (toxicity, half-life in the environment, 
bioaccumulation, and persistence).

II. Does the Rule Apply to Me?

A. What Facilities Are Subject to the Rule?

    The paper and other web coating source category includes any 
facility that is located at a major source and is engaged in the 
coating of paper, plastic film, metallic foil, and other web surfaces. 
Paper and other web coating may be simply referred to as ``web 
coating'' since paper is one of several web substrates in the paper and 
other web coating source category. The source category does not include 
printing operations covered under the Printing and Publishing NESHAP 
(40 CFR part 63, subpart KK) or web coating lines subject to the 
Magnetic Tape Manufacturing NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart EE). The 
source category does not include coil coating, i.e., the application of 
a coating to the surface of any metal strip at least 0.15 millimeter 
(0.006 inch) thick that is packaged in a roll or coil, which is being 
regulated as a separate source category. However, we have identified 
facilities that coat metal webs greater than 0.15 millimeter thick that 
are coated for use in flexible packaging. These web coating lines are 
part of the paper and other web coating source category and, therefore, 
are not subject to the Coil Coating NESHAP. Fabric coating operations 
are also being regulated as a separate source category, except for 
fabric coating for use in pressure sensitive tape and abrasive 
materials.
    The rule applies to you if you own or operate any web coating lines 
at a facility that is a major source of HAP emissions. This means that 
the web coating lines at a major source would be subject to the 
standards without regard to the relative proportion of HAP emissions 
from the web coating lines to total HAP emissions at the source.
    If your facility is a nonmajor (area) source, i.e., actual and 
potential annual emissions are less than 10 tons of any single HAP and 
less than 25 tons of all HAP combined, you would not be subject to the 
rule.
    If your facility is a major source, you would be required to meet 
the emission limits for all the web coating lines at your facility. We 
have defined a web to be a continuous substrate (e.g., paper, plastic 
film, foil) that is capable of being rolled at any point during the 
coating

[[Page 72332]]

process. We have defined a web coating line to be any number of work 
stations, of which one or more applies a continuous layer of coating 
material along the entire width of a continuous web substrate or any 
portion of the width of the web substrate, and any associated curing/
drying equipment between an unwind (or feed) station and a rewind (or 
cutting) station. As stated before, printing presses subject to the 
Printing and Publishing NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK) are not web 
coating lines.

B. What Is the Affected Source?

    We define an affected source as a stationary source, group of 
stationary sources, or part of a stationary source to which a specific 
NESHAP applies. Within a source category, we select the specific 
emission sources (emission points or groupings of emission points) that 
will make up the affected source for that category. To select these 
emission sources, we mainly consider the constituent HAP and quantity 
emitted from individual or groups of emission points.
    For the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP, the affected source is 
the collection of all the web coating lines at a facility. As 
previously stated, a web coating line is defined as any number of work 
stations, of which one or more applies a continuous layer of coating 
material across the entire width or any portion of the width of a web 
substrate, and any associated curing/drying equipment between an unwind 
or feed station and a rewind or cutting station.
    Affiliated operations such as mixing or dissolving of coating 
ingredients prior to application; coating mixing for viscosity 
adjustment, color tint or additive blending, or pH adjustment; cleaning 
of coating lines and coating line parts; handling and storage of 
coatings and solvent; and conveyance and treatment of wastewater are 
part of the paper and other web surface coating source category. The 
final distinction between these affiliated operations and other 
activities that go beyond the affiliated operations described above 
will be resolved in the context of the Miscellaneous Organic Chemical 
Manufacturing NESHAP or the Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing NESHAP, 
both currently under development. Review of the industry survey data 
reflected that only a small portion of the surveyed facilities reported 
any data concerning affiliated operations, and only some of these 
facilities reported that HAP emissions from affiliated operations were 
controlled. For facilities that reported control of HAP emissions from 
these sources, the data were not sufficiently detailed to determine if 
the reported control represented the facility level of control or the 
control for one unit operation of this type out of several in the 
facility. For example, mixing may be performed in a mix room and at the 
application station. It was not clear from the reported data if a 
facility reporting capture and control of emissions from mixing 
operations conducted all mixing at controlled application stations or 
possibly just a single mix room was controlled. When these operations 
occur inside a permanent total enclosure, emissions reductions can be 
achieved at the overall control efficiency of the capture and control 
system. We were not able to identify emissions reductions for 
affiliated operations with the available data. Since we were not able 
to identify emissions reductions for affiliated operations, we believe 
it is not appropriate at this time to include them in the affected 
source in the final rule.
    The requirements of the future Miscellaneous Organic Chemical 
Manufacturing NESHAP and the Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing NESHAP 
will not apply to affiliated operations located at a facility subject 
to the rule. Activities which go beyond the affiliated operations 
described above may, however, be subject to the requirements of the 
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing NESHAP and the 
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing NESHAP. Language will be added to 
both of these rules to clarify their applicability.
    Coating lines and equipment that are not in the source category and 
thus, not in the affected source, include those that perform both 
coating and printing and are subject to the national emission standards 
for the printing and publishing industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK); 
metal coil coating operations, except for the coating of metal webs 
greater than 0.15 millimeter thick that are used in flexible packaging; 
and fabric coating operations, except for fabric coating for use in 
pressure sensitive tape and abrasive materials.
    Many industrial facilities perform both coating and printing 
operations. Within the printing industry, the product and packaging 
rotogravure and wide-web flexographic industry segment (that includes 
the flexible packaging industry as a major subsector) does the most 
coating, with material use distributed almost equally between inks and 
other types of coatings. Printing operations are covered under the 
NESHAP for the printing and publishing industry (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart KK). The Printing and Publishing NESHAP also include an option 
for facilities that perform both printing and coating to include 
certain coating operations as affected sources subject to that rule. 
Therefore, many facilities that could potentially be subject to the 
Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP may have coating lines already 
subject to the Printing and Publishing NESHAP. Such web coating lines 
included in compliance demonstrations under the Printing and Publishing 
NESHAP are not subject to the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP. A 
detailed discussion of the printing and publishing industry is included 
in the background information document for that industry (Docket No. A-
92-42, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 
Printing and Publishing Industry--Background Information for Proposed 
Standards (EPA-453/R-95-002a)).

III. What Are the Emission Standards?

A. Emission Limits

    In the rule, we expressed the emission limit in three formats based 
on whether HAP emissions are measured in terms of mass of organic HAP 
applied, mass of coating material applied, or mass of coating solids 
applied. You may choose to comply with any of these formats (referred 
to as the ``emission limits''). The HAP emission limits are based on 
emission capture and control technology that can reduce total organic 
HAP emissions by 95 percent at existing affected sources and 98 percent 
at new affected sources. The HAP emission limits reflect this level of 
control by limiting organic HAP emissions to no more than 5 percent and 
2 percent of the organic HAP applied each month at existing and new 
affected sources, respectively; and by equivalently limiting emissions 
based on the mass of the solids part of your coatings or the mass of 
your total coating materials. We believe expressing emission limits in 
this way is appropriately based on the maximum achievable control 
technology (MACT) level of control and offers flexibility to reduce 
emissions through the use of control technology, pollution prevention, 
or a combination of the two.
    The three HAP emission limits for existing affected sources are: 
(1) Limit emissions to no more than 5 percent of the mass of organic 
HAP applied each month (95 percent reduction); (2) limit the total mass 
of organic HAP in your coating materials, or the total mass of organic 
HAP emitted, to no more than 4 mass percent of the total mass of 
coating materials applied to the web substrate each month; or (3) limit 
the total mass of organic HAP in your

[[Page 72333]]

coatings, or the total mass of organic HAP emitted, to no more than 20 
mass percent of the total mass of coating solids applied to web 
substrates each month.
    The three HAP emission limits for new affected sources are: (1) 
Limit emissions to no more than 2 percent of the mass of organic HAP 
applied each month (98 percent reduction); (2) limit the total mass of 
organic HAP in your coating materials, or the total mass of organic HAP 
emitted, to no more than 1.6 mass percent of the total mass of coating 
material applied to the web substrate each month; or (3) limit the 
total mass of organic HAP in your coatings, or the total mass of 
organic HAP emitted, to no more than 8 mass percent of the total mass 
of coating solids applied to web substrates each month.
    Alternatively, the owners or operators of both existing and new 
affected sources using a thermal oxidizer to control organic HAP 
emissions may choose to operate the oxidizer such that an outlet HAP 
concentration of no greater than 20 parts per million by volume (ppmv) 
by compound on a dry basis is achieved. If 100 percent capture 
efficiency is achieved and this outlet concentration is achieved on a 
continuous basis, then the source will be deemed to be in compliance 
with the emission limit. Our rationale for including this alternative 
emission limit is included in section VII.B of this preamble.
    If your facility is subject to today's rule, the General Provisions 
(40 CFR part 63, subpart A) also apply to you. The General Provisions 
codify procedures and criteria we use to carry out all part 63 NESHAP 
promulgated under the CAA. The General Provisions contain 
administrative procedures, preconstruction review procedures, and 
procedures for conducting compliance-related activities such as 
notifications, recordkeeping and reporting, performance testing, and 
monitoring. The rule refers to individual sections of the General 
Provisions that we believe will be of particular interest to you. 
However, unless specifically overridden in Table 2 of the rule, all of 
the General Provisions requirements apply to you.

B. Interaction With Other Regulations

    You may be subject to both the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP 
and other future or existing rules, such as new source performance 
standards (NSPS) and State rules requiring reasonably available control 
technology limits on volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions. You 
must comply with all applicable rules. Duplicative recordkeeping and 
reporting requirements and differences in emission limitations may be 
resolved through your title V permit.

IV. When Do I Show Initial Compliance With the Rule?

    Existing affected sources must comply with the rule no later than 3 
years after December 4, 2002. The effective date is December 4, 2002. 
New or reconstructed affected sources must comply upon start-up or 
December 4, 2002, whichever is later. Details of the compliance 
requirements can be found in the General Provisions, as outlined in 
Table 1 of today's rule.
    Before your initial compliance demonstration, you must choose which 
of the three emission limit options you will use for your affected 
source. In your initial compliance certification, you must notify the 
Administrator of your choice and after that, you must monitor and 
report compliance results accordingly. If you decide to change to other 
emission limit options, you are also required to notify the 
Administrator, as with other changes at the facility, as discussed in 
section VI of this preamble.

V. What Testing and Monitoring Must I Do?

    In addition to the specific testing and monitoring requirements 
specified below for the affected source, the rule adopts the testing 
requirements specified in Sec.  63.7 of 40 CFR part 63.

A. Test Methods and Procedures

    You may comply with the standards by applying materials meeting the 
organic HAP emission rate limits, by using capture and control 
equipment to reduce organic HAP emissions by 95 percent at existing 
affected sources and by 98 percent at new affected sources, or by using 
a combination of low-organic-HAP materials and capture and control 
equipment to meet the organic HAP emission rate limits.
    If you demonstrate compliance based on the coating materials 
applied on your web coating lines, you must determine the organic HAP 
content of materials applied using either EPA Method 311 of appendix A 
of 40 CFR part 63, an alternative method for determining the organic 
HAP content (but only after obtaining EPA approval), or the volatile 
organic content of the coating materials applied as the value for the 
organic HAP content. The volatile organic content must be determined by 
EPA Method 24 of appendix A of 40 CFR part 60 (or an approved 
alternative method). If you are demonstrating compliance by applying 
coating materials that meet the emission limit based on coating solids 
applied, the coating solids content of the materials must be determined 
using EPA Method 24.
    You may rely on formulation data to determine the organic HAP 
content, volatile matter content, or coating solids content as an 
alternative to performing Method 311 or Method 24 testing.
    To demonstrate compliance, you must calculate the average mass of 
organic HAP in the coating materials applied on the web coating lines 
and show that it is less than the organic HAP emission limits 
specified.
    If you use an emission capture and control system to comply with 
the standards, you must demonstrate that the overall control efficiency 
reduces total organic HAP emissions by at least 95 percent at existing 
sources and 98 percent at new sources. Alternatively, you may use 
capture and control equipment in combination with low-organic-HAP 
materials and demonstrate you meet one of the other organic HAP 
emission limits. To comply using this combined approach, you must 
determine the overall control efficiency of the capture and control 
equipment and the organic HAP content of the materials applied on the 
web coating lines. If you choose to demonstrate compliance with the 
emission limit based on coating solids applied, then you must also 
determine the coating solids content of each coating material used on 
the web coating lines. These values must be determined for each monthly 
period.
    To determine the capture system efficiency, you must either confirm 
that your capture system is a permanent total enclosure using EPA 
Method 204 of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M, in which case you may assume 
100 percent capture; or use EPA Methods 204A through F to measure 
capture efficiency. You may also use any capture efficiency protocol or 
test method that satisfies either the data quality objectives or lower 
confidence limit approach as described in appendix A of 40 CFR part 63, 
subpart KK.
    You must determine the emission destruction or removal efficiency 
of a control device by conducting a performance test or using a 
continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS). If you use a CEMS, you 
must determine the inlet and outlet concentration to calculate the 
control efficiency. The CEMS must comply with performance specification 
8 or 9 in 40 CFR part 60, appendix B.
    If you conduct a performance test, the destruction or removal 
efficiency of a control device must be determined based on three runs, 
each run lasting 1

[[Page 72334]]

hour. Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used for 
selection of the sampling sites. Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, or 2G of 40 
CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used to determine the gas volumetric 
flow rate. Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be 
used for gas analysis to determine dry molecular weight. Method 4 of 40 
CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used to determine stack moisture. 
Method 25 or 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used to 
determine organic volatile matter concentration, although the use of 
Method 25A is limited as detailed in the rule. Alternatively, any other 
test method or data that have been validated according to the 
applicable procedures in Method 301 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, may 
be used if approved by the Administrator.
    If you use a solvent recovery system to comply with the 
requirements of the rule, you may alternatively determine the overall 
control efficiency using a liquid-liquid material balance. If you 
demonstrate compliance by using the material balance, you must measure 
the amount of all coating materials applied during each month to the 
web coating lines and determine the volatile matter content of these 
materials. You must also measure the amount of volatile matter 
recovered by the solvent recovery system during the month and calculate 
the overall solvent recovery efficiency.
    If you so choose, you may also take into account any amount of 
organic HAP retained in the coated web or otherwise not emitted to the 
atmosphere, as discussed in section VII.C of this preamble. The final 
rule requires you to develop a testing protocol for determining the 
mass of volatile matter retained or otherwise not emitted to the 
atmosphere. This protocol would have to be submitted and approved as 
part of your site-specific test plan.
    The test methods we require, as discussed above, are existing EPA 
methods that are familiar to the industry, readily available, and 
appropriate to the device or the parameter being measured. The selected 
tests are expected to establish whether the facility is complying with 
the standards.

B. Monitoring Requirements

    According to paragraph (a)(3) of section 114 of the CAA, monitoring 
of stationary sources is required to determine the compliance status of 
the sources, and whether compliance is continuous or intermittent. For 
affected sources complying with the standards by using capture and 
control systems, initial compliance is determined through an initial 
performance test and ongoing compliance through continuous monitoring. 
We specify the operating parameters that need to be monitored for 
certain control devices used in the paper and other web coating 
industry (thermal and catalytic oxidizers). You must set the values of 
these parameters, which demonstrate compliance with the standards, 
during your initial performance test. These values are your ``operating 
limits.'' If future monitoring shows that capture and control equipment 
is operating outside the range of values established during the initial 
performance test, then you are deviating from the operating limits.
    If you use a capture and control system to meet the standards, you 
are required to develop and maintain a plan identifying the operating 
limit and monitoring procedures for the capture system. You must 
monitor in accordance with your plan.
    If you use a thermal or catalytic oxidizer to comply with the 
standards, you must monitor temperature using a continuous parameter 
monitoring system. If you use a thermal oxidizer to comply with the 
standards, you must establish the average combustion temperature 
recorded during the performance test as the operating limit. If you use 
a catalytic oxidizer to comply with the standards , you must establish 
as the operating limits the average inlet gas temperature and 
temperature rise across the catalyst bed recorded during the 
performance test. Alternatively, you may establish as the operating 
limits for a catalytic oxidizer the average gas temperature at the 
inlet of the catalyst bed and the average catalyst activity level.
    If you use a solvent recovery system to comply with the emission 
limits, you must conduct monthly liquid-liquid material balances or 
operate continuous emission monitors.

VI. What Notification, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements Must I 
Follow?

    The rule requires you to comply with notification, recordkeeping, 
and reporting requirements, generally as described in the General 
Provisions (see Table 2 of the rule) and specifically as designed to 
support demonstration of compliance with the rule. We believe that 
these requirements are necessary and sufficient to ensure that you 
comply with the requirements in the rule (40 CFR part 63 subpart JJJJ).

A. Initial Notification

    If the NESHAP apply to you, you must send an initial notification 
to the EPA Regional Office in the region where your facility is located 
and to your State agency. If you have an existing affected source, you 
must submit the initial notification no later than 1 year before the 
compliance date, which is December 5, 2005. If you have a new or 
reconstructed affected source, you must submit the notification no 
later than 120 days after either the date of initial start-up or 
December 4, 2002, whichever is later.
    The initial notification notifies us and your State agency that you 
have an existing affected source that is subject to the standards or 
that you have constructed a new affected source. Thus, it allows you 
and the Federal or State enforcement agency to plan for compliance 
activities. The General Provisions specify the information you must 
include in the initial notification and other reporting requirements 
for both existing affected sources and new or reconstructed affected 
sources.

B. Notification of Performance Tests

    If the rule applies to you, you will have several options for 
demonstrating compliance. If you demonstrate compliance by using a 
capture and control system to reduce HAP emissions, you must conduct a 
performance test as described in the rule. Prior to conducting the 
performance test, you must notify us or the delegated State or local 
agency at least 60 calendar days before the performance test is 
scheduled to begin, as indicated in the General Provisions.

C. Notification of Compliance Status

    You are required to send a notice of compliance status within 180 
days after the compliance date as specified in the General Provisions. 
This report must include your compliance certification, the results of 
any performance tests and monitoring, and a description of how you will 
demonstrate continuing compliance.
    In conformance with 40 CFR 63.9(h), the notification of compliance 
status must identify whether low-HAP materials, emission capture and 
control systems, or a combination of low-HAP materials and capture and 
control systems were used to comply with the standards. For capture and 
control systems, it must also identify the operating limits established 
during the performance test. Specific reporting requirements are 
dependent upon how you choose to comply with the standards.

D. Recordkeeping Requirements

    Records of the organic HAP, volatile organic content and solids 
content of

[[Page 72335]]

each coating applied, and the amount of each coating applied on paper 
and other web coating lines each month must be maintained to comply 
with the standards based on organic HAP content or organic HAP 
emissions on a mass basis.
    If capture and control technology is used, you are required to keep 
records of the equipment monitoring parameter measurements as specified 
in the final rule. You must also develop a start-up, shutdown, and 
malfunction plan. You would have to make the plan available for 
inspection if the Administrator requests to see it. It must stay in 
your records for the life of the affected source or until the source is 
no longer required to meet the standards.

E. Periodic Reports

    Each reporting year is divided into two semiannual reporting 
periods. If no deviations occur during a semiannual reporting period, 
you would submit a semiannual compliance report stating that the 
affected source has been in compliance. A deviation is any instance in 
which you fail to meet any requirement or obligation of the standards 
or any term or condition adopted to meet the standards. The following 
information would be required in semiannual compliance reports when 
deviations occur:
    [sbull] If you are complying by using add-on control devices, 
report all deviations from the control device operating parameters.
    [sbull] If you are complying by using solvent recovery systems and 
liquid-liquid material balance, report material balance calculations 
for all months when the material balances deviated from the emission 
limit.
    [sbull] If you are complying by using add-on controls or solvent 
recovery systems with continuous emission monitors, report all 
deviations from the operating parameter values established for the 
capture system and all deviations from the emission limit.
    [sbull] If you are complying by using low-HAP coating materials, 
report all deviations from the emission limit.
    [sbull] If you are complying by using a combination of capture and 
control systems with low-HAP coating materials, report all deviations 
from the emission limit and all deviations from operating parameters 
described above.
    You would also have to send us reports for each semiannual 
reporting period in which the following occur:
    [sbull] A change occurs at your facility or within your process 
that might affect its compliance status.
    [sbull] A change from what was reported in the initial notice 
occurs at your facility or within your process.
    [sbull] You decide to change to another emission limitation option.
    [sbull] You had a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of an emission 
control device during the semiannual period and the actions taken were 
consistent with your startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSMP).

VII. What Major Changes Have We Made to the Rule Since Proposal?

    We requested comments from the public on the proposed rule in 
general, as well as several specific areas. We received 28 comment 
letters from industry representatives, industry trade groups, and 
individuals. In response to these comments, we made several changes for 
the final rule. Many of these changes are clarifications designed to 
make our intentions clearer. However, some of the changes affect the 
requirements specified in the proposed rule. The more significant 
changes to the proposed rule are summarized in the following sections. 
Our complete responses to public comments for the final rule are 
contained in the document ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous 
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Source Category: Paper and Other Web 
Coating, Summary of Public Comments and Responses on the Proposed 
Rule'' (EPA-453/R-02-005).

A. Applicability

    Several comments were received on the potential applicability 
overlap between the proposed rule and other coating standards. The 
affected source section has been revised to exclude web coating lines 
subject to the Magnetic Tape Manufacturing NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart EE) and the Printing and Publishing NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart KK) from the requirements of the final rule (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart JJJJ). The affected source section has also been revised to 
exclude web coating lines that will be an affected source under the 
NESHAP for metal coil surface coating operations currently under 
development. The final rule has been revised to exclude web coating 
lines that are engaged in the coating of both fabric and other webs on 
the same fabric coating line and that will be an affected source under 
the NESHAP for fabric and other textiles printing, coating, and dyeing 
operations currently under development. Finally, the rule has been 
revised to clarify that certain web coating lines engaged in fabric 
coating for use in pressure sensitive tape and abrasive materials are 
part of the Paper and Other Web Coating source category. While most of 
these products are commonly produced using a paper web, product 
applications that require higher performance or unique characteristics 
may necessitate the use of a fabric web. The coating equipment, the 
coating solutions, and the emissions are essentially the same whether 
the coated web is fabric or paper. Therefore, we are regulating these 
web coating processes under today's final rule.

B. New Source Emission Limit

    We received a comment expressing doubt that new sources could 
consistently achieve 98 percent control efficiency using an oxidizer. 
The commenter stated that the data we used to develop the new source 
emission limit were based on short-term performance tests. Over the 
long term, according to the commenter, oxidizer performance can vary 
due to coating process variabilities. The commenter requested that we 
adopt the existing source control efficiency requirement of 95 percent 
for new sources. While the commenter did not explain what was meant by 
``coating process variabilities,'' we assumed that this was a reference 
to fluctuating organic HAP inlet concentrations during periods of 
reduced coating application. We recognize that oxidizer performance may 
decrease when the inlet concentration decreases. While we believe the 
98 percent organic HAP overall control efficiency for new sources is 
achievable based on information provided by the paper and other web 
coating industry, we added an alternative emission limit based on 
outlet organic HAP concentration that should account for any variable 
or low inlet concentrations. The MACT floor analysis for the rule 
determined that the emission control of the best controlled source in 
this category was 98 percent. Therefore, we have retained the 98 
percent overall control of organic HAP emissions for new affected 
sources. As stated in the preamble to the proposed rule (65 FR 55339), 
although some facilities reported more than 98 percent overall control 
of organic HAP emissions, this higher level of control may not be 
achievable on a continuous basis under all normal operating conditions 
applicable to new sources. In order to provide additional flexibility 
and ensure consistency with other coating-related NESHAP in 
development, we added an alternate emission limit based on outlet 
organic HAP concentration. Owners or operators of both existing and new 
affected sources using a thermal oxidizer to control organic HAP 
emissions may choose to operate the oxidizer such that

[[Page 72336]]

an outlet organic HAP concentration of no greater than 20 ppmv is 
achieved as long as 100 percent capture efficiency is achieved.
    The 20 ppmv by compound organic HAP limit is based on previous EPA 
studies of available oxidizer technology, cost, and energy use. The 
dual requirement of meeting a minimum control efficiency value or a 20 
ppmv by compound limit accounts for a fall-off of oxidizer efficiency 
at lower inlet concentrations. For example, if an inlet concentration 
is only 200 ppmv, even if an outlet concentration of 20 ppmv is 
achieved, the control efficiency is only 90 percent. This is less than 
the existing source limit of 95 percent and the new source limit of 98 
percent. We recognize this problem for oxidizers with low inlet 
concentrations and, consequently, have included the alternate 20 ppmv 
by compound organic HAP emission limit.
    Previous EPA studies have shown that new oxidizers can achieve the 
20 ppmv by compound emission limit even when the inlet organic HAP 
concentration is low. We believe that most existing oxidizers could 
also reach the emission limit with moderate adjustments. The combustion 
temperature and residence time used in the previous EPA studies to 
achieve the 20 ppmv by compound emission limit (870 degrees Celsius 
(1600 degrees Fahrenheit) and 0.75 second) are typical of the necessary 
operating conditions. We believe these operating conditions are 
achievable by both new and existing sources.

C. Solvent Retained in the Web

    Numerous commenters provided information concerning volatile 
materials that may be retained in the coated web even after the drying/
curing operation. Most of these commenters were concerned that a source 
using solvent recovery and demonstrating compliance by means of a 
liquid-liquid material balance would be at a disadvantage because the 
compliance demonstration procedures in the proposed rule assumed that 
all volatile materials in the coatings are emitted. Thus, the emissions 
would be overestimated when volatile material is retained in the coated 
web. The commenters requested that an ``as-emitted'' compliance option 
be added to the final rule.
    Volatile HAP may be retained in the web due to reactive coatings in 
which the volatiles are consumed or changed in a chemical reaction 
during the drying/curing operation, or where a portion of the volatiles 
is physically retained within the coated web. Volatile HAP may also be 
recovered from the web coating process and recycled, therefore, not 
being emitted to the atmosphere. Under the proposed rule, sources using 
solvent recovery devices and demonstrating compliance through the use 
of a liquid-liquid material balance would have no means of accounting 
for the volatile HAP retained in the coated web and not emitted to the 
atmosphere. Even a small percentage of volatile HAP retained in the 
coated web would restrict the ability of such a source to comply with 
the emission limitations in the proposed rule.
    In response to these comments, we have added paragraph (g) to Sec.  
63.3360, the performance testing section of the final rule. This 
paragraph allows a source to take into account the mass of volatile 
matter retained in the coated web after curing or drying, or otherwise 
not emitted to the atmosphere. It also requires the source to develop a 
testing protocol for determining the mass of volatile matter retained 
or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere. This protocol would have to 
be submitted and approved as part of a site-specific test plan. This 
added paragraph applies to any means of demonstrating compliance, not 
just liquid-liquid material balances.
    In conjunction with the new paragraph in Sec.  63.3360, we revised 
Equations 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14, and 15 of Sec.  63.3370 by adding a 
term (Mvret) to account for volatile matter not emitted from 
the coating operation. This term may be used to account for reactive 
coatings, volatile matter chemically bound in the dried coating, 
incomplete curing, or other situations. These modifications have the 
same effect as the commenters' request for adding an ``as-emitted'' 
compliance option.

D. Monitoring

    We received numerous comments indicating that the performance 
specifications (PS) for parameter monitoring of control devices were 
overly burdensome, particularly the temperature monitor requirements 
for oxidizers. While we believe the requirements in the proposed rule 
were appropriate, we have reviewed these requirements and made 
modifications where continuous compliance assurance will not be 
compromised. For example, the temperature monitor requirements for 
oxidizers no longer require monthly inspection of the electrical 
connections of the temperature monitoring system because we believe the 
industry adequately performs such monitoring in the absence of specific 
requirements as part of their routine maintenance. If you wish to 
monitor an alternative parameter for an oxidizer, or choose to use a 
control device other than an oxidizer, then you must apply for and 
receive approval of an alternative monitoring method under Sec.  
63.8(f) of the General Provisions. Through this procedure, you have the 
option of selecting monitoring appropriate to your specific facility 
that is the most efficient for your needs while still assuring that 
continuous compliance is maintained.
    A related change concerns control devices equipped with an 
automatic system that shuts down the control device when the 
temperature falls below the minimum set point. We received comments 
requesting that hourly averages of temperature readings not be required 
when such a system is installed. We agree that such a system is an 
adequate monitor of control device performance and will assure 
continuous compliance. The final rule specifies that you have the 
option of using such a system after receiving approval under Sec.  
63.8(f) of the General Provisions.
    We clarified the minimum data availability requirements for 
calculating a valid hourly value from continuous monitoring system 
data, as well as for calculating values for the 3-hour averages derived 
from the hourly values. These changes were in response to comments 
indicating that the proposed rule did not clearly indicate what 
constituted a valid set of data for an hourly reading.
    As an alternative to measuring the inlet temperature and 
temperature rise across the catalyst bed of a catalytic oxidizer to 
demonstrate continuous compliance, the rule includes a provision that 
allows you to monitor the temperature at the inlet to the catalyst bed 
and the catalyst activity level.
    The proposed rule did not take into account that some existing 
facilities may already have CEMS in place. In order to allow such a 
facility to use the CEMS for compliance purposes, a provision was added 
to the final rule which allows the use of CEMS to monitor the organic 
HAP concentration in an exhaust stream from an emission source that is 
controlled by means other than solvent recovery. However, in order to 
use the CEMS data for compliance purposes, the emission source must 
also be operated within a permanent total enclosure.

VIII. What Are the Environmental, Energy, and Economic Impacts of the 
Rule?

    We developed model facilities to represent the paper and other web 
coating industry based on the data we collected. We estimated 
environmental, energy, and economic impacts based upon what these 
modeled facilities must do to meet the rule. There are several options 
for demonstrating compliance

[[Page 72337]]

with these standards, and each facility has flexibility to adopt the 
compliance option which has the least economic impact for their 
individual situation. Most of the existing major source facilities in 
this industry apply solvent-based coatings and utilize thermal 
oxidation to reduce HAP emissions. Therefore, in estimating the impacts 
associated with the rule, we assumed that most facilities would install 
a permanent total enclosure and either install a new thermal oxidizer 
or upgrade the mechanical components of an existing one. If, instead, a 
facility complies with the rule by applying coatings that meet the 
emission limitation, the capital and operating costs and other impacts 
would be lower than estimated. Hence, the estimates presented below may 
overestimate the costs and other impacts as some facilities may comply 
with the rule by applying low-HAP coatings.

A. Emission Reductions

    For existing affected sources in the paper and other web coating 
industry (approximately 203 major sources), the nationwide baseline 
organic HAP emissions are estimated to be 35,000 Mg/yr (39,000 tpy). We 
estimate that implementation of the final rule would reduce emissions 
from existing major sources by approximately 29,000 Mg/yr (32,000 tpy), 
or approximately 80 percent.
    We have projected the growth of the paper and other web coating 
industry and anticipate that 32 new affected sources (individual 
facilities with one or more web coating lines) will be constructed over 
the next 5 years. In the absence of this rule, these new sources would 
be required to comply with the NSPS in 40 CFR part 60 for VOC. Because 
nearly all the VOC used by the paper and other web coating industry are 
also organic HAP, the NSPS would reduce organic HAP emissions as well 
as VOC emissions. Based on the analysis performed to develop model 
plants to assess the impacts of the proposed rule on the industry, it 
was determined that the NSPS represents a 90 percent reduction of 
organic HAP emissions. Therefore, this level of control was used to 
estimate the baseline organic HAP emissions for new sources (i.e., the 
level of emissions from new sources in the absence of this rule). We 
estimated that nationwide organic HAP baseline emissions from new 
sources will be about 2,800 Mg/yr (3,000 tpy). We estimate that 
implementation of the final rule will reduce emissions from new 
affected sources by about 2,300 Mg/yr (2,535 tpy), or approximately 80 
percent.

B. Secondary Environmental Impacts

    Secondary environmental impacts are considered to be any air, 
water, or solid waste impacts, positive or negative, associated with 
the implementation of the final standards. These impacts are exclusive 
of the direct organic HAP air emissions reductions discussed in the 
previous section.
    We estimate that more than 99 percent of the organic HAP emissions 
from paper and other web coating are VOC. Therefore, the capture and 
control of organic HAP that are presently emitted will result in a 
decrease in VOC emissions. Consequently, we estimate the current 
nationwide VOC emissions from the paper and other web coating source 
category to be at least 35,000 mg/yr (39,000 tpy), the nationwide 
organic HAP estimate. The emission controls for organic HAP will reduce 
non-HAP VOC emissions as well.
    Emissions of VOC have been associated with a variety of health and 
welfare impacts. The VOC emissions, together with nitrogen oxides, are 
precursors to the formation of ground-level ozone, or smog. Exposure to 
ambient ozone is responsible for a series of public health impacts, 
such as alterations in lung capacity and aggravation of existing 
respiratory disease. Ozone exposure can also damage forests and crops.
    The use of newly installed or upgraded control devices to meet the 
standards would result in greater electricity consumption. Increases in 
emissions of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and 
carbon dioxide, as well as certain HAP, from electric utilities could 
result. The operation of newly installed or upgraded control devices 
would also require combustion of supplemental fuel, typically natural 
gas, resulting in additional emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon 
monoxide, and carbon dioxide.
    It is expected that some paper and other web coating facilities 
will comply with the standards by substituting non-HAP materials for 
organic HAP presently in use. In some cases, the non-HAP materials may 
be VOC, however, in other cases, non-VOC materials (e.g., water) may be 
used. Facilities converting to waterborne materials as a means or 
partial means of compliance may have reduced Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act hazardous waste disposal if the status of the waste 
material changes from hazardous to nonhazardous. An increase in 
wastewater discharge may then occur if this waste material and 
waterborne wash up materials are discharged to publicly owned treatment 
works. However, we do not expect any significant increases in 
wastewater discharge to result from the standards.
    New and upgraded catalytic oxidizers will require catalysts. 
Catalyst life is estimated to be more than 10 years. Spent catalysts 
will represent a small amount of solid waste, and sometimes the spent 
catalyst will be regenerated by the manufacturer for reuse. Activated 
carbon used in solvent recovery systems is typically returned to the 
manufacturer at the end of its useful life and converted to other 
products. Little solid waste impact is expected from this.

C. Energy Impacts

    The operation of new and upgraded control devices will require 
additional energy. Capture of previously uncontrolled solvent-laden air 
will require fan horsepower. Operation of oxidizers, particularly 
thermal oxidizers, may require supplemental fuel (typically natural 
gas) to increase the combustion temperature and improve destruction 
efficiency.
    The total additional electrical energy required to meet the 
standards is estimated to be 313 million kilowatt-hours per year. 
Additional fuel requirements total 3.7 billion British thermal units 
per year. These fuel impacts are based on the use of thermal oxidizers 
at all facilities, which is the control scenario expected to result in 
the highest energy impacts.

D. Cost Impacts

    The total nationwide capital and annualized costs (1998 dollars) 
attributable to compliance with the standards have been estimated for 
existing and new affected sources. Costs are based on the use of 
permanent total enclosures, thermal oxidizers, and monitoring equipment 
(i.e., CEMS for solvent recovery systems). The capital costs with other 
methods of control (e.g., applying low-HAP coatings) are expected to be 
significantly lower.
    It is expected that any new facility using solvent-based coatings 
will install control systems to comply with applicable State and 
Federal regulations for reducing VOC emissions from this source 
category (e.g., the standards of performance for new stationary sources 
in 40 CFR part 60). The data we gathered on this industry indicate that 
thermal oxidation is the most common control technology installed to 
meet the requirements of these existing State and Federal regulations. 
Thermal oxidation is capable of achieving a 98 percent reduction of HAP 
emissions. Therefore, the additional costs to a new facility resulting 
from the standards were estimated based on the costs of

[[Page 72338]]

constructing a permanent total enclosure to deliver all HAP emissions 
to the existing thermal oxidizer.
    Capital costs would be incurred by installing capture and control 
systems at existing facilities presently without capture and control 
systems, and upgrading capture and control systems at existing 
facilities that do not meet the standards. Additionally, we estimated 
the cost for the purchase of monitoring equipment needed as a capital 
investment to meet the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting 
requirements of the standards. Total nationwide capital costs are 
estimated to be $222 million with the cost for existing sources and new 
sources estimated to be $204 million and $18 million, respectively.
    Total nationwide annualized costs of the standards have been 
estimated at $69 million with the annualized cost for existing and new 
sources estimated to be $64 million and $5 million, respectively. These 
costs include capital recovery over a 10-year period, operating costs 
for the newly installed and upgraded capture and control systems, and 
costs for monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting. These are net costs 
after taking into account the costs presently being incurred for the 
baseline control level.

E. Economic Impacts

    The economic impact analysis (EIA) shows that the expected price 
increases for affected output would range from only 0.1 to 1.1 percent 
as a result of the standards. The expected change in production of 
affected output is a reduction of 0.1 to 1.1 percent as a result of the 
standards. The economic impact analysis predicts three plant closures 
among the facilities included in the analysis. Although any facility 
closure is cause for concern, it should be noted that the baseline 
economic condition of the facilities predicted to close affects the 
closure estimate provided by the economic model. Facilities which are 
already experiencing adverse economic conditions for reasons 
unconnected to the final rule are more vulnerable to the impact of any 
new costs than those that are not. The facilities predicted to close 
appear to currently have low profitability levels. While the final rule 
may adversely impact the three facilities predicted to close, we do not 
predict an adverse economic impact to the industry as a whole.

IX. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), EPA 
must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order 
defines ``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to 
result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligation of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is 
therefore not subject to OMB review.

B. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any 
rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as 
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental 
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a 
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets 
both criteria, the EPA must evaluate the environmental health or safety 
effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned 
regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably 
feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that 
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has 
the potential to influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it is based on technology performance and 
not on an assessment of health or safety risks. Furthermore, the rule 
has been determined not to be ``economically significant'' as defined 
under Executive Order 12866.

C. Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' are defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    The final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does 
not apply to the rule. Although section 6 of Executive Order 13132 does 
not apply to the rule, EPA did consult with State and local officials 
to enable them to provide timely input in the development of the rule.

D. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' The final rule does not have 
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. No tribal 
governments own or operate paper and other web coating lines. Thus, 
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to the rule.

E. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, and Use

    The final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action 
under Executive Order 12866.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public

[[Page 72339]]

Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA 
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
1 year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement 
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify 
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt 
the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, 
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least 
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative if the 
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that 
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory 
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under 
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must 
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling 
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely 
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant 
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and 
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory 
requirements.
    The EPA has determined that the rule does not contain a Federal 
mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more to 
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private 
sector in any 1 year. The maximum total annual cost of the rule for any 
year has been estimated to be about $69 million. Thus, today's rule is 
not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. In 
addition, EPA has determined that the standards contains no regulatory 
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments because it contains no requirements that apply to such 
governments or impose obligations upon them. Therefore, today's rule is 
not subject to the requirements of section 203 of the UMRA.

G. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1966 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, et 
seq.

    The EPA has determined that it is not necessary to prepare a 
regulatory flexibility analysis in connection with the final rule. For 
purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small entities, 
small entity is defined as: (1) A small business ranging from 500 to 
750 employees, according to Small Business Administration size 
standards established under the NAICS for the industries affected by 
today's rule; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a 
government of a city, county, town, school district or special district 
with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization 
that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and 
operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's final rule on 
small entities, EPA has concluded that this action will not have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have 
determined that 50 of the 103 companies owning affected facilities are 
small businesses. Although small businesses represent 49 percent of the 
companies within the source category, they are expected to incur 25 
percent of the total industry compliance costs of $64 million. There 
are six small firms with compliance costs equal to or greater than 3 
percent of their sales. In addition, there are four small firms with 
cost-to-sales ratios between 1 and 3 percent.
    We performed an EIA to estimate the changes in product price and 
production quantities for the firms affected by the final rule. The 
analysis shows that of the 54 facilities owned by affected small firms, 
one would be expected to shut down rather than incur the cost of 
compliance with the final rule. Although any facility closure is cause 
for concern, it should be noted that the baseline economic condition of 
the facility predicted to close affects the closure estimate provided 
by the economic model. Facilities which are already experiencing 
adverse economic conditions for reasons unconnected to the rule are 
more vulnerable to the impact of any new costs than those that are not. 
The facility predicted to close appears to have low profitability 
levels currently. The EPA also notes that, while economies of scale 
will require individual small firms to pay a somewhat higher proportion 
of revenues than large firms for compliance, the burden on most small 
firms is quite low nevertheless. The median compliance cost is well 
below 1 percent of sales for both small and large firms affected by 
these standards (0.16 and 0.03 percent of sales for small and large 
firms, respectively).
    In summary, while a few small firms may experience significant 
impacts, there will not be a substantial number incurring such a 
burden. For more information, consult the docket for this project.

H. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection requirements in the rule have been 
submitted for approval to OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 
U.S.C. 3501, et seq. An Information Collection Request (ICR) document 
has been prepared by EPA (ICR No. 1951.02) and a copy may be obtained 
from Susan Auby by mail at the Collection Strategies Division (2822T), 
U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, by e-
mail at [email protected], or by calling (202) 566-1672. A copy may 
also be downloaded off the internet at http://www.epa.gov/icr. The 
information requirements are not effective until OMB approves them.
    The information requirements are based on notification, 
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements in the NESHAP General 
Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A), which are mandatory for all 
operators subject to national emission standards. These recordkeeping 
and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 
of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7414). All information submitted to EPA pursuant 
to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for which a claim of 
confidentiality is made is safeguarded according to Agency policies set 
forth in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B.
    The annual monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting burden for this 
collection (averaged over the first 3 years after the effective date of 
the rule) for existing web coating facilities is estimated to be 38,708 
labor hours at a total annual cost of $2,914,796. For new sources, the 
annual burden for the same 3-year period is estimated to be 2,754 labor 
hours at a total annual cost of $206,283. This estimate covers all 
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting activities, including a one-
time submission of a SSMP with semiannual reports for any event when 
the procedures in the plan were not followed; semiannual compliance 
reports; notifications; and recordkeeping. The total annual capital/
startup cost component (including purchase of services component) for

[[Page 72340]]

existing sources over the 3-year period is estimated to be $2,015,800. 
The annual operation and maintenance costs component for existing 
sources is estimated to be $649,779. For new sources, the estimated 
annual capital/startup cost component is $233,500 and the estimated 
annual operation and maintenance cost component is $28,520. Burden 
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by 
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 
information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed 
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and 
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and 
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to 
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; 
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; 
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; 
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR, chapter 15. The OMB 
control number for the information collection requirements in this rule 
will be listed in an amendment to 40 CFR part 9 in a subsequent Federal 
Register document after OMB approves the ICR.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    As noted in the proposed rule, section 12(d) of the National 
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 
104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use 
voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its regulatory activities unless 
to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise 
impractical. The VCS are technical standards (e.g., materials 
specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business 
practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The NTTAA 
directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the 
Agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS.
    The final rule involves technical standards. The EPA cites the 
following standards: EPA Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 3, 3A, 
3B, 4, 24, 25, 25A, 204, 204A through F, and 311; and PS 6, 8, and 9. 
Consistent with the NTTAA, EPA conducted searches to identify VCS in 
addition to these EPA methods/PS. No applicable VCS were identified for 
EPA Methods 1A, 2A, 2D, 2F, 2G, 204, 204A through F, and 311, and PS 6, 
8, and 9. The search and review results have been documented and are 
placed in docket A-99-09 for the rule.
    The VCS described below was identified as an acceptable alternative 
to EPA test methods for the purposes of the rule.
    The VCS ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses 
[Part 10, Instruments and Apparatus],'' is cited in the rule for its 
manual method for measuring the oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon 
monoxide content of exhaust gas. This part of ASME PTC 19.10-1981-Part 
10 is an acceptable alternative to Method 3B.
    Six VCS are already incorporated by reference (IBR) in EPA Method 
24: ASTM D1475-90, ASTM D2369-95, ASTM D3792-91, ASTM D4017-96a, ASTM 
D4457-85 (Reapproved 1991), and ASTM D5403-93. Five VCS are IBR in EPA 
Method 311: ASTM D1979-91, ASTM D3432-89, ASTM D4747-87, ASTM D4827-93, 
and ASTM PS9-94.
    In addition to the VCS EPA uses in the rule, the search for 
emissions measurement procedures identified 14 other VCS. The EPA 
determined that 11 of these 14 standards identified for measuring 
emissions of the HAP or surrogates subject to emission standards in the 
rule were impractical alternatives to EPA test methods for the purposes 
of the rule. Therefore, EPA does not intend to adopt these standards 
for this purpose. Three of the 14 VCS identified in this search were 
not available at the time the review was conducted for the purposes of 
the final rule.
    The VCS ASTM D3154-00, ``Standard Method for Average Velocity in a 
Duct (Pitot Tube Method),'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA 
Methods 1, 2, 2C, 3, 3B, and 4 for the purposes of the final rule since 
the standard appears to lack in quality control and quality assurance 
requirements. Specifically, ASTM D3154-00 does not include the 
following: (1) Proof that openings of standard pitot tube have not 
plugged during the test; (2) if differential pressure gauges other than 
inclined manometers (e.g., magnehelic gauges) are used, their 
calibration must be checked after each test series; and (3) the 
frequency and validity range for calibration of the temperature 
sensors.
    The VCS ASTM D3464-96 (2001), ``Standard Test Method Average 
Velocity in a Duct Using a Thermal Anemometer,'' is impractical as an 
alternative to EPA Method 2 for the purposes of the final rule 
primarily because applicability specifications are not clearly defined, 
e.g., range of gas composition, temperature limits. Also, the lack of 
supporting quality assurance data for the calibration procedures and 
specifications, and certain variability issues that are not adequately 
addressed by the standard limit EPA's ability to make a definitive 
comparison of the method in these areas.
    The VCS ISO 10780:1994, ``Stationary Source Emissions-Measurement 
of Velocity and Volume Flowrate of Gas Streams in Ducts,'' is 
impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 2 in the final rule. The 
standard recommends the use of an L-shaped pitot which historically has 
not been recommended by EPA. The EPA specifies the S-type design which 
has large openings that are less likely to plug up with dust.
    The VCS CAN/CSA Z223.2-M86(1986), ``Method for the Continuous 
Measurement of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Sulphur 
Dioxide, and Oxides of Nitrogen in Enclosed Combustion Flue Gas 
Streams,'' is unacceptable as a substitute for EPA Method 3A since it 
does not include quantitative specifications for measurement system 
performance, most notably the calibration procedures and instrument 
performance characteristics. The instrument performance characteristics 
that are provided are nonmandatory and also do not provide the same 
level of quality assurance as the EPA methods. For example, the zero 
and span/calibration drift is only checked weekly, whereas the EPA 
methods require drift checks after each run.
    Two very similar standards, ASTM D5835-95, ``Standard Practice for 
Sampling Stationary Source Emissions for Automated Determination of Gas 
Concentration,'' and ISO 10396:1993, ``Stationary Source Emissions: 
Sampling for the Automated Determination of Gas Concentrations,'' are 
impractical alternatives to EPA Method 3A for the purposes of the final 
rule because they lack in detail and quality assurance/quality control 
requirements. Specifically, these two standards do not include the 
following: (1) Sensitivity of the method; (2) acceptable levels of 
analyzer calibration error; (3) acceptable levels of sampling system 
bias; (4) zero drift and calibration drift limits, time span, and 
required testing frequency; (5) a method to test the interference 
response of the analyzer; (6) procedures to determine the minimum 
sampling time per run and minimum measurement time; and (7) 
specifications for data recorders in terms of resolution (all types) 
and recording intervals (digital and analog recorders, only).

[[Page 72341]]

    The VCS ISO 12039:2001, ``Stationary Source Emissions--
Determination of Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen--Automated 
Methods,'' is not acceptable as an alternative to EPA Method 3A. This 
ISO standard is similar to EPA Method 3A, but is missing some key 
features. In terms of sampling, the hardware required by ISO 12039:2001 
does not include a 3-way calibration valve assembly or equivalent to 
block the sample gas flow while calibration gases are introduced. In 
its calibration procedures, ISO 12039:2001 only specifies a two-point 
calibration while EPA Method 3A specifies a three-point calibration. 
Also, ISO 12039:2001 does not specify performance criteria for 
calibration error, calibration drift, or sampling system bias tests as 
in the EPA method, although checks of these quality control features 
are required by the ISO standard.
    The VCS ISO 11890-1 (2000) part 1, ``Paints and Varnishes--
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content-Difference 
Method,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA Method 24 because 
measured nonvolatile matter content can vary with experimental factors 
such as temperature, length of heating period, size of weighing dish, 
and size of sample. The standard ISO 11890-1 allows for different dish 
weights and sample sizes than the one size (58 millimeters in diameter 
and sample size of 0.5 gram) of EPA Method 24. The standard ISO 11890-1 
also allows for different oven temperatures and heating times depending 
on the type of coating, whereas EPA Method 24 requires 60 minutes 
heating at 110 degrees Celcius at all times. Because the EPA Method 24 
test conditions and procedures ``define'' volatile matter, ISO 11890-1 
is unacceptable as an alternative because of its different test 
conditions.
    The VCS ISO 11890-2 (2000) part 2, ``Paints and Varnishes--
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content-Gas 
Chromatographic Method,'' is impractical as an alternative to EPA 
Method 24 because ISO 11890-2 only measures the VOC added to the 
coating and would not measure any VOC generated from the curing of the 
coating. The EPA Method 24 does measure ``cure'' VOC which can be 
significant in some cases and, therefore, ISO 11890-2 is not an 
acceptable alternative to this EPA method.
    Two VCS, EN 12619:1999 ``Stationary Source Emissions--Determination 
of the Mass Concentration of Total Gaseous Organic Carbon at Low 
Concentrations in Flue Gases--Continuous Flame Ionization Detector 
Method'' and ISO 14965:2000(E) ``Air Quality-Determination of Total 
Nonmethane Organic Compounds--Cryogenic Preconcentration and Direct 
Flame Ionization Method,'' are impractical alternatives to EPA Method 
25 and 25A for the purposes of the final rule because the standards do 
not apply to solvent process vapors in concentrations greater than 40 
parts per million (ppm) (EN 12619) and 10 ppm carbon (ISO 14965). 
Methods whose upper limits are this low are too limited to be useful in 
measuring source emissions, which are expected to be much higher.
    Three of the 14 VCS identified in this search were not available at 
the time the review was conducted for the purposes of the final rule 
because they are under development by a VCS body: ASME/BSR MFC 13M, 
``Flow Measurement by Velocity Traverse,'' for EPA Method 2 (and 
possibly 1); ASME/BSR MFC 12M, ``Flow in Closed Conduits Using 
Multiport Averaging Pitot Primary Flowmeters,'' for EPA Method 2; and 
ISO/CD 17895, ``Paints and Varnishes-Determination of the Volatile 
Organic Compound Content of Water-based Emulsion Paints,'' for EPA 
Method 24.
    Sections 63.3320 and 63.3360 of the final rule list the EPA testing 
methods and PS included in the final rule. Under Sec. Sec.  63.7(f) and 
63.8(f) of subpart A of the General Provisions, a source may apply to 
EPA for permission to use alternative test methods or alternative 
monitoring requirements in place of any of the EPA testing methods, PS, 
or procedures.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by 
the SBREFA, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the 
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes 
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report 
containing the rule and other required information to the United States 
Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the Comptroller 
General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the 
Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after 
it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rule will be effective 
December 4, 2002.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous 
substances, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 8, 2002.
Christine T. Whitman,
Administrator.

    For reasons set out in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63 
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 63--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C., 7401, et seq.


    2. Part 63 is amended by revising Sec.  63.14(i). The revision 
reads as follows:


Sec.  63.14  Incorporations by reference.

* * * * *
    (i) The following material is available for purchase from at least 
one of the following addresses: ASME International, Orders/Inquiries, 
P.O. Box 2300, Fairfield, NJ 07007-2300; or Global Engineering 
Documents, Sales Department, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 
80112: ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 
10, Instruments and Apparatus],'' IBR approved for Sec.  
63.3360(e)(1)(iii), Sec.  63.4166(a)(3), and Sec.  63.5160(d)(1)(iii).
* * * * *

    3. Part 63 is amended by adding subpart JJJJ to read as follows:

Subpart JJJJ--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants: Paper and Other Web Coating

Sec.

What This Subpart Covers

63.3280 What is in this subpart?
63.3290 Does this subpart apply to me?
63.3300 Which of my emission sources are affected by this subpart?
63.3310 What definitions are used in this subpart?

Emission Standards and Compliance Dates

63.3320 What emission standards must I meet?
63.3321 What operating limits must I meet?
63.3330 When must I comply?

General Requirements for Compliance With the Emission Standards and for 
Monitoring and Performance Tests

63.3340 What general requirements must I meet to comply with the 
standards?
63.3350 If I use a control device to comply with the emission 
standards what monitoring must I do?
63.3360 What performance tests must I conduct?

Requirements for Showing Compliance

63.3370 How do I demonstrate compliance with the emission standards?

[[Page 72342]]

Notifications, Reports, and Records

63.3400 What notifications and reports must I submit?
63.3410 What records must I keep?

Delegation of Authority

63.3420 What authorities may be delegated to the States?

Tables to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63

Table 1 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63. Operating Limits if Using Add-On 
Control Devices and Capture System
Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63. Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63 
General Provisions to Subpart JJJJ

What This Subpart Covers


63.3280  What is in this subpart?

    This subpart describes the actions you must take to reduce 
emissions of organic hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from paper and 
other web coating operations. This subpart establishes emission 
standards for web coating lines and specifies what you must do to 
comply if you own or operate a facility with web coating lines that is 
a major source of HAP. Certain requirements apply to all who are 
subject to this subpart; others depend on the means you use to comply 
with an emission standard.


Sec.  63.3290  Does this subpart apply to me?

    The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing 
facility that is a major source of HAP, as defined in Sec.  63.2, at 
which web coating lines are operated.


Sec.  63.3300  Which of my emission sources are affected by this 
subpart?

    The affected source subject to this subpart is the collection of 
all web coating lines at your facility. This includes web coating lines 
engaged in the coating of metal webs that are used in flexible 
packaging, and web coating lines engaged in the coating of fabric 
substrates for use in pressure sensitive tape and abrasive materials. 
Web coating lines specified in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this 
section are not part of the affected source of this subpart.
    (a) Any web coating line that is stand-alone coating equipment 
under subpart KK of this part (national emission standards for the 
printing and publishing industry) which the owner or operator includes 
in the affected source under subpart KK.
    (b) Any web coating line that is a product and packaging 
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press under subpart KK of this 
part (national emission standards for the printing and publishing 
industry) which is included in the affected source under subpart KK.
    (c) Web coating in lithography, screenprinting, letterpress, and 
narrow-web flexographic printing processes.
    (d) Any web coating line subject to subpart EE of this part 
(national emission standards for magnetic tape manufacturing 
operations).
    (e) Any web coating line that will be subject to the national 
emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for surface 
coating of metal coil currently under development.
    (f) Any web coating line that will be subject to the NESHAP for the 
printing, coating, and dyeing of fabric and other textiles currently 
under development. This would include any web coating line that coats 
both a paper or other web substrate and a fabric or other textile 
substrate, except for a fabric substrate used for pressure sensitive 
tape and abrasive materials.
    (g) Any web coating line that is defined as research or laboratory 
equipment in Sec.  63.3310.


Sec.  63.3310  What definitions are used in this subpart?

    All terms used in this subpart that are not defined in this section 
have the meaning given to them in the Clean Air Act (CAA) and in 
subpart A of this part.
    Always-controlled work station means a work station associated with 
a dryer from which the exhaust is delivered to a control device with no 
provision for the dryer exhaust to bypass the control device unless 
there is an interlock to interrupt and prevent continued coating during 
a bypass. Sampling lines for analyzers, relief valves needed for safety 
purposes, and periodic cycling of exhaust dampers to ensure safe 
operation are not considered bypass lines.
    Applied means, for the purposes of this subpart, the amount of 
organic HAP, coating material, or coating solids (as appropriate for 
the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320(b)) used by the affected source 
during the compliance period.
    As-applied means the condition of a coating at the time of 
application to a substrate, including any added solvent.
    As-purchased means the condition of a coating as delivered to the 
user.
    Capture efficiency means the fraction of all organic HAP emissions 
generated by a process that is delivered to a control device, expressed 
as a percentage.
    Capture system means a hood, enclosed room, or other means of 
collecting organic HAP emissions into a closed-vent system that 
exhausts to a control device.
    Car-seal means a seal that is placed on a device that is used to 
change the position of a valve or damper (e.g., from open to closed) in 
such a way that the position of the valve or damper cannot be changed 
without breaking the seal.
    Coating material(s) means all inks, varnishes, adhesives, primers, 
solvents, reducers, and other coating materials applied to a substrate 
via a web coating line. Materials used to form a substrate are not 
considered coating materials.
    Control device means a device such as a solvent recovery device or 
oxidizer which reduces the organic HAP in an exhaust gas by recovery or 
by destruction.
    Control device efficiency means the ratio of organic HAP emissions 
recovered or destroyed by a control device to the total organic HAP 
emissions that are introduced into the control device, expressed as a 
percentage.
    Day means a 24-consecutive-hour period.
    Deviation means any instance in which an affected source, subject 
to this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this 
subpart including, but not limited to, any emission limitation 
(including any operating limit) or work practice standard;
    (2) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to 
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is 
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to 
obtain such a permit; or
    (3) Fails to meet any emission limitation (including any operating 
limit) or work practice standard in this subpart during start-up, 
shutdown, or malfunction, regardless of whether or not such failure is 
permitted by this subpart.
    Existing affected source means any affected source the construction 
or reconstruction of which is commenced on or before September 13, 
2000, and has not undergone reconstruction as defined in Sec.  63.2.
    Fabric means any woven, knitted, plaited, braided, felted, or non-
woven material made of filaments, fibers, or yarns including thread. 
This term includes material made of fiberglass, natural fibers, 
synthetic fibers, or composite materials.
    Facility means all contiguous or adjoining property that is under 
common ownership or control, including properties that are separated 
only by a road or other public right-of-way.
    Flexible packaging means any package or part of a package the shape 
of which can be readily changed. Flexible packaging includes, but is 
not limited to, bags, pouches, labels, liners

[[Page 72343]]

and wraps utilizing paper, plastic, film, aluminum foil, metalized or 
coated paper or film, or any combination of these materials.
    Formulation data means data on the organic HAP mass fraction, 
volatile matter mass fraction, or coating solids mass fraction of a 
material that is generated by the manufacturer or means other than a 
test method specified in this subpart or an approved alternative 
method.
    HAP means hazardous air pollutants.
    HAP applied means the organic HAP content of all coating materials 
applied to a substrate by a web coating line at an affected source.
    Intermittently-controlled work station means a work station 
associated with a dryer with provisions for the dryer exhaust to be 
delivered to or diverted from a control device through a bypass line, 
depending on the position of a valve or damper. Sampling lines for 
analyzers, relief valves needed for safety purposes, and periodic 
cycling of exhaust dampers to ensure safe operation are not considered 
bypass lines.
    Metal coil means a continuous metal strip that is at least 0.15 
millimeter (0.006 inch) thick which is packaged in a roll or coil prior 
to coating. After coating, it may or may not be rewound into a roll or 
coil. Metal coil does not include metal webs that are coated for use in 
flexible packaging.
    Month means a calendar month or a pre-specified period of 28 days 
to 35 days to allow for flexibility in recordkeeping when data are 
based on a business accounting period.
    Never-controlled work station means a work station that is not 
equipped with provisions by which any emissions, including those in the 
exhaust from any associated dryer, may be delivered to a control 
device.
    New affected source means any affected source the construction or 
reconstruction of which is commenced after September 13, 2000.
    Overall organic HAP control efficiency means the total efficiency 
of a capture and control system.
    Pressure sensitive tape means a flexible backing material with a 
pressure-sensitive adhesive coating on one or both sides of the 
backing. Examples include, but are not limited to, duct/duct insulation 
tape and medical tape.
    Research or laboratory equipment means any equipment for which the 
primary purpose is to conduct research and development into new 
processes and products where such equipment is operated under the close 
supervision of technically trained personnel and is not engaged in the 
manufacture of products for commercial sale in commerce except in a de 
minimis manner.
    Rewind or cutting station means a unit from which substrate is 
collected at the outlet of a web coating line.
    Uncontrolled coating line means a coating line consisting of only 
never-controlled work stations.
    Unwind or feed station means a unit from which substrate is fed to 
a web coating line.
    Web means a continuous substrate (e.g., paper, film, foil) which is 
flexible enough to be wound or unwound as rolls.
    Web coating line means any number of work stations, of which one or 
more applies a continuous layer of coating material across the entire 
width or any portion of the width of a web substrate, and any 
associated curing/drying equipment between an unwind or feed station 
and a rewind or cutting station.
    Work station means a unit on a web coating line where coating 
material is deposited onto a web substrate.

Emission Standards and Compliance Dates


Sec.  63.3320  What emission standards must I meet?

    (a) If you own or operate any affected source that is subject to 
the requirements of this subpart, you must comply with these 
requirements on and after the compliance dates as specified in Sec.  
63.3330.
    (b) You must limit organic HAP emissions to the level specified in 
paragraph (b)(1), (2), (3), or (4) of this section.
    (1) No more than 5 percent of the organic HAP applied for each 
month (95 percent reduction) at existing affected sources, and no more 
than 2 percent of the organic HAP applied for each month (98 percent 
reduction) at new affected sources; or
    (2) No more than 4 percent of the mass of coating materials applied 
for each month at existing affected sources, and no more than 1.6 
percent of the mass of coating materials applied for each month at new 
affected sources; or
    (3) No more than 20 percent of the mass of coating solids applied 
for each month at existing affected sources, and no more than 8 percent 
of the coating solids applied for each month at new affected sources.
    (4) If you use an oxidizer to control organic HAP emissions, 
operate the oxidizer such that an outlet organic HAP concentration of 
no greater than 20 parts per million by volume (ppmv) by compound on a 
dry basis is achieved and the efficiency of the capture system is 100 
percent.
    (c) You must demonstrate compliance with this subpart by following 
the procedures in Sec.  63.3370.


Sec.  63.3321  What operating limits must I meet?

    (a) For any web coating line or group of web coating lines for 
which you use add-on control devices, unless you use a solvent recovery 
system and conduct a liquid-liquid material balance, you must meet the 
operating limits specified in Table 1 to this subpart or according to 
paragraph (b) of this section. These operating limits apply to emission 
capture systems and control devices, and you must establish the 
operating limits during the performance test according to the 
requirements in Sec.  63.3360(e)(3). You must meet the operating limits 
at all times after you establish them.
    (b) If you use an add-on control device other than those listed in 
Table 1 to this subpart or wish to monitor an alternative parameter and 
comply with a different operating limit, you must apply to the 
Administrator for approval of alternative monitoring under Sec.  
63.8(f).


Sec.  63.3330  When must I comply?

    (a) If you own or operate an existing affected source subject to 
the provisions of this subpart, you must comply by the compliance date. 
The compliance date for existing affected sources in this subpart is 
December 5, 2005. You must complete any performance test required in 
Sec.  63.3360 within the time limits specified in Sec.  63.7(a)(2).
    (b) If you own or operate a new affected source subject to the 
provisions of this subpart, your compliance date is immediately upon 
start-up of the new affected source or by December 4, 2002, whichever 
is later. You must complete any performance test required in Sec.  
63.3360 within the time limits specified in Sec.  63.7(a)(2).
    (c) If you own or operate a reconstructed affected source subject 
to the provisions of this subpart, your compliance date is immediately 
upon startup of the affected source or by December 4, 2002, whichever 
is later. Existing affected sources which have undergone reconstruction 
as defined in Sec.  63.2 are subject to the requirements for new 
affected sources. The costs associated with the purchase and 
installation of air pollution control equipment are not considered in 
determining whether the existing affected source has been 
reconstructed. Additionally, the costs of retrofitting and replacing of 
equipment that is installed specifically to comply with this subpart 
are not considered reconstruction costs. You must

[[Page 72344]]

complete any performance test required in Sec.  63.3360 within the time 
limits specified in Sec.  63.7(a)(2).

General Requirements for Compliance With the Emission Standards and for 
Monitoring and Performance Tests


Sec.  63.3340  What general requirements must I meet to comply with the 
standards?

    Table 2 to this subpart specifies the provisions of subpart A of 
this part that apply if you are subject to this subpart, such as 
startup, shutdown, and malfunction plans (SSMP) in Sec.  63.6(e)(3) for 
affected sources using a control device to comply with the emission 
standards.


Sec.  63.3350  If I use a control device to comply with the emission 
standards, what monitoring must I do?

    (a) A summary of monitoring you must do follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 If you operate a web coating
line, and have the following:                Then you must:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Intermittently-controlled  Record parameters related to possible
 work stations.                 exhaust flow bypass of control device
                                and to coating use (Sec.   63.3350(c)).
(2) Solvent recovery unit....  Operate continuous emission monitoring
                                system and perform quarterly audits or
                                determine volatile matter recovered and
                                conduct a liquid-liquid material balance
                                (Sec.   63.3350(d)).
(3) Control Device...........  Operate continuous parameter monitoring
                                system (Sec.   63.3350(e)).
(4) Capture system...........  Monitor capture system operating
                                parameter (Sec.   63.3350(f)).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Following the date on which the initial performance test of a 
control device is completed to demonstrate continuing compliance with 
the standards, you must monitor and inspect each capture system and 
each control device used to comply with Sec.  63.3320. You must install 
and operate the monitoring equipment as specified in paragraphs (c) and 
(f) of this section.
    (c) Bypass and coating use monitoring. If you own or operate web 
coating lines with intermittently-controlled work stations, you must 
monitor bypasses of the control device and the mass of each coating 
material applied at the work station during any such bypass. If using a 
control device for complying with the requirements of this subpart, you 
must demonstrate that any coating material applied on a never-
controlled work station or an intermittently-controlled work station 
operated in bypass mode is allowed in your compliance demonstration 
according to Sec.  63.3370(n) and (o). The bypass monitoring must be 
conducted using at least one of the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1) 
through (4) of this section for each work station and associated dryer.
    (1) Flow control position indicator. Install, calibrate, maintain, 
and operate according to the manufacturer's specifications a flow 
control position indicator that provides a record indicating whether 
the exhaust stream from the dryer was directed to the control device or 
was diverted from the control device. The time and flow control 
position must be recorded at least once per hour as well as every time 
the flow direction is changed. A flow control position indicator must 
be installed at the entrance to any bypass line that could divert the 
exhaust stream away from the control device to the atmosphere.
    (2) Car-seal or lock-and-key valve closures. Secure any bypass line 
valve in the closed position with a car-seal or a lock-and-key type 
configuration. A visual inspection of the seal or closure mechanism 
must be performed at least once every month to ensure that the valve or 
damper is maintained in the closed position, and the exhaust stream is 
not diverted through the bypass line.
    (3) Valve closure continuous monitoring. Ensure that any bypass 
line valve or damper is in the closed position through continuous 
monitoring of valve position when the emission source is in operation 
and is using a control device for compliance with the requirements of 
this subpart. The monitoring system must be inspected at least once 
every month to verify that the monitor will indicate valve position.
    (4) Automatic shutdown system. Use an automatic shutdown system in 
which the web coating line is stopped when flow is diverted away from 
the control device to any bypass line when the control device is in 
operation. The automatic system must be inspected at least once every 
month to verify that it will detect diversions of flow and would shut 
down operations in the event of such a diversion.
    (d) Solvent recovery unit. If you own or operate a solvent recovery 
unit to comply with Sec.  63.3320, you must meet the requirements in 
either paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of this section depending on how control 
efficiency is determined.
    (1) Continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS). If you are 
demonstrating compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320 
through continuous emission monitoring of a control device, you must 
install, calibrate, operate, and maintain the CEMS according to 
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section.
    (i) Measure the total organic volatile matter mass flow rate at 
both the control device inlet and the outlet such that the reduction 
efficiency can be determined. Each continuous emission monitor must 
comply with performance specification 6, 8, or 9 of 40 CFR part 60, 
appendix B, as appropriate.
    (ii) You must follow the quality assurance procedures in procedure 
1, appendix F of 40 CFR part 60. In conducting the quarterly audits of 
the monitors as required by procedure 1, appendix F, you must use 
compounds representative of the gaseous emission stream being 
controlled.
    (iii) You must have valid data from at least 90 percent of the 
hours during which the process is operated.
    (2) Liquid-liquid material balance. If you are demonstrating 
compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320 through liquid-
liquid material balance, you must install, calibrate, maintain, and 
operate according to the manufacturer's specifications a device that 
indicates the cumulative amount of volatile matter recovered by the 
solvent recovery device on a monthly basis. The device must be 
certified by the manufacturer to be accurate to within +/-2.0 percent 
by mass.
    (e) Continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS). If you are using 
a control device to comply with the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320, you must install, operate, and maintain each CPMS specified in 
paragraphs (e)(9) and (10) and (f) of this section according to the 
requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) through (8) of this section. You must 
install, operate, and maintain each CPMS specified in paragraph (c) of 
this section according to paragraphs (e)(5) through (7) of this 
section.

[[Page 72345]]

    (1) Each CPMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation for 
each successive 15-minute period. You must have a minimum of four 
equally spaced successive cycles of CPMS operation to have a valid hour 
of data.
    (2) You must have valid data from at least 90 percent of the hours 
during which the process operated.
    (3) You must determine the hourly average of all recorded readings 
according to paragraphs (e)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.
    (i) To calculate a valid hourly value, you must have at least three 
of four equally spaced data values from that hour from a continuous 
monitoring system (CMS) that is not out-of-control.
    (ii) Provided all of the readings recorded in accordance with 
paragraph (e)(3) of this section clearly demonstrate continuous 
compliance with the standard that applies to you, then you are not 
required to determine the hourly average of all recorded readings.
    (4) You must determine the rolling 3-hour average of all recorded 
readings for each operating period. To calculate the average for each 
3-hour averaging period, you must have at least two of three of the 
hourly averages for that period using only average values that are 
based on valid data (i.e., not from out-of-control periods).
    (5) You must record the results of each inspection, calibration, 
and validation check of the CPMS.
    (6) At all times, you must maintain the monitoring system in proper 
working order including, but not limited to, maintaining necessary 
parts for routine repairs of the monitoring equipment.
    (7) Except for monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, or 
required quality assurance or control activities (including calibration 
checks or required zero and span adjustments), you must conduct all 
monitoring at all times that the unit is operating. Data recorded 
during monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, out-of-control 
periods, or required quality assurance or control activities shall not 
be used for purposes of calculating the emissions concentrations and 
percent reductions specified in Sec.  63.3370. You must use all the 
valid data collected during all other periods in assessing compliance 
of the control device and associated control system. A monitoring 
malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable 
failure of the monitoring system to provide valid data. Monitoring 
failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless 
operation are not malfunctions.
    (8) Any averaging period for which you do not have valid monitoring 
data and such data are required constitutes a deviation, and you must 
notify the Administrator in accordance with Sec.  63.3400(c).
    (9) Oxidizer. If you are using an oxidizer to comply with the 
emission standards, you must comply with paragraphs (e)(9)(i) through 
(iii) of this section.
    (i) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate temperature 
monitoring equipment according to the manufacturer's specifications. 
The calibration of the chart recorder, data logger, or temperature 
indicator must be verified every 3 months or the chart recorder, data 
logger, or temperature indicator must be replaced. You must replace the 
equipment whether you choose not to perform the calibration or the 
equipment cannot be calibrated properly.
    (ii) For an oxidizer other than a catalytic oxidizer, install, 
calibrate, operate, and maintain a temperature monitoring device 
equipped with a continuous recorder. The device must have an accuracy 
of +/-1 percent of the temperature being monitored in degrees Celsius, 
or +/-1[deg] Celsius, whichever is greater. The thermocouple or 
temperature sensor must be installed in the combustion chamber at a 
location in the combustion zone.
    (iii) For a catalytic oxidizer, install, calibrate, operate, and 
maintain a temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous 
recorder. The device must be capable of monitoring temperature with an 
accuracy of +/-1 percent of the temperature being monitored in degrees 
Celsius or +/- 1 degree Celsius, whichever is greater. The thermocouple 
or temperature sensor must be installed in the vent stream at the 
nearest feasible point to the inlet and outlet of the catalyst bed. 
Calculate the temperature rise across the catalyst.
    (10) Other types of control devices. If you use a control device 
other than an oxidizer or wish to monitor an alternative parameter and 
comply with a different operating limit, you must apply to the 
Administrator for approval of an alternative monitoring method under 
Sec.  63.8(f).
    (f) Capture system monitoring. If you are complying with the 
emission standards in Sec.  63.3320 through the use of a capture system 
and control device for one or more web coating lines, you must develop 
a site-specific monitoring plan containing the information specified in 
paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this section for these capture systems. 
You must monitor the capture system in accordance with paragraph (f)(3) 
of this section. You must make the monitoring plan available for 
inspection by the permitting authority upon request.
    (1) The monitoring plan must:
    (i) Identify the operating parameter to be monitored to ensure that 
the capture efficiency determined during the initial compliance test is 
maintained; and
    (ii) Explain why this parameter is appropriate for demonstrating 
ongoing compliance; and
    (iii) Identify the specific monitoring procedures.
    (2) The monitoring plan must specify the operating parameter value 
or range of values that demonstrate compliance with the emission 
standards in Sec.  63.3320. The specified operating parameter value or 
range of values must represent the conditions present when the capture 
system is being properly operated and maintained.
    (3) You must conduct all capture system monitoring in accordance 
with the plan.
    (4) Any deviation from the operating parameter value or range of 
values which are monitored according to the plan will be considered a 
deviation from the operating limit.
    (5) You must review and update the capture system monitoring plan 
at least annually.


Sec.  63.3360  What performance tests must I conduct?

    (a) The performance test methods you must conduct are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 If you control organic HAP on any
individual web coating line or any                You must:
  group of web coating lines by:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Limiting organic HAP or          Determine the organic HAP or
 volatile matter content of          volatile matter and coating solids
 coatings.                           content of coating materials
                                     according to procedures in Sec.
                                     63.3360(c) and (d). If applicable,
                                     determine the mass of volatile
                                     matter retained in the coated web
                                     or otherwise not emitted to the
                                     atmosphere according to Sec.
                                     63.3360(g).

[[Page 72346]]

 
(2) Using a capture and control      Conduct a performance test for each
 system.                             capture and control system to
                                     determine: the destruction or
                                     removal efficiency of each control
                                     device other than solvent recovery
                                     according to Sec.   63.3360(e), and
                                     the capture efficiency of each
                                     capture system according to Sec.
                                     63.3360(f). If applicable,
                                     determine the mass of volatile
                                     matter retained in the coated web
                                     or otherwise not emitted to the
                                     atmosphere according to Sec.
                                     63.3360(g).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) If you are using a control device to comply with the emission 
standards in Sec.  63.3320, you are not required to conduct a 
performance test to demonstrate compliance if one or more of the 
criteria in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section are met.
    (1) The control device is equipped with continuous emission 
monitors for determining inlet and outlet total organic volatile matter 
concentration and capture efficiency has been determined in accordance 
with the requirements of this subpart such that an overall organic HAP 
control efficiency can be calculated, and the continuous emission 
monitors are used to demonstrate continuous compliance in accordance 
with Sec.  63.3350; or
    (2) You have met the requirements of Sec.  63.7(h) (for waiver of 
performance testing; or
    (3) The control device is a solvent recovery system and you comply 
by means of a monthly liquid-liquid material balance.
    (c) Organic HAP content. If you determine compliance with the 
emission standards in Sec.  63.3320 by means other than determining the 
overall organic HAP control efficiency of a control device, you must 
determine the organic HAP mass fraction of each coating material ``as-
purchased'' by following one of the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1) 
through (3) of this section, and determine the organic HAP mass 
fraction of each coating material ``as-applied'' by following the 
procedures in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. If the organic HAP 
content values are not determined using the procedures in paragraphs 
(c)(1) through (3) of this section, the owner or operator must submit 
an alternative test method for determining their values for approval by 
the Administrator in accordance with Sec.  63.7(f). The recovery 
efficiency of the test method must be determined for all of the target 
organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, must be determined 
and applied.
    (1) Method 311. You may test the coating material in accordance 
with Method 311 of appendix A of this part. The Method 311 
determination may be performed by the manufacturer of the coating 
material and the results provided to the owner or operator. The organic 
HAP content must be calculated according to the criteria and procedures 
in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section.
    (i) Include each organic HAP determined to be present at greater 
than or equal to 0.1 mass percent for Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration (OSHA)-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR 
1910.1200(d)(4) and greater than or equal to 1.0 mass percent for other 
organic HAP compounds.
    (ii) Express the mass fraction of each organic HAP you include 
according to paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section as a value truncated 
to four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.3791).
    (iii) Calculate the total mass fraction of organic HAP in the 
tested material by summing the counted individual organic HAP mass 
fractions and truncating the result to three places after the decimal 
point (for example, 0.763).
    (2) Method 24. For coatings, determine the volatile organic content 
as mass fraction of nonaqueous volatile matter and use it as a 
substitute for organic HAP using Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix 
A. The Method 24 determination may be performed by the manufacturer of 
the coating and the results provided to you.
    (3) Formulation data. You may use formulation data to determine the 
organic HAP mass fraction of a coating material. Formulation data may 
be provided to the owner or operator by the manufacturer of the 
material. In the event of an inconsistency between Method 311 (appendix 
A of 40 CFR part 63) test data and a facility's formulation data, and 
the Method 311 test value is higher, the Method 311 data will govern. 
Formulation data may be used provided that the information represents 
all organic HAP present at a level equal to or greater than 0.1 percent 
for OSHA-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(4) and 
equal to or greater than 1.0 percent for other organic HAP compounds in 
any raw material used.
    (4) As-applied organic HAP mass fraction. If the as-purchased 
coating material is applied to the web without any solvent or other 
material added, then the as-applied organic HAP mass fraction is equal 
to the as-purchased organic HAP mass fraction. Otherwise, the as-
applied organic HAP mass fraction must be calculated using Equation 1a 
of Sec.  63.3370.
    (d) Volatile organic and coating solids content. If you determine 
compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320 by means other 
than determining the overall organic HAP control efficiency of a 
control device and you choose to use the volatile organic content as a 
surrogate for the organic HAP content of coatings, you must determine 
the as-purchased volatile organic content and coating solids content of 
each coating material applied by following the procedures in paragraph 
(d)(1) or (2) of this section, and the as-applied volatile organic 
content and coating solids content of each coating material by 
following the procedures in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
    (1) Method 24. You may determine the volatile organic and coating 
solids mass fraction of each coating applied using Method 24 (40 CFR 
part 60, appendix A.) The Method 24 determination may be performed by 
the manufacturer of the material and the results provided to you. If 
these values cannot be determined using Method 24, you must submit an 
alternative technique for determining their values for approval by the 
Administrator.
    (2) Formulation data. You may determine the volatile organic 
content and coating solids content of a coating material based on 
formulation data and may rely on volatile organic content data provided 
by the manufacturer of the material. In the event of any inconsistency 
between the formulation data and the results of Method 24 of 40 CFR 
part 60, appendix A, and the Method 24 results are higher, the results 
of Method 24 will govern.
    (3) As-applied volatile organic content and coating solids content. 
If the as-purchased coating material is applied to the web without any 
solvent or other material added, then the as-applied volatile organic 
content is equal to the as-purchased volatile content and the as-
applied coating solids content is equal to the as-purchased coating 
solids content. Otherwise, the as-applied volatile organic content must 
be

[[Page 72347]]

calculated using Equation 1b of Sec.  63.3370 and the as-applied 
coating solids content must be calculated using Equation 2 of Sec.  
63.3370.
    (e) Control device efficiency. If you are using an add-on control 
device other than solvent recovery, such as an oxidizer, to comply with 
the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320, you must conduct a performance 
test to establish the destruction or removal efficiency of the control 
device according to the methods and procedures in paragraphs (e)(1) and 
(2) of this section. During the performance test, you must establish 
the operating limits required by Sec.  63.3321 according to paragraph 
(e)(3) of this section.
    (1) An initial performance test to establish the destruction or 
removal efficiency of the control device must be conducted such that 
control device inlet and outlet testing is conducted simultaneously, 
and the data are reduced in accordance with the test methods and 
procedures in paragraphs (e)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section. You 
must conduct three test runs as specified in Sec.  63.7(e)(3), and each 
test run must last at least 1 hour.
    (i) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used for 
sample and velocity traverses to determine sampling locations.
    (ii) Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, or 2G of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, 
must be used to determine gas volumetric flow rate.
    (iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be 
used for gas analysis to determine dry molecular weight. You may also 
use as an alternative to Method 3B the manual method for measuring the 
oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide content of exhaust gas in 
ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 10, 
Instruments and Apparatus],'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  
63.14).
    (iv) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used to 
determine stack gas moisture.
    (v) The gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, and stack 
gas moisture must be determined during each test run specified in 
paragraph (f)(1)(vii) of this section.
    (vi) Method 25 or 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, must be used 
to determine total gaseous non-methane organic matter concentration. 
Use the same test method for both the inlet and outlet measurements 
which must be conducted simultaneously. You must submit notice of the 
intended test method to the Administrator for approval along with 
notification of the performance test required under Sec.  63.7(b). You 
must use Method 25A if any of the conditions described in paragraphs 
(e)(1)(vi)(A) through (D) of this section apply to the control device.
    (A) The control device is not an oxidizer.
    (B) The control device is an oxidizer but an exhaust gas volatile 
organic matter concentration of 50 ppmv or less is required to comply 
with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320; or
    (C) The control device is an oxidizer but the volatile organic 
matter concentration at the inlet to the control system and the 
required level of control are such that they result in exhaust gas 
volatile organic matter concentrations of 50 ppmv or less; or
    (D) The control device is an oxidizer but because of the high 
efficiency of the control device the anticipated volatile organic 
matter concentration at the control device exhaust is 50 ppmv or less, 
regardless of inlet concentration.
    (vii) Except as provided in Sec.  63.7(e)(3), each performance test 
must consist of three separate runs with each run conducted for at 
least 1 hour under the conditions that exist when the affected source 
is operating under normal operating conditions. For the purpose of 
determining volatile organic compound concentrations and mass flow 
rates, the average of the results of all the runs will apply.
    (viii) Volatile organic matter mass flow rates must be determined 
for each run specified in paragraph (e)(1)(vii) of this section using 
Equation 1 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.025

Where:

Mf = Total organic volatile matter mass flow rate, kilograms 
(kg)/hour (h).
Qsd = Volumetric flow rate of gases entering or exiting the 
control device, as determined according to Sec.  63.3360(e)(1)(ii), dry 
standard cubic meters (dscm)/h.
Cc = Concentration of organic compounds as carbon, ppmv.
12.0 = Molecular weight of carbon.
0.0416 = Conversion factor for molar volume, kg-moles per cubic meter 
(mol/m\3\) (@ 293 Kelvin (K) and 760 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)).

    (ix) For each run, emission control device destruction or removal 
efficiency must be determined using Equation 2 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.026

Where:

E = Organic volatile matter control efficiency of the control device, 
percent.
Mfi = Organic volatile matter mass flow rate at the inlet to 
the control device, kg/h.
Mfo = Organic volatile matter mass flow rate at the outlet 
of the control device, kg/h.

    (x) The control device destruction or removal efficiency is 
determined as the average of the efficiencies determined in the test 
runs and calculated in Equation 2 of this section.
    (2) You must record such process information as may be necessary to 
determine the conditions in existence at the time of the performance 
test. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction 
will not constitute representative conditions for the purpose of a 
performance test.
    (3) Operating limits. If you are using one or more add-on control 
device other than a solvent recovery system for which you conduct a 
liquid-liquid material balance to comply with the emission standards in 
Sec.  63.3320, you must establish the applicable operating limits 
required by Sec.  63.3321. These operating limits apply to each add-on 
emission control device, and you must establish the operating limits 
during the performance test required by paragraph (e) of this section 
according to the requirements in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) and (ii) of this 
section.
    (i) Thermal oxidizer. If your add-on control device is a thermal 
oxidizer, establish the operating limits according to paragraphs 
(e)(3)(i)(A) and (B) of this section.
    (A) During the performance test, you must monitor and record the 
combustion temperature at least once every 15 minutes during each of 
the three test runs. You must monitor the temperature in the firebox of 
the thermal oxidizer or immediately downstream of the firebox before 
any substantial heat exchange occurs.
    (B) Use the data collected during the performance test to calculate 
and record the average combustion temperature maintained during the 
performance test. This average combustion temperature is the minimum 
operating limit for your thermal oxidizer.
    (ii) Catalytic oxidizer. If your add-on control device is a 
catalytic oxidizer, establish the operating limits according to 
paragraphs (e)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) or paragraphs (e)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of 
this section.
    (A) During the performance test, you must monitor and record the 
temperature just before the catalyst bed and the temperature difference 
across

[[Page 72348]]

the catalyst bed at least once every 15 minutes during each of the 
three test runs.
    (B) Use the data collected during the performance test to calculate 
and record the average temperature just before the catalyst bed and the 
average temperature difference across the catalyst bed maintained 
during the performance test. These are the minimum operating limits for 
your catalytic oxidizer.
    (C) As an alternative to monitoring the temperature difference 
across the catalyst bed, you may monitor the temperature at the inlet 
to the catalyst bed and implement a site-specific inspection and 
maintenance plan for your catalytic oxidizer as specified in paragraph 
(e)(3)(ii)(D) of this section. During the performance test, you must 
monitor and record the temperature just before the catalyst bed at 
least once every 15 minutes during each of the three test runs. Use the 
data collected during the performance test to calculate and record the 
average temperature just before the catalyst bed during the performance 
test. This is the minimum operating limit for your catalytic oxidizer.
    (D) You must develop and implement an inspection and maintenance 
plan for your catalytic oxidizer(s) for which you elect to monitor 
according to paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(C) of this section. The plan must 
address, at a minimum, the elements specified in paragraphs 
(e)(3)(ii)(D)(1) through (3) of this section.
    (1) Annual sampling and analysis of the catalyst activity (i.e., 
conversion efficiency) following the manufacturer's or catalyst 
supplier's recommended procedures,
    (2) Monthly inspection of the oxidizer system including the burner 
assembly and fuel supply lines for problems, and
    (3) Annual internal and monthly external visual inspection of the 
catalyst bed to check for channeling, abrasion, and settling. If 
problems are found, you must take corrective action consistent with the 
manufacturer's recommendations and conduct a new performance test to 
determine destruction efficiency in accordance with this section.
    (f) Capture efficiency. If you demonstrate compliance by meeting 
the requirements of Sec.  63.3370(e), (f), (g), (h), (i)(2), (k), 
(n)(2) or (3), or (p), you must determine capture efficiency using the 
procedures in paragraph (f)(1), (2), or (3) of this section, as 
applicable.
    (1) You may assume your capture efficiency equals 100 percent if 
your capture system is a permanent total enclosure (PTE). You must 
confirm that your capture system is a PTE by demonstrating that it 
meets the requirements of section 6 of EPA Method 204 of 40 CFR part 
51, appendix M, and that all exhaust gases from the enclosure are 
delivered to a control device.
    (2) You may determine capture efficiency according to the protocols 
for testing with temporary total enclosures that are specified in 
Methods 204 and 204A through F of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M. You may 
exclude never-controlled work stations from such capture efficiency 
determinations.
    (3) You may use any capture efficiency protocol and test methods 
that satisfy the criteria of either the Data Quality Objective or the 
Lower Confidence Limit approach as described in appendix A of subpart 
KK of this part. You may exclude never-controlled work stations from 
such capture efficiency determinations.
    (g) Volatile matter retained in the coated web or otherwise not 
emitted to the atmosphere. You may choose to take into account the mass 
of volatile matter retained in the coated web after curing or drying or 
otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere when determining compliance 
with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320. If you choose this 
option, you must develop a testing protocol to determine the mass of 
volatile matter retained in the coated web or otherwise not emitted to 
the atmosphere and submit this protocol to the Administrator for 
approval. You must submit this protocol with your site-specific test 
plan under Sec.  63.7(f). If you intend to take into account the mass 
of volatile matter retained in the coated web after curing or drying or 
otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere and demonstrate compliance 
according to Sec.  63.3370(c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), or (d), then the test 
protocol you submit must determine the mass of organic HAP retained in 
the coated web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere. Otherwise, 
compliance must be shown using the volatile organic matter content as a 
surrogate for the HAP content of the coatings.
    (h) Control devices in series. If you use multiple control devices 
in series to comply with the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320, the 
performance test must include, at a minimum, the inlet to the first 
control device in the series, the outlet of the last control device in 
the series, and all intermediate streams (e.g., gaseous exhaust to the 
atmosphere or a liquid stream from a recovery device) that are not 
subsequently treated by any of the control devices in the series.

Requirements for Showing Compliance


Sec.  63.3370  How do I demonstrate compliance with the emission 
standards?

    (a) A summary of how you must demonstrate compliance follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you choose to demonstrate      Then you must
       compliance by:           demonstrate that:    To accomplish this:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Use of ``as-purchased''   (i) Each coating      Follow the
 compliant coating materials.  material used at an   procedures set out
                               existing affected     in Sec.
                               source does not       63.3370(b).
                               exceed 0.04 kg
                               organic HAP per kg
                               coating material,
                               and each coating
                               material used at a
                               new affected source
                               does not exceed
                               0.016 kg organic
                               HAP per kg coating
                               material as-
                               purchased; or.
                              (ii) Each coating     Follow the
                               material used at an   procedures set out
                               existing affected     in Sec.
                               source does not       63.3370(b).
                               exceed 0.2 kg
                               organic HAP per kg
                               coating solids, and
                               each coating
                               material used at a
                               new affected source
                               does not exceed
                               0.08 kg organic HAP
                               per kg coating
                               solids as-purchased.
(2) Use of ``as-applied''     (i) Each coating      Follow the
 compliant coating materials.  material used at an   procedures set out
                               existing affected     in Sec.
                               source does not       63.3370(c)(1). Use
                               exceed 0.04 kg        either Equation 1a
                               organic HAP per kg    or b of Sec.
                               coating material,     63.3370 to
                               and each coating      determine
                               material used at a    compliance with
                               new affected source   Sec.
                               does not exceed       63.3320(b)(2) in
                               0.016 kg organic      accordance with
                               HAP per kg coating    Sec.
                               material as-          63.3370(c)(5)(i).
                               applied; or.

[[Page 72349]]

 
                              (ii) Each coating     Follow the
                               material used at an   procedures set out
                               existing affected     in Sec.
                               source does not       63.3370(c)(2). Use
                               exceed 0.2 kg         Equations 2 and 3
                               organic HAP per kg    of Sec.   63.3370
                               coating solids, and   to determine
                               each coating          compliance with
                               material used at a    Sec.
                               new affected source   63.3320(b)(3) in
                               does not exceed       accordance with
                               0.08 kg organic HAP   Sec.
                               per kg coating        63.3370(c)(5)(i).
                               solids as-applied;
                               or.
                              (iii) Monthly         Follow the
                               average of all        procedures set out
                               coating materials     in Sec.
                               used at an existing   63.3370(c)(3). Use
                               affected source       Equation 4 of Sec.
                               does not exceed        63.3370 to
                               0.04 kg organic HAP   determine
                               per kg coating        compliance with
                               material, and         Sec.
                               monthly average of    63.3320(b)(2) in
                               all coating           accordance with
                               materials used at a   Sec.
                               new affected source   63.3370(c)(5)(ii).
                               does not exceed
                               0.016 kg organic
                               HAP per kg coating
                               material as-applied
                               on a monthly
                               average basis; or.
                              (iv) Monthly average  Follow the
                               of all coating        procedures set out
                               materials used at     in Sec.
                               an existing           63.3370(c)(4). Use
                               affected source       Equation 5 of Sec.
                               does not exceed 0.2    63.3370 to
                               kg organic HAP per    determine
                               kg coating solids,    compliance with
                               and monthly average   Sec.
                               of all coating        63.3320(b)(3) in
                               materials used at a   accordance with
                               new affected source   Sec.
                               does not exceed       63.3370(c)(5)(ii).
                               0.08 kg organic HAP
                               per kg coating
                               solids as-applied
                               on a monthly
                               average basis.
(3) Tracking total monthly    Total monthly         Follow the
 organic HAP applied.          organic HAP applied   procedures set out
                               does not exceed the   in Sec.
                               calculated limit      63.3370(d). Show
                               based on emission     that total monthly
                               limitations.          HAP applied
                                                     (Equation 6 of Sec.
                                                       63.3370) is less
                                                     than the calculated
                                                     equivalent
                                                     allowable organic
                                                     HAP (Equation 13a
                                                     or b of Sec.
                                                     63.3370).
(4) Use of a capture system   (i) Overall organic   Follow the
 and control device.           HAP control           procedures set out
                               efficiency is equal   in Sec.
                               to 95 percent at an   63.3370(e) to
                               existing affected     determine
                               source and 98         compliance with
                               percent at a new      Sec.
                               affected source on    63.3320(b)(1)
                               a monthly basis; or   according to Sec.
                               oxidizer outlet       63.3370(i) if using
                               organic HAP           a solvent recovery
                               concentration is no   device, or Sec.
                               greater than 20       63.3370(j) if using
                               ppmv by compound      a control device
                               and capture           and CPMS, or Sec.
                               efficiency is 100     63.3370(k) if using
                               percent; or           an oxidizer.
                               operating
                               parameters are
                               continuously
                               monitored; or.
                              (ii) Overall organic  Follow the
                               HAP emission rate     procedures set out
                               does not exceed 0.2   in Sec.
                               kg organic HAP per    63.3370(f) to
                               kg coating solids     determine
                               for an existing       compliance with
                               affected source or    Sec.
                               0.08 kg organic HAP   63.3320(b)(3)
                               per kg coating        according to Sec.
                               solids for a new      63.3370(i) if using
                               affected source on    a solvent recovery
                               a monthly average     device, or Sec.
                               as-applied basis;.    63.3370(k) if using
                                                     an oxidizer.
                              (iii) Overall         Follow the
                               organic HAP           procedures set out
                               emission rate does    in Sec.
                               not exceed 0.04 kg    63.3370(g) to
                               organic HAP per kg    determine
                               coating material      compliance with
                               for an existing       Sec.
                               affected source or    63.3320(b)(2)
                               0.016 kg organic      according to Sec.
                               HAP per kg coating    63.3370(i) if using
                               material for a new    a solvent recovery
                               affected source on    device, or Sec.
                               a monthly average     63.3370(k) if using
                               as-applied basis;     an oxidizer.
                               or.
                              (iv) Overall organic  Follow the
                               HAP emission rate     procedures set out
                               does not exceed the   in Sec.
                               calculated limit      63.3370(h). Show
                               based on emission     that the monthly
                               limitations.          organic HAP
                                                     emission rate is
                                                     less than the
                                                     calculated
                                                     equivalent
                                                     allowable organic
                                                     HAP emission rate
                                                     (Equation 13a or b
                                                     of Sec.   63.3370).
                                                     Calculate the
                                                     monthly organic HAP
                                                     emission rate
                                                     according to Sec.
                                                     63.3370(i) if using
                                                     a solvent recovery
                                                     device, or Sec.
                                                     63.3370(k) if using
                                                     an oxidizer.
(5) Use of multiple capture   (i) Overall organic   Follow the
 and/or control devices.       HAP control           procedures set out
                               efficiency is equal   in Sec.
                               to 95 percent at an   63.3370(e) to
                               existing affected     determine
                               source and 98         compliance with
                               percent at a new      Sec.
                               affected source on    63.3320(b)(1)
                               a monthly basis; or.  according to Sec.
                                                     63.3370(e)(1) or
                                                     (2).
                              (ii) Average          Follow the
                               equivalent organic    procedures set out
                               HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed 0.2   63.3370(f) to
                               kg organic HAP per    determine
                               kg coating solids     compliance with
                               for an existing       Sec.
                               affected source or    63.3320(b)(3)
                               0.08 kg organic HAP   according to Sec.
                               per kg coating        63.3370(n).
                               solids for a new
                               affected source on
                               a monthly average
                               as-applied basis;
                               or.
                              (iii) Average         Follow the
                               equivalent organic    procedures set out
                               HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed       63.3370(g) to
                               0.04 kg organic HAP   determine
                               per kg coating        compliance with
                               material for an       Sec.
                               existing affected     63.3320(b)(2)
                               source or 0.016 kg    according to Sec.
                               organic HAP per kg    63.3370(n).
                               coating material
                               for a new affected
                               source on a monthly
                               average as-applied
                               basis; or.

[[Page 72350]]

 
                              (iv) Average          Follow the
                               equivalent organic    procedures set out
                               HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed the   63.3370(h). Show
                               calculated limit      that the monthly
                               based on emission     organic HAP
                               limitations.          emission rate is
                                                     less than the
                                                     calculated
                                                     equivalent
                                                     allowable organic
                                                     HAP emission rate
                                                     (Equation 13a or b
                                                     of Sec.   63.3370)
                                                     according to Sec.
                                                     63.3370(n).
(6) Use of a combination of   (i) Average           Follow the
 compliant coatings and        equivalent organic    procedures set out
 control devices.              HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed 0.2   63.3370(f) to
                               kg organic HAP per    determine
                               kg coating solids     compliance with
                               for an existing       Sec.
                               affected source or    63.3320(b)(3)
                               0.08 kg organic HAP   according to Sec.
                               per kg coating        63.3370(n).
                               solids for a new
                               affected source on
                               a monthly average
                               as-applied basis;
                               or.
                              (ii) Average          Follow the
                               equivalent organic    procedures set out
                               HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed       63.3370(g) to
                               0.04 kg organic HAP   determine
                               per kg coating        compliance with
                               material for an       Sec.
                               existing affected     63.3320(b)(2)
                               source or 0.016 kg    according to Sec.
                               organic HAP per kg    63.3370(n).
                               coating material
                               for a new affected
                               source on a monthly
                               average as-applied
                               basis; or.
                              (iii) Average         Follow the
                               equivalent organic    procedures set out
                               HAP emission rate     in Sec.
                               does not exceed the   63.3370(h). Show
                               calculated limit      that the monthly
                               based on emission     organic HAP
                               limitations.          emission rate is
                                                     less than the
                                                     calculated
                                                     equivalent
                                                     allowable organic
                                                     HAP emission rate
                                                     (Equation 13a or b
                                                     of Sec.   63.3370)
                                                     according to Sec.
                                                     63.3370(n).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) As-purchased ``compliant'' coating materials.
    (1) If you comply by using coating materials that individually meet 
the emission standards in Sec.  63.3320(b)(2) or (3), you must 
demonstrate that each coating material applied during the month at an 
existing affected source contains no more than 0.04 mass fraction 
organic HAP or 0.2 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids, and that each 
coating material applied during the month at a new affected source 
contains no more than 0.016 mass fraction organic HAP or 0.08 kg 
organic HAP per kg coating solids on an as-purchased basis as 
determined in accordance with Sec.  63.3360(c).
    (2) You are in compliance with emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b)(2) and (3) if each coating material applied at an existing 
affected source is applied as-purchased and contains no more than 0.04 
kg organic HAP per kg coating material or 0.2 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids, and each coating material applied at a new affected 
source is applied as-purchased and contains no more than 0.016 kg 
organic HAP per kg coating material or 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids.
    (c) As-applied ``compliant'' coating materials. If you comply by 
using coating materials that meet the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b)(2) or (3) as-applied, you must demonstrate compliance by 
following one of the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of 
this section. Compliance is determined in accordance with paragraph 
(c)(5) of this section.
    (1) Each coating material as-applied meets the mass fraction of 
coating material standard (Sec.  63.3320(b)(2)). You must demonstrate 
that each coating material applied at an existing affected source 
during the month contains no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating material applied, and each coating material applied at a new 
affected source contains no more than 0.016 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating material applied as determined in accordance with paragraphs 
(c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section. You must calculate the as-applied 
organic HAP content of as-purchased coating materials which are 
reduced, thinned, or diluted prior to application.
    (i) Determine the organic HAP content or volatile organic content 
of each coating material applied on an as-purchased basis in accordance 
with Sec.  63.3360(c).
    (ii) Calculate the as-applied organic HAP content of each coating 
material using Equation 1a of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.027

Where:

Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Chi = Organic HAP content of coating material, i, as-
purchased, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = number of different materials added to the coating material.
Chij = Organic HAP content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.


or calculate the as-applied volatile organic content of each coating 
material using Equation 1b of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.028

Where:

Cavi = Monthly average, as-applied, volatile organic content 
of coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Cvi = Volatile organic content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Cvij = Volatile organic content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.

[[Page 72351]]

Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.

    (2) Each coating material as-applied meets the mass fraction of 
coating solids standard (Sec.  63.3320(b)(3)). You must demonstrate 
that each coating material applied at an existing affected source 
contains no more than 0.20 kg of organic HAP per kg of coating solids 
applied and each coating material applied at a new affected source 
contains no more than 0.08 kg of organic HAP per kg of coating solids 
applied. You must demonstrate compliance in accordance with paragraphs 
(c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section.
    (i) Determine the as-applied coating solids content of each coating 
material following the procedure in Sec.  63.3360(d). You must 
calculate the as-applied coating solids content of coating materials 
which are reduced, thinned, or diluted prior to application, using 
Equation 2 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.029

Where:

Csi = Coating solids content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Csij = Coating solids content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass-fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.

    (ii) Calculate the as-applied organic HAP to coating solids ratio 
using Equation 3 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.030

Where:

Hsi = As-applied, organic HAP to coating solids ratio of 
coating material, i.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Casi = Monthly average, as-applied, coating solids content 
of coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.

    (3) Monthly average organic HAP content of all coating materials 
as-applied is less than the mass percent limit (Sec.  63.3320(b)(2)). 
Demonstrate that the monthly average as-applied organic HAP content of 
all coating materials applied at an existing affected source is less 
than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg of coating material applied, and all 
coating materials applied at a new affected source are less than 0.016 
kg organic HAP per kg of coating material applied, as determined by 
Equation 4 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.031

Where:

HL = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of all 
coating materials applied, expressed as kg organic HAP per kg of 
coating material applied, kg/kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Chi = Organic HAP content of coating material, i, as-
purchased, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Chij = Organic HAP content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in Sec.  63.3370.

    (4) Monthly average organic HAP content of all coating materials 
as-applied is less than the mass fraction of coating solids limit 
(Sec.  63.3320(b)(3)). Demonstrate that the monthly average as-applied 
organic HAP content on the basis of coating solids applied of all 
coating materials applied at an existing affected source is less than 
0.20 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied, and all coating 
materials applied at a new affected source are less than 0.08 kg 
organic HAP per kg coating solids applied, as determined by Equation 5 
of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.032

Where:

Hs = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP to coating 
solids ratio, kg organic HAP/kg coating solids applied.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.

[[Page 72352]]

Chi = Organic HAP content of coating material, i, as-
purchased, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Chij = Organic HAP content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in Sec.  63.3370.
Csi = Coating solids content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Csij = Coating solids content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass-fraction, kg/kg.

    (5) The affected source is in compliance with emission standards in 
Sec.  63.3320(b)(2) or (3) if:
    (i) The organic HAP content of each coating material as-applied at 
an existing affected source is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating material or 0.2 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids, and the 
organic HAP content of each coating material as-applied at a new 
affected source contains no more than 0.016 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating material or 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids; or
    (ii) The monthly average organic HAP content of all as-applied 
coating materials at an existing affected source are no more than 0.04 
kg organic HAP per kg coating material or 0.2 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids, and the monthly average organic HAP content of all as-
applied coating materials at a new affected source is no more than 
0.016 kg organic HAP per kg coating material or 0.08 kg organic HAP per 
kg coating solids.
    (d) Monthly allowable organic HAP applied. Demonstrate that the 
total monthly organic HAP applied as determined by Equation 6 of this 
section is less than the calculated equivalent allowable organic HAP as 
determined by Equation 13a or b in paragraph (l) of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.033

Where:

Hm = Total monthly organic HAP applied, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Chi = Organic HAP content of coating material, i, as-
purchased, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Chij = Organic HAP content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in Sec.  63.3370.

    (e) Capture and control to reduce emissions to no more than 
allowable limit (Sec.  63.3320(b)(1)). Operate a capture system and 
control device and demonstrate an overall organic HAP control 
efficiency of at least 95 percent at an existing affected source and at 
least 98 percent at a new affected source for each month, or operate a 
capture system and oxidizer so that an outlet organic HAP concentration 
of no greater than 20 ppmv by compound on a dry basis is achieved as 
long as the capture efficiency is 100 percent as detailed in Sec.  
63.3320(b)(4). Unless one of the cases described in paragraph (e)(1), 
(2), or (3) of this section applies to the affected source, you must 
either demonstrate compliance in accordance with the procedure in 
paragraph (i) of this section when emissions from the affected source 
are controlled by a solvent recovery device, or the procedure in 
paragraph (k) of this section when emissions are controlled by an 
oxidizer or demonstrate compliance for a web coating line by operating 
each capture system and each control device and continuous parameter 
monitoring according to the procedures in paragraph (j) of this 
section.
    (1) If the affected source has only always-controlled work stations 
and operates more than one capture system or more than one control 
device, you must demonstrate compliance in accordance with the 
provisions of either paragraph (n) or (p) of this section.
    (2) If the affected source operates one or more never-controlled 
work stations or one or more intermittently-controlled work stations, 
you must demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of 
paragraph (n) of this section.
    (3) An alternative method of demonstrating compliance with Sec.  
63.3320(b)(1) is the installation of a PTE around the web coating line 
that achieves 100 percent capture efficiency and ventilation of all 
organic HAP emissions from the total enclosure to an oxidizer with an 
outlet organic HAP concentration of no greater than 20 ppmv by compound 
on a dry basis. If this method is selected, you must demonstrate 
compliance by following the procedures in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) and (ii) 
of this section. Compliance is determined according to paragraph 
(e)(3)(iii) of this section.
    (i) Demonstrate that a total enclosure is installed. An enclosure 
that meets the requirements in Sec.  63.3360(f)(1) will be considered a 
total enclosure.
    (ii) Determine the organic HAP concentration at the outlet of your 
total enclosure using the procedures in paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(A) or (B) 
of this section.
    (A) Determine the control device efficiency using Equation 2 of 
Sec.  63.3360 and the applicable test methods and procedures specified 
in Sec.  63.3360(e).
    (B) Use a CEMS to determine the organic HAP emission rate according 
to paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (x) of this section.
    (iii) You are in compliance if the installation of a total 
enclosure is demonstrated and the organic HAP concentration at the 
outlet of the incinerator is demonstrated to be no

[[Page 72353]]

greater than 20 ppmv by compound on a dry basis.
    (f) Capture and control to achieve mass fraction of coating solids 
applied limit (Sec.  63.3320(b)(3)). Operate a capture system and 
control device and limit the organic HAP emission rate from an existing 
affected source to no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP emitted per kg 
coating solids applied, and from a new affected source to no more than 
0.08 kg organic HAP emitted per kg coating solids applied as determined 
on a monthly average as-applied basis. If the affected source operates 
more than one capture system, more than one control device, one or more 
never-controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-
controlled work stations, then you must demonstrate compliance in 
accordance with the provisions of paragraph (n) of this section. 
Otherwise, you must demonstrate compliance following the procedure in 
paragraph (i) of this section when emissions from the affected source 
are controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in 
paragraph (k) of this section when emissions are controlled by an 
oxidizer.
    (g) Capture and control to achieve mass fraction limit (Sec.  
63.3320(b)(2)). Operate a capture system and control device and limit 
the organic HAP emission rate to no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP 
emitted per kg coating material applied at an existing affected source, 
and no more than 0.016 kg organic HAP emitted per kg coating material 
applied at a new affected source as determined on a monthly average as-
applied basis. If the affected source operates more than one capture 
system, more than one control device, one or more never-controlled work 
stations, or one or more intermittently-controlled work stations, then 
you must demonstrate compliance in accordance with the provisions of 
paragraph (n) of this section. Otherwise, you must demonstrate 
compliance following the procedure in paragraph (i) of this section 
when emissions from the affected source are controlled by a solvent 
recovery device or the procedure in paragraph (k) of this section when 
emissions are controlled by an oxidizer.
    (h) Capture and control to achieve allowable emission rate. Operate 
a capture system and control device and limit the monthly organic HAP 
emissions to less than the allowable emissions as calculated in 
accordance with paragraph (l) of this section. If the affected source 
operates more than one capture system, more than one control device, 
one or more never-controlled work stations, or one or more 
intermittently-controlled work stations, then you must demonstrate 
compliance in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (n) of this 
section. Otherwise, the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance 
following the procedure in paragraph (i) of this section when emissions 
from the affected source are controlled by a solvent recovery device or 
the procedure in paragraph (k) of this section when emissions are 
controlled by an oxidizer.
    (i) Solvent recovery device compliance demonstration. If you use a 
solvent recovery device to control emissions, you must show compliance 
by following the procedures in either paragraph (i)(1) or (2) of this 
section:
    (1) Liquid-liquid material balance. Perform a monthly liquid-liquid 
material balance as specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (v) of 
this section and use the applicable equations in paragraphs (i)(1)(vi) 
through (ix) of this section to convert the data to units of the 
selected compliance option in paragraphs (e) through (h) of this 
section. Compliance is determined in accordance with paragraph 
(i)(1)(x) of this section.
    (i) Determine the mass of each coating material applied on the web 
coating line or group of web coating lines controlled by a common 
solvent recovery device during the month.
    (ii) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied, organic HAP emission 
rate based on coating material applied, or emission of less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the organic HAP content of 
each coating material as-applied during the month following the 
procedure in Sec.  63.3360(c).
    (iii) Determine the volatile organic content of each coating 
material as-applied during the month following the procedure in Sec.  
63.3360(d).
    (iv) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied or emission of less than 
the calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the coating solids 
content of each coating material applied during the month following the 
procedure in Sec.  63.3360(d).
    (v) Determine and monitor the amount of volatile organic matter 
recovered for the month according to the procedures in Sec.  
63.3350(d).
    (vi) Recovery efficiency. Calculate the volatile organic matter 
collection and recovery efficiency using Equation 7 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.034

Where:

Rv = Organic volatile matter collection and recovery 
efficiency, percent.
Mvr = Mass of volatile matter recovered in a month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in Sec.  63.3370.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Cvi = Volatile organic content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Cvij = Volatile organic content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.

    (vii) Organic HAP emitted. Calculate the organic HAP emitted during 
the month using Equation 8 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.035


[[Page 72354]]


Where:

He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
Rv = Organic volatile matter collection and recovery 
efficiency, percent.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Chi = Organic HAP content of coating material, i, as-
purchased, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Chij = Organic HAP content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in Sec.  63.3370.

    (viii) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
using Equation 9 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.036

Where:

L = Mass organic HAP emitted per mass of coating solids applied, kg/kg.
He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Csi = Coating solids content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Csij = Coating solids content of material, j, added to as-
purchased coating material, i, expressed as a mass-fraction, kg/kg.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.

    (ix) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating materials applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating material 
applied using Equation 10 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.037

Where:

S = Mass organic HAP emitted per mass of material applied, kg/kg.
He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
Mij = Mass of material, j, added to as-purchased coating 
material, i, in a month, kg.

    (x) You are in compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b) if:
    (A) The volatile organic matter collection and recovery efficiency 
is 95 percent or greater at an existing affected source and 98 percent 
or greater at a new affected source; or
    (B) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
is no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied at an 
existing affected source and no more than 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids applied at a new affected source; or
    (C) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating material applied 
is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg coating material applied at 
an existing affected source and no more than 0.016 kg organic HAP per 
kg coating material applied at a new affected source; or
    (D) The organic HAP emitted during the month is less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP as determined using paragraph (l) of 
this section.
    (2) Continuous emission monitoring of capture system and control 
device performance. Demonstrate initial compliance through a 
performance test on capture efficiency and continuing compliance 
through continuous emission monitors and continuous monitoring of 
capture system operating parameters following the procedures in 
paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (vii) of this section. Use the applicable 
equations specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(viii) through (x) of this 
section to convert the monitoring and other data into units of the 
selected compliance option in paragraphs (e) through (h) of this 
section. Compliance is determined in accordance with paragraph 
(i)(2)(xi) of this section.
    (i) Control device efficiency. Continuously monitor the gas stream 
entering and exiting the control device to determine the total organic 
volatile matter mass flow rate (e.g., by determining the concentration 
of the vent gas in grams per cubic meter and the volumetric flow rate 
in cubic meters per second such that the total organic volatile matter 
mass flow rate in grams per second can be calculated) such that the 
control device efficiency of the control device can be calculated for 
each month using Equation 2 of Sec.  63.3360.
    (ii) Capture efficiency monitoring. Whenever a web coating line is 
operated, continuously monitor the operating parameters established in 
accordance with Sec.  63.3350(f) to ensure capture efficiency.
    (iii) Determine the percent capture efficiency in accordance with 
Sec.  63.3360(f).
    (iv) Control efficiency. Calculate the overall organic HAP control 
efficiency achieved for each month using Equation 11 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.038

Where:

R = Overall organic HAP control efficiency, percent.
E = Organic volatile matter control efficiency of the control device, 
percent.
CE = Organic volatile matter capture efficiency of the capture system, 
percent.

    (v) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied, organic HAP emission 
rate based on coating materials applied, or emission of less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the mass of each coating 
material applied on the web coating line or group of web coating lines 
controlled by a common control device during the month.
    (vi) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied, organic HAP emission 
rate based on coating material applied, or emission of less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the organic HAP content of 
each coating material as-applied during the month following the 
procedure in Sec.  63.3360(c).
    (vii) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied or emission of less than 
the calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the coating solids 
content of each coating material as-applied during the month following 
the procedure in Sec.  63.3360(d).
    (viii) Organic HAP emitted. Calculate the organic HAP emitted 
during the month for each month using Equation 12 of this section:

[[Page 72355]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.039

Where:

He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
R = Overall organic HAP control efficiency, percent.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in this section.

    (ix) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
using Equation 9 of this section.
    (x) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating materials applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating material 
applied using Equation 10 of this section.
    (xi) Compare actual performance to the performance required by 
compliance option. The affected source is in compliance with the 
emission standards in Sec.  63.3320(b) for each month if the capture 
system is operated such that the average capture system operating 
parameter is greater than or less than (as appropriate) the operating 
parameter value established in accordance with Sec.  63.3350(f); and
    (A) The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency 
is 95 percent or greater at an existing affected source and 98 percent 
or greater at a new affected source; or
    (B) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
is no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied at an 
existing affected source and no more than 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids applied at a new affected source; or
    (C) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating material applied 
is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg coating material applied at 
an existing affected source and no more than 0.016 kg organic HAP per 
kg coating material applied at a new affected source; or
    (D) The organic HAP emitted during the month is less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP as determined using paragraph (l) of 
this section.
    (j) Capture and control system compliance demonstration procedures 
using a CPMS. If you use an add-on control device, you must demonstrate 
initial compliance for each capture system and each control device 
through performance tests and demonstrate continuing compliance through 
continuous monitoring of capture system and control device operating 
parameters as specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of this 
section. Compliance is determined in accordance with paragraph (j)(4) 
of this section.
    (1) Determine the control device destruction or removal efficiency 
using the applicable test methods and procedures in Sec.  63.3360(e).
    (2) Determine the emission capture efficiency in accordance with 
Sec.  63.3360(f).
    (3) Whenever a web coating line is operated, continuously monitor 
the operating parameters established according to Sec.  63.3350(e) and 
(f).
    (4) You are in compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b) if the control device is operated such that the average 
operating parameter value is greater than or less than (as appropriate) 
the operating parameter value established in accordance with Sec.  
63.3360(e) for each 3-hour period, and the capture system operating 
parameter is operated at an average value greater than or less than (as 
appropriate) the operating parameter value established in accordance 
with Sec.  63.3350(f); and
    (i) The overall organic HAP control efficiency is 95 percent or 
greater at an existing affected source and 98 percent or greater at a 
new affected source; or
    (ii) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
is no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied at an 
existing affected source and no more than 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids applied at a new affected source; or
    (iii) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating material 
applied is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg coating material 
applied at an existing affected source and no more than 0.016 kg 
organic HAP per kg coating material applied at a new affected source; 
or
    (iv) The organic HAP emitted during the month is less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP as determined using paragraph (l) of 
this section.
    (k) Oxidizer compliance demonstration procedures. If you use an 
oxidizer to control emissions, you must show compliance by following 
the procedures in paragraph (k)(1) of this section. Use the applicable 
equations specified in paragraph (k)(2) of this section to convert the 
monitoring and other data into units of the selected compliance option 
in paragraph (e) through (h) of this section. Compliance is determined 
in accordance with paragraph (k)(3) of this section.
    (1) Demonstrate initial compliance through performance tests of 
capture efficiency and control device efficiency and continuing 
compliance through continuous monitoring of capture system and control 
device operating parameters as specified in paragraphs (k)(1)(i) 
through (vi) of this section:
    (i) Determine the oxidizer destruction efficiency using the 
procedure in Sec.  63.3360(e).
    (ii) Determine the capture system capture efficiency in accordance 
with Sec.  63.3360(f).
    (iii) Capture and control efficiency monitoring. Whenever a web 
coating line is operated, continuously monitor the operating parameters 
established in accordance with Sec.  63.3350(e) and (f) to ensure 
capture and control efficiency.
    (iv) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied, organic HAP emission 
rate based on coating materials applied, or emission of less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the mass of each coating 
material applied on the web coating line or group of web coating lines 
controlled by a common oxidizer during the month.
    (v) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied, organic HAP emission 
rate based on coating material applied, or emission of less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the organic HAP content of 
each coating material as-applied during the month following the 
procedure in Sec.  63.3360(c).
    (vi) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP 
emission rate based on coating solids applied or emission of less than 
the calculated allowable organic HAP, determine the coating solids 
content of each coating

[[Page 72356]]

material applied during the month following the procedure in Sec.  
63.3360(d).
    (2) Convert the information obtained under paragraph (p)(1) of this 
section into the units of the selected compliance option using the 
calculation procedures specified in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) through (iv) 
of this section.
    (i) Control efficiency. Calculate the overall organic HAP control 
efficiency achieved using Equation 11 of this section.
    (ii) Organic HAP emitted. Calculate the organic HAP emitted during 
the month using Equation 12 of this section.
    (iii) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
for each month using Equation 9 of this section.
    (iv) Organic HAP based on coating materials applied. Calculate the 
organic HAP emission rate based on coating material applied using 
Equation 10 of this section.
    (3) You are in compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b) if the oxidizer is operated such that the average operating 
parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value 
established in accordance with Sec.  63.3360(e) for each 3-hour period, 
and the capture system operating parameter is operated at an average 
value greater than or less than (as appropriate) the operating 
parameter value established in accordance with Sec.  63.3350(f); and
    (i) The overall organic HAP control efficiency is 95 percent or 
greater at an existing affected source and 98 percent or greater at a 
new affected source; or
    (ii) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
is no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied at an 
existing affected source and no more than 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg 
coating solids applied at a new affected source; or
    (iii) The organic HAP emission rate based on coating material 
applied is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg coating material 
applied at an existing affected source and no more than 0.016 kg 
organic HAP per kg coating material applied at a new affected source; 
or
    (iv) The organic HAP emitted during the month is less than the 
calculated allowable organic HAP as determined using paragraph (l) of 
this section.
    (l) Monthly allowable organic HAP emissions. This paragraph 
provides the procedures and calculations for determining monthly 
allowable organic HAP emissions for use in demonstrating compliance in 
accordance with paragraph (d), (h), (i)(1)(x)(D), (i)(2)(xi)(D), or 
(k)(3)(iv) of this section. You will need to determine the amount of 
coating material applied at greater than or equal to 20 mass percent 
coating solids and the amount of coating material applied at less than 
20 mass percent coating solids. The allowable organic HAP limit is then 
calculated based on coating material applied at greater than or equal 
to 20 mass percent coating solids complying with 0.2 kg organic HAP per 
kg coating solids at an existing affected source or 0.08 kg organic HAP 
per kg coating solids at a new affected source, and coating material 
applied at less than 20 mass percent coating solids complying with 4 
mass percent organic HAP at an existing affected source and 1.6 mass-
percent organic HAP at a new affected source as follows:
    (1) Determine the as-purchased mass of each coating material 
applied each month.
    (2) Determine the as-purchased coating solids content of each 
coating material applied each month in accordance with Sec.  
63.3360(d)(1).
    (3) Determine the as-purchased mass fraction of each coating 
material which was applied at 20 mass percent or greater coating solids 
content on an as-applied basis.
    (4) Determine the total mass of each solvent, diluent, thinner, or 
reducer added to coating materials which were applied at less than 20 
mass percent coating solids content on an as-applied basis each month.
    (5) Calculate the monthly allowable organic HAP emissions using 
Equation 13a of this section for an existing affected source:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.040

Where:

Ha = Monthly allowable organic HAP emissions, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Mi = mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
Gi = Mass fraction of each coating material, i, which was 
applied at 20 mass percent or greater coating solids content, on an as-
applied basis, kg/kg.
Csi = Coating solids content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
MLj = Mass of non-coating-solids-containing coating 
material, j, added to coating-solids-containing coating materials which 
were applied at less than 20 mass percent coating solids content, on an 
as-applied basis, in a month, kg.


or Equation 13b of this section for a new affected source:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.041

Where:

Ha = Monthly allowable organic HAP emissions, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Mi = Mass of as-purchased coating material, i, applied in a 
month, kg.
Gi = Mass fraction of each coating material, i, which was 
applied at 20 mass percent or greater coating solids content, on an as-
applied basis, kg/kg.
Csi = Coating solids content of coating material, i, 
expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
q = Number of different materials added to the coating material.
MLj = Mass of non-coating-solids-containing coating 
material, j, added to coating-solids-containing coating materials which 
were applied at less than 20 mass percent

[[Page 72357]]

coating solids content, on an as-applied basis, in a month, kg.

    (m) [Reserved]
    (n) Combinations of capture and control. If you operate more than 
one capture system, more than one control device, one or more never-
controlled work stations, or one or more intermittently-controlled work 
stations, you must calculate organic HAP emissions according to the 
procedures in paragraphs (n)(1) through (4) of this section, and use 
the calculation procedures specified in paragraph (n)(5) of this 
section to convert the monitoring and other data into units of the 
selected control option in paragraphs (e) through (h) of this section. 
Use the procedures specified in paragraph (n)(6) of this section to 
demonstrate compliance.
    (1) Solvent recovery system using liquid-liquid material balance 
compliance demonstration. If you choose to comply by means of a liquid-
liquid material balance for each solvent recovery system used to 
control one or more web coating lines, you must determine the organic 
HAP emissions for those web coating lines controlled by that solvent 
recovery system either:
    (i) In accordance with paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (iii) and (v) 
through (vii) of this section, if the web coating lines controlled by 
that solvent recovery system have only always-controlled work stations; 
or
    (ii) In accordance with paragraphs (i)(1)(ii), (iii), (v), and (vi) 
and (o) of this section, if the web coating lines controlled by that 
solvent recovery system have one or more never-controlled or 
intermittently-controlled work stations.
    (2) Solvent recovery system using performance test compliance 
demonstration and CEMS. To demonstrate compliance through an initial 
test of capture efficiency, continuous monitoring of a capture system 
operating parameter, and a CEMS on each solvent recovery system used to 
control one or more web coating lines, you must:
    (i) For each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent 
recovery system, monitor the operating parameter established in 
accordance with Sec.  63.3350(f) to ensure capture system efficiency; 
and
    (ii) Determine the organic HAP emissions for those web coating 
lines served by each capture system delivering emissions to that 
solvent recovery system either:
    (A) In accordance with paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iii), (v), 
(vi), and (viii) of this section, if the web coating lines served by 
that capture and control system have only always-controlled work 
stations; or
    (B) In accordance with paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iii), (vi), 
and (o) of this section, if the web coating lines served by that 
capture and control system have one or more never-controlled or 
intermittently-controlled work stations.
    (3) Oxidizer. To demonstrate compliance through performance tests 
of capture efficiency and control device efficiency, continuous 
monitoring of capture system, and CPMS for control device operating 
parameters for each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more 
web coating lines, you must:
    (i) Monitor the operating parameter in accordance with Sec.  
63.3350(e) to ensure control device efficiency; and
    (ii) For each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, 
monitor the operating parameter established in accordance with Sec.  
63.3350(f) to ensure capture efficiency; and
    (iii) Determine the organic HAP emissions for those web coating 
lines served by each capture system delivering emissions to that 
oxidizer either:
    (A) In accordance with paragraphs (k)(1)(i) through (vi) of this 
section, if the web coating lines served by that capture and control 
system have only always-controlled work stations; or
    (B) In accordance with paragraphs (k)(1)(i) through (iii), (v), and 
(o) of this section, if the web coating lines served by that capture 
and control system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-
controlled work stations.
    (4) Uncontrolled coating lines. If you own or operate one or more 
uncontrolled web coating lines, you must determine the organic HAP 
applied on those web coating lines using Equation 6 of this section. 
The organic HAP emitted from an uncontrolled web coating line is equal 
to the organic HAP applied on that web coating line.
    (5) Convert the information obtained under paragraphs (n)(1) 
through (4) of this section into the units of the selected compliance 
option using the calculation procedures specified in paragraphs 
(n)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section.
    (i) Organic HAP emitted. Calculate the organic HAP emissions for 
the affected source for the month by summing all organic HAP emissions 
calculated according to paragraphs (n)(1), (2)(ii), (3)(iii), and (4) 
of this section.
    (ii) Coating solids applied. If demonstrating compliance on the 
basis of organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied or 
emission of less than the calculated allowable organic HAP, the owner 
or operator must determine the coating solids content of each coating 
material applied during the month following the procedure in Sec.  
63.3360(d).
    (iii) Organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied. 
Calculate the organic HAP emission rate based on coating solids applied 
for each month using Equation 9 of this section.
    (iv) Organic HAP based on materials applied. Calculate the organic 
HAP emission rate based on material applied using Equation 10 of this 
section.
    (6) Compliance. The affected source is in compliance with the 
emission standards in Sec.  63.3320(b) for the month if all operating 
parameters required to be monitored under paragraphs (n)(1) through (3) 
of this section were maintained at the values established under 
Sec. Sec.  63.3350 and 63.3360; and
    (i) The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source 
based on coating solids applied is no more than 0.20 kg organic HAP per 
kg coating solids applied at an existing affected source and no more 
than 0.08 kg organic HAP per kg coating solids applied at a new 
affected source; or
    (ii) The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source 
based on material applied is no more than 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg 
material applied at an existing affected source and no more than 0.016 
kg organic HAP per kg material applied at a new affected source; or
    (iii) The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source 
during the month is less than the calculated allowable organic HAP as 
determined using paragraph (l) of this section; or
    (iv) The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source 
was not more than 5 percent of the total mass of organic HAP applied 
for the month at an existing affected source and no more than 2 percent 
of the total mass of organic HAP applied for the month at a new 
affected source. The total mass of organic HAP applied by the affected 
source in the month must be determined using Equation 6 of this 
section.
    (o) Intermittently-controlled and never-controlled work stations. 
If you have been expressly referenced to this paragraph by paragraphs 
(n)(1)(ii), (n)(2)(ii)(B), or (n)(3)(iii)(B) of this section for 
calculation procedures to determine organic HAP emissions for your 
intermittently-controlled and never-controlled work stations, you must:
    (1) Determine the sum of the mass of all coating materials as-
applied on intermittently-controlled work stations operating in bypass 
mode and the mass of all coating materials as-applied on

[[Page 72358]]

never-controlled work stations during the month.
    (2) Determine the sum of the mass of all coating materials as-
applied on intermittently-controlled work stations operating in a 
controlled mode and the mass of all coating materials applied on 
always-controlled work stations during the month.
    (3) Liquid-liquid material balance compliance demonstration. For 
each web coating line or group of web coating lines for which you use 
the provisions of paragraph (n)(1)(ii) of this section, you must 
calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 14 of 
this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.042

Where:

He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Mci = Sum of the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on 
intermittently-controlled work stations operating in controlled mode 
and the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on always-controlled 
work stations, in a month, kg.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Rv = Organic volatile matter collection and recovery 
efficiency, percent.
MBi = Sum of the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on 
intermittently-controlled work stations operating in bypass mode and 
the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on never-controlled work 
stations, in a month, kg.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in this section.

    (4) Performance test to determine capture efficiency and control 
device efficiency. For each web coating line or group of web coating 
lines for which you use the provisions of paragraph (n)(2)(ii)(B) or 
(n)(3)(iii)(B) of this section, you must calculate the organic HAP 
emitted during the month using Equation 15 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR04DE02.043

Where:

He = Total monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
p = Number of different coating materials applied in a month.
Mci = Sum of the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on 
intermittently-controlled work stations operating in controlled mode 
and the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on always-controlled 
work stations, in a month, kg.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
R = Overall organic HAP control efficiency, percent.
MBi = Sum of the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on 
intermittently-controlled work stations operating in bypass mode and 
the mass of coating material, i, as-applied on never-controlled work 
stations, in a month, kg.
Cahi = Monthly average, as-applied, organic HAP content of 
coating material, i, expressed as a mass fraction, kg/kg.
Mvret = Mass of volatile matter retained in the coated web 
after curing or drying, or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere, kg. 
The value of this term will be zero in all cases except where you 
choose to take into account the volatile matter retained in the coated 
web or otherwise not emitted to the atmosphere for the compliance 
demonstration procedures in this section.

    (p) Always-controlled work stations with more than one capture and 
control system. If you operate more than one capture system or more 
than one control device and only have always-controlled work stations, 
then you are in compliance with the emission standards in Sec.  
63.3320(b)(1) for the month if for each web coating line or group of 
web coating lines controlled by a common control device:
    (1) The volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency as 
determined by paragraphs (i)(1)(i), (iii), (v), and (vi) of this 
section is at least 95 percent at an existing affected source and at 
least 98 percent at a new affected source; or
    (2) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by 
paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section for each web coating 
line or group of web coating lines served by that control device and a 
common capture system is at least 95 percent at an existing affected 
source and at least 98 percent at a new affected source; or
    (3) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by 
paragraphs (k)(1)(i) through (iii) and (k)(2)(i) of this section for 
each web coating line or group of web coating lines served by that 
control device and a common capture system is at least 95 percent at an 
existing affected source and at least 98 percent at a new affected 
source.

Notifications, Reports, and Records


Sec.  63.3400  What notifications and reports must I submit?

    (a) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject to this 
subpart must submit the reports specified in paragraphs (b) through (g) 
of this section to the Administrator:
    (b) You must submit an initial notification as required by Sec.  
63.9(b).
    (1) Initial notification for existing affected sources must be 
submitted no later than 1 year before the compliance date specified in 
Sec.  63.3330(a).

[[Page 72359]]

    (2) Initial notification for new and reconstructed affected sources 
must be submitted as required by Sec.  63.9(b).
    (3) For the purpose of this subpart, a title V or part 70 permit 
application may be used in lieu of the initial notification required 
under Sec.  63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the 
permit application as required by Sec.  63.9(b) and the State to which 
the permit application has been submitted has an approved operating 
permit program under part 70 of this chapter and has received 
delegation of authority from the EPA to implement and enforce this 
subpart.
    (4) If you are using a permit application in lieu of an initial 
notification in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the 
permit application must be submitted by the same due date specified for 
the initial notification.
    (c) You must submit a semiannual compliance report according to 
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Compliance report dates.
    (i) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on 
the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.  
63.3330 and ending on June 30 or December 31, whichever date is the 
first date following the end of the calendar half immediately following 
the compliance date that is specified for your affected source in Sec.  
63.3330.
    (ii) The first compliance report must be postmarked or delivered no 
later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date follows the end of the 
calendar half immediately following the compliance date that is 
specified for your affected source in Sec.  63.3330.
    (iii) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual 
reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual 
reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
    (iv) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked or 
delivered no later than July 31 or January 31, whichever date is the 
first date following the end of the semiannual reporting period.
    (v) For each affected source that is subject to permitting 
regulations pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, and the 
permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual 
reports pursuant to Sec.  70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or Sec.  
71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), you may submit the first and subsequent compliance 
reports according to the dates the permitting authority has established 
instead of according to the dates in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iv) 
of this section.
    (2) The compliance report must contain the information in 
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (vi) of this section:
    (i) Company name and address.
    (ii) Statement by a responsible official with that official's name, 
title, and signature certifying the accuracy of the content of the 
report.
    (iii) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the 
reporting period.
    (iv) If there are no deviations from any emission limitations 
(emission limit or operating limit) that apply to you, a statement that 
there were no deviations from the emission limitations during the 
reporting period, and that no CMS was inoperative, inactive, 
malfunctioning, out-of-control, repaired, or adjusted.
    (v) For each deviation from an emission limitation (emission limit 
or operating limit) that applies to you and that occurs at an affected 
source where you are not using a CEMS to comply with the emission 
limitations in this subpart, the compliance report must contain the 
information in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section, and:
    (A) The total operating time of each affected source during the 
reporting period.
    (B) Information on the number, duration, and cause of deviations 
(including unknown cause), if applicable, and the corrective action 
taken.
    (C) Information on the number, duration, and cause for CPMS 
downtime incidents, if applicable, other than downtime associated with 
zero and span and other calibration checks.
    (vi) For each deviation from an emission limit occurring at an 
affected source where you are using a CEMS to comply with the emission 
limit in this subpart, you must include the information in paragraphs 
(c)(2)(i) through (iii) and (vi)(A) through (J) of this section.
    (A) The date and time that each malfunction started and stopped.
    (B) The date and time that each CEMS and CPMS, if applicable, was 
inoperative except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks.
    (C) The date and time that each CEMS and CPMS, if applicable, was 
out-of-control, including the information in Sec.  63.8(c)(8).
    (D) The date and time that each deviation started and stopped, and 
whether each deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, 
or malfunction or during another period.
    (E) A summary of the total duration (in hours) of each deviation 
during the reporting period and the total duration of each deviation as 
a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting 
period.
    (F) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations during the 
reporting period into those that are due to startup, shutdown, control 
equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other 
unknown causes.
    (G) A summary of the total duration (in hours) of CEMS and CPMS 
downtime during the reporting period and the total duration of CEMS and 
CPMS downtime as a percent of the total source operating time during 
that reporting period.
    (H) A breakdown of the total duration of CEMS and CPMS downtime 
during the reporting period into periods that are due to monitoring 
equipment malfunctions, nonmonitoring equipment malfunctions, quality 
assurance/quality control calibrations, other known causes, and other 
unknown causes.
    (I) The date of the latest CEMS and CPMS certification or audit.
    (J) A description of any changes in CEMS, CPMS, or controls since 
the last reporting period.
    (d) You must submit a Notification of Performance Tests as 
specified in Sec. Sec.  63.7 and 63.9(e) if you are complying with the 
emission standard using a control device and you are required to 
conduct a performance test of the control device. This notification and 
the site-specific test plan required under Sec.  63.7(c)(2) must 
identify the operating parameters to be monitored to ensure that the 
capture efficiency of the capture system and the control efficiency of 
the control device determined during the performance test are 
maintained. Unless EPA objects to the parameter or requests changes, 
you may consider the parameter approved.
    (e) You must submit a Notification of Compliance Status as 
specified in Sec.  63.9(h).
    (f) You must submit performance test reports as specified in Sec.  
63.10(d)(2) if you are using a control device to comply with the 
emission standard and you have not obtained a waiver from the 
performance test requirement or you are not exempted from this 
requirement by Sec.  63.3360(b). The performance test reports must be 
submitted as part of the notification of compliance status required in 
Sec.  63.3400(e).
    (g) You must submit startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports as 
specified in Sec.  63.10(d)(5), except that the provisions in subpart A 
of this part pertaining to startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions do not 
apply unless a control device is used to comply with this subpart.
    (1) If actions taken by an owner or operator during a startup, 
shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source

[[Page 72360]]

(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are not consistent 
with the procedures specified in the affected source's SSMP required by 
Sec.  63.6(e)(3), the owner or operator must state such information in 
the report. The startup, shutdown, or malfunction report must consist 
of a letter containing the name, title, and signature of the 
responsible official who is certifying its accuracy and must be 
submitted to the Administrator.
    (2) Separate startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports are not 
required if the information is included in the report specified in 
paragraph (c)(2)(vi) of this section.


Sec.  63.3410  What records must I keep?

    (a) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject to this 
subpart must maintain the records specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and 
(2) of this section on a monthly basis in accordance with the 
requirements of Sec.  63.10(b)(1):
    (1) Records specified in Sec.  63.10(b)(2) of all measurements 
needed to demonstrate compliance with this standard, including:
    (i) Continuous emission monitor data in accordance with the 
requirements of Sec.  63.3350(d);
    (ii) Control device and capture system operating parameter data in 
accordance with the requirements of Sec.  63.3350(c), (e), and (f);
    (iii) Organic HAP content data for the purpose of demonstrating 
compliance in accordance with the requirements of Sec.  63.3360(c);
    (iv) Volatile matter and coating solids content data for the 
purpose of demonstrating compliance in accordance with the requirements 
of Sec.  63.3360(d);
    (v) Overall control efficiency determination using capture 
efficiency and control device destruction or removal efficiency test 
results in accordance with the requirements of Sec.  63.3360(e) and 
(f); and
    (vi) Material usage, organic HAP usage, volatile matter usage, and 
coating solids usage and compliance demonstrations using these data in 
accordance with the requirements of Sec.  63.3370(b), (c), and (d).
    (2) Records specified in Sec.  63.10(c) for each CMS operated by 
the owner or operator in accordance with the requirements of Sec.  
63.3350(b).
    (b) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject to this 
subpart must maintain records of all liquid-liquid material balances 
performed in accordance with the requirements of Sec.  63.3370. The 
records must be maintained in accordance with the requirements of Sec.  
63.10(b).

Delegation of Authority


Sec.  63.3420  What authorities may be delegated to the States?

    (a) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority to a 
State under 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, the authorities contained in 
paragraph (b) of this section must be retained by the Administrator and 
not transferred to a State.
    (b) Authority which will not be delegated to States: Sec.  
63.3360(c), approval of alternate test method for organic HAP content 
determination; Sec.  63.3360(d), approval of alternate test method for 
volatile matter determination.
    If you are required to comply with operating limits by Sec.  
63.3321, you must comply with the applicable operating limits in the 
following table:

Tables to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63

  Table 1 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63.--Operating Limits if Using Add-On
                   Control Devices and Capture System
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        And you must
                                You must meet the        demonstrate
  For the following device:    following operating       continuous
                                     limit:            compliance with
                                                    operating limits by:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Thermal oxidizer.........  a. The average        i. Collecting the
                               combustion            combustion
                               temperature in any    temperature data
                               3-hour period must    according to Sec.
                               not fall below the    63.3350(e)(9);
                               combustion           ii. Reducing the
                               temperature limit     data to 3-hour
                               established           block averages; and
                               according to Sec.    iii. Maintain the 3-
                               63.3360(e)(3)(i).     hour average
                                                     combustion
                                                     temperature at or
                                                     above the
                                                     temperature limit.
2. Catalytic oxidizer.......  a. The average        i. Collecting the
                               temperature at the    catalyst bed inlet
                               inlet to the          temperature data
                               catalyst bed in any   according to Sec.
                               3-hour period must    63.3350(e)(9);
                               not fall below the   ii. Reducing the
                               combustion            data to 3-hour
                               temperature limit     block averages; and
                               established          iii. Maintain the 3-
                               according to Sec.     hour average
                               63.3360(e)(3)(ii).    catalyst bed inlet
                                                     temperature at or
                                                     above the
                                                     temperature limit.
                              b. The temperature    i. Collecting the
                               rise across the       catalyst bed inlet
                               catalyst bed must     and outlet
                               not fall below the    temperature data
                               limit established     according to Sec.
                               according to Sec.     63.3350(e)(9);
                               63.3360(e)(3)(ii).   ii. Reducing the
                                                     data to 3-hour
                                                     block averages; and
                                                    iii. Maintain the 3-
                                                     hour average
                                                     temperature rise
                                                     across the catalyst
                                                     bed at or above the
                                                     limit.
3. Emission capture system..  Submit monitoring     Conduct monitoring
                               plan to the           according to the
                               Administrator that    plan (Sec.
                               identifies            63.3350(f)(3)).
                               operating
                               parameters to be
                               monitored according
                               to Sec.
                               63.3350(f).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    You must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements 
according to the following table:

  Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 63.--Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63
                   General Provisions to Subpart JJJJ
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Applicable to
General provisions reference      subpart JJJJ           Explanation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.1(a)(1)-(4).......  Yes.

[[Page 72361]]

 
Sec.   63.1(a)(5)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.1(a)(6)-(8).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(a)(9)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.1(a)(10)-(14).....  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(b)(1)...........  No..................  Subpart JJJJ
                                                     specifies
                                                     applicability.
Sec.   63.1(b)(2)-(3).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(c)(1)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(c)(2)...........  No..................  Area sources are not
                                                     subject to emission
                                                     standards of
                                                     subpart JJJJ.
Sec.   63.1(c)(3)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.1(c)(4)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(c)(5)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(d)..............  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.1(e)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.1(e)(4)...........  No.
Sec.   63.2.................  Yes.................  Additional
                                                     definitions in
                                                     subpart JJJJ.
Sec.   63.3(a)-(c)..........  Yes.
Sec.   63.4(a)(1)-(3).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.4(a)(4)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.4(a)(5)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.4(b)-(c)..........  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(a)(1)-(2).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(b)(1)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(b)(2)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.5(b)(3)-(6).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(c)..............  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.5(d)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(e)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(f)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(a)..............  Yes.................  Applies only when
                                                     capture and control
                                                     system is used to
                                                     comply with the
                                                     standard.
Sec.   63.6(b)(1)-(5).......  No..................
Sec.   63.6(b)(6)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.6(b)(7)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(c)(1)-(2).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(c)(3)-(4).......  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.6(c)(5)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(d)..............  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.6(e)..............  Yes.................  Provisions
                                                     pertaining to SSMP,
                                                     and CMS do not
                                                     apply unless an add-
                                                     on control system
                                                     is used to comply
                                                     with the emission
                                                     limitations.
Sec.   63.6(f)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(g)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(h)..............  No..................  Subpart JJJJ does
                                                     not require
                                                     continuous opacity
                                                     monitoring systems
                                                     (COMS).
Sec.   63.6(i)(1)-(14)......  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(i)(15)..........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.6(i)(16)..........  Yes.
Sec.   63.6(j)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.7.................  Yes.
Sec.   63.8(a)(1)-(2).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.8(a)(3)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.8(a)(4)...........  No.
Sec.   63.8(b)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)-(3).......  Yes.................  Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(i)
                                                     & (ii) only apply
                                                     if you use capture
                                                     and control systems
                                                     and are required to
                                                     have a start-up,
                                                     shutdown, and
                                                     malfunction plan.
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.8(c)(5)...........  No..................  Subpart JJJJ does
                                                     not require COMS.
Sec.   63.8(c)(6)-(c)(8)....  Yes.................  Provisions for COMS
                                                     are not applicable.
Sec.   63.8(d)-(f)..........  Yes.................  Sec.   63.8(f)(6)
                                                     only applies if you
                                                     use CEMS.
Sec.   63.8(g)..............  Yes.................  Only applies if you
                                                     use CEMS.
Sec.   63.9(a)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(b)(1)...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(b)(2)...........  Yes.................  Except Sec.
                                                     63.3400(b)(1)
                                                     requires submittal
                                                     of initial
                                                     notification for
                                                     existing affected
                                                     sources no later
                                                     than 1 year before
                                                     compliance date.
Sec.   63.9(b)(3)-(5).......  Yes.

[[Page 72362]]

 
Sec.   63.9(c)-(e)..........  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(f)..............  No..................  Subpart JJJJ does
                                                     not require opacity
                                                     and visible
                                                     emissions
                                                     observations.
Sec.   63.9(g)..............  Yes.................  Provisions for COMS
                                                     are not applicable.
Sec.   63.9(h)(1)-(3).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(h)(4)...........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.9(h)(5)-(6).......  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(i)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.9(j)..............  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(a).............  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(b)(1)-(3)......  Yes.................  Sec.
                                                     63.10(b)(2)(i)
                                                     through (v) only
                                                     apply if you use a
                                                     capture and control
                                                     system.
Sec.   63.10(c)(1)..........  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(c)(2)-(4)......  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.10(c)(5)-(8)......  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(c)(9)..........  No..................  Reserved.
Sec.   63.10(c)(10)-(15)....  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(d)(1)-(2)......  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(d)(3)..........  No..................  Subpart JJJJ does
                                                     not require opacity
                                                     and visible
                                                     emissions
                                                     observations.
Sec.   63.10(d)(4)-(5)......  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(e)(1)-(2)......  Yes.................  Provisions for COMS
                                                     are not applicable.
Sec.   63.10(e)(3)-(4)......  No.
Sec.   63.10(f).............  Yes.
Sec.   63.11................  No.
Sec.   63.12................  Yes.
Sec.   63.13................  Yes.
Sec.   63.14................  Yes.................  Subpart JJJJ
                                                     includes provisions
                                                     for alternative
                                                     ASME test methods
                                                     that are
                                                     incorporated by
                                                     reference.
Sec.   63.15................  Yes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 02-29074 Filed 12-3-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P