[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62712-62713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-25540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC02-119-000, et al.]


Manchief Power Company, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Regulation Filings

October 1, 2002.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Manchief Power Company, L.L.C., Manchief Holding Company, Mesquite 
Colorado Holdco, L.L.C., Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Fulton 
Cogeneration Associates, L.P.

[Docket No. EC02-119-000]

    Take notice that on September 26, 2002, Manchief Power Company, 
L.L.C. (Manchief Power), Manchief Holding Company (Manchief Holding), 
Mesquite Colorado Holdco, L.L.C. (Mesquite Colorado) Mesquite 
Investors, L.L.C. (Mesquite Investors) and Fulton Cogeneration 
Associates, L.P. (Fulton) (jointly, Applicants) filed with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission an application pursuant to Section 203 of 
the Federal Power Act for authorization to effectuate a transfer of the 
member interests in Manchief Power (which constitutes and indirect 
change in control over Manchief Power's jurisdictional facilities) from 
Mesquite Colorado to Manchief Holding. Applicants also requested 
expedited consideration of the Application and privileged treatment for 
certain exhibits pursuant to 18 CFR 33.9 and 388.112. Fulton and 
Manchief are also requesting Section 203 approval, to the extent 
applicable, to separate their shared market-based rate tariff.
    Comment Date: October 17, 2002.

2. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER01-1951-003 and EL01-112-001]

    Take notice that on September 23, 2002, Entergy Services, Inc., on 
behalf of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy 
Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, 
Inc., (collectively, the Entergy Operating Companies) tendered for 
filing a compliance refund report in accordance with the Commission's 
letter order in Docket Nos. ER01-1951-000, ER01-1951-001, ER01-1951-
002, and EL01-112-000.
    Comment Date: October 23, 2002.

3. Duke Energy Oakland LLC, Duke Energy South Bay LLC

[Docket Nos. ER02-10-001 and ER02-239-003]

    Take notice that on September 26, 2002, Duke Energy South Bay, LLC 
(DESB) tendered for filing certain revisions to Schedules A and B of 
its RMR Agreement (RMR Agreement) with the California Independent 
System Operator (CAISO). The revisions are proposed in light of an 
Offer of Settlement submitted in the above-referenced dockets.
    DESB requests an effective date of January 1, 2002 for these 
revisions. Copies of the filing have been served upon each person 
designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in 
these proceedings.
    Comment Date: October 17, 2002.

4. Commonwealth Edison Company

[Docket No. ER02-2241-001]

    Take notice that on September 27, 2002, Commonwealth Edison Company 
(ComEd) submitted for filing an unexecuted Agreement for Dynamic 
Scheduling of Transmission Service between ComEd and Wisconsin Electric 
Power Company (Wisconsin Electric) under ComEd's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff (OATT) in compliance with Commonwealth Edison Co., 
100 FERC [para] 61,231 (2002).
    ComEd states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
Wisconsin Electric and the Illinois Commerce Commission.
    Comment Date: October 18, 2002.

5. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER02-2321-003]

    Take notice that on September 27, 2002, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a filing in compliance with 
the directives contained in the Commission's August 30, 2002 order in 
the captioned docket concerning Amendment No. 46 to the ISO Tariff, 100 
FERC [para] 61,234.
    The ISO has served this filing upon the Public Utilities Commission 
of the State of California, the California Energy Commission, the 
California Electricity Oversight Board, all parties with effective 
Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreements under the ISO Tariff, and all 
parties on the official service list for the captioned docket. In 
addition, the ISO has posted a copy of the filing on its Home Page.
    Comment Date: October 18, 2002.

6. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket Nos. ER02-2604-000 and EC02-118-000]

    Take notice that on September 24, 2002, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), pursuant to Section 35.13 of the Commission's 
regulations and Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, the High Desert 
Power Project Tie-Line Facilities Rental Agreement (Tie-Line 
Agreement), dated September 10, 2002, between SCE and High Desert Power 
Trust, LLC (HDPT). The Tie-Line Agreement specifies, among other 
things, that SCE shall engineer, design, procure, construct, install, 
own, operate, and maintain a 230 kV transmission line and related 
facilities to connect the switchyard at the High Desert Power Project 
to interconnection facilities at SCE's Victor Substation (Tie-Line). 
Following the in-service date of the Tie-Line, SCE will lease the Tie-
Line to HDPT.
    SCE requests that the Tie-Line Agreement be accepted for filing 
effective September 25, 2002. In addition, SCE also filed with the 
Commission an application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power 
Act requesting any authorizations deemed necessary by the Commission 
for a disposition of jurisdictional facilities, namely a lease of the 
Tie-Line to HDPT, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Tie Line 
Agreement. SCE respectfully requests that this application be granted 
and authorization be obtained by September 25, 2002.
    Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities 
Commission of the State of California, HDPT and HDPP.
    Comment Date: October 15, 2002.

7. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Nevada Power Company

[Docket No. ER02-2609-000]

    Take notice that on September 27, 2002, Sierra Pacific Power 
Company (Sierra) and Nevada Power Company (Nevada Power) tendered for 
filing pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power a revised Joint 
Open Access Transmission Tariff. This filing is intended to implement 
retail access in Nevada and to make certain other changes to reflect 
the current status of operations. Sierra and Nevada Power request that 
the revised tariff be made effective on November 1, 2002, which is

[[Page 62713]]

the date that retail access commences in the state of Nevada.
    Comment Date: October 18, 2002.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket 
'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-25540 Filed 10-7-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P