[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68856-68857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-28770]



[[Page 68856]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-23-000, et al.]


Pacer Power LLC, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings

 November 6, 2002.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Pacer Power LLC

[Docket No. EL03-23-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, Pacer Power LLC (Pacer) filed 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a petition 
for a declaratory order requesting the Commission disclaim jurisdiction 
over Pacer based on Pacer's status as a power broker. Pacer requests 
that the Commission act on the petition by the Commission's first 
January meeting date.
    Comment Date: December 5, 2002.

2. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. ER01-316-007]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, ISO New England, Inc., filed 
its Index of Customers for the third quarter of 2002 for its Tariff for 
Transmission Dispatch and Power Administration Services in compliance 
with Order No. 614.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

3. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER03-111-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted for Commission filing and 
acceptance the Utility Distribution Company Operating Agreement (UDC 
Operating Agreement) between the ISO and the City of Azusa, California. 
The ISO requests that the UDC Operating Agreement be made effective as 
of January 1, 2003. The ISO requests privileged treatment, pursuant to 
18 CFR 388.112, with regard to portions of the filing.
    The ISO has served copies of this filing upon the City of Azusa, 
California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of 
California.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

4. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-112-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, the New York System Operator, 
Inc. (NYISO) tendered for filing proposed revisions to its Market 
Administration and Control Area Services Tariff (Services Tariff) 
designed to extend the current methodology and rate used to calculate 
payments for Voltage Support Service through the end of calendar year 
2003. The NYISO has requested that the Commission make the filing 
effective on January 1, 2003.
    The NYISO has served a copy of this filing on all persons that have 
executed Service Agreements under the NYISO Services Tariff or the 
NYISO Open Access Transmission Tariff, on the New York Public Service 
Commission, and on the electric utility regulatory agencies in New 
Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

5. Idaho Power Company

[Docket No. ER03-113-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, Idaho Power Company filed a 
Service Agreement for Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service between 
Idaho Power Company and Pinnacle West Capital Corporation under its 
open access transmission tariff in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

6. Great Bay Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER03-114-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, Great Bay Power Marketing, 
Inc. (GBPM) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), an application for authority to sell electric 
energy, capacity and certain ancillary services at market-based rates 
under section 205(a) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824d(a), and 
accompanying requests for certain blanket approvals and for the waiver 
of certain Commission regulations. GBPM requests that the Commission 
accept its Original Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 for filing.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

7. PJM Interconnection, LLC

[Docket No. ER03-115-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, PJM Interconnection, LLC 
(PJM), submitted for filing an executed interconnection service 
agreement between PJM and Ocean Peaking Power, LP n/k/a Surfside 
Funding, Limited Partnership (Ocean Peaking/Surfside Funding).
    PJM requests a waiver of the Commission's 60-day notice requirement 
to permit the effective date agreed to by Surfside and PJM. Copies of 
this filing were served upon Ocean Peaking/Surfside Funding c/o 
Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. and the state regulatory 
commissions within the PJM region.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

8. Duke Energy Oakland, LLC

[Docket No. ER03-116-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 824d, 
and 18 CFR 35.13, Duke Energy Oakland, LLC (DEO) tendered for filing 
certain revisions to rate schedules A, B, and D of its RMR agreement 
with the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). DEO also 
tendered in the same submission an informational filing detailing and 
supporting the proposed changes to its Annual Fixed Revenue Requirement 
(AFRR) and Variable O&M Rate (VO&M), pursuant to schedule F of its RMR 
agreement.
    DEO requests an effective date of January 1, 2003, for these 
revisions. Copies of the filing have been served upon the CAISO, 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the Public Utilities Commission of 
the State of California, and the Electricity Oversight Board of the 
State of California.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

9. Duke Energy South Bay, LLC

[Docket No. ER03-117-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 824d, 
and 18 CFR 35.13, Duke Energy South Bay, LLC (DESB) tendered for filing 
certain revisions to rate schedules A, B, and D of its RMR agreement 
with the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). DESB also 
tendered in the same submission an informational filing detailing and 
supporting the proposed changes to its Annual Fixed Revenue Requirement 
(AFRR) and Variable O&M Rate (VO&M), pursuant to schedule F of its RMR 
agreement.
    DESB requests an effective date of January 1, 2003, for these 
revisions. Copies of the filing have been served upon the CAISO, San 
Diego Gas & Electric Company, the Public Utilities Commission of the 
State of California, and the Electricity Oversight Board of the State 
of California.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002

10. PJM Interconnection, LLC

[Docket No. ER03-118-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, PJM Interconnection, LLC 
(PJM), filed amendments to schedule 9 of the PJM Open Access 
Transmission Tariff (PJM Tariff), the Reliability Assurance Agreement 
Among Load-Serving Entities in the PJM Control Area (RAA), and the 
Reliability Assurance Agreement Among Load-Serving g

[[Page 68857]]

Entitites in the PJM West Region (West RAA) to: (1) Eliminate the two 
schedules involving the smallest portion of PJM's costs, shifting those 
costs to other schedules; and (2) transfer PJM's costs for the 
Commission's part 382 annual charges from one of the existing schedules 
to a new schedule devoted solely to such annual charges.
    Copies of this filing were served upon all PJM members and each 
state electric utility regulatory commission in the PJM region. PJM 
proposes an effective date of January 1, 2003, for the amendments.
    Comment Date: November 21, 2002.

11. MDU Resources Group, Inc.

[Docket No. ES03-10-000]

    Take notice that on October 30, 2002, MDU Resources Group, Inc. 
submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power 
Act seeking authorization to incur short-term indebtedness in an amount 
not to exceed $125 million.
    Comment Date: November 27, 2002.

12. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ES03-12-000]

    Take notice that on October 31, 2002, Oklahoma Gas and Electric 
Company submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal 
Power Act seeking authorization to issue not more than $400,000,000 of 
short-term debt securities on or before December 31, 2004, with a final 
maturity date of December 31, 2005.
    Comment Date: November 22, 2002.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number filed to 
access the document. For assistance, call (202) 502-8222 or TTY, (202) 
502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. 
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-28770 Filed 11-12-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P