[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58038-58041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-23365]



[[Page 58038]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7376-8]


Notice of Request for Proposals for Projects To Be Funded From 
the FY 03 Wetland Program Development Cooperative Agreement Allocation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA Region 6 is soliciting proposals from State agencies, 
local governments, and Tribes interested in applying for Federal 
assistance for the State/Tribal/Local Government Wetlands Protection 
Development Grant Program under the Clean Water Act section 104(b)(3), 
33 U.S.C.1254(b)(3) in the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, 
Oklahoma and Texas. EPA Region 6 estimates $1.3 million will be awarded 
to eligible applicants through assistance agreements. The State, Tribe 
or local government must provide a 25 percent (25%) match of the total 
costs of the project. 15 percent (15%) of the funding allocation will 
be targeted to support local and tribal initiatives.

DATES: EPA Region 6 will consider all proposals post marked by November 
1, 2002. Proposals received after the due date will not be considered 
for funding, (no exceptions will be made). Once the proposal is 
approved for further funding consideration, applicants will be notified 
to submit a formal application.

ADDRESSES: Send proposals along with the cover sheet included in this 
notice to: Sondra McDonald (6WQ-AT), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sondra McDonald by telephone at 214-
665-7187 or by E-mail at [email protected]. This solicitation 
notice can also be found at the Assistance Program Branch, State/Tribal 
Programs Section Web site: www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6wq/at/sttribal.htm. Or 
please refer to the National guidelines for the Wetlands Program 
Development Grants which are published in the August 26, 2002, Federal 
Register or can be viewed at the following web site: http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/grantguidelines.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

What Is the Purpose of this Request for Proposals?

    The purpose of Wetland Development Grants is to assist States, 
Tribes, and Local Governments with developing new wetland programs or 
refining existing wetland programs, and NOT for operational support of 
wetland programs. Reviewers will pay special attention to the project's 
longevity and self-sustaining ability. Additional points may be given 
to implementation projects that actually demonstrate protection, 
restoration or enhancement of wetlands. If a proposal does not meet EPA 
Headquarters or Region 6 priorities, the proposal will not be ranked. 
The following types of projects will be considered for funding:

Project Implementation

    [sbull] Clean Water Action Plan (CWAP): Projects relating to 
meeting wetland goals set forth within the plan, namely a net increase 
of 100,000 acres per year by the year 2005. Preference will be given to 
projects that seek to develop self-sustaining, naturally functioning 
wetland systems.(web page: http://www.cleanwater.gov)
    [sbull] Watershed Projects:
    a. Wetland components of established watershed plans
    b. Coastal wetland protection/restoration especially within 
estuaries areas
    [sbull] Targeted (but not limited) Wetland Types: projects relating 
to the protection /restoration of riparian areas, sea grasses, and 
bottomland hardwoods.
    [sbull] Stream Management:
    a. Alternatives to traditional engineering (i.e. such as 
development of natural stream patterned profiles instead of trapezoidal 
channels; use of vegetated natural materials for bank stabilization 
instead of harder structures like rip rap or concrete)
    b. Utilizing alternative techniques such as applied fluvial 
geomorphology
    c. Stream management education to include such activities as 
training and planning in urban/suburban areas
    d. Formation of stream team (interagency workgroups designed to 
evaluate stream modification projects during planning phase) to work 
with local planning officials to protect/restore streams and wetlands 
by the use of demonstration projects
    [sbull] Continued Development and Implementation of Wetland 
Protection Programs: specifically projects that seek to develop and/or 
implement statewide/tribal-nationwide programs to assess and monitor 
overall wetland health and for programs that protect or restore 
wetlands with the active involvement of local communities. Also, State/
Tribal development of wetland assessment/monitoring tools to be 
utilized in a formal program to assess and monitor overall wetland 
health.
    [sbull] Protection of ``SWANCC'' isolated wetlands through the 
development of State, Tribal or Local government regulations incentives 
and/or long term conservation measures.
    [sbull] Development and Implementation of Tribal Wetlands and 
Stream Corridor Conservation Plans: emphasis on wetlands, riparian and 
stream resources.

Education/Outreach

    Recognizing the importance of public education in wetland 
protection and management, Region 6 has sought to help S/T/LG improve 
the public's access to, and education about wetland information. WPDG 
projects can be used to develop outreach programs, and can also be used 
to create innovative educational tools for the public. The production 
of outreach materials alone is not eligible for funding.
    a. Programs which are designed to increase awareness and the 
importance of wetlands to local governments, general public, 
landowners, and private sector through the use of partnerships, 
training and/or seminars.
    b. Programs which promote wetland education in schools, 
universities, and youth organizations.
    c. Examples of past outreach/education projects funded through the 
WPDG include:

--Conducting outreach and education efforts aimed at improving public 
understanding of wetland protection and regulatory efforts
--Development of outreach programs to inform owners of potential 
wetland restoration sites of governmental assistance programs
--Creating public education programs which promote wetland information 
for American Wetlands month
--Creating programs for use of the internet and other technologies for 
educating the public about wetlands

Partnership Restoration Projects

    a. Projects must involve diverse partnerships of ideally five 
organizations (private sector government, or non-government), that 
contribute funding, land, technical assistance workforce support, and/
or other in-kind services.
    b. Projects may be a discrete part of a larger restoration effort.
    c. Preference will be given to projects that are part of a larger 
watershed or community stewardship effort; include specific provisions 
for long-term management and projection; and demonstrate the value of 
innovative, collaborative approaches to restoring the nation's waters.
    d. Projects must include a strong on-the-ground wetland or riparian 
component, and should also include

[[Page 58039]]

education, outreach and community stewardship.
    e. Projects must demonstrate measurable ecological, educational, 
social and/or economic benefits resulting from the completion of the 
project.
    f. Projects that are part of a mitigation requirement are NOT 
eligible for funding.

Schedule of Activities

    September 16, 2002--Target Date for Region 6 to distribute grant 
solicitation notice.
    August 1, 2002-October 11, 2002--Region 6 staff has set-aside this 
time to assist applicants in preparing more competitive proposals. 
Contact Donna Mullins 214-665-7576.
    November 1, 2002--Proposals must be POSTMARKED by this date, or 
they will not be accepted. Certified mail is recommended, and keep 
documentation.
    November 12, 2002-December 31, 2002--Review Committee evaluates 
proposals.
    January 24, 2003--Letters are sent requesting formal applications 
from selected proposals.
    March 14, 2002--Formal applications must be POSTMARKED by this 
date, or they will not be accepted. Certified mail is recommended and 
keep documentation.
    April-July 2003--Awarding of grants and Congressional notification 
to recipients.

Proposal Format and Contents

    A proposal is different from a work plan. Region 6 staff has set-
aside August 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002 to assist applicants in 
preparing a more competitive proposal. Please contact Ms. Donna Mullins 
at 214-665-7576 to arrange for a pre-proposal meeting/review. If you 
are unsure of any section or criteria, please call Region 6 BEFORE you 
submit your package. Keep in mind this is a competitive process, and 
adherence to the proposal guidelines is part of the selection criteria. 
As a front cover for the proposal, please use the form below. The cover 
does not count as a page. The proposal should contain the following 
information, with a maximum of five (5) one sided pages:
    1. Title;
    2. Introduction with brief background, goals, and objectives;
    3. Overview of project, listing each task and deliverable. Give 
specific information concerning the task, explaining how it will be 
accomplished, how it relates to the overall project, and how the 
progress will be monitored;
    4. A plan view map (this will not count as one of the five pages);
    5. Any use of contractors must be included and explained. Guidance 
precludes greater than a 50% pass through to contractors, and specifies 
significant involvement of grant recipient.
    6. Proposed costs, broken down by task, including contractor's 
costs by task;
    7. Identify measures of success, including clear milestones with 
expected dates. Include the number of wetland acres affected by 
project;
    8. Include a public participation element (40 CFR part 25) in the 
proposal which reflects how public participation will be provided, 
encouraged, and assisted. Include a full description of its interagency 
and public participation process. This process should go beyond the 
input stage and include information and methods of sharing throughout 
the project period;
    9. There should be concrete demonstration of coordination/
partnership among various agencies. This can be accomplished in various 
ways, including a written agreement with agencies outlining 
responsibilities and commitment to the project; and,
    10. Region 6 requires a 25% match of the total project cost. The 
proposal needs to show the Federal assistance amount you are requesting 
from EPA, 25% minimum agency match, and the total amount for the 
project. Use the following formula: requested EPA amount divided by 75% 
equals the total amount for the project. Subtract the EPA amount from 
the total, and that is the minimum, required match. Your match may 
exceed 25%. (EXAMPLE: EPA amount $50,000; project total is $66,667; 
required 25% match is $16,667)
    11. Explain if your agency has a Quality Management Plan (QMP). If 
you project contains environmental measurements, a QMP must be approved 
by EPA before any money can be awarded.
    12. Identify if there are any known threatened or endangered 
species and/or cultural resource concerns.
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

[[Page 58040]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN13SE02.004

BILLING CODE 6560-50-C

[[Page 58041]]

How the Proposals Are Reviewed and Ranked

    The Selection Committee reviews each proposal with the following 
criteria in mind. Each area has a numerical value, with an opportunity 
for a narrative response. The points of each reviewer for each proposal 
are totaled, comments are added, then each proposal is given an 
average. The Committee meets to discuss each proposal and review the 
results of scoring. The proposals with the highest ranking, up to the 
estimated amount of funding, are selected. Upon approval of management, 
formal applications are then requested from the selected applicants.

Proposal Evaluation Criteria

    [sbull] 1. Does the project meet one or more of the Regional 
priorities? If not, has the applicant justified the need for the 
project?
    [sbull] 2. Does the project have transferability to other State/
Tribes/Local governments?
    [sbull] 3. Did applicant follow proposal guidelines? Did it address 
all components?
    [sbull] 4. What is the applicant's past performance, if applicable?
    [sbull] 5. Is the budget reasonable and appropriate?
    [sbull] 6. What are the potential environmental results? Does it 
result in physical, natural restoration? Are the environmental results 
immediate or long term? How many acres of wetlands are enhanced, 
restored, created?
    [sbull] 7. What is the outreach/educational value of the project?
    [sbull] 8. What is the likelihood of success? Can the project be 
realistically accomplished?
    [sbull] 9. Does the project have durable and sustainable 
characteristics; in other words, will it outlive the project period?
    [sbull] 10. Is the project part of an approved State Wetlands 
Conservation Plan?

Oscar Ramirez, Jr.,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 02-23365 Filed 9-12-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P