[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61333-61334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-24694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF02-3031, et al.]


United States Department of Energy, et al.; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Regulation Filings

September 20, 2002.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. United States Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration

[Docket No. EF02-5171-000]

    Take notice that on September 12, 2002, the Secretary of the 
Department of Energy, by Rate Order No. WAPA-99, did confirm and 
approve on an interim basis, to be effective on October 1, 2002, the 
Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Rate Schedules SLIP-F7 
for firm power from the Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects (SLCA/
IP), SP-PTP6 for firm point-to-point transmission on the Colorado River 
Storage Project (CRSP), SP-NW2 for network integration transmission 
service on the CRSP transmission system, SP-NFT5 for non-firm 
transmission over the same system, and SP-SD2, SP-RS2, SP-EI2, SP-FR2, 
and SP-SSR2 for ancillary services.
    The rates in Rate Schedules SLIP-F7, SP-PTP6, SP-NW2, SP-NFT5, SP-
SD2, SP-RS2, SP-EI2, SP-FR2, and SP-SSR2 will be in effect pending the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) approval of these 
or of substitute rates on a final basis, ending September 30, 2007.
    Comment Date: October 11, 2002.

2. ISO New England Inc.; New England Power Pool

[Docket Nos. EL00-62-051; ER98-3853-018]

    Take notice that on September 13, 2002, ISO New England Inc. 
submitted its compliance filing in response to the Commissions 
September 4, 2002 Order in the above captioned Dockets.
    Copies of said filing have been served upon all parties to this 
proceeding, and upon NEPOOL Participants, and upon all non-Participant 
entities that are customers under the NEPOOL Open Access Transmission 
Tariff, as well as upon the utility regulatory agencies of the six New 
England States.
    Comment Date: October 4, 2002.

3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. EL02-65-010]

    Take notice that on September 17, 2002, Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) and PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) filed their further compliance filing 
pursuant to the Commission's July 31, 2002 order issued in the above-
referenced proceeding.
    Comment Date: October 8, 2002.

4. California Independent System Operator Corporation, Investigation of 
Wholesale Rates of Public Utility Sellers of Energy and Ancillary 
Services in the Western Systems Coordinating Council

[Docket Nos. ER02-1656-000, EL01-68-017]

    Take notice that on September 16, 2002, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted, in the above-referenced 
dockets, an informational letter in compliance with the Commissions 
July 17, 2002 ``Order On the California Comprehensive Market Redesign 
Proposal,'' 100 FERC ] 61,060 (2002), informing the Commission that the 
ISO has retained the services of Potomac Economics, LTD, a privately-
held S-corporation incorporated in the State of Virginia, to perform 
the task of calculating reference prices. The ISO has served copies of 
this filing upon all entities that are on the official service lists in 
the above-referenced dockets.
    Comment Date: October 4, 2002.

5. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER02-2552-000]

    Take notice that on September 13, 2002, Tampa Electric Company 
(Tampa Electric) tendered for filing a notice of cancellation of the 
service agreement with Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP (Mirant) 
for non-firm point-to-point transmission service under Tampa Electric's 
open access transmission tariff. Tampa Electric proposes that the 
cancellation be made effective on September 13, 2002.
    Copies of the filing have been served on Mirant and the Florida 
Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: October 4, 2002.

6. Duke Energy Corporation

[Docket No. ER02-2553-000]

    Take notice that on September 13, 2002, Duke Energy Corporation, on 
behalf of Duke Electric Transmission, (collectively, Duke) tendered for 
filing a Notice of Cancellation of the Service Agreement for Network 
Integration Transmission Service between Duke and Cincinnati Gas and 
Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Services, Inc., as 
agent for and on behalf of Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, PSI 
Energy, Inc., and the Commissioners of Public Works of the City of 
Greenwood, South Carolina. Duke requests an effective date for the 
Notice of Cancellation of September 14, 2002.
    Comment Date: October 4, 2002.

7. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER02-2554-000]

    Take notice that on September 16, 2002, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing revised rate sheets (Revised Sheets) 
to the Interconnection Facilities Agreement (Interconnection Agreement) 
between SCE and Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC (PEF), Service Agreement 
No. 12, under SCE's Transmission Owner Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, 
Substitute First Revised Original Volume No. 6 (Tariff). The Revised 
Sheets include revised and additional work elements, cost estimates and 
revisions identified by SCE that are

[[Page 61334]]

needed to interconnect PEF's generating facility to SCE electrical 
system.
    SCE respectfully requests the Revised Sheets become effective on 
September 17, 2002. Copies of this filing were served upon the Public 
Utilities Commission of the State of California and PEF.
    Comment Date: October 7, 2002.

8. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC

[Docket No. ER02-2555-000]

    Take notice that on September 16, 2002, CenterPoint Energy Houston 
Electric, LLC (CenterPoint Houston) tendered for filing a Notice of 
Succession, along with a revised Transmission Service Tariff for 
Transmission Service To, From and Over Certain Interconnections, 
reflecting CenterPoint Houston's exact name. As a result of a change in 
its name and corporate organization, CenterPoint Houston is succeeding 
to the FERC Electric Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1 of Reliant 
Energy HL&P, effective August 31, 2002.
    Comment Date: October 7, 2002.

9. Oswego Harbor Power LLC

[Docket No. ER02-2556-000]

    Take notice that on September 16, 2002, Oswego Harbor Power LLC 
(Oswego) filed under section 205 of the Federal Power Act, Part 35 of 
the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission), and Commission Order No. 614, a request that the 
Commission (1) accept for filing a revised market-based rate tariff; 
(2) waive any obligation to submit a red-lined version of the currently 
effective tariff; and (3) grant any waivers necessary to make the 
revised tariff sheets effective as soon as possible, but no later than 
60 days from the date of this filing. Oswego's proposed tariff 
revisions merely seek to properly designate, update and conform the 
tariff to a format like those that the Commission has approved for 
Oswego affiliates.
    Comment Date: October 7, 2002.

10. Orion Power MidWest, L.P.

[Docket No. ER02-2557-000]

    Take notice that on September 16, 2002, Orion Power MidWest, L.P. 
(Orion) submitted a Notice of Termination pursuant to Section 35.15 of 
the Commission's Regulations, 18 CFR 35.15 (2002). Orion states that 
its Ancillary Services Agreement and Capacity Agreement with Duquesne 
Light Company, accepted for filing in Docket Nos. ER02-2108-000 and 
ER02-2109-000, respectively, on July 26, 2002, terminated by their own 
terms at midnight on August 14, 2002.
    Comment Date: October 7, 2002.

11. SWEPI LP

[Docket No. ER02-2558-000 (Kalkaska)]

    Take notice that on September 17, 2002, SWEPI LP (SWEPI), a limited 
partnership organized under the laws of Delaware, petitioned the 
Commission for acceptance of its market-based rate tariff, waiver of 
certain requirements under Subparts B and C of Part 35 of the 
Commission's regulations, and the granting of waivers and blanket 
approvals normally accorded sellers permitted to sell at market-based 
rates. SWEPI proposes to sell up to 4 MW of power from its generation 
facility located in Kalkaska, Michigan.
    Comment Date: October 8, 2002.

Standard Paragraph

    E. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing 
should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket 
'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-24694 Filed 9-27-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P