[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54192-54196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-21279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-2002-0172 FRL-7191-1]


Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions to Establish Tolerances 
for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of pesticide 
petitions proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a 
certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket ID number OPP-2002,-0172, must be 
received on or before September 20, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail, electronically, or in 
person. Please follow the detailed instructions for each method as 
provided in Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. To ensure 
proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that you identify docket ID 
number OPP-2002-0172 in the subject line on the first page of your 
response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shaja R. Brothers, 
Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703) 308-3194; e-mail address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 54193]]

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural 
producer, food manufacturer or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Examples of
           Categories                 NAICS codes         potentially
                                                       affected entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry........................  111...............  Crop production
  ..............................  112                 Animal production
  ..............................  311                 Food manufacturing
  ..............................  32532               Pesticide
                                                       manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particularly 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this 
Document and Other Related Documents?

    1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this 
document, and certain other related documents that might be available 
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/. 
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and 
Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the 
entry for this document under the ``Federal Register--Environmental 
Documents.'' You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings 
at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for 
this action under docket ID number OPP-2002-0172. The official record 
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any 
public comments received during an applicable comment period, and other 
information related to this action, including any information claimed 
as confidential business information (CBI). This official record 
includes the documents that are physically located in the docket, as 
well as the documents that are referenced in those documents. The 
public version of the official record does not include any information 
claimed as CBI. The public version of the official record, which 
includes printed, paper versions of any electronic comments submitted 
during an applicable comment period, is available for inspection in the 
Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, 
Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, from 8:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments through the mail, in person, or 
electronically. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that 
you identify docket ID number OPP-2002-0172 in the subject line on the 
first page of your response.
    1. By mail. Submit your comments to: Public information and Records 
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources and Services Division 
(7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    2. In person or by courier. Deliver your comments to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources 
and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticides Programs (OPP), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA. The PIRIB is open from 8:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
    3. Electronically. You may submit your comments electronically by 
e-mail to: [email protected], or you can submit a computer disk as 
described above. Do not submit any information electronically that you 
consider to be CBI. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of 
encryption. Electronic submissions will be accepted in Wordperfect 6.1/
8.0 or ASCII file format. All comments in electronic form must be 
identified by docket ID number OPP-2002-0172. Electronic comments may 
also be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.

D. How Should I Handle CBI That I Want to Submit to the Agency?

    Do not submit any information electronically that you consider to 
be CBI. You may claim information that you submit to EPA to response to 
this document as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as 
CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance 
with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete 
version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a 
copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as 
CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public version of the 
official record. Information not marked confidential will be included 
in the public version of the official record without prior notice. If 
you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, 
please consult the person identified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your 
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used 
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you 
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this 
notice.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket 
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page 
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal 
Register citation.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA has received pesticide petitions as follows proposing the 
establishment and/or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain 
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408 
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. 
EPA has determined that the petitions contains data or information 
regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has 
not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time 
or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data 
may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, 
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.


[[Page 54194]]


    Dated: August 14, 2002.

Debra Edwards,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Summary of Petitions

    The petitioner summary of the pesticide petitions is printed below 
as required by section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA. The summary of the 
petitions were prepared by the Interregional Research Project No. 4 
(IR-4) and represents the view the Interregional Research Project No. 4 
EPA is publishing the petition summary verbatim without editing it in 
any way. The petition summary announces the availability of a 
description of the analytical methods available to EPA for the 
detection and measurement of the pesticide chemical residues or an 
explanation of why no such method is needed.

Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4)

PP 0E6178, 2E6386, 2E6410, and 2E6432

    EPA has received pesticide petitions (0E6178, 2E6386, 2E6410, and 
2E6432) from the Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4), Rutgers, 
The State University of New Jersey, Highway No. 1 South, North 
Brunswick, NJ, 08902-3390 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to 
amend 40 CFR 180.493 by establishing tolerances for residues of the 
fungicide dimethomorph [(E,Z)4-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-
dimethoxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]-morpholine] in or on the following 
raw agricultural commodities: Dried cone hop at 60 parts per million 
(ppm) (0E6178); leaf lettuce and head lettuce at 10 ppm (2E6386); 
cucurbit vegetable group at 0.5 ppm (2E6410); and bulb vegetable group 
at 2 ppm (2E6432). A related petition (PP 8F4946) for the establishment 
of a tolerance for residues of dimethomorph in or on imported dried 
hops cones at 45 ppm has previously been filed by American Cyanamid 
Company. This notice includes summaries of the petitions prepared by 
BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA has determined that 
the petitions contain data or information regarding the elements set 
forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully 
evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether 
the data support granting of these petitions. Additional data may be 
needed before EPA rules on these petitions.

A. Residue Chemistry

    1. Plant metabolism. The nature of the residues of dimethomorph is 
adequately understood. No metabolites were identified that require 
regulation.
    2. Analytical method. A reliable method for the determination of 
dimethomorph residues in dried hops cones, lettuce (head and leaf), 
cucurbit vegetables (crop group 9), and bulb vegetables (crop group 3) 
exists; this method is the FDA Multi-Residue Method, Protocol D, as 
published in the Pesticide Analytical Manual 1.
    3. Magnitude of residues. Complete residue data for dimethomorph 
and the petitioned tolerances have been submitted. The data support the 
requested tolerances.

B. Toxicological Profile

    1. Acute toxicity--i. An acute oral toxicity study was conducted in 
the Sprague-Dawley rat for dimethomorph technical with a lethal dose 
(LD)50 of 4,300 milligrams/kilogram body weight (mg/kg bwt) 
for males and 3,500 mg/kg bwt for females. Based upon EPA toxicity 
criteria, the acute oral toxicity category for dimethomorph technical 
is Category III or slightly toxic.
    ii. Oral LD50 studies were conducted on the two isomers 
(E and Z) alone:
    a. An acute oral toxicity study in the wistar rat for the E-isomer 
with a LD50 greater than 5,000 mg/kg bwt for males and 
approximately 5,000 mg/kg bwt for females.
    b. An acute oral toxicity study in the wistar rat for the Z-isomer 
with a LD50 greater than 5,000 my/kg bwt for both males and 
females.
    iii. An acute dermal toxicity study was conducted in the Wistar rat 
for dimethomorph technical with a dermal LD50 greater than 
5,000 mg/kg bwt for both males and females. Based on the EPA toxicity 
category criteria, the acute dermal toxicity category for dimethomorph 
is Category IV or relatively non-toxic.
    iv. A 4-hour inhalation study was conducted in wistar rats for 
dimethomorph technical with a lethal concentration (LC)50 
greater than 4.2 mg/L for both males and females. Based on the EPA 
toxicity category criteria, the acute inhalation toxicity category for 
dimethomorph technical is Category IV or relatively non-toxic.
    2. Genotoxicty--i. Salmonella reverse gene mutation assays (2 
studies) were
negative up to a limit dose of 5,000 grams (g)/plate. Chinese hamster 
lung V79 cells were negative up to toxic doses in two studies.
    ii. Two chinese hamster lung structural chromosomal studies were 
reportedly positive for chromosomal aberrations at the highest dose 
tested (HDT) (160 grams milliliter (g/mL)/-S9; 170 g/mL/+S9). 
Dimethomorph induced only a weak response in increasing chromosome 
aberrations in this test system. These results were not confirmed in 
two micronucleus tests under in vivo conditions.
    iii. Structural chromosomal aberration studies were weakly positive 
in human lymphocytic cultures, but only in S9 activated cultures 
treated at 422 g/mL, the HDT, were strongly cytotoxic. No increase in 
chromosomal aberrations was observed in the absence of S9 activation at 
all doses. Furthermore, the positive clastogenic response observed 
under the in vitro conditions was not conformed in two in vivo 
micronucleus assays.
    iv. Micronucleus assay (2 studies) indicated that dimethomorph was 
negative for inducing micronuclei in bone marrow cells of mice 
following intraperitoneal administration of doses up to 200 mg/kg or 
oral doses up to the limit dose of 5,000 mg/kg. Thus, dimethomorph was 
found to be negative in these studies for causing cytogenic damage in 
vivo.
    v. Dimethomorph was negative for inducing unscheduled DNA 
synthesis, in cultured rat liver cells, at doses up to 250 g/mL, a 
weakly cytotoxic level.
    vi. Dimethomorph was negative for transformation in Syrian hamster 
embryo cells treated, in the presence and absence of activation, up to 
cytotoxic concentrations (265 g/mL/+S9; 50 g/mL/-S9).
    3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity--i. A rat developmental 
toxicity study was conducted with the lowest observed adverse effect 
level (LOAEL) for maternal toxicity of 160 mg/kg/day and the no 
observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity of 60 mg/
kg/day. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity is 60 mg/kg/day. 
Dimethomorph is not carcinogenic in the Sprague-Dawley rat.
    ii. A rabbit development toxicity study was conducted with a LOAEL 
for maternal toxicity of 650 mg/kg/day and a NOAEL for maternal 
toxicity of 300 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity is 650 
mg/kg/day, the HDT.
    iii. A two-generation rat reproduction study was conducted with a 
LOAEL for parental systemic toxicity of 1,000 ppm, or approximately 80 
mg/kg/day, and a NOAEL for parental systemic toxicity of 300 ppm, or 
approximately 24 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL for fertility and reproductive 
function was 1,000 ppm, the highest concentration tested (HCT), or 
approximately 80 mg/kg bwt/day.

[[Page 54195]]

    4. Subchronic toxicity--i. A 90-day dietary study was conducted in 
Sprague-Dawley rats with a NOAEL of greater than or equal to 1,000 ppm, 
the HCT, or approximately 73 mg/kg/day for males and 82 mg/kg/day for 
females.
    ii. A 90-day dog dietary study was conducted with a NOAEL of 450 
ppm, or approximately 15 mg/kg/day, and a LOAEL of 1,350 ppm, or 
approximately 43 mg/kg/day.
    5. Chronic toxicity--i. A 2-year chronic toxicity study was 
conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats with a NOAEL of 200 ppm or 
approximately 9 mg/kg/day for males and 12 mg/kg/day for females. The 
LOAEL for systemic toxicity is 750 ppm, or approximately 36 mg/kg/day 
for males and 58 mg/kg/day for females.
    ii. A 1-year chronic toxicity study was conducted in dogs with a 
NOAEL of 450 ppm, or approximately 14.7 mg/kg/day and a LOAEL of 1,350, 
or approximately 44.6 mg/kg/day.
    iii. A 2-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in Sprague-Dawley 
rats with a NOAEL for systemic toxicity of 200 ppm, or approximately 9 
mg/kg/day for males and 11 mg/kg/day for females. The LOAEL for 
systemic toxicity was 750 ppm, or approximately 34 mg/kg/day for males 
and 46 mg/kg/day for females. There was no evidence of increased 
incidence of neoplastic lesions in treated animals. The NOAEL for 
carcinogenicity is 2,000 ppm, the HCT, or approximately 95 mg/kg/day 
for males and 132 mg/kg/day for females.
    iv. A 2-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in mice with a 
NOAEL for systemic toxicity of 100 mg/kg/day and a LOAEL of 1,000 mg/
kg/day. There was no evidence of increased incidence of neoplastic 
lesions in treated animals. The NOAEL for carcinogenicity is 1,000 mg/
kg/day, the HDT.
    6. Animal metabolism. Results from the livestock and rat metabolism 
studies show that orally administered dimethomorph was rapidly excreted 
by the animals. The principal route of elimination is the feces.
    7. Metabolite toxicology. There were no metabolites identified in 
plant or animal commodities which require regulation.
    8. Endocrine disruption. Collective organ weights and 
histopathological findings from the two-generation reproduction study 
in rats, as well as from the subchronic and chronic toxicity studies in 
two or more animal species, demonstrate no apparent estrogenic effects 
or effects on the endocrine system. There is no information available 
which suggests that dimethomorph technical would be associated with 
endocrine effects.

C. Aggregate Exposure

    1. Dietary exposure. Tolerances have been established (40 CFR 
180.493) for the residues of dimethomorph in or on potatoes at 0.05 
ppm, potatoes, wet peel at 0.15 ppm, tomato at 0.5 ppm, tomato paste at 
1.0 ppm, hop, dried cones at 60 ppm (import tolerance) and time-limited 
tolerances have been established for cantaloupe, cucumber, squash and 
watermelon at 1 ppm and on the cereal grains group: fodder at 0.15 ppm, 
forage and grain at 0.05 ppm, hay at 0.10 ppm, and straw at 0.15 ppm.
    i. Food--a. Acute dietary exposure. An acute dietary risk 
assessment is not required because no acute toxicological endpoints 
were identified by EPA for dimethomorph.
    b. Chronic dietary exposure. To assess the potential chronic 
dietary exposure to dimethomorph residues for all tolerances in effect 
early in 1999, EPA used the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM 
) to conduct a chronic dietary (food only) exposure analysis. 
In conducting this analysis, EPA made very conservative assumptions: 
That all commodities having dimethomorph tolerances contain residues of 
dimethomorph and that those residues are at the level of the tolerance. 
These assumptions result in an overestimate of human dietary exposure. 
All section 18 tolerances (cantaloupe, watermelon, cucumber, squash, 
and tomato) were included in this assessment along with tolerances for 
cereal grain crops and potato.
    ii. Drinking water. The Generic Estimated Environmental 
Concentration (GENEEC) was 24 parts per billion (ppb) for 56 days. This 
model was used to determine surface water residues. Dimethomorph 
residues in ground water were also estimated using the Screening 
Concentration in Ground Water (SCI-GROW) model, but these estimates 
were significantly lower than those obtained from the GENEEC model. 
Given the low levels of dimethomorph residues as estimated by the 
GENEEC model, the additional use of dimethomorph on hops, lettuce, 
cucurbit vegetables, and bulb vegetables is not expected to reach a 
level of concern for residues in drinking water.
    2. Non-dietary exposure. Currently, there are no registered 
residential uses for dimethomorph in the United States. Thus, an 
assessment of non-dietary exposure is not relevant to this petition.

D. Cumulative Effects

    There is no information to indicate that any toxic effects produced 
by dimethomorph would be cumulative with those of any other chemical. 
The fungicidal mode of action of dimethomorph is unique; dimethomorph 
inhibits cell wall formation only in Oomycete fungi. The result is 
lysis of the cell wall that kills growing cells and inhibits spore 
formation in mature hyphae. This unique mode of action and limited pest 
spectrum suggest that there is little or no potential for cumulative 
toxic effects in mammals. In addition, the toxicity studies submitted 
to support this petition do not indicate that dimethomorph is a 
particularly toxic compound. No toxic end-points of potential concern 
were identified.

E. Safety Determination

    1. U.S. population. The cPAD is 0.1 mg/kg bwt/day, based on a NOAEL 
of approximately 10 mg/kg bwt/day (200 ppm) from a 2-year dietary 
toxicity study in rats that demonstrated decreased body weight and 
liver foci in females at 750 ppm. The cPAD is calculated using an 
uncertainty factor of 100. The theoretical maximum residue contribution 
(TMRC) for lettuce, cucurbit and bulb vegetable is estimated at 0.003 
mg/kg bwt/day for the general population. This represents a dietary 
exposure to the general population of the United States that is 3.0% of 
the cPAD. The TMRC for dried hops cones is estimated at 0.0000515 mg/kg 
bwt/day for the general population. This represents a dietary exposure 
to the general population of the United States which is 0.05% of the 
cPAD. The combined TMRC for all current and pending dimethomorph 
tolerances in potato, tomato, grape, hop, cereal grain commodities, 
lettuce (head and leaf), endive (escarole), radicchio, cucurbit 
vegetable (crop group 9), and bulb vegetable (crop group 3) will 
utilize less than 10% of the cPAD for the general U.S. population. 
Since EPA generally has no concern for exposures below 100% of the 
cPAD, there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 
aggregate exposure to dimethomorph residues in or on commodities of the 
cited crops.

Drinking Water

    i. Lettuce, cucurbit and bulb vegetables. Currently, the only 
federally registered food/feed uses of dimethomorph in the United 
States are on potato and tomato crops. For these uses, the Drinking 
Water Level of Concern (DWLOC) from chronic exposure to dimethomorph 
was estimated by BASF to be 2,800 ppb for the U.S. population and for 
males 13 years and older, and 910 ppb for children 1-6 years of age. 
Given the low levels of dimethomorph residues as

[[Page 54196]]

estimated by the GENEEC model, the large margin of exposure (38x-116x), 
and the similar use patterns of dimethomorph on commodities of the 
cited crops, the additional proposed uses of dimethomorph are not 
expected to reach a level of concern for residues in drinking water.
    ii. Hops. For this use, the DWLOC from chronic exposure to 
dimethomorph was estimated by EPA to be 3,400 ppb for the U.S. 
population and for males 13 years and older, 2,900 ppb for females 13 
years and older, and 960 ppb for children (1-6 years of age). Given the 
low levels of dimethomorph residues as estimated by the GENEEC model 
and the large margin of exposure (40x-142x), the additional use of 
dimethomorph on hops is not expected to reach a level of concern for 
residues in drinking water.
    2. Infants and children. The TMRC for all commodities covered in 
this petition is minimal. The consumption of residues of dimethomorph 
on lettuce (head and leaf), cucurbit vegetables (crop group 9), and 
bulb vegetables (crop group 3) will use approximately 7.0% of the cPAD 
for children ages 1-6. The TMRC for residues of dimethomorph in hops as 
consumed by infants, non-nursing infants, children ages 1-6, and 
children ages 7-12 are each estimated to be 0.00% of the cPAD. 
Moreover, the combined TMRC values for all current and pending 
dimethomorph tolerances will utilize less than 10% of the cPAD for each 
of the subgroups.
    The results of the studies submitted to support this package 
provide no evidence that dimethomorph caused reproductive, 
developmental or reproductive effects. No such effects were noted at 
dose levels that were not maternally toxic. The NOAELs observed in the 
developmental and reproductive studies were 6 to 65 times higher than 
the NOAEL used to establish the cPAD. There is no evidence to indicate 
that children or infants would be more sensitive than adults to toxic 
effects caused by exposure to dimethomorph.
    Therefore, the registrant believes that the results of the 
toxicology and metabolism studies support both the safety of 
dimethomorph to humans based on the intended use as a fungicide on 
domestically produced hops, lettuce (head and leaf), cucurbit 
vegetables (crop group 9), and bulb vegetables (crop group 3) and the 
granting of the requested tolerances.

F. International Tolerances

    There are no Canadian, Mexican, or codex MRLs established for 
dimethomorph for the commodities associated with this request; 
consequently, a discussion of international harmonization is not 
relevant.
[FR Doc. 02-21279 Filed 8-16-02; 4:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S